开云体育

Since the RM1X was mentioned, I wanted to point out the the RS7000 is basically an upgraded RM1X with sampling capabilities added. ? It’s quite a bit bigger/heavier but the RM1X often goes for a

Oops I just realized that Kaltar already mentioned the extra midi ports. It’s really cool that you can assign every individual track to a channel on either of the midi ports…both in or out… it

I am fairly certain the QY70/100 have 16 song and 8 pattern tracks where as the QY700 has 32 song and 16 pattern tracks (48 tracks total)… as well as an extra midi port (or two, I can’t

I own both 100 and 700. Mostly use the 700. the workflow on the 700 is faster. I - some extra jobs on the 100. - Some different midi FX on both. - better midi implementation on the 100 (to remotely

Gotcha... I was misunderstanding.. but I see what you mean now. By the way, the QY700 has caught my attention since this thread mentioned it are there other pros and cons to the QY700 other than

By real-time I mean to record in a loop, in any track, without stopping the playback. I can record any track on the QY members, but MUST press the stop button after each recording and that stops the

I've recorded tracks on my QY100 in realtime before... not very well I'll admit, but the Q100 definitely can record in real time. Is the QY700 unable to do this?

Then a replacement or upgrade as such, is limited in the QY category. I find the QY700 being the easiest to use in the QY family, thanks to the dedicated buttons and big screen, but the QY family

a kind of realtime loop recording in step mode. but you don't just toggle play/record without stopping. there's also a 'grid' mode, TR-ish. no it doesn't have the chord transpose. rm1x is more of a

Nice selling of the RMX1, however, you forgot to add that you loose the pattern chord track and the real-time transposition. However, the RMX1 gains (I think) real-time loop recording! (Please

you could get a RM1x for that, more or less - a different approach, same sort of XG soundset. have the QY functions on the 70/100, and a more flexible instance with the RM1x - which is a TANK of a

I disagree. You arrive faster to any function on the QY700. Portability is obviously not better.

In some ways, I’ve read, qu700 isn’t even an upgrade. Because the qy70 has more shortcut commands, it’s easier to get around on it. And also the portability factor.

Same as Eric: QY700 is the upgrade.

I might be wrong but I believe the QY300 is a downgrade because it only has General MIDI (and just 128 instruments). On the hand, the QY700 is definitely an upgrade on a number of fronts, especially

I have the opportunity to buy a QY300 for a decent price anyone think it's worth the upgrade for 200 bucks?

“some exclusions apply, see your local physicist for details” How can I argue with that! But we are old, nonetheless

kaltar wrote: “ You know “Mad World” is from 1982, ?right? ;) That’s 41 years ago! Well, while that is technically true, in reality due to theoretical time displacement (because of the the

This is apparently dependent on the MIDI. Reaper should be able to do it with relatively few hiccups. https://forum.cockos.com/showpost.php?p=2412683&postcount=34

"what free alternatives to Cubase, for dropping an SMF onto an arrange page and splitting it out onto tracks?" Cakewalk.