开云体育

Thanks, Steve. I would never have guessed that one. 73….Eric VK2VE. Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 21:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ft817] FT-817 Replacement Application Specific

G’day Greg, I wasn’t being particular. You are correct. Steve VK2ARS Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 1:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ft817] FT-817 Replacement Application Specific

Application Specific Integrated Circuit, i.e. a custom part as opposed to a generic FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) for DSP (Digital Signal Processing), or indeed any custom IC replacing a number

I had the happen to me and got the small ring left in it by heating up a tip of a small safety pin and poking that into the yellow ring and slowly lifting it out off the power pin. Marty kd8bj

Check the power socket on the radio to see if the little yellow insulation tip on the end of the plug has not dislodged and is stuck in there. If that happened from another cable, you won’t be able

You mean disconnect it from battery pack? Sorry I forgot to mention this, I have no battery pack installed (to be honest, I don't have my battery pack anymore). Or pull it from mainboard

Pull the battery connector and try again. -- Al Skierkiewicz WB9UVJ

Hello everyone :) I have recently came back to the ham radio hobby, and decided to remove some dust from my old FT-817 (not ND) To my surprise, the unit refuses to turn on when connected to a 13.8V

I like that it has a more modern chassis. The trend for faceplate on a slab form factors is well established by icom with the 705, elecraft with kx2 and kx3, and the tx-599. So far as features, I

Thank you for saying what _needed_ to be said, Ken! The negativity, shortsightedness, and lack of gratitude around here lately has been increasingly unpleasant. I wish Yaesu all the best with their

Application Specific Integrated Circuit, if we're being particular. Greg KO6TH tomsdad97 via groups.io wrote: Application Specific

Application Specific Integrated Controller.ASICSteve VK2ARS

Well said, Ken. The FT-817 is a 25 years old design, based on a much older architecture. The FT-818 was a bit of industrial CPR to keep a very useful radio going as long as possible, because lots of

I once went on a training course. The last 21 pages of the pre-read document were definitions of all the acronyms used on the course. By day 4 of the course, the letters of the new acronyms we learned

“If NOTHING ELSE, the new field radio should appeal to all those so-called FT-1634 owners who strapped two FT-817s together to have a great satellite radio. (but of course, they complain they can't

Hi Mike, PLEASE, if you’re going to use acronyms, spell them out the first time you use them unless they are obvious such as SSB, FM or DSP etc. For instance, what is ASIC? To me, it’s the

Surely it was mainly for new hams, new owners? My query is. Is it an ASIC based DSP set (low power receive, but design fixed in silicon and high NRE? Or an FPGA based DSP which is much higher power

What FT-817 owners wanted was something different, yet the same - size, weight, features, etc. Yaesu instead added a few more years to the life of the FT-817 ecosystem with the very slightly

This rumor of a new 817 updated replacement has been going around for a decade or more. Thats why the ft818 was such a disappointment, it didn't look like the 'dream' replacement at all.Wa2nub Yahoo

It's all you're gonna get, I wouldn't expect an FT-891 form-factor QR radio from Yaesu anytime soon. Ken, N2VIP