¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

And the Bonneville America?...I think....

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: [W650riders] Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition

Didn¡¯t the Yam TDM and TRX 800¡¯s have 270 cranks?

?

?

Larry Botheras

?

Essex UK

W650 Wrench

2007 Moto Guzzi Norge

1977 KH400

1978 CD175

1994 Ural Solo

?

?

?

From: W650riders@... [mailto:W650riders@...] On Behalf Of James Franklin
Sent: 07 July 2007 14:35
To: W650riders@...
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition

?

My two stroke twins have all been 180 cranks, since a two stroke fires every
revolution, would just be two singles if they wer a 360 crank (Ossa's 500
was a 360 crank, but I never rode one of those).

Honda's CA 72/77 Dreams, and the 125/150 Benlys were 360 crank, single carb
bikes for sure, and I think that the 1968 - 1976 CB 350/360s, CB/CL
were..but I would have to look that up. I think, also from memory, that the
CB 160/175s, Twin Stars (ugh), Rebels and Nighthawk 250s were also 360
cranks.

Honda's CB 72/77 Hawk/Super Hawk were 180 cranks as were the original DOHC
CB 450s. I had a newer 450 Hawk..the 3 valve per cylinder SOHC thing, which
I think had a 360 (ugly appliance looking engine, unlike the original 450
which had one of the best looking motorcycle engines ever in my opinion).
180s for a small "revver" 4 stroke seems appropriate to me.

Yamaha's XS 650 came with a 360, but there is an an Australian made 270
crank that is getting a lot of attention on their site. Supposed to be
smoother, better power delivery..never rode one with that crank though.

James Franklin
2411 Pine Summit DR. E
Jacksonville, Florida 32211

808-225-0994 (cell)

From: "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...>
Reply-To: W650riders@...
To: <W650riders@...>
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:34:21 +0100

I like the power delivery of a 360 degree twin. Firing order is important.
The reason that Triumphs made such good dirt bikes is that the firing angle
is symmetrical...every 180 degrees. Bang chuff bang chuff and so on. Thus
you get a regular bang on every revolution, at the same place...just like a
two stroke single....

180 degree crank bikes don't have the same firing,...they're either bang
chuff, chuff bang, or bang bang chuff chuff. It feels different and not
entirely 'right' to me.

It's like the difference between a 120 degree triple and a typical four. The
Triple always has a totally different feel...somehow more appropriate to a
motorcycle...It might be something to do with the regularity of power pulses
when the bike is at the limit of traction...I don't really know, but
certainly 360 degree twin dirt bikes put power down in a very controlled
way.

Four stroke single dirt bikes are better than two stroke singles at getting
power down initially as they punch out of corners and that is entirely down
to the fact that the bikes composure has time to settle in-between pulses
and the regular rhythm of the pulses allows the rider to 'sense' the rear
tyre's behaviour . 360 twins are the same but you need long stroke lower
revving motors to ensure the pulses are far enough apart.

If they could make them light enough, I would not be surprised to see four
stroke 360 degree twins competing again in top level MX because they make
more power than a single with similar bottom end grunt.

As you say, you need to add 1000 rpm to everything...That doesn't work
'off-road' and the edge of that difference is what I sense 'on-road'.

I've no doubt your bike fuels smoothly, revs higher, makes more power and
all that, but all 180 degree motors 'feel' slightly wrong to
me...irrespective of build or brand.

Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: Dennis J. Guggemos
To: W650riders@...
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition

This I take issue with. The 650Rs power delivery is one reason I bought
it. Feels like 2 singles grunting out of a corner. Rarely do I take it to
8500 RPM (max hp). Usually it's ridden like the W, just add 1000 rpm to
everything.

You need to ride one before you flag it with the generalizations. It's
not a buzzy ER5.

Dennis

----- Original Message -----
From: Jonhaddock@...
To: W650riders@...
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: bring back the w650 to the us - Petition

In my opinion there is no comparison between the two types of layout in
'feel' terms. Having ridden the old ER5 180 twin, it's 'just' a bike.
Fairly
peppy, of course, a bit revvy, nice neutral handling and all that, but
no
magic to the power delivery or feel.

.

----------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.1/888 - Release Date:
06/07/2007 06:36

__________________________________________________________

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.