开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

148 ft wire testing

raimo
 

Hi All.

I made 148 feet wire test last weekend.
FC40 is abt 10 ft from ground, 119 wire first straight up 20 feets,
to highest point at 30 feets, after that horisontal and straight
until it ends at 20 ft height. Radio FT897 and FC40.
Just fast test: tune or not..

1810 to 2000 kHz: Tuned
3500 to 3740 kHz: No Tune
3745 to 3800 kHz: Tuned
7000 to 7200 kHz: Tuned
10100 to 10150 kHz: Tuned
14000 to 14350 kHz: No Tune
18068 to 18168 kHz: Tuned
21000 to 21450 kHz: Tuned
24890 to 24990 kHz: Tuned
28000 to 29700 kHz: Tuned
50000 to 52000 kHz: Tuned


73s es gl de rami, oh6bi


119 ft Wire testing

raimo
 

Hi All.

I did some testings with 119 foot wire at cottage.
Radio: FT897, Ant Tuner: FC40, end fed tuner.
Ground: one 20m long 16sqmm copper loop buried in ground 2 feets,
two 10 ft copper/steel ground rods. Distance between each
ground component abt 15 feets. all connected together with 25sqmm
copper and to electrical ground. Soil conductivity not known.

FC40 is abt 10 ft from ground, 119 wire first straight up 20 feets,
to highest point at 30 feets, after that horisontal and straight
until it ends at 20 ft height.

I didnt do impedance measuring, forgot Analyser at home...
Just trying to tune with FC40.

1815 kHz to 1999 kHz: perfect tuning.
3500 kHz to 3800 kHz: no tune
7000 kHz to 7150 kHz: no tune
7151 kHz to 7200 kHz: tuned (not perfect)
10100 kHz to 10149 kHz: tuned
14000 kHz to 14350 kHz: tuned
18100 kHz : band was not tested
2100 kHz to 21450 kHz: not good, some frgs tuned
24900 kHz : band was not tested
28000 kHz to 28600 kHz: perfect tuning, I didnt test higher.

Next weekend maybe trying 148 feets.

73s es gl dx de rami, oh6bi


added some files

raimo
 

Hi All.

I did excel stuff for wirelengths.
feets and meters.xls
and printed out 119ft and 148ft results as pdf.
They are in files section.


Re: VE3EED's intresting Link

raimo
 

In earlier message data didnt look nice,
I made another more clear list..

73s de rami, oh6bi


ft m
29 > 8,85
35,5 > 10,83
41 > 12,51
58 > 17,69
71 > 21,66
84 > 25,62
107 > 32,64
119 > 36,30
148 > 45,14
203 > 61,92
347 > 105,84
407 > 124,14
423 > 129,02


VE3EED's intresting Link

raimo
 

Hi All.
I got intresting link from other Yahoo group

(()
( there is good info abt MagLoops, even some my loop photos))
Try the Group, I like it..



VE3EED has done some maths for endfed wires. List of useful lengths.

I copied result to excel and converted feets to meters :

ft m
29 8,85
35,5 10,83
41 12,51
58 17,69
71 21,66
84 25,62
107 32,64
119 36,30
148 45,14
203 61,92
347 105,84
407 124,14
423 129,02

Goeing to test at least one of these with FT897/FC40.
At the moment I dont have good wire for 160m ,
thinking to test 107 or 119 at cottage next weekend.

73s es GL de rami, oh6bi


Re: AH3 vs FC40

 


? ... use 3.5" to 4" copper foil or strip to connect those elements 1" too skinny. If you can pass the copper around the boat under the cabinetry that would work as well. Some boats have an aluminum toe rail or hull to deck join. If you connect those to the counterpoise with some foil they work great. External copper plate is not as effective as interior foil distribution and subject to corrosion. Some boats expoxied or painted vinylester resin under and over the foil to protect it against physical and corrosive damage.

