ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

 

I'm fairly sure they have to be set and documented by the individual app developer, and not all support this integration.

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@...> wrote:

Ok, I will bite, where in Crestron online help does it tell you what the url's are for the apps?

--- In Crestron@..., "Ted" <ted_brincka@> wrote:

How about duh, Crestron online help.

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@> wrote:

Please ignore this question... I figured it out... duh, Google :-)

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@> wrote:

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


Re: Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

innoventgroup
 

Ok, I will bite, where in Crestron online help does it tell you what the url's are for the apps?

--- In Crestron@..., "Ted" <ted_brincka@...> wrote:

How about duh, Crestron online help.

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@> wrote:

Please ignore this question... I figured it out... duh, Google :-)

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@> wrote:

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


Just Got My DMC-E Today!

ewilliams0305
 


Re: TSW series a lot to learn and ask...

Heath Volmer
 

On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:53 AM, jbudz1977 <jbudz1977@...> wrote:

My advise with Core 3 would be to start from the groud up, instead of trying to use a complicated example to learn from.
+1


Don't try to get wrapped up in making a Core 3 panel look exactly like an existing GUI that was done for a synapse panel, I think that is where a lot of people got hung up in the beginning.
+ 50. Guilty as charged. If you can, wait for the stuff in Labs to make it out. It will be much easier to use your existing images.


Re: Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

 

How about duh, Crestron online help.

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@...> wrote:

Please ignore this question... I figured it out... duh, Google :-)

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@> wrote:

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


Re: Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

Georges Khalil
 

I will hijack your question (if you don't mind!) and would like to know if
that also works for the Android application? Has anyone tried it before? It
would be nice to be able to launch for example the Sonos application frmo
within the Crestron Mobile app.


--
Georges Khalil, M.Sc.A.

Directeur de l'ingnierie
Engineering Manager

Design Homesync Inc.
www.homesync.ca
T : 514 360-3414


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, innoventgroup <innoventgroup@...>wrote:

**


Please ignore this question... I figured it out... duh, Google :-)


--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@...>
wrote:

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would
like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP
for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

innoventgroup
 

Please ignore this question... I figured it out... duh, Google :-)

--- In Crestron@..., "innoventgroup" <innoventgroup@...> wrote:

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

I'm assuming the log entries you've included are from the Simpl+ module
'Tandberg MXP Processor v1 (cm)'.



Adding a ClearBuffer is rarely a good solution to a buffer overflow. I'd
suggest one of two things:



Make the buffer bigger. This isn't anything like a sure-fire solution, but
it's easily accomplished. This really only works when a module that will
always, eventually process (and remove) all data from its buffer is
overwhelmed with a lot of data in a very short period of time.



Make sure the module is configured in such a way that all data will always
be processed (and removed) from the buffer, regardless of the timing of its
arrival.



The Simpl+ in question appears to be written in such a way that the contents
of the buffer, assuming all data is delimited with a New Line, will
eventually be processed regardless of timing. I'm not a big fan of the
specific method used* but in and of itself, it should function as intended.
My guess, is this is one of those somewhat rare instances where making the
buffer bigger might actually pay off.



*More than a few bits of the logic inside the TandbergRx$ Change could be
rewritten to make life easier for both the programmer and the processor, but
you'd have to give up X-Gen compatibility along the way.



From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of coolaiddrinker
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:53 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Tandberg Buffer Overflow error





Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control
module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is
indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer
shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of
change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New
= 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9

just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them
with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules)
as well?

Thanks in advance.


Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

Seth Olle
 

Believe there are console commands to do that.
Of note, in theory should not see this on a 3 series processor, as its memory allocation is much better. IN THEORY

From: coolaiddrinker <coolaiddrinker@...<mailto:coolaiddrinker@...>>
Reply-To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:40 AM
To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error



It does work fine but i wanted to not have error logs bogging the processor down.
Is there a way to clear those errors in the processor at the end of the day or something?

--- In Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>, Seth Olle <seth@...> wrote:

IN reality, this is a physical issue with how the 2 series processors divide up memory.
In my experience no matter how big you make the buffers you will have the same problems.
It does seem to work fine even with the errors.

I went round and round once with this module, trying to change the buffer size, did not fix the problem.
The messages that come back from the MXP are sometimes quite large.
It should work fine however.

From: Brian Gross <brian@...<mailto:brian@...>>
Reply-To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>>>
Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:14 AM
To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>>>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error



I am curious what people have to say about this as well. With the Tandberg module, I pretty much had to remove/comment out all the Crestron written feedback portion of the module, and just write my own code for the feedback I needed.

--- In Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>, "coolaiddrinker" <coolaiddrinker@> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.


Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

It does work fine but i wanted to not have error logs bogging the processor down.
Is there a way to clear those errors in the processor at the end of the day or something?

