开云体育

John, here's a working WW3 in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKfx4TTJXek

Nice photo of your machine I would like to see one of these machines running. A friend of mine has one like your but it is just the head and not the cabinet. He used to bend his own needles, he is 85y

I'm late with the welcome but here it is anyway:? Welcome! I have a total of seven W&W's including one like yours.? If I were to collect only one brand, it would be Wheeler and Wilson.? They are

Welcome to the group.? There is lots of information in the files.? If you have specific questions, please ask them. Cheryl -- http://cherylsteapots2quilting.blogspot.com/

Welcome to the group -- looks like you have some cleanup to do. :-) Keep us posted on your progress! paul finkeyholly@... wrote: =---------------------- paul fox, pgf@...

Hello! I was asked to do an introduction so here is mine. I recently purchased an early wheeler and Wilson. I was told it’s an 1872, and needs a bit of work to get it going. I joined this group to

We've gotten an 1865 #3 head that was spray-painted black.? It did not move.? I've cleaned it up as well as these old hands will allow, put it back together and it operates as it should.? Pretty

If you're not familiar with it already, ismacs website has info on W&W as well as a comprehensive SN list for singers:

Thank you again!? Will check the forums.? Since I now know that the machine is not a W&W, I'll try not to discuss it much more here.? However, as you mentioned, the W&W base is perplexing.? If

Huh.? I wonder if the parts list was put out as Singer was changing the name, because it also has "UFA" at the bottom.? Clearly, there's a crossover in name prior to any design change.? The 29s

bsiegmund01, my assumption about the UFA being a No. 29 was based on this.? I really know nothing about them.

If you'll allow me, that is not a 29.? That is a UFA, which pre-dates the 29 series.? ISMACS notes that they were produced from 1877 to 1892+.? The 29-4 started in 1896, but no real data on US or

Great find. The "cobbler" looks like it will be a fun machine to restore. I am a bit envious. [email protected]> wrote: -- Bill Wells ronone69@...

Thank you both!? It appears that the machine is 100% Singer and matches photos for Singer No. 29.? My next question is about what kind of W&W machine head would've originally been on the base.? I'm

Universal Feed Arm.? If that's what it is, it's a fabulous, bordering on rare catch!

roxy via groups.io wrote: Interesting. You might try googling for UFA (can't remember what that stands for) since it looks older tgan the 29-4, and that suggests a UFA machine. Also, you should feel

Hello, all.? I've been lurking here for a few months and have so appreciated your wealth of knowledge.? I currently have a beautiful W&W 9 in a gorgeous cabinet, a D9 machine head that was rescued

sunday, at end of a pillowcase for small friend, plastic wonder sm tied up t_read.....?? and anot_er sm suddenly as no feed.. !!! so, i'm off to WONDERFUL no 8!!!!! pillowcase is done and off to

MB, I think Miller would have referred to the 1908 Singer Bridgeport catalog which notes "corrected to Nov 23- 11"? for model information.? I recall a few W&W's from Russia that didn't fit any of

Jon, Miller and I corresponded often right up to the time he passed away. ?I miss and enjoyed his patience and subject knowledge no matter what the question was I asked him. Miller told me he could