You might also pass the foil from your keel/engine block to a through hull fitting. That will better help connect you with the sea. But there should be no other reason the FC40 does a bad tune to any Freq the 857D can tune to. Note if your cabin lights and engine alarms come on while you transmist your connection to and your counterpoise is inadequate. Start transmitting at low power and work up. Don't start right out at 100W until you know the FC40 is happy.

Happy sailing!!
JD


--- On Mon, 9/21/09, GUILLOT JC wrote:

From: GUILLOT JC
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Re: AH3 vs FC40
To: YaesuTuner@...
Received: Monday, September 21, 2009, 1:21 PM

?

My backstay is 13.7 meter long which puts limits to my isolated backstay, I thought to 12.5 meter as the 20 meter band will be my favourite band (mostly digital traffic with Pactor modem but also SSB operation on various sailors Pacific nets).
As counterpoise I plan to link my keel and diesel engine by wide (around 1 inch wide) flat copper ribbon to the FT897D tranceiver and the FC40 ATU. The keel is about 1.85 meter deep, made of steel covered by epoxy and weights about 1 300 kilograms, between 2 and 3 square meter area. I think this should work well by capacitive effect with the surrounding salt water, for the moment I do not intend to have a grounding brass plate outside but I can change my mind.
Any comments will be appreciated.
73s to all.
FK8IH

--- In YaesuTuner@yahoogro ups.com, JD Baillie wrote:
>
> On my sailboat I have no idea what lenth the backstay was. Where I found a point that the system wouldn't tune I felt the problem was inadequate counterpoise inside the boat. Upgrading the counterpoise solved all tuning problems.
>
> What do you plan to use for a counterpoise?
>
> JD




Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer? 8. Optimized for Yahoo!


Re: AH3 vs FC40

GUILLOT JC
 

My backstay is 13.7 meter long which puts limits to my isolated backstay, I thought to 12.5 meter as the 20 meter band will be my favourite band (mostly digital traffic with Pactor modem but also SSB operation on various sailors Pacific nets).
As counterpoise I plan to link my keel and diesel engine by wide (around 1 inch wide) flat copper ribbon to the FT897D tranceiver and the FC40 ATU. The keel is about 1.85 meter deep, made of steel covered by epoxy and weights about 1 300 kilograms, between 2 and 3 square meter area. I think this should work well by capacitive effect with the surrounding salt water, for the moment I do not intend to have a grounding brass plate outside but I can change my mind.
Any comments will be appreciated.
73s to all.
FK8IH

--- In YaesuTuner@..., JD Baillie <tisvcs@...> wrote:

On my sailboat I have no idea what lenth the backstay was. Where I found a point that the system wouldn't tune I felt the problem was inadequate counterpoise inside the boat. Upgrading the counterpoise solved all tuning problems.

What do you plan to use for a counterpoise?

JD


Re: AH3 vs FC40

 

On my sailboat I have no idea what lenth the backstay was. Where I found a point that the system wouldn't tune I felt the problem was inadequate counterpoise inside the boat. Upgrading the counterpoise solved all tuning problems.

What do you plan to use for a counterpoise?

JD


--- On Sun, 9/20/09, GUILLOT JC <jcjglt@...> wrote:

From: GUILLOT JC
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Re: AH3 vs FC40
To: YaesuTuner@...
Received: Sunday, September 20, 2009, 9:15 PM

?

Thanks for your interesting post. I want to use my FT897D with a FC40 on board my sailboat and I read many proposals for the "good length" of the isolated backstay, I had thought to 12.5m but as you say it does not work I shall keep your suggested 9.6m length BUT what do you call a 0.4m pigtail ? Could you explain lease, I would like to have the system working well on all HF bands.
73s and best regards from FK8IH

> The wire antenna is 9.60m long, and tunes all freq but only upper
> part of 80m. To make it tune 80m I have to add a 0.4m pigtail to the
> antenna connection of the tuner, parallel to the antenna wire.



