I think the quality of the grind is more important than Trimaster Vs CT.? I've had too many people preferring either to guess which is best.? The Trimaster has more carbide but a fast running saw likes the 1.3.? My experience has been that if one tooth is slightly
off it really shows in the cut.? Dave
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] on behalf of David Luckensmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FOG] New resaw setup
Jason:
I have not done that and I wonder too. But I know the CT Woodmaster is much less expensive than the Trimaster and I get a demonstrably better cut and it cuts faster. As a result, I will not buy another Trimaster. Each to their own.
Lucky
On 25 Nov 2020, at 7:15 am, Jason Holtz <
jholtzy@...> wrote:
I had a Trimaster previously, and I got a lot of mileage out of it until I cut some anigre which is high in silica.
I do wonder about the whole carbide/steel argument?though. Obviously?the?carbide?will outlast. In most other cases, planer knives, lathe tooling, etc. the sharp tool steel is a better cut than carbide. The Wood Slicer blades are $45 a piece for
our saw and the cut is amazing. I can buy 6 for the price of the Trimaster. Wonder how that math would come out factoring in resharpening of the carbide, possibility of needing more cleanup after cutting etc.
Has someone done this for me already?
Jason Holtz
J. Holtz Furniture
3307 Snelling Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
612 432-2765
--
Jason
J. Holtz Furniture
3307 Snelling Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55406