Re: How to monitor multiple applications?
ah got it, thanks. I'll check it out!
By
[email protected]
·
#245743
·
|
Re: How to monitor multiple applications?
SMW, meaning SimplWindows, i.e. a custom programmed system vs the packaged/configured HOME offering. Though HOME has been adding alot of stuff, a custom system allows you to get things just the way
By
ckangis
·
#245742
·
|
Re: How to monitor multiple applications?
any suggestions on SMW system? I'm not really familiar with this.
By
[email protected]
·
#245741
·
|
Re: Wake On LAN (WOL) Help!
That?s not how a WoL magic packet looks like. It?s six times FF in hex followed by sixteen repetitions of the target device MAC address. Cheers, Thorsten Von: [email protected] <[email protected]>
By
Thorsten K?hler
·
#245740
·
|
Re: Wake On LAN (WOL) Help!
I forget what Port I used, but I know on certain Samsung there is a setting in the Power menu that you have to enable. Like remote configuration or somthing.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy
By
VA_AVTech
·
#245739
·
|
Re: Wake On LAN (WOL) Help!
I cannot seem to get this to work... Trying to turn on a Samsung TV, IP control works but cannot power it back on. I used a free Wake On Lan app on my iPhone and it powers on every time with WOL. I
By
David H
·
#245738
·
Edited
|
Re: How to monitor multiple applications?
IMO, HOME is not flexible enough for this kind of application. An SMW-based system and Domotz to fill in the things that cannot be directly managed, like NEST and probably SubZero would be what I'd
By
ckangis
·
#245737
·
|
How to monitor multiple applications?
Hi, I've got someone who has posed an interest challenge: Their home has multiple automation systems and he wants to have a single app or site where he can determine the status of all of these systems
By
[email protected]
·
#245736
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
"AFAIK any control system that can do IP and serial communications is going to be sold by a dealer. A used 3-series processor and an HR-150 would be a more budget friendly solution. " I agree with
By
ckangis
·
#245735
·
Edited
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
A Raspberry Pi4 with a generic 10" touch panel from Sunfounder can be made to do anything with basic Python programming and a Tkinter GUI. Any hardware IO device you could ever need can be bought from
By
bryanga@...
·
#245734
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
?Pro Control products are sold and serviced exclusively by a network of qualified dealers.¡° AFAIK, the programming software is dealers-only, same as the others. I know that many dealers give away
By
Thorsten K?hler
·
#245733
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
I¡¯d recommend ProControl. ?It¡¯s made by RTI, but it has the volume and channel buttons on the proper sides. It can be purchased through almost any distribution. It offers IP for iOS apps and RF
By
Brian Matson
·
#245732
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
I set up a system with a ML-600 for my parents probably 10 years ago now. The original remote failed after a while, so we found one on ebay. Other than that, the system works great for their simple
By
Geoffrey Reynolds
·
#245731
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
A solution that pretty much only works with smartphones or iOS/Android tablets for the user interface isn't a good solution, IMHO. Dedicated remotes with buttons are needed in many cases. Will Home
By
Geoffrey Reynolds
·
#245730
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
Being a dinosaur I still use an ML-600 for my main TV room.? It is just so frigging reliable I've never found the headaches with Crestron's newer remotes worth the effort to migrate to a new
By
jbasen
·
#245729
·
|
Re: Big Ass Fan integration
Thanks Tony. I don't see a reason that the Hubitat-Crestron code I've written shouldn't work with a Big Ass Fan as long as there is a properly written Hubitat driver for the Big Ass Fan.? I use the
By
jbasen
·
#245728
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
An HR-310 or HR-150 would be a lot easier to use than a TSR-310, especially for older users. It would also be lower cost.
By
Tony Golden
·
#245727
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
If a touchscreen is not required, you could go for the HR-310 which is much cheaper. And i?d also go for a used RMC3 as it was already suggested by somebody else. Cheers, Thorsten Von:
By
Thorsten K?hler
·
#245726
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
Thanks all for the quick responses. This is for older folks that would require a handheld remote over an ipad or any other flat surface interface. May just need to have them bite the bullet for a RMC4
By
Brad Wykoff
·
#245725
·
|
Re: Alternative to high-end automation
Have a look at Home Assistant, I have programmed and setup bunch of AMX systems and more recentrly Crestron ones but now I'm over with these oldies that suffer too much of their history ! I have
By
Vincen PUJOL
·
#245724
·
|