Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Ibmpension
- Messages
Search
ACA reduces insurance premiums almost 20%
Sheila Beaudry
¡°Today¡¯s report shows that the Affordable Care Act is working to increase transparency and competition among health insurance plans and drive premiums down,¡± said Secretary Sebelius.? ¡°The reforms in the health care law ensure consumers will have access to better coverage at a lower cost in
2014.¡± Specifically the report finds that:
Further, data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component shows that the average premiums for employer sponsored insurance increased by only 3 percent from 2011 to 2012, the lowest rate of increase observed since the data series started in 1996. Already the 80/20 rule, or medical loss ratio, has saved 77.8 million consumers $3.4 billion up front on their premiums as insurance companies operated more efficiently and spent more on health care than administrative expenses, and 8.5 million consumers can expect an average rebate of approximately $100 per family.? Since the health law¡¯s rate review provisions were implemented, the number of requests for insurance premium increases of 10 percent or more has dropped dramatically, from 75 percent to 14 percent.? To date, the rate review program has helped save Americans an estimated $1 billion. The report is available at:? . |
Re: Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
Sheila Beaudry
I believe most people would be willing to pay 4 cents more per pizza so workers can get healthcare. Franchise Owners Take ObamaCare Costs out on WorkersFranchise owners of chains like Papa John's, KFC,
Taco Bell, Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Denny's, Longhorn Steakhouse, The Capital Grille and Applebee's say ObamaCare will force them to cut employees' hours since they can't afford to provide more full-time workers with?health insurance?or pay the fines for leaving them uninsured. Many of these chains' franchise owners have taken the opportunity to talk about the horrors of the cost of ObamaCare, which of course must be taken out on customers and employees, on Fox News. Other sources for the "job killer" rumors include crossroads GPS, Forbes, Heritage Foundation among other openly anti-ObamaCare sources. For our information, we have turned to cross referenced studies by experts, including the CBO report on ObamaCare. What the "Job Killers" Aren't Telling YouThe corporate loudmouths want to blame?health care?for "killing jobs", but companies are the ones in control of their hiring and firing process. If they want to slow down productivity, deal with sick workers, low-job retention and the costs of training and re-training by cutting jobs and wages, then that makes them "job killers"- not ObamaCare. Is there more to this picture? What aren't these companies telling us? What they don't tell you is that over the past decade, the amount of small businesses who can afford to provide health insurance to their employees has dropped dramatically, while larger businesses have been mostly unaffected. 3/4 of small businesses who dropped employee benefits because of the rising costs of health
care will receive tax credits to offer their employees insurance. This will help to increase hiring rates and decrease turn over, making small business jobs more attractive. ObamaCare helps small business, and forces bigger businesses who don't want to provide benefits to do something that the big boys already do: treat their workers with respect. Perhaps it's time to start supporting the 96% of large employers who already offer benefits including WholeFoods, Nordtrom, Starbucks, UPS, Lowe's, JCPenny, Land's End, JP Morgan Chase, Barnes & Noble, Target, Home Depot, Costco, among many others who all offer part-time employees health benefits. From: "zimowski@..." To: ibmpensionissues@... Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:37 AM Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
?
Your NBC reference predates the NBC news report I referenced. Looks like the NBC news room has changed it's mind.
