Application Market Place.

What module are you using?
The Sony EVI-D100 worked out of the gate for me.

Typically you have to send a stop command upon button release. IIRC I found a way to do it with a logic wave pulse I’m the Cisco SX-80 module.

Hope this helps.

On Jan 8, 2021, at 9:02 AM, Dillon Costanza <dmcostanza1992@...> wrote:

?Thanks in advance

I took a look at the uploaded pdf this morning and it looks like a really good solution.? I didn't find this device during my research for the article I wrote and I don't believe that a lot of other people, even in the garage door opener industry, know about it either.? What I found was that people making 3rd party devices that integrate with LiftMaster openers were hacking a visor transmitter and soldering wires across the button contacts to integrate their devices with a Liftmaster opener.??

I personally have been using a magnetic garage door contact connected to a wireless alarm door/window sensor that has a set of contact closure inputs to provide open/close feedback of my garage overhead door.? The wireless door/window sensor connects to a non-alarm zone of my alarm panel that is integrated with my Crestrons system.? It very reliably provides open/close status of the garage overhead door without having to run an extra wire to that remote location.

Here is a teaser.? My next article is about some inexpensive, wireless IoT devices that could easily be used to both monitor a magnetic garage door sensor and trigger the lift master dry contact adapter.? There will also be a Crestron driver included with the article.? For more, you'll just have to wait until January 20th for the article :-)

Jay

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:29 AM <dan@...> wrote:

I have used this also, and it works well. I also tried the module posted by ckangis and it also works well so far.? What's missing is the status of the door or a change in the status of the doors. Right now we use magnetic contacts, but can be a pain on retro work.
Add me to the interested camp as well!

I have used this also, and it works well. I also tried the module posted by ckangis and it also works well so far.? What's missing is the status of the door or a change in the status of the doors. Right now we use magnetic contacts, but can be a pain on retro work.
Add me to the interested camp as well!

The issue is with listening on ports < 1024 (ie TCP servers).? Way back in the annals of Unix, someone decided that only root should be allowed to run services on ports < 1024 - this is what passed for a security model back when you could trust anyone who had root on any machine.? :)? Still an issue, but a little less likely to cause widespread problems since it doesn't affect TCP clients.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:53 PM Jason Mussetter <j.mussetter1@...> wrote:

It's never been a problem to do this on 3-series that I'm aware of.? Is this is a new limitation for 4-series?? How on earth would you write a S+ module to use the most common IP control port ever, TelNet port 23 if so.? There is a ton of equipment that uses port 23 for IP control.? Will any module or program that needs to communicate to ports under 1024 not compile on 4-series?
--
Jason Mussetter

Control Systems Designer

Mussetter Programming Services

It's never been a problem to do this on 3-series that I'm aware of.? Is this is a new limitation for 4-series?? How on earth would you write a S+ module to use the most common IP control port ever, TelNet port 23 if so.? There is a ton of equipment that uses port 23 for IP control.? Will any module or program that needs to communicate to ports under 1024 not compile on 4-series?
--
Jason Mussetter

Control Systems Designer

Mussetter Programming Services