Instant message from any web browser! Try the new


Re: AH3 vs FC40

GUILLOT JC
 

Thanks for your interesting post. I want to use my FT897D with a FC40 on board my sailboat and I read many proposals for the "good length" of the isolated backstay, I had thought to 12.5m but as you say it does not work I shall keep your suggested 9.6m length BUT what do you call a 0.4m pigtail ? Could you explain lease, I would like to have the system working well on all HF bands.
73s and best regards from FK8IH

The wire antenna is 9.60m long, and tunes all freq but only upper
part of 80m. To make it tune 80m I have to add a 0.4m pigtail to the
antenna connection of the tuner, parallel to the antenna wire.


New file uploaded to YaesuTuner

 

Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the YaesuTuner
group.

File : /FC40 and 3 Wires.xls
Uploaded by : oh6bi <oh6bi@...>
Description : Testing some wires and FC40

You can access this file at the URL:


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


Regards,

oh6bi <oh6bi@...>


Some Testing

oh6bi
 

Hi All !

I have used lot of time with Magnet Loops,
But now time to End Feds with FC40.
I did some tests with different wire lengths.
15m , 11.5m and 8m long.
I was very surprised for 15m long wire results.
I uploaded file FC40 and 3 Wires to files section.
Comments ?

73s de rami, oh6bi


Control Cable

wb0m
 

Anyone have an extra FC-40 control cable they would sell?
Tnx,

Jeff/wb0m


Shunt Coil

Damon Wascom
 

Should I install a shunt coil onto a 102" whip feed point? (This would be between the whip base and FC-40.)
73, Damon


Re: extending tuner control cables

 

开云体育

To remote my FC-40 I use Ethernet cables with DIN to RJ adapters. I bought the male and female DIN connectors with short pigtails from W4RT and the Ethernet cables and connectors from Home Depot. The RJ connectors come in a small plastic box for surface mounting on a wall, like the old wired phone jacks. I just ran the DIN connector wires to the screw terminals in the RJ connector boxes.

?

I have used two 100’ cables with a double female RJ connector between them and it worked great at 200’ total length. Just watch out for all the swapping of wires in Ethernet cables – it’s been too long since I built mine and I don’t remember if the wires cross.

?

?

73,

?

Charles

WA5VHU / YI9VHU

?

?


From: YaesuTuner@... [mailto:YaesuTuner@...] On Behalf Of w8ob
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 9:58 AM
To: YaesuTuner@...
Subject: [YaesuTuner] extending tuner control cables

?




I want to purchase a fc40 but need to locate it 30-40 feet away from the shack outside. What are you guys using to extend the 15 meter long cables?


extending tuner control cables

w8ob
 

I want to purchase a fc40 but need to locate it 30-40 feet away from the shack outside. What are you guys using to extend the 15 meter long cables?


Re: Alternatives to the FC-40

 

开云体育

i have a fc1000 ... it is almost like the fc40 .... i had some spare room in it to put a 1:4 balun in
now i have a ladderline output on it (switchable)
it tunes dipoles and loops very easy
just my 2 cents
dg9bfc
sigi
?

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 4:39 AM
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Re: Alternatives to the FC-40

I agree with this. I've got an FC-40 and it will tune a loop just fine. Actually, when I tested it, it tuned a full wave 80 meter loop on all bands 80 and above.

