Wow John you have got me worried now! I did not think that it was
"clever math" so I had better go back and check what I did.
Richard
On 18/10/2020 17:30, John Dammeyer
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi
Ralph,
So
you have written the 'clever math' to do this.? Super.? Looking forward to a
detailed explanation on how you've done that.
John
?
?
?
Actually
John I think that Ralph was directing the question to John
Lindo!
Further to the comment you made that I repeat below, sorry
John you are incorrect. I am using the Russian ELS on on
Arduino Mega and I have "modified" the software. I have
constant area cutting and the operator can pick plunge or
flank cutting. After reaching the calculated depth for the
Metric or Imperial thread further passes are possible at
increments chosen by the operator. I also have the
capability of clearing the tool away from the job? in X for
testing then subsequently moving it back to the original
position if further cuts are needed. As the system is
encoder controlled the speed can vary whilst cutting.
Richard
On 17/10/2020 23:31, John Dammeyer wrote:
?
Unless the math is
really clever on the Arduino based electronic gearing
systems they can't do it either.
?
?
?