Regarding Medicare, who would pay for it, if it covered everyone? Obamacare is much more than just a health care plan. As we all know, it's also a tax, per the Supreme Court, and also many other things. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > > > > Of course the real solution would be Medicare for all and no employer would have to provide healthcare insurance. > > > ________________________________ > From: "zimowski@..." <zimowski@...> > To: ibmpensionissues@... > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:19 PM > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours > > > > ?? > Finally, the main stream prime-time news stations are beginning to report the truth about the effects of Obamacare: > > Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours > By Lisa Myers and Carroll Ann Mears > NBC News > > Employers around the country, from fast-food franchises to colleges, have told NBC News that they will be cutting workers' hours below 30 a week because they can't afford to offer the health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. > > > |
Re: Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
Your NBC reference predates the NBC news report I referenced. Looks like the NBC news room has changed it's mind.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Regarding Medicare, who would pay for it, if it covered everyone? Obamacare is much more than just a health care plan. As we all know, it's also a tax, per the Supreme Court, and also many other things. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry <sbbeaudry@...> wrote:
|
Re: Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
buckwildbeemer
Yeah right. Your story is from July 24th!!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
1. Comcast owns NBC. 2. Obama dines with Comcast CEO Brian Roberts between golfing at Martha's Vinyard. Something went wrong? 3. On Aug 13th: Duh. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry <sbbeaudry@...> wrote:
|
Re: Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
Sheila Beaudry
Of course the real solution would be Medicare for all and no employer would have to provide healthcare insurance. From: "zimowski@..." To: ibmpensionissues@... Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:19 PM Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
?
Finally, the main stream prime-time news stations are beginning to report the truth about the effects of Obamacare:
Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours By Lisa Myers and Carroll Ann Mears NBC News Employers around the country, from fast-food franchises to colleges, have told NBC News that they will be cutting workers' hours below 30 a week because they can't afford to offer the health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. |
Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours
Finally, the main stream prime-time news stations are beginning to report the truth about the effects of Obamacare:
Businesses claim Obamacare has forced them to cut employee hours By Lisa Myers and Carroll Ann Mears NBC News Employers around the country, from fast-food franchises to colleges, have told NBC News that they will be cutting workers' hours below 30 a week because they can't afford to offer the health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. |
Re: Future Health Account
catfishweiner
speaking of music, check this song list:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ibmpensionissues@..., <c.mankat@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
icarlosdanger
Mel,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hunch: Rules don't have to say "why" they say "what". Not sure what you are smoking. (weed leftover from Berkeley?) Just kidding. Both links work for me. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., "zimowski@..." <zimowski@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
The point I was trying to make is that the text of the proposed rule doesn't tell the real story. Interesting to read, especially the part that makes it clear that Congress has written the rule so that it is conveniently vague as to who exactly it applies to and, of course, there is no provision for any kind of oversight.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
ACA as originally written and passed raised the health care costs of most members of congress and their staff. Does anyone still believe that the Pelosi and Reid didn't force a vote on this legislation before most even had a chance to read it? BTW, neither of your links are valid. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., icarlosdanger <no_reply@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
icarlosdanger
Duh--
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
was the motivator! quote: "Last week, when President Barack Obama came to the Hill to meet with Senate Democrats, he informed them that he would personally get involved to sort out the confusion, and the White House said that OPM would issue guidelines this week." --- In ibmpensionissues@..., "zimowski@..." <zimowski@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
The text of the proposed rule does not explain any of the motivation behind the proposed rule.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ibmpensionissues@..., icarlosdanger <no_reply@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
icarlosdanger
all 13 pages of it, in case you posted about it before you read the proposed rule... (snicker)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ibmpensionissues@..., "zimowski@..." <zimowski@...> wrote:
|
Re: Fed. Lawmakers & Staffies Freak Over ACA
Here's a more in depth view of what this is all about:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Congress Pulls a Fast One; Obamacare Premiums Won't Apply to Them s it any wonder that the American people are fed up with politics? Barack Obama's approval numbers are terrible, but American's feelings toward Congress are even worse. So, it shouldn't be hard to believe that members of Congress (with the help of Obama) are hard at work to make sure that sky-high Obamacare premiums will NOT apply to them. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, the annual salary of members of Congress and their higher paid aides put them in a category where they won't qualify for Obamacare subsidies. Thus, the premiums and potential out of pocket expenses for them are about to go up, up, and up. So what are they going to do about it? You guessed it... --- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry <sbbeaudry@...> wrote:
|
Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life
Reminds me of what someone (not sure who) once said: "You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time".