WN9E

--- In YaesuTuner@yahoogroups.com, "w6gq@..." wrote:
>
> The FC-40 will tune a loop, I made a 160 meter loop for field day and it worked just fine
>
>
> --- In YaesuTuner@yahoogroups.com, raimo ilkka wrote:
> >
> > How you can be sure that FC40 does not tune loops ?
> > Is there something different than Icom products like
> > AH4 , AH3 etc. They can tune loops very well.
> > I have AH3 and FC40, I have done some loop testings with AH3,
> > not yet with FC40. Goeing to do that.
> >
> > 73s de rami, oh6bi
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 10/12/08, Zack wrote:
> >
> > > From: Zack
> > > Subject: [YaesuTuner] Alternatives to the FC-40
> > > To: YaesuTuner@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008, 7:51 PM
> > > There are alternatives to the FC-40 tuner. I have a huge
> > > loop with an
> > > apex around 75 feet up in a tree. My SG-239 will tune all
> > > frequencies
> > > from 160-10 meters. It has operated flawlessly at my QTH
> > > with temps
> > > ranging from 10F-95F. The SG-239 is mounted about 75 feet
> > > from my rig
> > > and is fed with Davis Buryflex coax.
> > >
> > > You may want to take a look at the SG-239 from SGC.
> > >
> > > Lets look at a few reasons why you may want one.
> > >
> > > 1 It will tune a long wire with radials and loops. The
> > > FC-40 will not
> > > tune a loop.
> > >
> > > 2 The SG-239 does not need a control line for the rig but
> > > the FC-40
> > > does. This makes installation much easier. I bought some
> > > buryable
> > > wire for 120 volts (but carries 12v for the tuner) and ran
> > > it out to
> > > my tuner which is in a waterproof electrical box that I got
> > > on ebay
> > > for $15.00. SGC makes a device that lets you run DC over
> > > the coax
> > > going to the tuner. It costs $160 so that is why I went
> > > with the
> > > buryable wire for DC.
> > >
> > > 2 It costs $195.99 from AES and the FC-40 costs $250.00.
> > >
> > > 4 The only disadvantages to the SG-239 is that it needs to
> > > be put in
> > > a waterproof box. And it will not tune 6 meters.
> > >
> > > 5 It will handle 80 watts for 100% duty cycle (CW &
> > > RTTY) but the FC-
> > > 40 will do 100. Not really a very big difference for the
> > > guy at the
> > > other end of you signal.
> > >
> > >
> > > For a real sweet antenna you could install one of these and
> > > put the
> > > SG-239 at the base of it and get coverage from 160-10
> > > meters.
> > >
> > > My bet is that it would outperform any vertical from GAP,
> > > Cushcraft
> > > or the like. Having a tuner at the base of the antenna
> > > makes it a lot
> > > more efficient.
> > >
> > > BTW, there is a Yahoo group devoted to the line of SGC
> > > tuners. I have
> > > photos there of an SG-237 installation but it now has a
> > > SG-239 in it.
> > > > > >
> > > Zack
> > > N8FNR
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > > Here are the SG-239 specs.
> > >
> > > HF Frequency Range: 1.8-30 MHz
> > > Power Input Range: 1.5-200 watts (PEP)
> > > Or CW duty cycle 40%
> > > Number of channels: unlimited
> > > Revolving memory bins: 165 TX; 5 RX
> > > Input Impedance Range: .2-5000 ohms
> > > VSWR: (Typical) Typically less than 2:1
> > > DC Input Requirement: +13.8 VDC (nominal)
> > > DC Operating Range: +10 to 18.5 VDC
> > > Input Current: Average: 230 milliamps
> > > Random set time: Typical: less than 2 seconds
> > > Recurrent set time: Typical: less than 10 milliseconds
> > > Antenna Length: Minimum length of 9 ft. - 7 to 30 MHz
> > > Minimum length of 40 ft.-3 to 30 MHz
> > > Minimum length of 100 ft. - 1.8-30 MHz
> > > Installation: Any position
> > > Operating Temperature: -35° to +70°C
> > > Size: 7.5"L x 6"W x 1.85"H
> > > (19cm x 15cm x 4.5cm)
> > > Weight: 2 pounds
> > > Case Construction: Irradiated aluminum case
> > > Control Cable Standard coaxial and 2 wires for DC plus 2
> > > (not supplied) wires for optional SmartLock gauge 14-18
> > > Antenna types: 1. Whip
> > > 2. Backstay (marine, sail)
> > > 3. Dipole centerfed
> > > 4. Dipole with feedline
> > > 5. Loop (small) 2x2 multi turn
> > > 6. Loop (large) 10 ft. and up single turn
> > > 7. Longwire
> > > 8. Ladder feed
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: Alternatives to the FC-40

 

I agree with this. I've got an FC-40 and it will tune a loop just fine. Actually, when I tested it, it tuned a full wave 80 meter loop on all bands 80 and above.

