Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
CrestronLabs.com and/or directly to those that I know at Crestron. There's a nice thread on Smart Objects and standard joins now.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote: Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
It all seems to fall on deaf ears regardless of where we "vent." Believe me, I've talked to almost everyone up to the top. Heath Volmer Digital Domain Systems Littleton, CO Sent from my iTypo 4 On Aug 14, 2013, at 6:48 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote: Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
I am trying to quit complaining on here about it. Improvements are being made and it is getting better. One of the reasons I quit posting for a little was to get out of that habit. The complaining wasn't being productive for the group. As far as someone at crestron, no. Just on Labs a little and I have not been on there in a while.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote: Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
Absolutely.
That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.
I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.
In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.
I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.
-- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Commercial Market Director Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks Consulting, LLC Crestron Services Provider
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Complaints
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
I have also spoken with a number of people in Crestron leadership and head engineers about various issues as mentioned before. When speaking with them at Master's classes and CSP meetings at Infocomm, they never fail to acknowledge that there's room for improvement. For example, they know that Crestron Studio is a work in progress. But if they wait to release it until it's all "done", it will certainly not be done anywhere close to where full time programmers need it to be to be able to program a job with it. Last time I spoke to those at Crestron in the know, they did not recommend that I use Studio exclusively, and that I should be careful about using it on live projects at that point. And so I have Studio installed, and I have used it for my own personal stuff, and I have provided some feedback in the Crestron Labs and at the last InfoComm. I was a Crestron programmer back when Crestron made the move from the DOS Workshop programming to the Windows environment and SIMPL Windows. It wasn't pretty, and I think Crestron has learned from that. So the transition to Studio and Smart Graphics in my opinion has been slow and methodical. And probably for good reason. I have only done two projects with a Core 3 processor so far, and only one of those had Smart Graphics. I charged hourly for those projects due to these unknowns with the new gear and Smart Graphics. So I came out OK. I do mostly commercial work, and maybe my clients are slow adopters due to corporate policies and red tape. I am not too antsy to dive into newly released products that have no known track record. I realize that some others don't have much choice. But series 2 processors and non-smart graphics touch panels are still viable in my opinion, and as long as I can keep my clients happy I will continue to program these proven products. Since Crestron does not have internal project programmers like they used to, we do have a roll to fill in helping Crestron help us in making better products. Some people will say that this should not be our job, but the reality is that it is in our best interest to provide valuable and constructive feedback when we can. I will do as much as I can to help, while being careful to limit my risk with new technology as much as practical for my business, so I can continue to deliver successful solutions.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote: It all seems to fall on deaf ears regardless of where we "vent." Believe me, I've talked to almost everyone up to the top.
Heath Volmer Digital Domain Systems Littleton, CO
Sent from my iTypo 4
On Aug 14, 2013, at 6:48 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
I'm not even going to waste my time complaining anymore. None of their product/software/pricing decisions make sense to me these days.
It been a great 10+ years working with Crestron products but enough is enough. I'm fixing to venture into the land of a certain 3 letter company and see how the other half live. Don't know that it will be any better but it's hard to imagine it being any worse...
JRW
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote: Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
From my point of view, it seems as though they don't want feedback, it "is what it is", and that's just the way it's going to be. They "know better" than us on what we want and what the client wants so keep a sock in it. If they do want feedback, they only listen to the positive feedback, and ignore the negative, or critical ones it seems.
I watched at Master's class last year, when 200+ certified programmers from around the country (just in one of the several sessions) expressed their deep concerns for the direction they were taking with some of their products and programming environment, as well as pleaded with them (directly to the software development team) for key features that many of us MUST have in order to adopt it... and have not seen anything substantial done about it in the year since then. At least nothing that has made an impact or satisfied our needs. Same with Core3 (SG) and TSW harware.
Even though many inside Crestron see problems and can relate to what is going on, they don't have to deal with it like we do. Crestron isn't in the position where they have to make their stuff work themselves anymore, and it's on us lowly programmers that get stuck between major firmware or feature bugs and a mad client that can't understand the problem. Case in point is the new TSW panels where you just "reboot it everyday, there problem fixed". It seems to me they are setting us programmers and CSP's up for a no win situation where the "GAP" between their marketing promises and the "real world" thing is so wide, the client is left to assume that WE don't know what we're doing or doing it wrong.
I have another theory that the guys on the inside that do see the problems they are having are being made to keep their mouths shut and drink more cool-aid, but that is just a theory, maybe they are just working with that soon-to-be-released version that magically makes all the issues go away.
