¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

 

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 06:53 PM, Fred Schumacher wrote:


Have you disconnected the trace rotationcoil? This is causing a small magnetic
field which might produce a small shift from the center. This coil is
operating with a dc voltage of + and - 8,6 V.
There might be something wrong with this supply voltage.
Also you have to connect all vertical and horizontal plates to earth, avoiding
a static charge on those plates.
I'd be *very* surprised if the rotation coil caused this offset. Let's see!

Raymond

The voltage


Re: Tektronix AM503S AC/DC Current Probe Amplifier system

 

Mark,

You might refer to this Tek document:



Greg


Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

Chris Smith
 

Hi,

I haven¡¯t tried disconnecting the trace rotation coil yet. I will try that as well. I wouldn¡¯t expect that to cause loss of focus however. The rest of the power supply is healthy and within spec.

I haven¡¯t tried to earth the plates yet. I will try that as well. I¡¯ve done this with numerous other scopes and had nothing unstable and glitchy go on.

Best regards,

Chris

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, at 17:53, Fred Schumacher via Groups.Io wrote:
Hi Chris,
Have you disconnected the trace rotationcoil? This is causing a small magnetic field which might produce a small shift from the center. This coil is operating with a dc voltage of + and - 8,6 V.
There might be something wrong with this supply voltage.
Also you have to connect all vertical and horizontal plates to earth, avoiding a static charge on those plates.
Hope these suggestions might be useful.
Fred
On 10 mrt. 2019, at 16:49, Roger Evans via Groups.Io <very_fuzzy_logic@...> wrote:

Chris,

Has the scope functioned correctly and stably since in your possession (ie before the power supply blew)? The spot is so far off centre with no voltage on the deflection plates that it could be there is some internal damage to the CRT. If something is loose internally then the motion of the spot should correlate with moving or tapping the scope.

Roger






Re: M48Z35-70PC1 NVRAM for CSA803 & 11801 E5622 error

 

RS Components are showing 36 ex-stock at 11.99 GBP each in the UK if that's any help?

On 3/10/2019 6:31 PM, Tom Miller wrote:


These are what I use. They are due in in June.



On 3/10/2019 2:10 PM, Reginald Beardsley via Groups.Io wrote:
I have been unable to find anyone who has these in stock selling just 2.? I've checked Digikey, Mouser, Newark, Arrow, and any other places google turned up.? ST said Arrow has them, but Arrow says otherwise.

Futureelectronics.com says they have them for $13.50 each, but with a 12 piece minimum.

There are lots of them on eBay from China, some with 1999 date codes.?? And I wouldn't trust more recent date codes on anything from China.? Far too much history of remarking.

These are the cure for E5622.? Is anyone else interested in getting a pair?? If so, please contact me off list.

I'm in Arkansas so it would cost $3.50 for me to ship them priority mail.? So a fresh pair would be $30.50 shipped.? These seem to have a useful life of 5-10 years.? I had to replace NVRAM in a Sun workstation in the past.? So I'm all too familiar with these things.

Reg





Re: M48Z35-70PC1 NVRAM for CSA803 & 11801 E5622 error

 



These are what I use. They are due in in June.

On 3/10/2019 2:10 PM, Reginald Beardsley via Groups.Io wrote:
I have been unable to find anyone who has these in stock selling just 2. I've checked Digikey, Mouser, Newark, Arrow, and any other places google turned up. ST said Arrow has them, but Arrow says otherwise.

Futureelectronics.com says they have them for $13.50 each, but with a 12 piece minimum.

There are lots of them on eBay from China, some with 1999 date codes. And I wouldn't trust more recent date codes on anything from China. Far too much history of remarking.

These are the cure for E5622. Is anyone else interested in getting a pair? If so, please contact me off list.

I'm in Arkansas so it would cost $3.50 for me to ship them priority mail. So a fresh pair would be $30.50 shipped. These seem to have a useful life of 5-10 years. I had to replace NVRAM in a Sun workstation in the past. So I'm all too familiar with these things.

Reg



Re: 2467B geometry

Chuck Harris
 

On further reflection, I mistated things. The channel switch
cannot be the problem, as it has no insight into the horizontal
system... none at all.

-Chuck Harris

Chuck Harris wrote:

Hmmm?

The channel switch (MUX) is about the only part of the scope
where both the Vertical and the Horizontal signals are used
together.

However, the Horizontal position control has no part of the
channel switches operation, and yet the distortions are firmly
fixed to the position on the CRT's screen. You can move the
image frame right and left across the screen, and the distortion
still remains nailed to the graticule position of the beam.