WN9E

--- In YaesuTuner@..., "w6gq@..." <w6gq@...> wrote:

The FC-40 will tune a loop, I made a 160 meter loop for field day and it worked just fine


--- In YaesuTuner@..., raimo ilkka <oh6bi@> wrote:

How you can be sure that FC40 does not tune loops ?
Is there something different than Icom products like
AH4 , AH3 etc. They can tune loops very well.
I have AH3 and FC40, I have done some loop testings with AH3,
not yet with FC40. Goeing to do that.

73s de rami, oh6bi


--- On Wed, 10/12/08, Zack <vtnn43e@> wrote:

From: Zack <vtnn43e@>
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Alternatives to the FC-40
To: YaesuTuner@...
Date: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008, 7:51 PM
There are alternatives to the FC-40 tuner. I have a huge
loop with an
apex around 75 feet up in a tree. My SG-239 will tune all
frequencies
from 160-10 meters. It has operated flawlessly at my QTH
with temps
ranging from 10F-95F. The SG-239 is mounted about 75 feet
from my rig
and is fed with Davis Buryflex coax.

You may want to take a look at the SG-239 from SGC.

Lets look at a few reasons why you may want one.

1 It will tune a long wire with radials and loops. The
FC-40 will not
tune a loop.

2 The SG-239 does not need a control line for the rig but
the FC-40
does. This makes installation much easier. I bought some
buryable
wire for 120 volts (but carries 12v for the tuner) and ran
it out to
my tuner which is in a waterproof electrical box that I got
on ebay
for $15.00. SGC makes a device that lets you run DC over
the coax
going to the tuner. It costs $160 so that is why I went
with the
buryable wire for DC.

2 It costs $195.99 from AES and the FC-40 costs $250.00.

4 The only disadvantages to the SG-239 is that it needs to
be put in
a waterproof box. And it will not tune 6 meters.

5 It will handle 80 watts for 100% duty cycle (CW &
RTTY) but the FC-
40 will do 100. Not really a very big difference for the
guy at the
other end of you signal.


For a real sweet antenna you could install one of these and
put the
SG-239 at the base of it and get coverage from 160-10
meters.

My bet is that it would outperform any vertical from GAP,
Cushcraft
or the like. Having a tuner at the base of the antenna
makes it a lot
more efficient.

BTW, there is a Yahoo group devoted to the line of SGC
tuners. I have
photos there of an SG-237 installation but it now has a
SG-239 in it.
;

Zack
N8FNR


_______________________________________________________
Here are the SG-239 specs.

HF Frequency Range: 1.8-30 MHz
Power Input Range: 1.5-200 watts (PEP)
Or CW duty cycle 40%
Number of channels: unlimited
Revolving memory bins: 165 TX; 5 RX
Input Impedance Range: .2-5000 ohms
VSWR: (Typical) Typically less than 2:1
DC Input Requirement: +13.8 VDC (nominal)
DC Operating Range: +10 to 18.5 VDC
Input Current: Average: 230 milliamps
Random set time: Typical: less than 2 seconds
Recurrent set time: Typical: less than 10 milliseconds
Antenna Length: Minimum length of 9 ft. - 7 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 40 ft.-3 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 100 ft. - 1.8-30 MHz
Installation: Any position
Operating Temperature: -35° to +70°C
Size: 7.5"L x 6"W x 1.85"H
(19cm x 15cm x 4.5cm)
Weight: 2 pounds
Case Construction: Irradiated aluminum case
Control Cable Standard coaxial and 2 wires for DC plus 2
(not supplied) wires for optional SmartLock gauge 14-18
Antenna types: 1. Whip
2. Backstay (marine, sail)
3. Dipole centerfed
4. Dipole with feedline
5. Loop (small) 2x2 multi turn
6. Loop (large) 10 ft. and up single turn
7. Longwire
8. Ladder feed



