Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
AXIP
#bpq32
Well i wanted add some routes to my AXIP route and the new ones do not work. Nothing shows up in my AXIP port resolver or the MHeard window. The person I am mapped to sees me in his port resolver abut that is all. I currently has three people mapped but have not been able to add anyone else so far. Any ideas?
Joey N4QMI |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe most likely is a problem with your AXIP port config. Do you get any error messages in the console window when you start BPQ?If not, if you send me the AXIP bit of your bpq2.cfg I'll check it out. 73, John On 14/07/2022 05:44, Joey N4QMI wrote:
Well i wanted add some routes to my AXIP route and the new ones do not work. Nothing shows up in my AXIP port resolver or the MHeard window. The person I am mapped to sees me in his port resolver abut that is all. I currently has three people mapped but have not been able to add anyone else so far. Any ideas? |
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:44 PM, Joey N4QMI wrote:
Well i wanted add some routes to my AXIP route and the new ones do not work. Nothing shows up in my AXIP port resolver or the MHeard window. The person I am mapped to sees me in his port resolver abut that is all. I currently has three people mapped but have not been able to add anyone else so far. Any ideas?I hope you asked permissions before adding maps to those as they must often be reciprocal for them to work. If its a bunch of copy pasted maps from somewhere this is not the way to go about linking. Feel free to drop me a line: ?password to the page is ¡°matrix¡± 73 de Red |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe resolver converts host names to pi addreses. Can be viewed in the Windows GUI or via the node command AXRaxr 1 BPQ:G8BPQ-2} AXIP Resolver info for Port 1 GM8BPQ-11? = 192.168.1.199 0 = 192.168.1.199 GM8BPQ-7?? = 192.168.1.35 10093 = 192.168.1.35 B AE5E-14??? = DXSPOTS.COM 10093 = 216.172.112.208 B C G8BPQ-9??? = 192.168.1.44 10092 = 192.168.1.44 B N9PMO-2??? = n9pmo.no-ip.org 10093 = 70.94.252.87 B N9LYA????? = w9bbs.no-ip.org 10093 = 63.142.97.107 B 73, John On 14/07/2022 10:54, Chuck Gelm wrote:
On 7/14/22 00:44, Joey N4QMI wrote: |
On 7/14/22 06:33, John G8BPQ wrote:
The resolver converts host names to pi addreses. Can be viewed in the Windows GUI or via the node command AXR 73,Super cool! Works fine in (pi)linbpq. Thanks. |
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hey John, sorry to mention that in the original message. Here is the error messages I get.. |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:18 PM, Joey N4QMI wrote:
That was the problem John, but is weird is that N5MDT doesn't use UDP before 10094 and it works.. I tried his with UDP in it and it gave an error.. But it works so problem solved! Thanks!We couldn't get the UDP working. We are connected via a TCP connection. Mark, N5MDT |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:06 AM, Joey N4QMI wrote:
Hey Red, I only tried a couple for testing purposes only and I removed them. I was able to add N3HYM with no problem but W4GON gives the error.Hi Joey No worries, yeah some nodes do autoaddmap - I have a backup node that provides that, if you¡¯d like to link up with mine I¡¯ve got all the info posted here: ?password is ¡®matrix¡¯ (without quotes). Glad to hear you got the UDP port info sorted with John, its easy to miss! 73 Red |
Joey, looks like your node table is full which may also be exacerbating the problem linking.
Recommended action is to Increase the main MINQUAL= to something around 150 to start with to take out the multi-hop nodes. You can use the MINQUAL console command to gradually back MINQUAL down to a point where you only get 200 nodes and the rest out of 500 as free slots. |
I deleted the previous message from the list as I believe the remaining link issues are from higher interval broadcasters out-competing my own thus knocking my route out of Joey¡¯s table because its full. Fixable with below: On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 01:14 PM, Red - PE1RRR - Masochistic Test Pilot wrote: Joey, looks like your node table is full which may also be exacerbating the problem linking.73¡¯²õ Red |
Joey,
You have a nodes list of >900 Remember that a sysop chooses his own alias.? With 900+ in the nodes list it is possible to have conflicts.? I'm also wondering if it is detrimental to performance. I like to have a node table that is approximately 5 * (number of forwarding partners)?? Call me crazy but just don't see any reason to have every node in the world listed in my node table. But that's just me... Mark |
You¡¯re not crazy Mark, if you¡¯re seeing > 900 nodes now that means the node limit was raised from 500 from earlier yesterday, this isn¡¯t as you might agree- the way. As mentioned MINQUAL is tweakable in realtime via the sysop terminal but it won¡¯t survive restarts so the parameter in the config file must be adjusted before each restart to save progress.
?
You can find the tuned parameters in this one, just pop your passwords back in, delete BPQNODES.dat and see how it goes.
? I have set the node parameters up to the absolute maximum a BPQ node can do, adjusting these parameters higher will make them invalid or cause a malfunction should your node ever reach maximum capacity.? ? I am running ~80+ AXIP links here, and that¡¯s not yet at maximum (128 AXIP maximum possible + up to 16 RF circuits comprised each of a pair of connections into the node). This brings the actual maximum MAXROUTES calculation to 144.? ? MAXCIRCUITS is calculated by looking at the stream capability of BPQ - it can do a max of 64 streams for applications. ? When all streams are in use, there are 128 circuits.? ? The potential maximum number of NETROM users that also create circuits is 16 (two per link, so 32 circuits). Add those together and we get 160 as the absolute MAXCIRCUITS ? Then the MAXLINKS is derived from adding the MAXCIRCUITS to the maximum possible users coming in via single AX25 connections, which is (if they¡¯re free and not used by NETROM circuits) 32. |