azul_elmar wrote:
--- In Abraham-Hicks@y..., "suetanida@y..." <suetanida@y...>
wrote:
I WANT to be rich. I don't care about the highest good. To me
that is the highest good. And in fact, there is no other highest
good than
what I am currently wanting. Correct????
You might be being short-sighted. I don't think "the highest good"
is a crock unless you think it is. And why would you? Because
perhaps deep down you don't think your being rich is actually in
the highest good. Correct?
i.e. You want to be rich. Would you engage in illegal behavior to
be rich? No , probably.
Would you drive 60 MPH in 55 MPH zone to get to an appointment on time?
Isn't that "illegal behavior?" Isn't it all a matter of degree? In some
states it's said to still be "illegal" to have oral sex. I'll bet we all
do something illegal every day. I recently tore mattress tags off "under
penalty of law."
Because that's limited thinking. It's saying
you have to get rich at someone else's expense.
Isn't the idea that people get rich at someone else's expense the more
limiting idea?
IOW the highest good.
How about the Enron kind of illegal behavior? i.e. the kind that
everyone applauds until it all goes horribly wrong.
To me "the highest good" is not asking permission per se, it is
asking for the farthest sight possible.
And since you can always change your vibration and tune in something
else at any time, that sorta takes the pressure off of having to get
something correct, or right, or for the highest good.
Even if we accept such a thing as "the highest good" (and I can't
imagine what that could be in a universe wherein each person is creator
of their experience) then such a highest good must be changing minute by
minute, second by second.
Rick
.
