开云体育

OK, will do that, thanks. Cheers, Thorsten -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von rickwookie Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2023 14:01 An:

I found the Power On would work about 10% of the time (as in 1 in 20 triggers). Send a simple WoL packet to the TVs MAC address (use the UDP symbol) and it fires every time. It annoys me that the CCD

Update: I changed the order of the passcode and MAC-address, and now control works partially. I only need power on/off, input switching and power feedback. That works, except power-on and power

What I have done several times is to have both processors have the exact same IP, program(s) and settings, then they just move over the Ethernet cable along with the RS-232 and relay connections. Just

Hi All, I have a UC Engine with room environment controls and lots of Teams Automation. The client wants a back up CP4 to take over if the primary CP4 goes down for whatever reason. I have 3 coms,

Thanks, Tony. Enabling logging revealed the following messages: ?00:02:52.344: [Console Data] : 048-12:05:26.696 ( 3) [Info ] CORD - LG Smart TV : Processing control command Connection.Connect()

I forgot to mention, we have about 50 spaces, each with CP4N, and I'm working on getting all of them on the exact same program that I'll be able to mass load. Plus, the head-end Pro4 manages all the

Ha ha MSTC. I fixed it. I meant per processor, auto correct changed it...

My latest article, "Circular Introduces Next-Gen Smart Ring Slim” is being published by the good folks at Residential Tech Today Magazine on their web site. Circular, a French technology company,

That sounds magical, what is it? ?On 11/15/23, 10:05 AM, "Eric Luckart" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of eluckart@... <mailto:eluckart@...>> wrote: EISC

What is the timing requirement for updating the remote processors?? Is this a thing that could be accomplished at some interval or does it need to be real time?? You can accomplish the transfer of

EISC is one to one not one to many. Why not just use an ipid per processor?

Hi All, I'm trying to get this working where my Pro4 has, for now, a bunch of channel labels that I want any of the 50+ CP4N's to access to update the buttons on the local touch panels in the rooms.

Cue Barbara Streisand singing 'Memories...' :)

Brian, Can’t explain your issues but the Rack Build seems on point, from a temperature control perspective. Good Luck Best regards, Michael S. Moran

Just another quick NVX question. As far as I can tell NVX only has integer frame rates. Eg 24p and 60p. It doesn’t seem to be able to output 23.98 or 59.94 frame rates. That means it has judder when

Thanks for the replies, everyone. Yes, there is a TSTAT in the rack reading 74 degrees, and it controls the mini-split unit. They had originally supplied the unit from a shared condenser, and we

Heat is always an issue. That said, there is heat and then there is pant on fire. Have you deployed any active cooling? Do you have proper build distribution to funnel The heat In and Out of the Rack?

Heat could always be a factor, but we haven't received any heat alarms from any of the network devices installed there. Also, the closet has its own mini-split. The chassis power supply could

Do you think heat could be a factor in the rack which is hard to access ?