Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Yaesu-FT-60
- Messages
Search
|
FT-60 Commander v0.0.8 Beta Released
FT-60 Commander v0.0.8 Beta Released
-Software no longer allows entering or importing of freqs not supported in the radio. On import, invalid frequencies are displayed in an error log. -Remove Empty Rows - Useful if importing a file with invalid frequencies left some empty rows in the grid. All memories will be pushed together at the beginning. -Auto Step - Automatically selects the step, based on entered frequency -Auto Name - When entering frequencies or tags, automatically selects NAME -Open ADMS-1J RDF Files (Must Save as .60r file) -Set the grid font, colors -Column widths set by user are saved -Fixed some bugs with duplicate frequency check -Fixed bug with clock shift Get it from my page: Jim KC8UNJ |
||||
|
Re: Crossband repeat (...well operation)
Steve
Yes you say it, KT0DD had posted it, but it wsa subsequently deleted
by the reviews manager as it was not a review. It porbably should have been posted to the VHF/UHF and/or the Sat Forums. See the post here referencing page 28(?) of the instructions re: odd splits -- just save to a memory a 'very odd' split, across bands. That was the gist of Todd's message. 73 de Steve - KB1LKR --- In FT-60@..., Dan Morisseau <dpm3@m...> wrote: and could have sworn I saw some directions from a member describing howhe got his FT-60 to crossband repeat. I neglected to print out thematerial, but thought of doing so today. When I went back the message appeared tobe gone. Was I hallucinating or was it expunged for a reason beyond mythat information could they post it here or forward it to me directly?night to visit violence on those who would do us harm" |
||||
|
Re: Programming Cable Source
Phil on the Job
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIt uses the same cable as the vx-5
|
||||
|
Re: Programming Cable Source
Larry B
Hello,
You can contact RT systems and or Yaesu for the proper cable!
?
I have no affiliation with either of these manufacturers!
?
?
RT systems Part Number
RT systems ?
?
Yaesu????? ? I hope this helps ? Larry ? ?
w1ksz wrote:
__________________________________________________ |
||||
|
Re: Programming Cable Source
73 de KE2QR Fred Jacobowitz _._. _ _ ._ _.. . _._ . .._ _ _ _ _._ ._. THE MORSE CODE:When you rearrange the letters:HERE COME DOTS Instant Messenger: KE2QR -----Original Message----- |
||||
|
Re: Hole in 900Mhz
w1ksz
I don't care about Cell Phones, but I would like to monitor the
output of my 900 MHz repeater (927.1375). 73, Dick, W1KSZ --- In FT-60@..., ke2qr@a... wrote: Ah, so for the techno savy out there, lets take a break fromputting down this radio and lets come up with a strategy for plugging the hole!What are the legal issues concerning monitoring the cell frequencies.Certainly, you can't disclose to third parties, but I don't think anybody can stopyou from listening. The fathers' of the constitution may not of had this(radio) in mind but I think it is ok. |
||||
|
Re: RT Systems FT-60 Software Opinions?
Working good for me... Tech support has answered all of my questions
in a timely manner. Sure beats entering all of the data by hand. --- In FT-60@..., <mgardner@s...> wrote: Greetings,and are using RT Systems' ADMS-1J software for the FT-60.
|
||||
|
Re: Crossband repeat
At 07:31 PM 11/7/2004, Jim wrote:
Crossband repeat generally implies that the handheld will receive a signal Ahhh! This, no doubt, is what the individual posting on the e-ham web site was referring to, but characterized as "crossband repeating". What was meant, I expect, was more in the nature of "crossband operation". Mystery solved. Thanks guys. Dan - N7ZXL Cardinal Nation - N 38¡ã34'53", W 90¡ã22'32", 680' "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm" |
||||
|
Crossband repeat
Crossband repeat generally implies that the handheld will receive a signal on one band and retransmit it on another band, and vica versa. This requires a transceiver that has independent receiver/transmitter combinations. I.e. can receive two different frequencies simultaneously, as well as being able to transmit on one and receive on another. The last Yaesu handheld that I remember that could do this was the FT-51R.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Storing different frequencies for Receive and Transmit, even between bands, can be done on most handhelds. '73 de Jim N2ZZ ----- Original Message -----
From: <ke2qr@...> To: <FT-60@...> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 8:07 PM Subject: RE: [FT-60] Crossband repeat Of course it does cross band repeat. It is in the manual on page 28 but hidden under the title "Storing Independent Transmit Frequencies "Odd Splits"). It is not so odd to receive on 2 meters and transmit on 440. hi hi. 73 de KE2QR Fred Jacobowitz _._. _ _ ._ _.. . _._ . .._ _ _ _ _._ ._. THE MORSE CODE:When you rearrange the letters:HERE COME DOTS Instant Messenger: KE2QR -----Original Message----- Yahoo! Groups Links |
||||
|
Re: Crossband repeat
Yes, my mistake. The FT-60r certainly cannot act as a repeater. I misread
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the posting. Sorry for any confusion. 73 de KE2QR Fred Jacobowitz _._. _ _ ._ _.. . _._ . .._ _ _ _ _._ ._. THE MORSE CODE:When you rearrange the letters:HERE COME DOTS Instant Messenger: KE2QR -----Original Message----- |
||||
|
Re: Crossband repeat
Jim Gerke
Crossband repeat means that a signal being received on one frequency is simultaneously re-transmitted on another frequency. The FT-60 is not capable of doing that. It cannot receive while it is transmitting.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