My final words here, is that with this whole paradigm shift, it SEEMS that they have made too big of change, in the wrong direction, and have dumped too many resources into it that they don't want to admit their mistake...so now they are waist deep in a pile of you-know-what , can't find a graceful way out, and so are trying to convince everyone that they meant to end up in the dung pile on purpose and that everyone else should follow them in, as it's the wave of the future. To save face and get more people to join them in the dung, they're marketing team renamed "dung" to "smart excrement" in hopes of tricking people that it's not "dung". Problem is, once you start working with it, it still smells.
Ok, that last one was a little harsh, but that's what it seems sometimes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote: Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
|
Not only are they not listening to CSP's but I try as a Consultant(also programmer) to relay things that are going on and they also fall on deaf ears. ?I'll talk to anyone who listens. ?I think they are actually sick of me.
I have been so disappointed in things of late that I actually had the chance to hit up Fred after the Consultant summit at Infocomm, Of all the things I could of talked to him about, I wanted to get my point across about dual ethernet ports needed on the DMPS series, not just Pro3. ?He was grateful of my suggestion and said the 3 series boards are getting ready for the DMPS and he will look into. ?I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). ?That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack.
I am anxiously waiting to see if any of this comes to fruition.
Steve
________________________________ From: Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> To: "'Crestron@...'" <Crestron@...> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [Crestron] Complaints
Absolutely.
That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.
I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.
In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.
I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.
-- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Commercial Market Director Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks Consulting, LLC Crestron Services Provider
-----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Complaints
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it?? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
|
Thank you John. We appreciate it. I think most of us are in the same boat, gave up completely on studio, frustrated beyond believe with the TSW panels and just hoping for fixes. It does seem the feedback to what is going on in labs is lacking or possibly we are just not seeing it. Personally I gave up on labs.
For now I guess patience is our only option, screaming no longer works. We do appreciate it you listening though.
From: John Pavlik <jpavlik@...<mailto:jpavlik@...>> Reply-To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>> Date: Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:57 AM To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>> Subject: RE: [Crestron] Re: Complaints
Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
|
Really nicely put, John - thanks! And yes, seeing you at masters would be great! --- In Crestron@..., John Pavlik <jpavlik@...> wrote: - I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I still think mine would have been the best, though it never got past the "conceptual" phase. :) KAD's were awesome... "Y U No Go Away?!?" - Chip
|
John,
I think all of us understand that this will be a long process. The major frustrations seem to come out of miscommunications with marketing -- for instance, you just said "Studio [is] probably not of any interest to this group". Yet only a few months ago, CTI changed all their classes to be Studio only, completely dumping the "old stuff", and marketing is heavily pushing use of Studio saying how much development time it's going to save. Fortunately CTI went back to the "old stuff" classes AFAIK, but the point remains that the message from Crestron is very thoroughly mixed.
I'm not ready to jump onboard with Core3 graphics at this point. I've heard all the arguments pro and con, and it looks a little too bleeding edge for what we're doing right now. That's fine with me. We stay a few firmware revisions behind what Crestron considers "stable" as well. I'd rather deal with known "known issues" than unknown "known issues". What's not fine with me is Crestron discontinuing "Core2" panels and pushing everything to be Core3 only. You have something that works, you need to keep supporting it (both in engineering AND with marketing AND tech support) until there's a viable replacement for it. Beta-testing stuff is great, and it needs to happen, but not involuntarily.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, John Pavlik <jpavlik@...> wrote: Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- Jeremy Weatherford
|
" I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack."
- You can plug any Ethernet device into a DM8G port and it will go into "Ethernet Fall Back Mode" and will behave like a normal LAN port. I havent actually tried it but it is part of the HDBase-T spec.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., Steve Robinson <stever101010@...> wrote: Not only are they not listening to CSP's but I try as a Consultant(also programmer) to relay things that are going on and they also fall on deaf ears. ?I'll talk to anyone who listens. ?I think they are actually sick of me.
I have been so disappointed in things of late that I actually had the chance to hit up Fred after the Consultant summit at Infocomm, Of all the things I could of talked to him about, I wanted to get my point across about dual ethernet ports needed on the DMPS series, not just Pro3. ?He was grateful of my suggestion and said the 3 series boards are getting ready for the DMPS and he will look into. ?I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). ?That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack.
I am anxiously waiting to see if any of this comes to fruition.
Steve
________________________________ From: Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> To: "'Crestron@...'" <Crestron@...> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [Crestron] Complaints
Absolutely.
That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.
I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.
In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.
I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.
-- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Commercial Market Director Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks Consulting, LLC Crestron Services Provider
-----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Complaints
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it?? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
DM != HD-Base-T spec... On 2013-08-15, at 11:47 AM, "jac777888" <jchelton@...> wrote: " I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack."
- You can plug any Ethernet device into a DM8G port and it will go into "Ethernet Fall Back Mode" and will behave like a normal LAN port. I havent actually tried it but it is part of the HDBase-T spec.
