开云体育Hello John, All IPV4 addresses are now assigned. Any thoughts on how much work it would be to make D-Rats be IPv6 compatible?? IPv6 is clearly the future of the Internet, most ISPs support it now, and the ridiculous number of IPs you get from your ISP are all publicly reachable. If it does not match the whatismyip.com report, then running a public ratflector is a lost cause. This is not entirely true as a user has at least two more options: ? - The ISP's operated NAT is usually a form of Carrier Grade NAT (CG-NAT) which should be able to support port forwarding via Port Control Protocol (PCP) - .? The enduser will need to contact their ISP to see if they support PCP for their endusers ? - The end user can setup a VPN with a provider that supports port forwarding or supports static IPs for their tunnels.? I've heard good success with vendors like vultr, etc.? The VPNs aren't too expensive to operate. Also it is recommended that UPNP (Universal Plug and Play) be disabled. I also generally recommend disabling UPnP as most of the router implementations of that stack are known to have many various security vulnerabilities (Google it.. it's really bad).? Unfortunately, some of the CG-NAT solutions out there support the configuration of PCP via the enduser's UPnP stack.? Again.. the user will need to contact their ISP to understand how it's done for their specific network. --David KI6ZHD |