¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Chinese water filter analysis


 

OK on all. thanks

Geo

----- Original Message -----
From: taray singh via groups.io <sukhjez@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 12:01:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [XRF] Chinese water filter analysis


Geo
Will do the the bg count?
Taray




On Sunday, November 8, 2020, 12:26 AM, taray singh via groups.io <sukhjez@...> wrote:



Geo
Ignore the nov
It¡¯s?just there to organize my samples since changing settings?
nov is for November?
The one with lead water?control sample ?is?filter paper wet with clean?RO water?
Lead water is RO residue?
Am241 is for calibration check?
Taray





On Saturday, November 7, 2020, 11:37 PM, GEOelectronics@... wrote:

One more question, do you have a long time background test with no exciter or sample?

If not, please put that on your list of things to do, for same 2800 seconds or whatever long time you use.

Geo


From: "taray singh via groups.io" <sukhjez@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:51:28 AM
Subject: Re: [XRF] Chinese water filter analysis


Geo
I am not sure of the shifting downward trend.
But most of my low Z samples esp containing organics such C,H ,O or N tend to have scattering peaks at 13 ,16 ,20 and 50.
Their broad nature suggest they are Compton scattering .
Taray




On Saturday, November 7, 2020, 6:16 PM, GEOelectronics@... wrote:

Good work Taray. I was thinking the 3 large peaks were backscatter from the exciter source, but with your calibration they seem to be clearly shifted downward, do you have a theory?

Geo




From: "taray singh via groups.io" <sukhjez@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 12:07:34 AM
Subject: Re: [XRF] Chinese water filter analysis

Hi guys
Repeated this test with more sample? concentrate .
Sampling preparation is important for optimal results.
Soaking a filter paper direct works better than scanning through plastic containers.
This is not a clinical trial so issue of bias does not exist but to have an open mind.
The gains are improved this time.Further improvements via fine gain control will be attempted next time.
Slow learning curve...
Results are suggestive of lead in drinking water.
Suggestive? is good enough for affirmative action,
Don't drink stagnated water from taps.Flush before drinking,
Most of these heavy metals come from plumbing system.
Most publications on water lead? content point to near normal levels
Higher levels ones? will face hurdles before publication.
Thanks
Taray










Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.