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: Alternatives to the FC-40

 

The FC-40 will tune a loop, I made a 160 meter loop for field day and it worked just fine

--- In YaesuTuner@..., raimo ilkka <oh6bi@...> wrote:

How you can be sure that FC40 does not tune loops ?
Is there something different than Icom products like
AH4 , AH3 etc. They can tune loops very well.
I have AH3 and FC40, I have done some loop testings with AH3,
not yet with FC40. Goeing to do that.

73s de rami, oh6bi


--- On Wed, 10/12/08, Zack <vtnn43e@...> wrote:

From: Zack <vtnn43e@...>
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Alternatives to the FC-40
To: YaesuTuner@...
Date: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008, 7:51 PM
There are alternatives to the FC-40 tuner. I have a huge
loop with an
apex around 75 feet up in a tree. My SG-239 will tune all
frequencies
from 160-10 meters. It has operated flawlessly at my QTH
with temps
ranging from 10F-95F. The SG-239 is mounted about 75 feet
from my rig
and is fed with Davis Buryflex coax.

You may want to take a look at the SG-239 from SGC.

Lets look at a few reasons why you may want one.

1 It will tune a long wire with radials and loops. The
FC-40 will not
tune a loop.

2 The SG-239 does not need a control line for the rig but
the FC-40
does. This makes installation much easier. I bought some
buryable
wire for 120 volts (but carries 12v for the tuner) and ran
it out to
my tuner which is in a waterproof electrical box that I got
on ebay
for $15.00. SGC makes a device that lets you run DC over
the coax
going to the tuner. It costs $160 so that is why I went
with the
buryable wire for DC.

2 It costs $195.99 from AES and the FC-40 costs $250.00.

4 The only disadvantages to the SG-239 is that it needs to
be put in
a waterproof box. And it will not tune 6 meters.

5 It will handle 80 watts for 100% duty cycle (CW &
RTTY) but the FC-
40 will do 100. Not really a very big difference for the
guy at the
other end of you signal.


For a real sweet antenna you could install one of these and
put the
SG-239 at the base of it and get coverage from 160-10
meters.

My bet is that it would outperform any vertical from GAP,
Cushcraft
or the like. Having a tuner at the base of the antenna
makes it a lot
more efficient.

BTW, there is a Yahoo group devoted to the line of SGC
tuners. I have
photos there of an SG-237 installation but it now has a
SG-239 in it.
;

Zack
N8FNR


_______________________________________________________
Here are the SG-239 specs.

HF Frequency Range: 1.8-30 MHz
Power Input Range: 1.5-200 watts (PEP)
Or CW duty cycle 40%
Number of channels: unlimited
Revolving memory bins: 165 TX; 5 RX
Input Impedance Range: .2-5000 ohms
VSWR: (Typical) Typically less than 2:1
DC Input Requirement: +13.8 VDC (nominal)
DC Operating Range: +10 to 18.5 VDC
Input Current: Average: 230 milliamps
Random set time: Typical: less than 2 seconds
Recurrent set time: Typical: less than 10 milliseconds
Antenna Length: Minimum length of 9 ft. - 7 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 40 ft.-3 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 100 ft. - 1.8-30 MHz
Installation: Any position
Operating Temperature: -35° to +70°C
Size: 7.5"L x 6"W x 1.85"H
(19cm x 15cm x 4.5cm)
Weight: 2 pounds
Case Construction: Irradiated aluminum case
Control Cable Standard coaxial and 2 wires for DC plus 2
(not supplied) wires for optional SmartLock gauge 14-18
Antenna types: 1. Whip
2. Backstay (marine, sail)
3. Dipole centerfed
4. Dipole with feedline
5. Loop (small) 2x2 multi turn
6. Loop (large) 10 ft. and up single turn
7. Longwire
8. Ladder feed



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



FC40 & Ft847.......

bigbushkitty81
 

Does anyone know if a Yaesu FC40 will work with Yaesu FT 847 without a lot of rewiring?
Thanks, Jon - KA9LDS


Re: Alternatives to the FC-40

raimo ilkka
 

How you can be sure that FC40 does not tune loops ?
Is there something different than Icom products like
AH4 , AH3 etc. They can tune loops very well.
I have AH3 and FC40, I have done some loop testings with AH3,
not yet with FC40. Goeing to do that.

