开云体育

I think the plotter you are thinking of is the 4662. I have three of those and my best one is on display at Building 50 on the Tektronix Campus in their "mini-museum" history display. I also have a

FWIW I produced our wedding invitiations on a 4051, plotting them out on a Tek x-y plotter - I forget the type number of this unit. However, that too was pretty exotic stuff for 1978! If I close my

The 661 is the same physical size as a 545A. There is a picture of one on page 337 of my book. Stan w7ni@... Michael Dunn wrote:

Hi Michael, Those are vertical amplifiers for the 661 sampling scope. The time bases for the 661 had numbers like 5T1, 5T1A, and 5T3. In fact, those three were the only timebases ever made for the

Dean, Very excellent idea about the two hole 7K plugin portable scope. The more I think about it, the better I like it! I remember a lunar lander game for the 4081 workstation which I played while on

That must be a massive mainframe, to take TWO of those plug-ins! Got a picture? (upload to our Pictures area) md

The 4S1 and 4S2 plugins are used with the 661 scope mainframe along with a 5T1 or 5T2 time base. I believe this was one of Teks first attempts at sampling technology. I think I have a scope or two and

I just came across some 4S1s and 4S2s!!! Dual-channel sampler plugs w/o timebases. What on earth were these used in? Anyone have docs? I'd like to know what sampling diodes are used in it if nothing

Playing with the 4051 was fun. I remember the standard game was "Lunar Lander". Then the 4052 and 4054 came out and Lunar Lander became worthless because they were so much faster that all you could do

Stan, I that book that you look down at, 'Winning with People', there was a mention of a guy by name Bob Anderson, who was hired from Hughes in 1959 (page 214, right hand column). He started at CRT

Hi Don, No, I don't think we ever really went into this stuff before and I am sure you have the attention of a few hundred very interested guys . . . More below . . . donlcramer@... wrote: The main

I was thinking as I wrote the email last night that I might have gotten the wrong product number (I recollect now the 4052 was a faster 4051, and the 4054 had in addition a bigger screen). Tonight I'm

Well, if I don't have the manual, it's not of much use to me. I would take $30 for it plus a few bucks for shipping. Assuming you in the CONUS. As for the difference between the two, I have no idea.

Hi all, I have been having a bit of fun recently restoring a 585 scope - a late model which had been modified into a de-facto 585A. This instrument is nearly 40 years old and must have really wowed

I do not quite understand why do you want to sell that camera if you do not have manual, but if you persist, I might consider buying it. What is your asking price? Do you know what is difference

Hello Don, I enjoyed reading what you had to say. It was interesting but sickening at the same time, too. That business of marketing worrying about 'cannibalizing sale of existing line' makes me barf.

Speaking of prototypes, I am fascinated by them, whether Tek or someone elses'. They represent someone's vision and generally also a lot of effort, so it would be nice if something of it could be

I "reverse engineered" the power connector and figured out the pin-out. So far I have not gotten anywhere on getting a manual. If all else fails, I'll probably just put it up for sale and move on to

A lot of those 600-series monitors, especially the bi-stable storage versions, were sold as OEM components to companies that manufactured medical imaging equipment. Dean

Hi Paul, The type "J" became the 1A1 in real life. (The 1A2 was called the type "F", originally.) Neither the type J or F ever reached production. I save any of that kind of historic stuff that