With the table that opens and the reverse seats in the MV the same
bolting pattern simply would not work. I agree that ideally it would
be best to keep the infrastructure the same if possible, but in this
case the differences were significant enough that they apparently
couldn't.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 6/26/08, Neil McConville <neilmcc_98@...> wrote:
what I'm talking about is the infra-structure for the seats and bodies. the
company can change the "styles" all they want. When it comes time to "bolt"
it on everything should be the same.
--- On Thu, 6/26/08, gti_matt <gti_matt@...> wrote:
From: gti_matt <gti_matt@...>
Subject: Re: [ev_update] 3rd row seat/bed assembly.
To: ev_update@...
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 11:34 AM
It is not cost effective to have two different styles of seats.
The MV vs. CL/GL/GLS though had a different purpose and that sometimes is
justification enough. If we always took the "different styles are not cost
effective" approach, every car model would have one trim line only and
few/no options.
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