--- In Crestron@..., Seth Olle <seth@...> wrote:

IN reality, this is a physical issue with how the 2 series processors divide up memory.
In my experience no matter how big you make the buffers you will have the same problems.
It does seem to work fine even with the errors.

I went round and round once with this module, trying to change the buffer size, did not fix the problem.
The messages that come back from the MXP are sometimes quite large.
It should work fine however.

From: Brian Gross <brian@...<mailto:brian@...>>
Reply-To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:14 AM
To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error



I am curious what people have to say about this as well. With the Tandberg module, I pretty much had to remove/comment out all the Crestron written feedback portion of the module, and just write my own code for the feedback I needed.

--- In Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>, "coolaiddrinker" <coolaiddrinker@> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.


Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

Seth Olle
 

IN reality, this is a physical issue with how the 2 series processors divide up memory.
In my experience no matter how big you make the buffers you will have the same problems.
It does seem to work fine even with the errors.

I went round and round once with this module, trying to change the buffer size, did not fix the problem.
The messages that come back from the MXP are sometimes quite large.
It should work fine however.

From: Brian Gross <brian@...<mailto:brian@...>>
Reply-To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Date: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:14 AM
To: "Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>" <Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron@...>>
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error



I am curious what people have to say about this as well. With the Tandberg module, I pretty much had to remove/comment out all the Crestron written feedback portion of the module, and just write my own code for the feedback I needed.

--- In Crestron@...<mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>, "coolaiddrinker" <coolaiddrinker@...> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.


Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender

innoventgroup
 

Does anyone know how to figure out the URL for a APP on an iPad. I would like to use the Crestron Mobile Functions Device Extender to launch an APP for the client.

Thanks,
DAVE


Re: ONVIF IP Camera Control command format help

 

ONVIF is a protocol standard. It would be more helpful to know what the
camera type is since we are more likely to have specific modules than the
generic protocol.

B

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of maheksamani
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 1:43 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] ONVIF IP Camera Control command format help


Hello All,

I was wondering if someone who had already worked with the PTZ IP Camera
with ONVIF protocol.

could you please guide me with the how to control the camera from the
touch panel.

I am Able to stream the camera feed with MJPEG. but need to control the
camera moves.

Thanks a Zillion in advance .

-Mahek


Re: door locks recommendation

 

Correct, make sure the manufacture says it has firmware revision 3 (most do). If you read the Crestron help file, it explains this.

--- In Crestron@..., "kevin" <k_krussell@...> wrote:

The Leviton Controller, that's the VRCOP you are using correct? Thinking of doing this as well!!

--- In Crestron@..., "Trey Chamrad - Hometunes" <trey@> wrote:

Ken - thank you very much!



From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of Ken Brunner
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:22 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: door locks recommendation





Yes, your issue with battery life is due to the module you are using, I am
assuming the Crestron one. It polls the locks extremely often. These locks
give unsolicited feedback after any event. If you open the module and change
the polling of the lock as I have, once every 24 hours, simply to query the
battery life, you will see the locks last 4-5 months of average use. Then
you can just invest on two sets of rechargeable batteries.

--- In Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> , "Trey
Chamrad - Hometunes" <trey@> wrote:

my latest response from Crestron rep from TB:

"Sorry for the delayed response, I was researching and getting up to date
info. The Yale lock has been Crestron Certified and the module has been
completed. See attached, these are the locks which will be Crestron
Connected. We are currently deciding the distribution channel. This will
be
announced for resale shortly � Date is TDB."

I have also used Kwikset with Leviton Zwave controller. My issue was
battery life, it would only last 10 days. the feedback could be seen every
15s, my thought was that was causing the shortened life. I RMAs the
kiwkset
lock 3 times to come to this conclusion. Other than that, the feedback,
control, integration with MC3, Mobile Pro, MTX3, MLX3 was seemless.

Please let me know if you have a hint of help on the battery life I have
experienced. the customer has decided to wait for the Vale, but I could
try
and get back over there to try something if you guys have a hint.

Thanks!
Trey

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Georges Khalil
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Re: door locks recommendation

Hasn't Yale released deadbolts that include InfinitEX? Anyone has any news
on those?


--
Georges Khalil, M.Sc.A.

Directeur de l'ingénierie
Engineering Manager

Design Homesync Inc.
www.homesync.ca
T : 514 360-3414


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Ken Brunner <kenbrunner69@>wrote:

**


Kwikset Zwave with the leviton Zwave controller has exceeded my
expectations. Long battery life, feedback including manual operation and
battery level, and easy to install.


--- In Crestron@... <mailto:Crestron%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"wes_lim88" <wes_lim88@> wrote:

what door locks do you find easy to integrate with Crestron?

i need feedback. when the door is manually locked/unlocked it shows in
the panel and the same time i can lock/unlock through crestron panel.