What is described on page 28 has nothing to do with crossband repeat. The proper term for the use you mentioned would be "crossband operation" since no "repeating" is involved. 73, Jim K5QL ke2qr@... wrote: Of course it does cross band repeat. It is in the manual on page 28 but |
||||
|
Re: Crossband repeat
Of course it does cross band repeat. It is in the manual on page 28 but
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
hidden under the title "Storing Independent Transmit Frequencies "Odd Splits"). It is not so odd to receive on 2 meters and transmit on 440. hi hi. 73 de KE2QR Fred Jacobowitz _._. _ _ ._ _.. . _._ . .._ _ _ _ _._ ._. THE MORSE CODE:When you rearrange the letters:HERE COME DOTS Instant Messenger: KE2QR -----Original Message----- |
||||
|
Crossband repeat
I was nosing about the e-ham.com review section last night and
could have sworn I saw some directions from a member describing how he got his FT-60 to crossband repeat. I neglected to print out the material, but thought of doing so today. When I went back the message appeared to be gone. Was I hallucinating or was it expunged for a reason beyond my knowledge? Did anyone else see the message ... maybe it was posted elsewhere and I'm just confused as to its location. If someone has that information could they post it here or forward it to me directly? Dan - N7ZXL Cardinal Nation - N 38¡ã34'53", W 90¡ã22'32", 680' "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm" |
||||
|
Re: Hole in 900Mhz
Phil Porteus
You could also get a very old television the kind with the old dials
on them, and tune it to the upper UHF band. You are likely to hear cellular conversations on a piece of equipment that is fcc approved. --- In FT-60@..., PATRICK MASON <fcr222@y...> wrote: FRED,Government to make the privacy act law. Unfortunatley you are correct. If you build your "homebrew" and it can receive cellular, or any other transmissions protected by the Act. Yup we would be in violation. That is why it took many years for the digital scanners to become REALITY. Uniden had to prove the digital scanners did not violate theprivacy act. Patwhat you monitor to a third party. But are you telling me, that if I was an experimenter, and I built a homebrew radio that received cellular transmissions it is illegal!? I believe you, because I just read a portion of the Electronics Communications Privacy Act. dad said, "Fred, how would you like to build a crystal radio"?, and ¡.. So I guess if I don't that with my kids I better be very careful. I mean, if I wind the wrong number of turns on that toilet paper form, they may be visiting me upstate. It certainly sounds like something is wrong with that scenario. wireless privacy act to intercept (receive) any cellular transmissions analog or digital signals, period. It is also against the law to manufacturer equipment that is "easily modified" to do this as well. your radios to a third party. Certainly, you can't disclose to third parties, but I don't think anybody can stopyou from listening.Service.
|
||||
|
Re: Hole in 900Mhz
Steve
The link reference is dated 1995.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would note that the LA county law prohibing receivers from 1600 to 2500 kHz overlaps with the new FCC extention of the AM broadcast band to from 1600 to 1700 kHz (though possission of a factory equipped or equivalent aftermarket AM radio in a late model automobile isn't likely to get you into trouble I wouldn't think. Also odd is the limitation on 150-160 MHz, as this includes the 156.050 to to 161.925 MHz VHF marine radio band -- though I suppose the possision of an FCC marine VHF license would cover you is you had a marine radio in your position, much as an amateur or GMRS or other FCC license would. In general it appears they are trying to limit scanning of law enforcement frequencies. As for ME it appears they are not restricting 200-500m transmitters per se, just ones causing interference, so an unlicensed Part 15 transmitter should be legal if it didn't interfere with MF marine or AM broadcast stations. --- In FT-60@..., "g4hfq" <bob.freeth@d...> wrote:
|
||||
|
Re: RT Systems FT-60 Software Opinions?
Clint Bradford
Just FYI, RTSystems posts UPDATES to their wares for registered users....RT Systems software...now may need some tinkering-with... The update procedure is painless! It has been my experience the past decade or so that many users have...Some users clearly dislike it... problems with the "basics" when it comes to programming software - like setting up the proper COM port and resolving conflicts. This frustration leads to unwarranted negative reviews... Yes - I have had "problems" with software. And if I can reach tech support in a reasonable amount of time and get answers, then I continue to support that company. Jim's Commander series and RTSystems ADMS series are programs and programmers that I wholeheartedly support, due to their contributions to the hobby, dedication, and support policies. Clint Bradford, K6LCS |
||||
|
Re: RT Systems FT-60 Software Opinions?
For the record my ADMS software is working fine now, I can only conclude that I hit a wrong key the first time I tried to upload to the radio. I have done several subsequent uploads with no problems. By the way when I called tech support, they got back to me in less than 20 minutes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: mgardner@... Date: Thursday, November 4, 2004 10:30 pm Subject: Re: [FT-60] Re: RT Systems FT-60 Software Opinions? Thanks Clint, s1moller, and Fred for your feedback. |
James F. Boehner, MD
to navigate to use esc to dismiss