Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
dhuster@... wrote:
I was in sales and not service when the TQ scopes hit the market so I was not
aware they had sockets. I just assumed (a bad thing to do) that since they
were so cheap,
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#512
·
|
Re: Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
I think you answered your own question below, but just didn't see it. :)
-- jm
By
John Miles <jmiles@...>
·
#510
·
|
Re: Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
Well, Walter, that's the nice thing about this world. Everybody's
different (especially those who think that hp made the best scopes,
although I did much prefer their 130C over the Tek 503) and
By
dhuster@...
·
#509
·
|
Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
Everybody seems to have missed the entire point of the 465M, it was
designed specifically for a MTTR of 30 minutes, and the modular
design makes that possible. The MTTR of a regular 465 is measured
By
walter2@...
·
#508
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
As much as I like sockets, I must agree with Dean. It is sure handy to be
able to remove and replace components easily, but that should be confined to
prototyping. The first Tektronix scope that I
By
Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...>
·
#507
·
|
Re: 7B70 gone bad...
John, with no manual, it's difficult. Since intermittents are a big
problem with Tek products having socketed component, the first thing
I'd do is rock every transistor around in its socket.
By
dhuster@...
·
#506
·
|
Re: T900 photo
Don, that is a T912 in the ebay photo, and it is a dual-channel,
single-timebase, bistable storage scope with a bandwidth of 10MHz.
The T921 was the least-expensive, but didn't didn't sell very
By
dhuster@...
·
#505
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I'm not sure I've figured out how to reply on this forum yet. I'd
replied previously to the #445 OP as I am now "465M Flaky vertical
height" figuring that it would end up in the queue at the end,
By
dhuster@...
·
#504
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Peter Florance wrote:
In my opinion, yes, the 465 is superior to the 465M. But that's only one
opinion . . .
Stan
w7ni@...
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#502
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
donlcramer@... wrote:
It could have been a cost issue, but it was not a "price" issue. In the 1978 Tek
catalog, for example, you see the 465 at $2295 and the 465M at $2345, or $50
MORE. In spite
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#501
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Phil (VA3UX) wrote:
By
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#500
·
|
Re: T900 photo
Don,
Thanks for the picture and descriptions. This is not the scope I used. The
one I used had the Telequipment name on it. It was horizontally layed out. The
tube was on the left, then the
By
Doug Hale <DougHale@...>
·
#499
·
|
TEK 2232, RS232 port
I have a Tek 2232 scope and am looking to add the RS232 plot output.
Tek apparently offered a field installation kit (Option F12) however
apparently neither the kits or tech support is available
By
gwerl@...
·
#498
·
|
Re: T900 photo
Hi Doug,
There is a photo of a T912 on ebay at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1622982027
The style is similar on all the T900 scopes. Blue plastic case, tube to
upper
By
donlcramer@...
·
#497
·
|
7B70 gone bad...
I've followed this group for quite a while: what an incredible wealth of knowledge the contributors have! Following this has been very educational for me.
I now have my first request for help:
By
john graves <jgraves2@...>
·
#495
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Thank you, Phil; it is only now when I saw your writing that I remembered
that 'Tecelec' was a French rep firm (represented C&K switches, among
others) while Telequipment is what I should have said.
By
Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...>
·
#494
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I always wondered what happened to Telequipment. I used a little Dual Trace Dual
Timebase Telequipment scope in college ~1975. It was a great scope. Stable, easy
to setup, and the dual/delayed
By
Doug Hale <DougHale@...>
·
#493
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
That's what I thought too. That was an informative post.
It was "Telequipment" from the UK
Kikisui ??
Phil
By
Phil (VA3UX) <phil@...>
·
#492
·
|
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I find Don's story fascinating.
To start with, until very recently I thought that 465M is a 465, in a funny
housing, but still 465. I never new that 465M traces lineage to T900. I
believe that T900
By
Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...>
·
#491
·
|
Re: CONTACT CLEANER
On the subject of cleaning labels, I found success with ski wax cleaner for
cross country skies. I use 'Swix', which is a Scandinavian brand; if anyone
used ski wax 'clister' (or however you spell the
By
Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...>
·
#490
·
|