Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: Cleaning dirty pots on 5xx series plug-ins
--- In TekScopes@..., tubesnthings@... wrote:
OK. Sounds interesting. I see links to "Files", "Photos", "Database", and others but no "archives." Would someone please point me to the forum archives. Thanks, Tom |
Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board
Rob
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYep Good Luck. It wasn¡¯t too long ago that a list of vendors was delineated and discussed here. Wish I could remember. You may want to run a limited search for say the last 9-12 months. Anyway, Talon is worth remembering as well as a Greek company and of course classic Tek page¡. and ¡..and¡ ? Well you get the point. I hope this finds you well. Rob ? From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of chrismh_somenumber
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:55 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board ? ? Thanks, I didn't know about that site. I checked Sphere and Tucker. |
Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board
chrismh_somenumber
Thanks, I didn't know about that site. I checked Sphere and Tucker.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I ordered one from SMC. Hopefully he has it. Chris --- In TekScopes@..., "Rob" <rgwood@...> wrote:
|
Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board
Rob
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýLooks like the chip can be obtained here: ? ? I did not search further at the other ¡°normal parts vendors¡± (Sphere, Talon, etc.)... ?No particular association with SMC in a monetary way. I am however a satisfied customer and I do chat with the owner from time to time. ? ? Anyway, not 100% sure he has 155-0021-01 left nor how his price compares to others out there. Personally I have done enough business with SMC that if he has it I stop my search and purchase just based on my time being valuable and results of enough price shopping I am satisfied. ? Anyway, hopefully helpful. Sorry for rambling on so. Rob ? ? From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of chrismh_somenumber
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:35 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board ? ? The readout board part # is 670-1900-XX. Looks like it was used in lots of scopes, not just those I listed. |
Re: WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board
chrismh_somenumber
The readout board part # is 670-1900-XX. Looks like it was used in lots of scopes, not just those I listed.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks --- In TekScopes@..., "chrismh_somenumber" <hogancm@...> wrote:
|
WTB: Readout IC (155-0021-01), or entire readout board
chrismh_somenumber
By swapping in the above IC from another scope, I've determined that the custom IC on my 7844 has died.
Would anyone happen to have one they would part with, or have an entire working readout board from a 7844/7904A? Thanks, Chris |
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
BNC have poor performance above 1.8 to 2GHz so they may slow the risetime of
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the pulse. SMA is a much better choice, and this is what Tek used in the later versions of the HAPG. But at the time it was originally built SMA was probably not available. GR874 is capable of >8GHz. Soldering the RG-147 directly to the PC board is OK, but long lengths of coax make poor delay lines (charge lines). They suffer from "dribble up" effects. The HAPGs use special copper hard line for their internal delay lines. If the RG-147 is short (a few feet) it "dribble up" won't matter. Read the Theory of Operation in the manual to learn how a length of charge line works. The pulse width is going to be twice as long as the length of the line since the pulse has to travel out to the end and return to the beginning before the avalanche, which is using the charge stored in the line, can turn off. If you know the velocity of propagation of the electrical signal in the particular 50 Ohm coax you are using (it must be 50 ohm) and you multiply the length times the velocity of propagation and then double the result that should give you an idea of how wide the pulse will be. Dennis -----Original Message-----
From: iglesia_cristiana_arpas_eternas, Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:22 PM Hi Albert..probably I put some meters of RG147 as fixed(solder) internal line in order to obtain a 100nS pulse width. What is the secret about this GR connectors ?, I have the temptation to replace by a BNC, any wrong with this change?. Gabriel. --- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote: Probably a peltola jack has been removed there. In my later XH unit the board and the line have SMA connectors. Albertwhich the cable is soldered to the board.--- The cable has a peltola connector at one end. I have another unit in --- |
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Hi Albert..probably I put some meters of RG147 as fixed(solder) internal line in order to obtain a 100nS pulse width.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
What is the secret about this GR connectors ?, I have the temptation to replace by a BNC, any wrong with this change?. Gabriel. --- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote:
|
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
I will be surprised if there is a manual since it does not even have a part
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
number. Sometimes you have to settle for the next best thing. Dennis -----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of iglesia_cristiana_arpas_eternas Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:18 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator?? Very useful info indeed..thanks a lot Dennis. I'm not feel "safe men" until obtain the right info about..I just like to have "all" the service manual of my gear. I was send a mail to Artekmanual , but not response yet. Regards Gabriel. --- In TekScopes@..., "Dennis Tillman" <dennis@...> wrote: prototype-ish.