So, no I don't think this can be anything to do with the vertical
and horizontal signal paths. It has to be a distortion within
the CRT itself.

I think it is one of the following:

1) physical abnormality inside of the CRT.
2) incorrect bias point for the quadrapole lens.
3) a stray magnetic influence.

The CRT is extremely sensitive to magnets put near the
face plate of the CRT. They can easily move the beam several
tenths of a division.

I suppose it could even be something as stupid as the current
traveling through the wires for one of the trace rotation coils.
They pass inside of the mumetal shield... though I don't think
it is really all that likely. The answer would only be a
connector pull away.

-Chuck Harris


Re: 2467B geometry

Chuck Harris
 

Hmmm?

The channel switch (MUX) is about the only part of the scope
where both the Vertical and the Horizontal signals are used
together.

However, the Horizontal position control has no part of the
channel switches operation, and yet the distortions are firmly
fixed to the position on the CRT's screen. You can move the
image frame right and left across the screen, and the distortion
still remains nailed to the graticule position of the beam.

So, no I don't think this can be anything to do with the vertical
and horizontal signal paths. It has to be a distortion within
the CRT itself.

I think it is one of the following:

1) physical abnormality inside of the CRT.
2) incorrect bias point for the quadrapole lens.
3) a stray magnetic influence.

The CRT is extremely sensitive to magnets put near the
face plate of the CRT. They can easily move the beam several
tenths of a division.

I suppose it could even be something as stupid as the current
traveling through the wires for one of the trace rotation coils.
They pass inside of the mumetal shield... though I don't think
it is really all that likely. The answer would only be a
connector pull away.

-Chuck Harris

satbeginner wrote:

Just another idea:

the vertical position is coming from the analogue multiplexers, not?

If so, can it be a drift of the output of the mux during the sweep?

So, maybe a faulty mux?

Just my two cents..

Leo




M48Z35-70PC1 NVRAM for CSA803 & 11801 E5622 error

 

I have been unable to find anyone who has these in stock selling just 2. I've checked Digikey, Mouser, Newark, Arrow, and any other places google turned up. ST said Arrow has them, but Arrow says otherwise.

Futureelectronics.com says they have them for $13.50 each, but with a 12 piece minimum.

There are lots of them on eBay from China, some with 1999 date codes. And I wouldn't trust more recent date codes on anything from China. Far too much history of remarking.

These are the cure for E5622. Is anyone else interested in getting a pair? If so, please contact me off list.

I'm in Arkansas so it would cost $3.50 for me to ship them priority mail. So a fresh pair would be $30.50 shipped. These seem to have a useful life of 5-10 years. I had to replace NVRAM in a Sun workstation in the past. So I'm all too familiar with these things.

Reg


Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

 

Hi Chris,
Have you disconnected the trace rotationcoil? This is causing a small magnetic field which might produce a small shift from the center. This coil is operating with a dc voltage of + and - 8,6 V.
There might be something wrong with this supply voltage.
Also you have to connect all vertical and horizontal plates to earth, avoiding a static charge on those plates.
Hope these suggestions might be useful.
Fred

On 10 mrt. 2019, at 16:49, Roger Evans via Groups.Io <very_fuzzy_logic@...> wrote:

Chris,

Has the scope functioned correctly and stably since in your possession (ie before the power supply blew)? The spot is so far off centre with no voltage on the deflection plates that it could be there is some internal damage to the CRT. If something is loose internally then the motion of the spot should correlate with moving or tapping the scope.

Roger



Re: 2467B geometry

 

For giggles I added a couple of photos of my 2467's geometry "problems" to
the album (/g/TekScopes/album?id=86473). Note that this
was the first (and only) time I've been through the calibration of a 2467,
so I'm by no means an expert. From the photos I uploaded, I'd say the
distortion on mine looks like vanilla pincushion distortion - it seems
likely it would be possible to do a better job, or adjust this out
altogether.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:25 AM Chuck Harris <cfharris@...> wrote:

I settled the grid issue, to my satisfaction, by hooking a
1 division square wave to the CH1, 2, and 3 inputs, turning
on the CH1-4 display, and triggering on AC mains.

I adjusted the vertical positions so that the pair of lines
visible for CH1-3 covered the lower graticule lines, and the
baseline trace covered the upper graticule line... leaving
out the top most, and the bottom most graticule lines, as
tek doesn't seem to think them relevant.

I then adjusted the time cursors to the first and last
graticule line, and the full picture of the distortion became
visible.

