¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
dhuster@... wrote: I was in sales and not service when the TQ scopes hit the market so I was not aware they had sockets. I just assumed (a bad thing to do) that since they were so cheap,
By Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...> · #512 ·
Re: Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
I think you answered your own question below, but just didn't see it. :) -- jm
By John Miles <jmiles@...> · #510 ·
Re: Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
Well, Walter, that's the nice thing about this world. Everybody's different (especially those who think that hp made the best scopes, although I did much prefer their 130C over the Tek 503) and
By dhuster@... · #509 ·
Different view of the 465M, etc. --where to find parts
Everybody seems to have missed the entire point of the 465M, it was designed specifically for a MTTR of 30 minutes, and the modular design makes that possible. The MTTR of a regular 465 is measured
By walter2@... · #508 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
As much as I like sockets, I must agree with Dean. It is sure handy to be able to remove and replace components easily, but that should be confined to prototyping. The first Tektronix scope that I
By Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...> · #507 ·
Re: 7B70 gone bad...
John, with no manual, it's difficult. Since intermittents are a big problem with Tek products having socketed component, the first thing I'd do is rock every transistor around in its socket.
By dhuster@... · #506 ·
Re: T900 photo
Don, that is a T912 in the ebay photo, and it is a dual-channel, single-timebase, bistable storage scope with a bandwidth of 10MHz. The T921 was the least-expensive, but didn't didn't sell very
By dhuster@... · #505 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I'm not sure I've figured out how to reply on this forum yet. I'd replied previously to the #445 OP as I am now "465M Flaky vertical height" figuring that it would end up in the queue at the end,
By dhuster@... · #504 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Peter Florance wrote: In my opinion, yes, the 465 is superior to the 465M. But that's only one opinion . . . Stan w7ni@...
By Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...> · #502 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
donlcramer@... wrote: It could have been a cost issue, but it was not a "price" issue. In the 1978 Tek catalog, for example, you see the 465 at $2295 and the 465M at $2345, or $50 MORE. In spite
By Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...> · #501 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Phil (VA3UX) wrote:
By Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...> · #500 ·
Re: T900 photo
Don, Thanks for the picture and descriptions. This is not the scope I used. The one I used had the Telequipment name on it. It was horizontally layed out. The tube was on the left, then the
By Doug Hale <DougHale@...> · #499 ·
TEK 2232, RS232 port
I have a Tek 2232 scope and am looking to add the RS232 plot output. Tek apparently offered a field installation kit (Option F12) however apparently neither the kits or tech support is available
By gwerl@... · #498 ·
Re: T900 photo
Hi Doug, There is a photo of a T912 on ebay at: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1622982027 The style is similar on all the T900 scopes. Blue plastic case, tube to upper
By donlcramer@... · #497 ·
7B70 gone bad...
I've followed this group for quite a while: what an incredible wealth of knowledge the contributors have! Following this has been very educational for me. I now have my first request for help:
By john graves <jgraves2@...> · #495 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
Thank you, Phil; it is only now when I saw your writing that I remembered that 'Tecelec' was a French rep firm (represented C&K switches, among others) while Telequipment is what I should have said.
By Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...> · #494 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I always wondered what happened to Telequipment. I used a little Dual Trace Dual Timebase Telequipment scope in college ~1975. It was a great scope. Stable, easy to setup, and the dual/delayed
By Doug Hale <DougHale@...> · #493 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
That's what I thought too. That was an informative post. It was "Telequipment" from the UK Kikisui ?? Phil
By Phil (VA3UX) <phil@...> · #492 ·
Re: 465M Flaky vertical height.
I find Don's story fascinating. To start with, until very recently I thought that 465M is a 465, in a funny housing, but still 465. I never new that 465M traces lineage to T900. I believe that T900
By Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...> · #491 ·
Re: CONTACT CLEANER
On the subject of cleaning labels, I found success with ski wax cleaner for cross country skies. I use 'Swix', which is a Scandinavian brand; if anyone used ski wax 'clister' (or however you spell the
By Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...> · #490 ·