¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: VFD wiring

 

Dave,
what wiring did your machine have? Mine is the 'Safety Electric' wiring. I'm still trying to understand it. I'm a physicist, this stuff is not totally alien to me, I just don't quite understand little boxes that say 'low voltage release'. Trying to understand items like c1 with terminals a/b and 13/14

If I wire the motor directly to the VFD, this whole circuit won't be working, right? Since I won't have high voltage on it? My VFD wants a low volt. signal though passed through an EMO switch... I am not piecing it all together. I know I can get the functionality, I know I can jumper that signal at the VFD side. Need to stare at it more I guess

--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz


================================


Re: VFD wiring

 

Yup, same thing - Rockwell Automation calls them 'snubber resistors' - just there to bleed off the emf generated by the decelerating rotor. Sounds like a good idea to use :-)

On 4/8/2006 at 7:19 PM davedamouth wrote:

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:
Not sure on the terminology your manual is using. All but the very
cheapest vfd's can usually use a braking resistor. It's a large
resistor that will attach to an extra set of terminals. Allows for
much faster deceleration than just the drive transistors. At 30 rpm,
a 1/2 second braking ramp will stop the spindle in 1/4 revolution.

I use them wherever possible. If something is going wrong, I want the
spindle to stop quickly. Even changing the work in and out of the
chuck goes quicker when you don't need to wait for it to stop.
--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz


================================


Re: VFD wiring

 

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:


Are you using what's referred to as a 'snubber resistor' in my VFD
manual? Had you tried without that and found you needed it, or is it
something that is just generally recommended and should always be used?

Not sure on the terminology your manual is using. All but the very
cheapest vfd's can usually use a braking resistor. It's a large
resistor that will attach to an extra set of terminals. Allows for
much faster deceleration than just the drive transistors. At 30 rpm,
a 1/2 second braking ramp will stop the spindle in 1/4 revolution.

I use them wherever possible. If something is going wrong, I want the
spindle to stop quickly. Even changing the work in and out of the
chuck goes quicker when you don't need to wait for it to stop.


Re: VFD wiring

 

Thanks, Dave, seems like the right thoughts went through my head, and I have a fairly reasonable understanding of the issues and functionality. I fully realize that with the low-low speed thought using a wired-up potentiometer I lose a lot of power. I figured this would allow me to stop on a dime when cutting a thread against a shoulder. I am not too worried about power there. But 27 RPM is pretty slow, maybe it's not an issue.

Are you using what's referred to as a 'snubber resistor' in my VFD manual? Had you tried without that and found you needed it, or is it something that is just generally recommended and should always be used?

--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz


================================


Re: VFD wiring

 

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:

Simplest thing would be to wire the VFD output into the S11 input.
The negatives would be that fast switching off and on may reset the
VFD. Let's say I try not to do that. But when I switch from off to
speed 1 and then speed 2 don't I do exactly that, as far as the VFD is
concerned? Don't know whether the rotary switch B1 is make before
break or what.

Your VFD is not going to like that. Each speed seting on the motor has
a different amp draw, and different speed. There may be a wiring
diagram inside the cover of the elecrical box that will help.

The advantage would be that I can wire up a potentiometer for
external speed control to the VFD to be able to go down to nearly
zero. Max would be 60 Hz.

Really low hz are not a good idea. HP falls off linearly below 60 hz.
If 60 hz is 1.5 hp, 30 hz = .75 hp. Above 60 hz, hp remains fairly
flat, so 100 hz = 1.5 hp.

If I wire up as shown in the posted diagram, the logic goes back to
the VFD and presumably there are no switching issues. But with my VFD
at least I lose the capability to control the speed via a
potentiometer. The downside is that I don't know if the motor is
rated for 120Hz for extended times.

Seems to work fine. As you've noted, you won't use 2000 rpm very
often. The motor was designed to run 3400 rpm, which is all it is
turning. With the stock wiring, 3400 rpm is speed 2, 1700 is speed 1.

I understand that this wiring uses all poles and has more torque at
high speed rather than use only every other pole for high speed with
the original wiring. Don't know whether torque at high speed really
is an issue of course - I doubt it.

The wiring suggested actually uses only the 1700 rpm circuit, and lets
the vfd overspeed the 1700 rpm circuit to 3400. The purpose for using
the low speed circuit is to provide the best power across all
settings. The low speed circuit does provide more torque, but as the
frequency is increased beyond 60 hz, the vfd auomatically reduces the
torque. So there is no net gain in high speed torque.

However, if you were to use the 3400 rpm circuit, you would have
slightly more power at 3400 rpm. 3400 rpm would be 60 hz, so o
achieve 1700 rpm you would dial it down to 30 hz. At 30 hz, you would
have 50% of your original power.

I have to say I don't fully understand the rationale for the 2nd
speed, or how it is used in general. It seems to really give 1
distinct extra speed, 2200 RPM. Do you normally turn on speed1 (elec.
switch) and is speed2 just there for a finishing cut or polishing for
the convenience of not having to switch gears? And the 2200 would
have the highest startup current draw of course, probably the worst
thing for a VFD, switching quickly through speed1 to speed2.