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Very useful info indeed..thanks a lot Dennis.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'm not feel "safe men" until obtain the right info about..I just like to have "all" the service manual of my gear. I was send a mail to Artekmanual , but not response yet. Regards Gabriel. --- In TekScopes@..., "Dennis Tillman" <dennis@...> wrote:
|
Re: Cleaning dirty pots on 5xx series plug-ins
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDan;
There's a bunch of material on this subject in the forum's archives.
More was added, recently. Check it out.
Bernd
?
In a message dated 2/27/2013 8:25:32 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
kaboomdk@... writes:
? |
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI think you are being overly concerned about your purchase not working. These are rugged instruments and not likely to fail. The PV509 manual is close enough to tell you everything you will need to know about your purchase. But here is some additional information on the HAPG that I kept from years ago. ? From: "Craig Sawyers" Date: Tue May 4, 2004? 2:25 pm Subject: Wierd Pulse generator? craig_sawyers ? Hi Group ? Well I took delivery of the strange "High Amplitude Pulse Generator". This is a TM500 style plug-in, and I bought it kind of out of curiosity, since I had seen nothing like it. It also has no identifying type number at all - so it was either a development unit, or an internal use only test fixture - hopefully one of the ex-Tek guys on the list will recognize it - I've put some pics on the yahoo gallery. ? This is the only thing I've seen that uses the strange attenuator that the 7A29 uses. This has a huge bandwidth - way above 1GHZ, and probably *way* above so that it doesn't cramp the 7A29's style. I suspect that the 7A29 has a 1.5GHz bandwidth, so the attenuator is possible approaching 5GHz. ? It also has a rigid charge line inside, estimated at around 3m (10') long. This line isn't secured at all, and is prevented from shorting to the back of the PCB with a layer of self-adhesive plastic film - very prototype-ish. Date on the PCB is copyright 1978, and component date codes indicate late 1982 build. ? The unit is basically a pre-trigger pulse generator that uses an avalanche transistor to give a fast rising pulse. The pre-trigger can be adjusted with a front panel control from 50-125ns early, so that a sampling time base gets time to crank itself into action. ? Using a 7104/7A29 gives a measured 410ps rise, implying a rise time of the pulse gen itself is 240ps (because the 7104/7A29 has a measured rise time of 330ps). ? Preshoot is 2%, and overshoot is un-measurably small, the very slightest ripple on the pulse top. One of the cleanest rises I have ever seen. Front panel says rise time <=300ps. Pulse length as expected (from the internal charge line) is about 30ns and the rep rate is 110kHz. Amplitude can be adjusted from 250mV to 25V in switched steps, with a variable control too. ? Pretrigger gives a 2.5V pulse 250ns long with a 1.4ns rise. ? I'll try it out on a sampler (S4) later and get a better grip on the pulse rise and what the pre-trigger does on a 7T11. I always find triggering a 7T11 from external sources a bit fiddly, not surprising when you read the manual in detail and see that each triggering mode has very different frequency and amplitude characteristics. ? This is a comparison between the "Unknown Unit" and a Type 111 pre-trigger pulse generator: ? 111 === Fixed output level of at least 10V, not precise <500ps rise Switchable polarity 2ns pulse length without external charge line Rep rate variable from 10Hz to 100kHz Pre-trigger 30-250ns early, 300ns duration, <5ns rise, +10V ? The unknown one =============== Switched and variable output level from 250mV to 25V <300ps rise Fixed polarity 30ns pulse length without external charge line Fixed rep rate of 110kHz (probably 100kHz nominal) Pre-trigger 50-125ns early (measured 30-130ns), 250ns duration, 1.4ns rise, +2.5V
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of iglesia_cristiana_arpas_eternas Here the link to this almost? new pulsed generator, at first glance is a transmission line pulser with 300ps ..but no model or number at all. _._,___ |
Re: 7k Readout Board Swap
chrismh_somenumber
Thanks for the info. I'm going to give it a shot this evening.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Chris --- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:
|
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Albert
Correction: in my early XF unit the charge line is soldered to the board. Probably a peltola jack has been removed there. In my later XH unit the board and the line have SMA connectors.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Albert --- The cable has a peltola connector at one end. I have another unit in which the cable is soldered to the board. |
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Albert
Hi Gabriel,
Your HAPG version is a rather early one. I have one with a sticker (not the original label) saying SN160. The boards are exactly the same version XF, with the same hand written signature GUB. The only difference in board components seems to be that yours has a variable R75. Further mine has an internal open ended charge line. You might make the same modification, with the advantage that you can use the GR connector to export the pretrigger signal to the front panel. Simply reconnect the GR connector to the empty socket (about 2 cm away from Q60, to the rear side). Pretrigger lead time can be adjusted with R75. Best avalanching can be set by R100. R10 sets -18V IIRC. C102 influences rise time and/or aberrations. The internal charge line is a rigid 20 ns cable, probably very high quality. It might be difficult to find something like that. The cable has a peltola connector at one end. I have another unit in which the cable is soldered to the board. I suppose the internal charge line was a later modification, copied from the PG509. The most vulnerable component in your unit might be the attenuator. Same problems as in the 7A29. Albert |
Re: 7000 Series Interface Socket Cover Changing
Tom Jobe
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks George,
This morning I was thinking that I should add more comments to
those pictures while it was all fresh in my mind, so I?edited them to
explain things a bit better.