--- In Crestron@..., Steve Robinson <stever101010@...> wrote:
Not only are they not listening to CSP's but I try as a Consultant(also programmer) to relay things that are going on and they also fall on deaf ears. I'll talk to anyone who listens. I think they are actually sick of me.
I have been so disappointed in things of late that I actually had the chance to hit up Fred after the Consultant summit at Infocomm, Of all the things I could of talked to him about, I wanted to get my point across about dual ethernet ports needed on the DMPS series, not just Pro3. He was grateful of my suggestion and said the 3 series boards are getting ready for the DMPS and he will look into. I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack.
I am anxiously waiting to see if any of this comes to fruition.
Steve
________________________________ From: Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> To: "'Crestron@...'" <Crestron@...> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [Crestron] Complaints
Absolutely.
That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.
I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.
In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.
I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.
-- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Commercial Market Director Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks Consulting, LLC Crestron Services Provider
-----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Complaints
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Thats sad, seems like it would have been a useful feature...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@...> wrote: DM != HD-Base-T spec...
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-08-15, at 11:47 AM, "jac777888" <jchelton@...> wrote:
" I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack."
- You can plug any Ethernet device into a DM8G port and it will go into "Ethernet Fall Back Mode" and will behave like a normal LAN port. I havent actually tried it but it is part of the HDBase-T spec.
--- In Crestron@..., Steve Robinson <stever101010@> wrote:
Not only are they not listening to CSP's but I try as a Consultant(also programmer) to relay things that are going on and they also fall on deaf ears. I'll talk to anyone who listens. I think they are actually sick of me.
I have been so disappointed in things of late that I actually had the chance to hit up Fred after the Consultant summit at Infocomm, Of all the things I could of talked to him about, I wanted to get my point across about dual ethernet ports needed on the DMPS series, not just Pro3. He was grateful of my suggestion and said the 3 series boards are getting ready for the DMPS and he will look into. I told him that at the very least they needed to add a cheap RX(model #DMRMC-IP-C, how do you like that?) that passed only Ethernet(I don't know if you can ever call it cheap by using up an actual video output). That way we could control a device with IP or go to a switch on the back side without the IT guys having a freakin' heart attack.
I am anxiously waiting to see if any of this comes to fruition.
Steve
________________________________ From: Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@> To: "'Crestron@...'" <Crestron@...> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [Crestron] Complaints
Absolutely.
That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.
I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.
In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.
I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.
-- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Commercial Market Director Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks Consulting, LLC Crestron Services Provider
-----Original Message----- From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM To: Crestron@... Subject: [Crestron] Complaints
Hey all
Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?
Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.
I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?
Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------
Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.
A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Very well said John. And thanks for jumping in. Seeing your posts here on this forum is affirmation that the rants/bitches/complaints/ideas are actually being heard.
-Chris
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., John Pavlik <jpavlik@...> wrote: Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
|
"> I'm not ready to jump onboard with Core3 graphics at this point. I've heard all the arguments pro and con, and it looks a little too bleeding edge for what we're doing right now. That's fine with me. We stay a few firmware revisions behind what Crestron considers "stable" as well. I'd rather deal with known "known issues" than unknown "known issues". What's not fine with me is Crestron discontinuing "Core2" panels and pushing everything to be Core3 only. You have something that works, you need to keep supporting it (both in engineering AND with marketing AND tech support) until there's a viable replacement for it. Beta-testing stuff is great, and it needs to happen, but not involuntarily." BINGO! That is my number one complaint. If the new something is not as stable, doesn't have as many development tools available, and is still "in the works" with fixing major active bugs, then WHY on earth would the older models be phased out so fast??? If the older panels were still around, you probably wouldn't hear half of us bitching so loud. At least we would have the option to use the old stuff that just works. I've seen way too many legacy panels get discontinued with the only similar replacements being Core3 only. That is not good. Most of the dealers I've worked with have been trying to stick with the legacy stuff for as long as possible for the same reasons when engineering systems, but when all the legacy's are gone, you're stuck with Core3. And I do mean "stuck", because if something doesn't work, there is no alternative but to put more of our time, resources, and ultimately money into resolving the problems that shouldn't be there in the first place. Hard to break even on a project when there is a big "?" hanging over the hardware being used. A better and longer "transitional" period should have been developed and slowly rolled out, keeping the legacy hardware around a lot longer. Maybe even providing more touchpanels that support both (like the TPMC-9) would have been a good idea (even though the TPMC9 has it's own problems) I'm only referring to the option of doing a legacy design or Core3 design on the same panel depending on what you preferred would have been nice. It would have been an incremental step, that would have allowed Core3 to be used when needed, or legacy to be used when needed. Some of the Core3 bugs could have been worked out, and the programmers that didn't want to loose money on a project or be guinea pigs could have stayed with the "tried-and-true" way of doing it for longer. It reminds me of how Microsoft brought out Windows8, which >50% of the users didn't like, or had major complaints about, and then promptly stopped all sales of Win7 in an effort to force everyone into the new platform, earlier than people were willing and ready to make the move.
|
As others have said John great to see that you are taking notice and taking the time to reply.
