开云体育

Isn't the server socket a one-at-a-time thing though? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I believe a TCP/IP server socket with the address of 0.0.0.0 will allow any IP address to connect to it, then do what you will with clients from the other processors.

You seem to have inside information Neil, are you saying that the EISC will generate a single packet when multiple transitions occur on a single logic wave, rather than a packet for every change?

I have a client and 3 out of 4 of her Ipads are cellular capable on AT&T, and she lives in an area of terrible cell reception. The result of this, and not the best wi-fi, is that the 3 AT&T ipads do a

There is no good reason to use the old (non-packed) symbol any longer. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hmm. That sounds more efficient. When would you use one vs. the other? Is there a reason why you wouldn't want to always send multiple state changes in a single packet? Does this only come into play

Toolbox has been broken for a long time when using the System Info tool to adjust network settings on a DMPS. Try using the terminal commands and things will work way better for you.

Oh, man, that's awesome! <lincoln@...> wrote:

Well, it also doesn't help that Crestron has invalid.crestron.com actually configured to resolve -- 96.234.151.126 belongs to "CRESTRON MID-ATLANTIC, IN; 6990 COLUMBIA GATEWAY COLUMBIA MD 21046 US"

Many (most?) DNS providers no longer return a NXDOMAIN record (non-existent domain) when looking up an address that doesn't exist. They prefer to return an IP address corresponding to their

Many thanks for the replies. I just got the RS-232 module working after 3 days of head banging. The trick is: The "Login_User_Text" must be the word "user" and nothing else in the RackLink v1.2

If the customer wants SSH and won't allow Telnet, your only option for control is serial. -- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks

I have a DMPS-300 and I keep getting this error after a reboot when I'm trying to disable both the DHCP and the Private Network mode: "Timeout waiting for the device to respond to the command

SSH and Telnet are completely different protocols. SSH requires encryption which is not supported currently (Simpl# is supposed to change that but it is in beta)

it is obvious you don't know what a raspberry pi is. I would just avoid the expense and do some more research as to what the raspberry pi actually is. hint. it is a computer. From:

Was running a C40 with the ip module via Telnet (Port 23). End user wants to switch it to SSH. End user changed C40 to SSH an I changed the port value in the ip client to 22d. I am now getting a

There was a prodigy multicast symbol I used a while back for this purpose exactly. Don't know if its still around...

What are you trying to control on the Pi? It's basically a computer, you can run software on it to talk to Crestron using any protocol you want.

Not too sure. Have just being doing some research on Google, and apparently you can connect an IR receiver to it and control it with a remote? If that that is the case then it is easy, but was

Umm. That's kind of a broad question. The Pi is a piece of hardware that runs Linux or Android or whatever operating system that you can find for it. It's just as controllable as any other Linux