Lets number our horizontal graticule lines as follows:

outer most top line we ignore.
1-4 where 4 is the center line.
4-7 where 4 is again the center line.
outer most bottom line we ignore.

My CRT is almost perfect on line 1, but grows more and more
bowed to a peak at line 3, where it grows less and less
bowed to a straight line at line 5, After line 5 it starts
to bow downwards, to line 7 where it is bowed a little.

As to physical damage:

The 2467 CRT is built like a brick outhouse, except in 4 elements.

These elements are fringe shields for the vertical and horizontal
deflection plates, and are basically V shaped channels that are
positioned at the sides of each plate pair... in other words,
they cover the space between the left and right horizontal plates,
and the up and down vertical plates.

These shields are connected to anode1, and can be seen on the CRT
schematic as dashed lines.

Anyway, these are longish structure that are only fixed on one
end.

Everything else in the CRT is fused to the heavy glass rods that
define the positions and structures of the CRT.

-Chuck Harris

Harvey White wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 21:38:36 -0500, you wrote:

Two frame calibration standardizers will work, I think, certainly one
will give you horizontal lines. I seem to remember using two of them
and getting a grid. Different scan rates, though.

Harvey


Hi Rolynn,

There is no setting of the geometry that will allow
my 2467B to have a straight horizontal trace in the
center of the screen. It either bows up a little bit,
or it bows up a lot. The switch between bowing up and
bowing down is about 2 divisions from the bottom of
the CRT.



Re: 2467B geometry

 

Just another idea:

the vertical position is coming from the analogue multiplexers, not?

If so, can it be a drift of the output of the mux during the sweep?

So, maybe a faulty mux?

Just my two cents..

Leo


Re: TM5xx extenders

John Griessen
 

On 3/4/19 2:20 PM, bill K7WXW wrote:
John's version comes up as 404. Thanks, Bill
Yes, my TM500 extender kits are EOL, not being made again.

--
John Griessen -- building lab gear for biologists
Ecosensory Austin TX blog.kitmatic.com


Re: 2465B vertical lines when readout is on

 

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:23 AM Dr. Bernd Burfeindt via Groups.Io
<femtocam@...> wrote:

I did some further trouble shooting. The problem must be on the A5 board,
as I can see the same issue with the vertical artifacts when I install the
board on a different 2465b.
The A5 had some leaky capacitor which I replaced. Traces were all good.
After I realized that the problem is on the A5 I replaced some of the
smaller capacitor and resistors, as they showed some corrosion.
Unfortunately this did not fix the issue.
Does anyone has an idea what else could be wrong
There are two signals that go from the readout circuitry to the display
sequencer to enable readout, and to unblank it. The two signals are /ROA
and /ROB, you may want to look at the blanking signal in particular, I
think.


Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

Chris Smith
 

Hi,

Unfortunately I can't answer that. It was stored for a long time I suspect. It was purchased at a hamfest for 25 GBP recently. The seller assured me that it worked but I didn't believe a word of that. Nothing I've bought at a hamfest worked! :) It was powered up for about 10 minutes initially which wasn't really enough time to pick this up, then the power supply exploded.

That's an interesting theory. I couldn't correlate it to motion; I tried tapping the chassis etc. Could be thermal expansion causing it. I will pull the tube out and reseat everything and see what happens. I only tested the tube base in situ so it's possible that there's a thermal problem on the pins on the base or something. I'll do that when I get a few minutes.

Thanks for the reply :)

Best regards,

Chris

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, at 15:49, Roger Evans via Groups.Io wrote:
Chris,

Has the scope functioned correctly and stably since in your possession (ie before the power supply blew)? The spot is so far off centre with no voltage on the deflection plates that it could be there is some internal damage to the CRT. If something is loose internally then the motion of the spot should correlate with moving or tapping the scope.

Roger




Re: 2465B vertical lines when readout is on

 

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 09:23 PM, Dr. Bernd Burfeindt wrote:


Unfortunately this did not fix the issue
Have you done the 2465B CRT adjustment procedure in the service manual?

Craig


Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

 

Chris,

Has the scope functioned correctly and stably since in your possession (ie before the power supply blew)? The spot is so far off centre with no voltage on the deflection plates that it could be there is some internal damage to the CRT. If something is loose internally then the motion of the spot should correlate with moving or tapping the scope.