Turns out that the character limit for the photo's
name?is fairly short but the photo's description can be
a little longer.
tom jobe...
?
?
|
Re: 7000 Series Interface Socket Cover Changing
Tom, Great photos and an excellent addition to the documentation of the 7K scope. Thanks! George On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:30 PM, "Tony Jacobson" <tonyman@...> wrote:
|
Re: Quality of FG 502 Waveforms
Try different sweep speeds to see what the envelope looks like, then try line triggering to see if it will lock to the envelope. If it does, then supply ripple or ground loops are the likely problem. If it does not, then look for oscillations in the power supplies.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would suspect the "20V" supply you mentioned, but first check the manual to see if it's supposed to be regulated or not. Sometimes "raw" supplies are labeled with the nominal voltage under certain conditions, may have lots of ripple, and are subject to drastic change - all normal. If it's a regulated supply, it should stay very close to nominal under a wide range of conditions, have very little line frequency ripple, and should certainly be adjustable to the right setpoint value if there's a pot for that purpose. Bad electrolytic capacitors are the prime suspects whenever supply ripple problems arise. In this case, I would blame a power supply fault until you get that 20V right - especially since you've already found a failed part in that section. On TM500s, also try different plug-in compartments to make sure it's not a mainframe pass transistor or connector problem. Ed --- In TekScopes@..., "Philip" <ndpmcintosh@...> wrote:
|
Re: Quality of FG 502 Waveforms
I was going to suggest checking both power supply outputs for ripple
with the AC range of a multimeter or an oscilloscope set to AC coupling but I think you found the problem. That fuzzy output is exactly what I would expect with AC ripple on the power supply. I assume you mean one of the diodes in bridge rectifier CR600 is bad? There is nothing special about the diodes. I would definitely double check C620 and C680 out of circuit with something more than an ESR meter. I would fix the ripple before worrying about not being able to adjust the voltage via R625 but this is one of those cases though where I might use a variac to bring the input voltage up gradually while watching the +20V and -20V regulated outputs to make sure they go into regulation. This is not one of Tektronix's better power supply designs. U615 or maybe U664 could have been damaged. On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:45:22 -0000, "Philip" <ndpmcintosh@...> wrote: I don't have a differential comparator to check the ripple in the way the manual specifies, but I did throw a 1x probe on it and saw a huge amount of what looks to be sawtooth ripple. That is why I have been focusing on the power supply. The filter capacitors check good and I suspect perhaps a problem with the +20V supply rectifier. |
Re: Quality of FG 502 Waveforms
--- In TekScopes@..., "Philip" <ndpmcintosh@...> wrote:
I don't know the magnitudes of the waveform amplitudes (noise and signal pk-pk), but it looks like a classic ground loop problem to me: TM500 mainframe grounded through ground pin in power cable, as the scope is too. Ground through the BNC cable makes one huge! ground loop. Any dynamic magnetic field passing through the loop induces a current into what is essentially a shorted transformer secondary turn. Current is only limited by impedance of the conductors, and could reach a few dozen amps!. This induces a voltage across the impedances, with the largest possibly being the BNC cable ground. Ground at the front panel of the FG502 does not equal ground at the vertical input connector of the scope. Resulting potential difference is superimposed on the displayed waveform. If you have a differential amplifier, try using it, without plugging the BNC cable into to it. Connect the + input to the BNC cable connector center pin, and the ¨C input to the BNC ground shell. If you don't have a diff amp, try quasi differential using two scope channels, added with one inverted. Make sure both as set to the same V/div. - Steve |