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry <sbbeaudry@...> wrote:
|
Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life
Sheila Beaudry
Notice they made it more lenient for absentee votes which are a much higher percentage of Republican voters than they did for in-person voters.? They also reduced the early voting time and days where the early voters have a higher percentage of Democratic voters.? They also redistricted in 2010 and pushed most minorities into just a few districts.? Even though 51% of the votes in 2012 were for Democratic representatives only 4 Democrats were elected and 9 Republicans.? There needs to be unbiased, neutral redistricting.
From: "zimowski@..."
To: ibmpensionissues@... Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2013 1:39 AM Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life ?
The North Carolina rules for absentee ballot voters seems very flexible to me. The only time any kind of identification is required is when an individual who is registered to vote by mail has not previously voted in an election that includes a ballot item for federal office. The individual then includes one of the following types of identification in the envelope containing the absentee ballot: A copy of a current and valid photo identification or a copy of one of the following documents that shows the name and address of the voter: a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document. Thanks for providing this information. I'm now even more convinced that the voter id requirements in NC are reasonable. --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > 7/29/13 This is the Technical corrections bill to several of the bills passed.?? See > > > From: "zimowski@..." > To: mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 1:07 PM > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life > > ?? > The date on my reference is July 27, 2013. How current is your reference? > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > > > This is where I read it:SECTION 14.(b) G.S. 163-166.12 reads as rewritten: > > "???¡ì 163-166.12. Requirements for certain voters who register by mail. > > (a) Voting in Person. ?????" An individual who has registered to vote by mail on or after January 1, 2003, and has not previously voted in an election that includes a ballot item for federal office in North Carolina, shall present to a local election official at a voting place before voting there one of the following: > > (1) A current and valid photo identification. > > (2) A copy of one of the following documents that shows the name and address of the voter: a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document. > > (b) Voting Mail-In Absentee. ?????" An individual who has registered to vote by mail on or after January 1, 2003, and has not previously voted in an election that includes a ballot item for federal office in North Carolina, in order to cast a mail-in absentee vote, shall submit with the mailed-in absentee ballot one of the following: > > (1) A copy of a current and valid photo identification. > > (2) A copy of one of the following documents that shows the name and address of the voter: a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document. > > > > From: "zimowski@" > > To: mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 11:27 AM > > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life > > > > ???? > > There are some that disagree with you. They quote from H589. Are they wrong? > > > > > > > > Here's an extract from the article: > > > > From the text of the H589: > > > > PART 2. PHOTO IDENTIFICATION > > > > SECTION 2.1. Article 14A of Chapter 163 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read: > > > > "???¡ì 163?????`166.13. Photo identification requirement for voting in person. > > > > (a) Every qualified voter voting in person in accordance with this Article, G.S. 163?????`227.2, or G.S. 163?????`182.1A shall present photo identification bearing any reasonable resemblance to that voter to a local election official at the voting place before voting, except as follows: [bold emphasis added by me above] > > > > The requirement to show an ID to vote is limited to those voting in person, with an allowance made for curbside voting outside a precinct where a poll worker comes to the car (this is considered in person). If you request an absentee ballot you do have to provide some identifying information in written form; options include providing a NC DL number, the last 4 digits of a Social Security number, etc [see ???¡ì 163?????`230.2. (4)]. > > > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > > > > > In NC the voter ID is required for absentee too. > > > ???€????? > > > > > > From: "zimowski@" > > > To: mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 12:22 AM > > > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: Interesting Podcast to Listen To: ObamaCare Invades Your Personal Life > > > > > > ???