Doesn't seem to mind. I'm using a braking resisor, so if you move
slow enough, it almost stops from speed 1 turning off before speed 2
starts. Still works just fine.

Another option you may want to try: Put the stock switch in speed 1.
Pull the switch handle off so you're not tempted to use it. Then
mount your vfd externally and run it like you want. The two items of
concern that I worry about:
1. If you ever accidentally get the barrel switch into speed 2, you
risk trying to turn the motor 6800rpm. This would be bad.
2. The little buttons on the VFD are a very small target to be
searching for when the machine is making thunk-thunk noises as it
tries to destroy itself, your work, or you. I always prefer external
switching on a VFD. At a minimum, find a way to put an E-Stop switch
wihin easy reach.

Good Luck!
Dave


VFD wiring

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I'm struggling with wiring a Super11 to a VFD.? I saw the instructions posted in the photo and file area - thanks a lot!? But several things went through my head in recent days, and I can't quite decide.? I wonder if anyone can give me some guidance.
?
Simplest thing would be to?wire the VFD output into the S11 input.? The negatives would be that fast switching off and on may reset the VFD.? Let's say I try not to do that.? But when I switch from off to speed 1 and then speed 2 don't I do exactly that, as far as the VFD is concerned?? Don't know whether the rotary switch B1 is make before break or what.
?
The advantage would be that I can wire up a potentiometer for external speed control to the VFD to be able to go down to nearly zero.? Max would be 60 Hz.
?
If I wire up as shown in the posted diagram, the logic goes back to the VFD and presumably there are no switching issues.? But?with my VFD at least I lose the capability to control the speed via a potentiometer.? The downside is that I don't know if the motor is rated for 120Hz for extended times.? I understand that this wiring uses all poles and has more torque at high speed rather than use only every other pole for high speed with the original wiring.? Don't know whether torque at high speed really is an issue of course - I doubt it.
?
I have to say I don't fully understand the rationale for the 2nd speed, or how it is used in general.? It seems to really give 1 distinct extra speed, 2200 RPM.? Do you normally turn on speed1 (elec. switch) and is speed2 just there for a finishing cut or polishing for the convenience of not having to switch gears?? And the 2200 would have the highest startup current draw of course, probably the worst thing for a VFD, switching quickly through speed1 to speed2.
?
Appreciate your thoughts!
?

--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


Re: milling attachment

almus_kenter
 

OK here is another data point.

I have a V10P and a Super-11.

The milling column attachment bolts appear
to be the same; same size and same spacing.

Both machines are "green" vintage.

-Almus


Re: milling attachment

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

OK, that makes sense - the column is the same.? The bracket has to be different, and to assure no mixup they use unique bolt spacings.? All makes sense now!? Thanks for checking

* REPLY SEPARATOR *


On 4/4/2006 at 6:50 PM Frank Hasieber wrote:

Rich I would not expect any problems with distortion, the face of the mounting area on the bed is machined at the factory, as is the mounting face of the bracket, I would imagine that Emco would be putting their reputation on the line if any distortion were to occur. The V13 bed is very much heavier. Except that as far as the brackets are concerned I have to swallow my words and take it all back I actually went a physically checked the bolt spacing on the FB2, the V10P and the V13, they ARE all different! Beat that!

Frank.


--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


Re: milling attachment

Frank Hasieber
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Rich I would not expect any problems with distortion, the face of the mounting area on the bed is machined at the factory, as is the mounting face of the bracket, I would imagine that Emco would be putting their reputation on the line if any distortion were to occur. The V13 bed is very much heavier. Except that as far as the brackets are concerned I have to swallow my words and take it all back I actually went a physically checked the bolt spacing on the FB2, the V10P and the V13, they ARE all different! Beat that!

Frank.

-----Original Message-----
From: emcoV10lathe@... [mailto:emcoV10lathe@...]On Behalf Of Richard Kleinhenz
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:47 PM
?

Thanks Frank, and thanks for the photo.? Is the mill column bracket just attached to the bed with 4 bolts?? Are there any bed twisting issues with this type of mount?

?

So the brackets for the V10 and the V13 must be different though, I can't imagine that the larger machines uses the same bed (?)

?

I'm not sure that this is something I want to pursue, but then again, if I happen to come across a tool with the right price and the right voltage motor, who knows ;-)

?


--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


Re: milling attachment

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Frank, and thanks for the photo.? Is the mill column bracket just attached to the bed with 4 bolts?? Are there any bed twisting issues with this type of mount?
?
So the brackets for the V10 and the V13 must be different though, I can't imagine that the larger machines uses the same bed (?)
?
I'm not sure that this is something I want to pursue, but then again, if I happen to come across a tool with the right price and the right voltage motor, who knows ;-)

* REPLY SEPARATOR *


On 4/4/2006 at 4:16 PM Frank Hasieber wrote:

Rich, the head and column are identical for the FB2 mill, the V10 and the V13; I cannot imagine that Emco would have separate and different brackets for the 3 different machines, not good economic sense. If you have seen the photo of the mount on the FB2 that I sent, it is a substantial casting. Looking at the V10 manual it looks the same.