------------------------------------

*
****

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
*
****Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

I am curious what people have to say about this as well. With the Tandberg module, I pretty much had to remove/comment out all the Crestron written feedback portion of the module, and just write my own code for the feedback I needed.

--- In Crestron@..., "coolaiddrinker" <coolaiddrinker@...> wrote:

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.


Re: Core 3.......ya

 

The gauges have a little animation to them... Crestron calls it their "Bouncy Scrolly," trying to make things more "Apple Like."

I would also try the same example on a dedicated network, a noisy network can cause "hickups."

Jeff

--- In Crestron@..., "Sean" <seanzombie56@...> wrote:

Anyone have issues displaying an analog gauge in core 3?

Specifically the analog feedback seems to update slowly. I tested with just an analog ramp and two buttons to ramp up/down. The analog gauge ramps up and down but slowly and keeps ramping visually after I release the buttons.

Same program/ buttons/ analog ramp/ analog gauge - work fine and update correctly on a standard panel / XPanel.


Sean


Re: TSW series a lot to learn and ask...

 

I've haven't been experiencing many crashes in VTPro-e lately, working on Core 3 projects seems to be pretty stable. One thing that crashes the heck out of VTPRO-e is trying to save as to the same file name.

My advise with Core 3 would be to start from the groud up, instead of trying to use a complicated example to learn from. Once you learn your way around the property grid things become a lot easier. I'm not doing a lot of the fancy stuff, mostly just buttons, analogs and text strings, so your experience may not be as good if you are playing with Smart Objects and Smart Applications.

My customers have been really thrilled with the quality of graphics I can whip up using the built-in Core3 stuff. Don't try to get wrapped up in making a Core 3 panel look exactly like an existing GUI that was done for a synapse panel, I think that is where a lot of people got hung up in the beginning.

--- In Crestron@..., "gsusmood" <audioandnetartist@...> wrote:

Guys I might need to venture into this series, but as we all know their C3 only. I just created a test project, (i dont have a unit with me). and downloaded the Conference room example. Just trying to figure out Dump stuff like background??? another thing I wonder about Radio Ra2, I use them a lot and I want to really understand this layout. One last thing. My Mac just crashed in one of the moment exploring the example. is this a sign of whats ahead to me? LOL happy Friday I Guess!


Tandberg Buffer Overflow error

 

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get buffer overflow issues from Tandberg MXP Full Control module (crestron written). I opened the module to see where the issue is indicated, I can see they have put remove command so technically the buffer shouldn't overflow. Should I just put a clearbuffer command at the end of change event to rid me of this issue.

here is what i am receiving in the error logs

ystem log:

1. Notice: CIP device 12: back ONLINE
TimeStamp: 20:23:56 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:01:08.15 Task: UDP_Serv
2. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1007, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.36 Task: EvD0004
3. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1021, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.39 Task: EvD0004
4. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1022, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.41 Task: EvD0004
5. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1011, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.43 Task: EvD0004
6. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.44 Task: EvD0004
7. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1013, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.46 Task: EvD0004
8. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1002, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.48 Task: EvD0004
9. Error: Overflow on Buffer Input __TANDBERGRX$ on Module: S-3.3:S-32. New = 1024, Max = 1000
TimeStamp: 20:28:35 3-20-13 UpTime: 0 days 00:05:48.58 Task: EvD0004
Total Errors Logged = 9


just for curiosity, how do you guys fix these issues as i experience them with clearone/Biamp(sometimes) modules and some others(all crestron modules) as well?

Thanks in advance.


Re: OT: Multi-room amplifiers

 

Sorry, I should have said... same power, features and quality as the Sonnex 24x8, but less expensive.

--- In Crestron@..., "jcdigitalmethod" <j.j.cunningham@...> wrote:


Any of the ADA ptm series amps. PTM-850 is 1 space 8 channel tank, stable down to 2 ohms if you dare.

--- In Crestron@..., "Etienne" <etienne@> wrote:

Hi,

I love using Crestron Sonnex, but for some projects it is just to expensive. The AAE's aren't bad, but sometimes they are "too light" for some projects.

What do the rest of you use if you require more power than AAE's, but at a budget? I need a unit with at least 8 zones (16 channels), full and reliable control, pre-amp and amplifier in one or separates, BUT cost less than Sonnex 24x8.

Thanks!


Re: Brand Spankin New Processor with Program Loaded - WTF?

 

Sometimes the person who check the product at crestron forgot to
reinitialize device.

{Paf}
Le 22 mars 2013 08:40, "jcdigitalmethod" <j.j.cunningham@...> a
crit :

**


Just opened a new DMPS-300-C and found a program already loaded on it.
Anyone else see this? 2nd one I've seen like this in a year. Are they
taking refurbed boards and throw them in new chassis? I thought they are
legally supposed to disclose refurbished product as "refurbished product"
not new.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]