My main complaint with the Core 3 stuff is lack of training, We live on the other side of the planet so I don't know if you guys have specific training for Core 3 in the US. Our sales guys here love selling new stuff....TSW 1050 and 750's being their favourite... So it leaves us to carry on regardless of our opinions, On starting my first Core 3 a while ago I rang up our support here in Oz and was told to watch the videos on the website as that was all there was, it helped a little but no way explained the nuances of switching from the old VT Pro. So again its doing stuff self taught so you really don't know if you are really doing it the correct or quickest way
My 2c
Cheers Jon
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In Crestron@..., John Pavlik <jpavlik@...> wrote: Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
School of hands on hard knocks. That's how I learned Smart Graphics and its paid off in spades. I now hate non Smart Graphics projects and avoid them wherever possible. On 2013-08-15, at 8:44 PM, "goofy_1562" <jon@...> wrote: As others have said John great to see that you are taking notice and taking the time to reply.
My main complaint with the Core 3 stuff is lack of training, We live on the other side of the planet so I don't know if you guys have specific training for Core 3 in the US. Our sales guys here love selling new stuff....TSW 1050 and 750's being their favourite... So it leaves us to carry on regardless of our opinions, On starting my first Core 3 a while ago I rang up our support here in Oz and was told to watch the videos on the website as that was all there was, it helped a little but no way explained the nuances of switching from the old VT Pro. So again its doing stuff self taught so you really don't know if you are really doing it the correct or quickest way
My 2c
Cheers Jon
--- In Crestron@..., John Pavlik <jpavlik@...> wrote:
Sounds like I'd better show up at Master's class this year - because none of that feedback made it back to me.
Look, we can't do everything and we can't do it all immediately. And yes, inertia sometimes comes into play. The bottom line is that Fred and I do very much care what you have to say and please don't stop telling us what you want and need.
In a lot of cases of course, everyone wants something different and so "make a product that is this" sorts of comments are good but of course will take the longest to gel. In other cases, there may be infrastructure shifts that we've made (and in some cases those shifts are still looking years down the road) and so the request is backtracking from the bigger picture.
We have made a lot of changes in engineering over the last year to improve quality and change some of the direction - but it takes months and months for those efforts to show up at your doorstep.
To address a few things that I've seen recently...
- I lost track of who updated the splash screens in the software but I thought that was classic. I am sorry that it was done out of frustration but thanks for giving me a chuckle.
- No engineering resources were harmed in updating the icons. Frankly, I was surprised as you were to see them changed. That doesn't go through Architecture review!
- Rebooting the TSW nightly is a stopgap. Creating an embedded product these days is much more complicated than it was years ago and has all sorts of operating system and supplier nuances (and legalities on source code, etc). But we have been actively pursuing solutions for some time now. I am a frustrated as you are that we are still doing this.
- Crestron Studio - well, I think the answer is that it isn't ready for anybody on this forum. I'll be honest, my team doesn't use it either. But as someone pointed out, if we don't get the feedback from everyone here it will never be what you want. But, the database thing has been well discussed and there is agreement that what is there is not appropriate for what many of you are doing. So, there will be changes. But not soon enough - that nasty priority thing again. The immediate goal it to improve upon on the program generation aspects of the system to allow more automatic system generation. I wouldn't call it System Builder but maybe System Builder re-imagined, where logic is generated but not untouchable, and customizations and mix and match code really work. Probably not of any interest to this group, but we need it in the market as a whole.
- Meanwhile, we have been investing heavily in SIMPL Windows and VTPro. For example, SIMPL Windows is going to be getting the automatic CED File management that it so very sorely needs.
- And for those about to jump on why do we even have CED files, I do have a skunk works project to try and produce at least a flat view dpad and number pad. Haven't quite figured out the best way to release it yet.
So, while we don't necessarily share back what we've heard and what we are doing about it, we do listen and it does cause change. Probably not as fast as you want it and probably not everything you want but don't stop sharing.
I want Crestron to be the best that it can be. And to do that we need the continued support of all of you. You all are a big part of what Crestron has become and I need you to continue to do that. I know its frustrating at times. As I lie awake at 3am staring at the ceiling I think about these things too! But I think together we can continue to make strives and be a mutual success.
I will see many of you at CEDIA so that you can complain in person! And I think most of you know how to get it touch with me one way or another so feel free.
John Pavlik Crestron Electronics, Inc. Director, Architecture & Design
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|