Frank

?


--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


Re: milling attachment

Frank Hasieber
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Rich, the head and column are identical for the FB2 mill, the V10 and the V13; I cannot imagine that Emco would have separate and different brackets for the 3 different machines, not good economic sense. If you have seen the photo of the mount on the FB2 that I sent, it is a substantial casting. Looking at the V10 manual it looks the same.

Frank

?

-----Original Message-----

From: emcoV10lathe@... [mailto:emcoV10lathe@...]On Behalf Of Richard Kleinhenz
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Emco V10 group
Subject: Re: [emcoV10lathe] Re: milling attachment

?

Sorry I should have been clearer.? Yes, does the bracket mount directly w/o redrilling, and is the column diameter the same.? Also whether the column to lathe distance is the same, which would be a function of the bracket.




Re: milling attachment

 

Sorry I should have been clearer. Yes, does the bracket mount directly w/o redrilling, and is the column diameter the same. Also whether the column to lathe distance is the same, which would be a function of the bracket.

On 4/4/2006 at 11:24 AM almus_kenter wrote:

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:

Does anyone know whether the V10 milling column and head will fit
the Super 11?
--
Do you want to know if the bolt spacing is the same on
the lathe bed? ie the bolts that hold the mill to the lathe
bed?
--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz


================================


Re: milling attachment

almus_kenter
 

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:

Does anyone know whether the V10 milling column and head will fit
the Super 11?
--
Do you want to know if the bolt spacing is the same on
the lathe bed? ie the bolts that hold the mill to the lathe
bed?

-A


milling attachment

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Does anyone know whether the V10 milling column and head will fit the Super 11?
?

--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


Re: S11 tailstock handwheel

 

I'd try to make something like this work:



The inside bore needs to be enlarged and have a keyway broached or
filed, and with a little luck there is enough on the o.d. of the hub
to be able to turn it to fit the dial.



--- In emcoV10lathe@..., Richard Kleinhenz <richk@...> wrote:

I broke the handwheel on my new (used) S11 tailstock by dropping
it... Does anyone know about a generic replacement, or where would I
get it - does BlueRidge stock parts, or will they get them, or do I go
to Enco - here in the US or in Austria?


Re: S11 tailstock handwheel

 

I meant EMco not ENco of course :-)

* REPLY SEPARATOR *

On 4/2/2006 at 9:11 AM Richard Kleinhenz wrote:
I broke the handwheel on my new (used) S11 tailstock by dropping it...
Does anyone know about a generic replacement, or where would I get it -
does BlueRidge stock parts, or will they get them, or do I go to Enco -
here in the US or in Austria?
--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz


================================


S11 tailstock handwheel

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I broke the handwheel on my new (used) S11 tailstock by dropping it...? Does anyone know about a generic replacement, or where would I get it - does BlueRidge stock parts, or?will they get them, or do I go to Enco - here in the US or in Austria?
?

--
Regards,
Rich
================================
Richard Kleinhenz
================================


S 11 switches

Richard W. Remington
 

Some time ago the barrel switch became hard to turn with artharitic
hands. I replaced it with 5 contactors. Now I have a 4 position easy to
turn direction and speed switch. Controll is with a start and a stop
push button-- much easier.
I had a 1hp. DC motor on my previous lathe. I kept the motor planning
to install it on the S11. It will take some inginuity to fit it on the
motor mount. I really do miss the DC drive. So nice when threading to a
sholder.Where did you get the varispeed AC drive? Sounds as tho it
might be as good (or better?) than the DC.
Dick R.


Re: Super 11 VFD

almus_kenter
 

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., "almus_kenter" <akenter@...> wrote:



Also....

Dave,

I was impressed that you got your VFD in to the lathe
electrical enclosure. Mine won't fit. I also have
a different electrical set up; no red E off switch



Actually I managed to get my VFD inside my electrical
enclosure. I ran the lathe and was able to cut metal!
Overall the machine runs very smooth

I may remake the rear cover for the electrical panel and
put a muffin fan on it; I am paranoid about summer time
cooling.

-A


Re: toolposts

 

Nice work Frank. Very inspiring!
I like the way that design is such that there are no dovetail cutters needed.
Thanks for the great pictures.

Dan

--- In emcoV10lathe@..., "Frank Hasieber" <fhasieber@...> wrote:

I have just added some pics of my homemade QC toolpost, it was based on the
exploded view in the parts manual of the Emco one supplied as an accessory
to the V13, this one is the one for my V10P, I have made another bigger
version for my V13. The body is machined from 60 ton steel, the holders are
made from key steel, no parts are hardened or heat treated, the one on my
V13 has now been in use for almost 20 years, and is still as good as the day
I made it. This is one of the best accessories one can add to a lathe, I
made 8 toolholders for each of them. You can see photos of it in my album
Franks bits and pieces.
<>
They show it assembled and disassembled.
Frank.


-----Original Message-----
From: emcoV10lathe@... [mailto:emcoV10lathe@...]On
Behalf Of Dan Falck

Your riser block looks good. I bet you're having fun with the quick change
tooling. It
makes an incredible difference.

Dan






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 3/24/2006