Roger


Re: Tektronix 2235 beam+focus instability

 

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 04:13 PM, Chris Smith wrote:


Unfortunately 100% sure this is correct.
Hi Chris,
That really is surprising! AFAIK, all electrodes left connected after disconnecting the plates are "circular symmetrical" so nothing should be able to put the spot this far off center screen. Looks like electron gun misalignment (shock/drop damage) and possibly broken/unreliable connection(s) inside CRT. OTOH, quite surprising that the 'scope functions normally otherwise.
Permanent magnetisation may explain the spot offset but I'd expect image distortion with that. And it doesn't explain the jitter. The is *no* vertical jitter, right?
Further things to check/try may be:
How does it (the CRT) react to tapping? Any microphonic effects?
You may temporarily connect horizontal and vertical plates together (two groups). Shouldn't make any difference
Is the large, mostly horizontal offset present with plates connected?
How about horizontal (and vertical) linearity and max. amplitude?

Raymond


Re: 2467B geometry

 

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 01:21:01 -0800, you wrote:

Chuck and Rolynn:
re: staircases. Easy way to do that, take a binary counter and run a
10k, 20K and 40K( 39.9K?) resistor to a summing point. Instant 8
level stairstep generator. Expand as needed. If you do that with a 4
bit counter, and use the remaining input for a signal from an 8 bit
multipexer, you have a cheap scope switch.... Digital only, unless you
use analog switches.

Harvey




TEK spec

"X-Axis Low-frequency Linearity
0.1 division or less compression or expansion of
a two-division, center-screen signal when
positioned within the graticule area.

Y-Axis Low-frequency Linearity
0.1 division or less compression or expansion of
a two-division, center-screen signal when
positioned anywhere within the graticule area."

This is really compression of the amplifiers, vs screen position, not line curvature or geometry!

two have almost perfect geometry, the is other off by ~ a dim tracewidth <<1/20 div
The 2467B with CCW GEOM trim,~ 1/20 div.
All are well within the 0.1 div TEK linearity spec.

Can any TEK CRT veterans assist?

Harvey, re frame standardizers, the 067-0587-02 would work but are TEK 7000 plugins, and cant output to an external scope:



What we need is a ROM generating staircases run scope in X-Y mode.

Pity that the TEK CAL has no dot pattern for this purpose!

Cheers,

Jon








Re: 2467B geometry

Chuck Harris
 

I settled the grid issue, to my satisfaction, by hooking a
1 division square wave to the CH1, 2, and 3 inputs, turning
on the CH1-4 display, and triggering on AC mains.

I adjusted the vertical positions so that the pair of lines
visible for CH1-3 covered the lower graticule lines, and the
baseline trace covered the upper graticule line... leaving
out the top most, and the bottom most graticule lines, as
tek doesn't seem to think them relevant.

I then adjusted the time cursors to the first and last
graticule line, and the full picture of the distortion became
visible.

Lets number our horizontal graticule lines as follows:

outer most top line we ignore.
1-4 where 4 is the center line.
4-7 where 4 is again the center line.
outer most bottom line we ignore.

My CRT is almost perfect on line 1, but grows more and more
bowed to a peak at line 3, where it grows less and less
bowed to a straight line at line 5, After line 5 it starts
to bow downwards, to line 7 where it is bowed a little.

As to physical damage:

The 2467 CRT is built like a brick outhouse, except in 4 elements.

These elements are fringe shields for the vertical and horizontal
deflection plates, and are basically V shaped channels that are
positioned at the sides of each plate pair... in other words,
they cover the space between the left and right horizontal plates,
and the up and down vertical plates.

These shields are connected to anode1, and can be seen on the CRT
schematic as dashed lines.

Anyway, these are longish structure that are only fixed on one
end.

Everything else in the CRT is fused to the heavy glass rods that
define the positions and structures of the CRT.

-Chuck Harris

Harvey White wrote:

On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 21:38:36 -0500, you wrote:

Two frame calibration standardizers will work, I think, certainly one
will give you horizontal lines. I seem to remember using two of them
and getting a grid. Different scan rates, though.

Harvey


Hi Rolynn,

There is no setting of the geometry that will allow
my 2467B to have a straight horizontal trace in the
center of the screen. It either bows up a little bit,
or it bows up a lot. The switch between bowing up and
bowing down is about 2 divisions from the bottom of
the CRT.


Re: 2467B geometry

 

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:26 PM Jean-Paul <jonpaul@...> wrote:

Geometry issue in 2467B, trimpot is fully CCW and still not perfect.

after tweaking, best results, 4 ch ON

Chuck your comments? Compared to yours?

Jon

(see new album 2467B GEOMETRY for photo)
And here's a link to the album for posterity:
/g/TekScopes/album?id=86473