开云体育

-------- Original message --------
From: Andre Bouchard <alexanbo@...>
Date:
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Clearing 3-series processor

Initialize clears all but wipes out anything else you might have on the processor like mobile projects etc.

--- In Crestron@..., Chen Zhihao <bobbylken@...> wrote:

Hi all,

Anybody know of a way to clearing all the 10 program and IP table of a 3-series processor instead of doing it one by one in toolbox?

Thank you all.

cheers,
Ken
听
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
Learn to focus on solutions not on problems
"If you look at what you do not have in life, you don't have anything"
"If you look at what you have in life, you have everything"
*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@...> wrote:

Actually Matt, that wasn't the problem (this is my personal MacBook) but you gave me an idea. I had my network setup in Parallels to be "Shared" and saw the IP address was in the 10.x.x.x range, when my local network is 192.x.x.x. I changed the setting to "Bridged", it snagged a 192鈥� ip address and happy days.

All working now, so many thanks鈥�kind of!

Marc

On 11 May 2013, at 17:13, matt_rasmussen_2000 <mjrtoo@...> wrote:

I had that happen to me on Win7, there must have been some obscure domain security settings because when I removed my computer from my work domain, everything was fine.

Not sure if that applies to you, but worth a shot.

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@> wrote:

Is anyone having problems running Masterinstaller in Windows 8? For me it simply crashes (the usual "Crestron Masterinstaller has stopped working 鈥︹�� Check online for a solution blah blah) as soon as I try to load it and even when i try to reinstall, the installer crashes.

It was working, it is how I installed all the other programs, but no longer and I am mystified.

Any thoughts?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of Brian Gross
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 6:15 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: CHV-TSTAT force "extended" run times?

If I recall correctly, there are heating and cooling 'anticipators' in the setup screen on the tstat. Sounds like the cooling one may be set a bit too aggressively.

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> wrote:

So my house has started running "cool" cycles for the year and I'm noticing that the cycle times seem much shorter and more frequently than prior years and actually if I look at the temps the temp is 1-2 degrees above the setpoint within a few seconds of the cool cycle ending. (I can't say I've ever noticed that before - but cycle times haven't bothered me before either)

The TSTAT is admittedly not in a great place -- it's where the HVAC contractor/prior owner put the old school Honeywell stat - but since all of the other walls on this floor are either exterior, a common wall with my next door neighbor, or have a fireplace/plasma on them I can't really do much better. (Also: Whomever designed the HVAC system was, IMO, smoking crack - there's only one return in the house and it's on the first floor of a 3-story townhome)

Is there any way to force the TSTAT to make the cool call longer / reduce the number of cycles? I'd much rather a longer cool cycle and have it overshoot the setpoint by a degree or five than have it firing every 10 minutes or so.

Or am I barking up the wrong tree in the first place?

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
Crestron Services Provider




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

On 8 May 2013, at 20:49, "Nick Mitchell" <nick@...<mailto:nick@...>> wrote:

Just add power.com<>

Sent from my eMail.

On May 8, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Etienne <etienne@...<mailto:etienne@...>> wrote:



What are the alternative to Crestron for full HD distribution, when the
budget is tight?

4x4, 8x8 or 16x16

tx








------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@...> wrote:

Is anyone having problems running Masterinstaller in Windows 8? For me it simply crashes (the usual "Crestron Masterinstaller has stopped working 鈥︹�� Check online for a solution blah blah) as soon as I try to load it and even when i try to reinstall, the installer crashes.

It was working, it is how I installed all the other programs, but no longer and I am mystified.

Any thoughts?

--- In Crestron@..., "eagrubbs" <eagrubbs@...> wrote:

Aren't you still limited to 3 or 4gb of ram with XP? I can't remember what the limit was.

You can also disable all the xtras of win7 and get it a little faster. But if you have a new laptop and plenty of cpu and ram you should not have any problems. I have come to really like win7 pro.

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@> wrote:

I don't know that I've heard an "official" answer -- and in all likelihood it will continue to work even after support is ended -- but unless they've changed the requirements for Studio are W7 64-bit so while current tools are XP OK, the new tools -- if they're ever ready for prime time -- will not be supported on XP.

That said, I'm running XP on my work desktop (and personal laptop and personal desktop) & W7 Pro on my work laptop -- the work laptop is only slightly newer than the work desktop and it feels so much faster and more usable than the desktop. [and I find myself trying to do the WinKey+Left and WinKey+Right shortcuts on XP far too often] -- so it might be worth digging into your configuration and looking or any differences that may be contributing to your "slowness"

Lincoln


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of xymox1357
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:34 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Win XP support

Is there any official Crestron statement on how much longer it will support XP ?

I want to know when some Crestron tool will not work on XP.

I prefer XP over Win 7. I have both installed on 2 separate SSD's on my laptop and XP is just faster for everything i do. Im thinking about buying a Win XP Pro 64 full install disc before they go away and I want to determine how much longer I will be able to use XP with Crestron.



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., Chris Niles <chris.niles.crestron@...> wrote:

I tried going the WinXP 64-bit route. I couldn't find drivers for most of
my hardware.

Just a heads up to find the drivers BEFORE you reboot with the install disc.