€????? > > > My, my, my.... you do like to twist what others say. Not a winning argument if you're really trying to convince that I'm mistaken and should change my mind about the need for voter ids. You and I both know that I believe very strongly in everyone's right to vote. I also believe that legal immigrants should obtain their citizenship as quickly as possible so they can participate. > > > > > > There are clear disadvantages to living in rural areas. If you get sick, the health care you need may not be readily available. You'll probably not be able to watch the latest movies when they're first released. You may or may not have good internet support or reliable cell phone service, etc.. And you may not be able to obtain a voter id as easily as you might like. But, if you get sick, you go to where the proper healthcare is available. Likewise, if voting is important to you and you need a voter id , then you do what it takes to get one. But having said that, it's my understanding that a voter id is not required to vote by absentee ballot. So is having to have a voter id a real problem for anyone? Why can't they just vote by absentee ballot? Their signature will be on file from when they originally registered to vote. Which reminds me, we are not talking about registering to vote, which is what you last post is all about. We're just talking about > > the > > > requirement for the voter id. > > > > > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, edward_berkline wrote: > > > > > > > > So your argument is that it is ok to make it inconvenient and difficult to register to vote and disenfranchise voters so long as those votes wouldn't make a difference in the outcome of the election? Something that can't be known with 100% certainty in advance! > > > > > > > > Shouldn't the policy be that no citizen, no matter what party, should not be disenfranchised and should be allowed to register to vote with no unnecessary roadblocks? > > > > > > > > Oh, I know, next you'll argue that the massive degree of voter fraud makes this necessary. But the truth is, the actual level of voter fraud is far, far below the level of being significant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, "zimowski@" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It is possible to convince me that my view on something may be incorrect. Arguments that teach me something new and that support the point being made will have the best chance of success. > > > > > > > > > > As far as Texas is concerned, I stand by the statement I made. Most rural Texans are Republican. If, in fact, a few rural Texans were unable to vote in the 2012 presidential election due to burdensome voter id laws, then I seriously doubt that these uncast votes if cast for Obama would have made any difference at all. From the wikipedia web site: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Mitt Romney won the state of Texas with 57.17%, over Barack Obama's 41.38%. As in past elections, President Obama and the Democrats won in major metropolitan areas such as Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, and Houston, but Republicans were able to overwhelm the urban vote by sweeping the vast rural areas and suburbs of Texas by large margins." > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at the pictorial county by county results and draw your own conclusions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???? > > > |
Re: The Inequality President
Sheila Beaudry
Very happy, especially since my husband had a heart attack, and triple bypass this year.? Bill would have been over $217,000 if didn't have insurance.
From: "zimowski@..."
To: ibmpensionissues@... Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2013 1:44 AM Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: The Inequality President ?
I really didn't expect a reply to this one. After I sent it, I realized I forgot to include :-) Am hoping I am as happy as you are with medicare when my time arrives. --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > No, just replying to??"Let's all share how government has fixed your most recent social problem!" > > > From: "zimowski@..." > To: mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 1:01 PM > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: The Inequality President > > ?? > Are you now suggesting that Medicare is also one of Obama's accomplishments? > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > > > Medicare has greatly lowered our medical insurance costs.???? Previously even with $7000 IBM subsidy, had to pay over $15000 a year and it was taking the majority of the pension. > > > > > > From: weinerisnospitzer > > To: mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 12:55 PM > > Subject: [ibmpensionissues] Re: The Inequality President > > > > ???? > > HA!???????? > > Let's all share how government has fixed your most recent social problem! > > > > The politics of Washington Monthly are left of center. Founder Charles Peters refers to himself as a New Deal Democrat and advocates the effective use of government to address social problems.???? > > > > ref:???? > > > > Publisher Diane Straus Tucker worked with wacko Howard Dean???? at the DNC.???????????????????? <<<===(Watch last 4 seconds) > > > > --- In mailto:ibmpensionissues%40yahoogroups.com, Sheila Beaudry wrote: > > > > > > Lots of hope and change for me. > > > > > > |
Re: The Inequality President
I really didn't expect a reply to this one. After I sent it, I realized I forgot to include :-)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Am hoping I am as happy as you are with medicare when my time arrives. --- In ibmpensionissues@..., Sheila Beaudry <sbbeaudry@...> wrote:
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss