Re: Sure this was asked before
Well, it also doesn't help that Crestron has invalid.crestron.com actually configured to resolve -- 96.234.151.126 belongs to "CRESTRON MID-ATLANTIC, IN; 6990 COLUMBIA GATEWAY COLUMBIA MD 21046 US"
By
Lincoln King-Cliby
·
#179634
·
|
Re: Sure this was asked before
Many (most?) DNS providers no longer return a NXDOMAIN record (non-existent domain) when looking up an address that doesn't exist. They prefer to return an IP address corresponding to their
By
Kool-Aid Drinker <herald@...>
·
#179633
·
|
Re: Help for the Middle Atlantic Racklink SW215
Many thanks for the replies. I just got the RS-232 module working after 3 days of head banging. The trick is: The "Login_User_Text" must be the word "user" and nothing else in the RackLink v1.2
By
David George
·
#179632
·
|
Re: Cisco C40 via SSH
If the customer wants SSH and won't allow Telnet, your only option for control is serial. -- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver) ControlWorks
By
Lincoln King-Cliby
·
#179630
·
|
DMPS Disabling DHCP and Private Network Mode
I have a DMPS-300 and I keep getting this error after a reboot when I'm trying to disable both the DHCP and the Private Network mode: "Timeout waiting for the device to respond to the command
By
rbutram
·
#179631
·
|
Re: Cisco C40 via SSH (Secure Shell)
SSH and Telnet are completely different protocols. SSH requires encryption which is not supported currently (Simpl# is supposed to change that but it is in beta)
By
nathan_hesson
·
#179629
·
|
Re: Raspberry Pi
it is obvious you don't know what a raspberry pi is. I would just avoid the expense and do some more research as to what the raspberry pi actually is. hint. it is a computer. From:
By
Tres <tres@...>
·
#179628
·
|
Cisco C40 via SSH
Was running a C40 with the ip module via Telnet (Port 23). End user wants to switch it to SSH. End user changed C40 to SSH an I changed the port value in the ip client to 22d. I am now getting a
By
Mark Chytka <mchytka@...>
·
#179627
·
|
Re: "Many to one" EISC
There was a prodigy multicast symbol I used a while back for this purpose exactly. Don't know if its still around...
By
Neil Dorin
·
#179626
·
|
Re: Raspberry Pi
What are you trying to control on the Pi? It's basically a computer, you can run software on it to talk to Crestron using any protocol you want.
By
Jeremy Weatherford
·
#179625
·
|
Re: Raspberry Pi
Not too sure. Have just being doing some research on Google, and apparently you can connect an IR receiver to it and control it with a remote? If that that is the case then it is easy, but was
By
micky3corks <micky3corks@...>
·
#179624
·
|
Re: Raspberry Pi
Umm. That's kind of a broad question. The Pi is a piece of hardware that runs Linux or Android or whatever operating system that you can find for it. It's just as controllable as any other Linux
By
kaybee302
·
#179623
·
|
Raspberry Pi
Hi Guys, New to the group so bare with me if this topic has already been covered... I would like to purchase a couple of Raspbeery Pi units, but was wondering if there was a control module available
By
micky3corks <micky3corks@...>
·
#179622
·
|
Re: Rollback to pre 4.007
Answer ID: 1402
By
kenbrunner69
·
#179620
·
|
Re: EISC (Packed)?
The regular one sends an ip packet for each join, the packed version will send multiple joins in one ip packet.
By
akaweed
·
#179621
·
|
Re: "Many to one" EISC
I've done this with UDP sockets in SIMPL+. As I remember, I had to use a temp string that was defined as ASCII because otherwise it was inserting \x00 between each byte at the receiving end. Mark
By
delcrestron
·
#179619
·
|
EISC (Packed)?
What is the difference between the regular EISC and the "packed" version? The help file for the "packed" version simply takes you to the regular EISC definition, and there is no mention of the
By
floyd1212
·
#179618
·
|
"Many to one" EISC
Is there a way to do something like a many-to-one EISC? Several different processors could all monitor/control the status of one EISC (or similar) on another processor. Seems stupid to define many
By
Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...>
·
#179617
·
|
Re: Help for the Middle Atlantic Racklink SW215
127.0.0.1 is a loopback address only used by IPID entries for other Crestron slave devices within a processor's IP table (touchpanels, IDOCs, etc.)
By
Neil Dorin
·
#179616
·
|
Re: Help for the Middle Atlantic Racklink SW215
The IPID entry for the TCP client in the processor needs to be the IP Address of the device you're trying to control
By
Neil Dorin
·
#179615
·
|