73s de rami, oh6bi

--- On Wed, 10/12/08, Zack <vtnn43e@...> wrote:

From: Zack <vtnn43e@...>
Subject: [YaesuTuner] Alternatives to the FC-40
To: YaesuTuner@...
Date: Wednesday, 10 December, 2008, 7:51 PM
There are alternatives to the FC-40 tuner. I have a huge
loop with an
apex around 75 feet up in a tree. My SG-239 will tune all
frequencies
from 160-10 meters. It has operated flawlessly at my QTH
with temps
ranging from 10F-95F. The SG-239 is mounted about 75 feet
from my rig
and is fed with Davis Buryflex coax.

You may want to take a look at the SG-239 from SGC.

Lets look at a few reasons why you may want one.

1 It will tune a long wire with radials and loops. The
FC-40 will not
tune a loop.

2 The SG-239 does not need a control line for the rig but
the FC-40
does. This makes installation much easier. I bought some
buryable
wire for 120 volts (but carries 12v for the tuner) and ran
it out to
my tuner which is in a waterproof electrical box that I got
on ebay
for $15.00. SGC makes a device that lets you run DC over
the coax
going to the tuner. It costs $160 so that is why I went
with the
buryable wire for DC.

2 It costs $195.99 from AES and the FC-40 costs $250.00.

4 The only disadvantages to the SG-239 is that it needs to
be put in
a waterproof box. And it will not tune 6 meters.

5 It will handle 80 watts for 100% duty cycle (CW &
RTTY) but the FC-
40 will do 100. Not really a very big difference for the
guy at the
other end of you signal.


For a real sweet antenna you could install one of these and
put the
SG-239 at the base of it and get coverage from 160-10
meters.

My bet is that it would outperform any vertical from GAP,
Cushcraft
or the like. Having a tuner at the base of the antenna
makes it a lot
more efficient.

BTW, there is a Yahoo group devoted to the line of SGC
tuners. I have
photos there of an SG-237 installation but it now has a
SG-239 in it.
;

Zack
N8FNR


_______________________________________________________
Here are the SG-239 specs.

HF Frequency Range: 1.8-30 MHz
Power Input Range: 1.5-200 watts (PEP)
Or CW duty cycle 40%
Number of channels: unlimited
Revolving memory bins: 165 TX; 5 RX
Input Impedance Range: .2-5000 ohms
VSWR: (Typical) Typically less than 2:1
DC Input Requirement: +13.8 VDC (nominal)
DC Operating Range: +10 to 18.5 VDC
Input Current: Average: 230 milliamps
Random set time: Typical: less than 2 seconds
Recurrent set time: Typical: less than 10 milliseconds
Antenna Length: Minimum length of 9 ft. - 7 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 40 ft.-3 to 30 MHz
Minimum length of 100 ft. - 1.8-30 MHz
Installation: Any position
Operating Temperature: -35° to +70°C
Size: 7.5"L x 6"W x 1.85"H
(19cm x 15cm x 4.5cm)
Weight: 2 pounds
Case Construction: Irradiated aluminum case
Control Cable Standard coaxial and 2 wires for DC plus 2
(not supplied) wires for optional SmartLock gauge 14-18
Antenna types: 1. Whip
2. Backstay (marine, sail)
3. Dipole centerfed
4. Dipole with feedline
5. Loop (small) 2x2 multi turn
6. Loop (large) 10 ft. and up single turn
7. Longwire
8. Ladder feed



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links