Chris
On May 11, 2013 12:34 AM, "xymox1357" <public2@...> wrote:

**


Is there any official Crestron statement on how much longer it will
support XP ?

I want to know when some Crestron tool will not work on XP.

I prefer XP over Win 7. I have both installed on 2 separate SSD's on my
laptop and XP is just faster for everything i do. Im thinking about buying
a Win XP Pro 64 full install disc before they go away and I want to
determine how much longer I will be able to use XP with Crestron.

--- In Crestron@..., "xymox1357" <public2@...> wrote:

You know what would be really cool. If Crestron supported some version of *nix. Thats a class of stunningly stable OS'. But that will never happen.

While I hate Apple, you Applers should be using XP for your VM as it will produce a faster more stable environment.

I would be happy with Win 7 if it was not quite noticeably slower then XP. Even simple web browsing using the same browser, on the same hardware using the same SSD model is quite a bit less responsive using Win 7. Of course win 8 is just incredibly stupid and pointless, even if its the new Windows Blue.

I love XP. It will be sad to be forced to use 7.

--- In Crestron@..., "xymox1357" <public2@...> wrote:

Is there any official Crestron statement on how much longer it will support XP ?

I want to know when some Crestron tool will not work on XP.

I prefer XP over Win 7. I have both installed on 2 separate SSD's on my laptop and XP is just faster for everything i do. Im thinking about buying a Win XP Pro 64 full install disc before they go away and I want to determine how much longer I will be able to use XP with Crestron.

--- In Crestron@..., "Gregg M" <jets_in_2003@...> wrote:

It was the Page Join Transmit.....always the little things

Thanks

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@> wrote:

And on that note, if you don't need the page join feedback you can turn off Page Join Feedback Transmission (without connecting to a panel PAGEJOINXMIT ?) -- I'd say that's certainly not helping because the processor sees it as inbound data from the panel and thus "activity"

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
V: 440.449.1100 x1107 | F: 440.449.1106 | I:
Crestron Services Provider


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of Jay Basen
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 2:27 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Activity Detection

I expect this may be due to page joins transmitting back from the touch panel to the processor.

Hope this helps

Jay

----- Original Message -----

From: "Gregg M" <jets_in_2003@>
To: Crestron@...
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:23:58 AM
Subject: [Crestron] Activity Detection





So I have a small piece of code running in my MC3 that basically says if my TPS-4L Activity Detection goes Low Set the hard button Backlight to Low and Jump to Page X. From my understanding Activity Detection is based on anything from the touch panel to the processor, not the other way around. But in my case here, when the processor triggers the page flip, it also registers that as activity, thus trigger the backlights to go high and the timer to restart.

Am I incorrect in my assumption or am I just plain doing something wrong.









------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> wrote:

I don't know that I've heard an "official" answer -- and in all likelihood it will continue to work even after support is ended -- but unless they've changed the requirements for Studio are W7 64-bit so while current tools are XP OK, the new tools -- if they're ever ready for prime time -- will not be supported on XP.

That said, I'm running XP on my work desktop (and personal laptop and personal desktop) & W7 Pro on my work laptop -- the work laptop is only slightly newer than the work desktop and it feels so much faster and more usable than the desktop. [and I find myself trying to do the WinKey+Left and WinKey+Right shortcuts on XP far too often] -- so it might be worth digging into your configuration and looking or any differences that may be contributing to your "slowness"

Lincoln


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of xymox1357
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:34 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Win XP support

Is there any official Crestron statement on how much longer it will support XP ?

I want to know when some Crestron tool will not work on XP.

I prefer XP over Win 7. I have both installed on 2 separate SSD's on my laptop and XP is just faster for everything i do. Im thinking about buying a Win XP Pro 64 full install disc before they go away and I want to determine how much longer I will be able to use XP with Crestron.



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of xymox1357
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 1:34 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Win XP support

Is there any official Crestron statement on how much longer it will support XP ?

I want to know when some Crestron tool will not work on XP.

I prefer XP over Win 7. I have both installed on 2 separate SSD's on my laptop and XP is just faster for everything i do. Im thinking about buying a Win XP Pro 64 full install disc before they go away and I want to determine how much longer I will be able to use XP with Crestron.



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., "madbanzai88" <danielteed@...> wrote:

Thanks for the replies, basically this is how a Hitachi projector returns its lamp hours, I know the lamp has currently done 974 hours.
Which in HEX is 3CE, so I want to strip out everything else and pass out 3CE to another module to convert the hex to decimal to get 974 (or whatever the hours our).

Matt you said I'm having issues because I'm starting my mid after the length of the string, how can I correct this?

--- In Crestron@..., "madbanzai88" <danielteed@> wrote:

Hi All,

I would really appreciate some help, as I can't see what I'm doing wrong.

I've got an RS232 command "&#92;x1D&#92;xCE&#92;x03" that I want to output as 03CE.

Here's what I have so far:

if (Find("&#92;x1D", FromDevice$))
{
Stored$ = FromDevice$;
Trash$ = remove("&#92;x1D", Stored$); // Stored$ = &#92;xCE&#92;x03
string1 = mid(Stored$,3,3);

output$ = string1;
}
I've done this to test, to see if I could get the middle of Stored$.
So I would expect output$ to be "E&#92;", but its coming out empty. What am I doing wrong?