开云体育

Steve- tnx for the suggestion about digrig.? It does seem to be more flexible and I I like the idea of built in CAT. Question:? Are you using it with the USB Isolator?

Digirig is worth a look, very happy with mine on my 817 and 857. And you get CAT control which the Signalink doesn’t do. 73 Steve VK2ARS Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 12:22 PM To: [email protected]

I built mine. It's not a difficult job if you have passion as a maker. Pietro I2OIM Il giorno mar 21 feb 2023 alle ore 02:22 lbakely <lbakely@...> ha scritto:

Larry, I also use the SignalLink USB version with my FT-817. I was able to get it with the lead and configuration header. I use it with both an Acer Chromebook with fldigi running in its linux mode

I have been using Signalink USB with my 817nd for a few years now on ft8 ft4 and psk31. It works fine

Hi all. ECHOLINK is also a very good option with which you can access repeaters all over the world and have QSO's. Works from a pc, tablet, mobile phone, etc. Good luck in your future QTH. Richard

Hello, I use with FT 818 SCU17, it is with sound card and CAT. It works absolutely perfectly in my opinion. Zdenek ok1mae 73! "---------- P?vodní zpráva ---------- Od: lbakely <lbakely@...>

Hi Larry, I highly recommend that you check out the DigiRig interface. https://digirig.net/ Gigiparts sells it in radio specific bundles.

Samuda, This is getting silly, and your responses feel 'personal'. I asked if this design you say was widely discussed in the 70s, 80s, and 90s was ever discussed in an ARRL publication - for some

Ken N2VIP, I won't obviously change your mind - and you have already said NEDA antenna design must have been published before in the US (still waiting) - just need to point out you can't compare the

The Signalink is the easiest solution. I have been using one with my original FT-817. There are other interfaces with more bandwidth but the 817 is limited to about 2.8kHz. You will also want a CAT

On Feb 20, 2023, at 19:27, Samudra <samudra.haque@...> wrote: <snip> So for an 80m band operation, reducing that to 12feet in total length should put this antenna in a different class than what

The SignaLink has lots of features for aiding in adapting it to various rigs.? Inside is a 16 pin socket for configuring the interface cable to the radio for the signals, one puts jumpers into it?

I agree with Dan. I use a signaling with my Icom 756,7000,706,705,Yaesu ft817, 891 and my KX3. It just works. I use the remade jumpers for easy swap to other radios. ~ Don

Al, You might read on how an antenna tuner works. Tuners do more than just make the radio happy. It will result in getting more power into the antenna/radiator.? Now what the radiator does with that

The SignaLink is excellent interface and can get a USB version.? Also I am sure you can get the custom cable for the FT817, I did once for the fT857.? It plugged into the rear DATA port on the

I use the signalink. It’s older, but solid. Well supported, good isolation, etc. It’s not the cheapest solution, but I also didn’t have to spend time setting everything up, it “just worked”,

The SignaLink SLUSB6PM connects to the 6 pin mini-din on the back of the FT-817ND and should work fine. There are other more recent sound interface devices, but they are newer with less service

Hmm, Al WB9UBJ, I would point out that the NEDA antenna that I designed from the reference material I was able to gather (mentioned by others in this thread) is half-wave length in total and

I'm planning to venture into FT8 for the first time, and I'm going to use my FT-817.? I'm looking for a USB interface (w/ sound card), and it looks like the SignaLink SLUSB6PM might be the most