I forgot to add: The problem originated by accidentally touching the ground lead of a probe to line voltage!
|
Re: T935A seized pots help
Hello Andrew Ship it to me I can repair it for a small charge. I am in UK. EX Tek.
|
Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.
Chris
The CR1244 is across the B-E junction of the transistor, so in circuit it would not measure Open like a diode out of the circuit would.
I have my board out waiting for the inverter board to dry from it's cleaning, and I measure .706V forward (of the diode) and .581V reverse (instead of open, which is forward for the transistor junction.)
You could measure all the voltages Q1220, Q1221, Q1222, and Q1224 E,B and C along with U1281A pin 1, 2 and 3 CR1220 anode to see what is out of wack
John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:37 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc. John, A HUGE thank you on checking that and giving me your value! I was hoping the short wasn't in the main board somewhere as that doesn't look like fun to pull in the least. I just checked the resistance from the pin 7 (blue 87v wire) on the connector (power supply still out and on the bench) and I got a value of 25.55Kohm, so it would appear I should be OK to go at that (assuming that powering something else up on the main board doesn't cause it to short/overload the supply). I was testing the diodes on the power supply and diode CR1244 is giving me 0.538V forward and 0.630v reverse. I think I might pull it and check it out of the board later tonight after I eat etc. Thanks for the help! Chris --- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@...> wrote: Chris
The problem could be in the 87V regulator
Or
Their could be a short/low Resistance some where in the load
I have a 2465B open and I measured a load resistance of 25.3K to ground on Pin 7 of J121 (87V, the blue wire) with the power supply unplugged from
the J121 connector unit
John
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:40 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.
All voltages measured in the scope with everything hooked up. I just got done checking the voltages pre-regulator.
At J233A I get: pin 5 (87v unregulated) 97.6v Pin 3 (42v unregulated) 49.0v
And at J234A I get: pin 5 (15v unregulated) 18.94v Pin 4 (5v unregulated) 6.64 Pin 2 (-5v unregulated) -6.92v Pin 1 (-15v unregulated) -18.54v
Based on the unregulated values, I believe the issue must lie in the regulator portions, and since I'm getting the 97.6v pre-regulated it would seem to me the voltage doubler is working. I also double checked and verified the 10v reference voltage at the test point on the main board as well as the J121 connector that feeds the main board. (I figured this was important to double check as the regulators all are based off the 10v reference as I read it). Of course this is where I wish to learn more - I understand what the individual components do but I still somewhat struggle to see what the assembly as a whole is doing, which is why I'm trying to get into all this, so maybe my understanding is skewed. :)
At any rate, it would seem to me that with the unregulated voltages where they're at, that the issue would have to lie within the follow area:
Yes? No? I mean I have the correct voltages on the left side of those three groups, and the wrong voltages on the right side, so it would seem that's where I should look next?
Thanks for helping this newb out!
Chris
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@> wrote:
The +87 is from a doubler and added to the +42. I would take a close
look at the three 10 uF caps and all the diodes in that area. Be sure to only use fast diodes for any replacements.
Since you recapped this unit, don't overlook the fact that bad
capacitors can come from the factory new. Did you measure all these voltages in the scope or on an external load?
Regards, Tom
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: DC504 counter display
If it displays a "8" as a "0" and a "0" as
a "U" it is almost certainly a driver issue.
If it were a bad display segment the "0" would display as a
"0" if the "8" displayed as a "0".
Do all positions display the same incorrect digits?
73
Glenn
WB4UIV
At 11:52 PM 2/18/2013, you wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Anyone familiar with the TM500
counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing
the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0"
as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving
the display ?
HankC
|
I have two Tektronix scopes: a 485 and a 2465. Both of them need a little TLC, but I'm going to focus on the 485 at the moment as it is non-functional. I'm not an experienced electronics tech, but I'm not a complete novice either.
I really like the blue phosphor of the 485. For the moment the traces will show up, but the traces don't respond to input on either channel. I think the problem lies with the attenuator cards, but I'm not 100% sure thats the only problem. This I know for sure: if I take my signal gen and hook up its output to the place on the vertical amplifier where the attenuator plugs in, the signal is displayed on the scope. Another strange symptom is that on Channel 1, if the impedance is on the 50 Ohm setting, the trace is there, but on the 1 MegaOhm setting it disappears. Any thoughts guys? Have any experience with this sort of thing?
I've taken out the channel 1 attenuator and have it in my hands right now. Where should I start troubleshooting?
Thanks!
John
|
Re: DC504 counter display
Tektronix had propensity to use chip IC sockets. Try to remove display
package and reseat it. That might re-establish pin connection.
Sometimes it takes several re-seatings to clear the socket.
Miroslav Pokorni
On 2/18/2013 9:18 PM, David wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
?
Going by the schematic, the display digits are multiplexed which is
the common configuration so if the middle horizontal segment is
working on at least some digits, then the 7 segment display driver is
fine. If some segments of every 7 segment display work, then the
column display driver is fine as well.
That pretty much narrows any problem to bad display segments or
possibly an open connection to the missing display segments. I would
normally consider the later less likely than the former except that
two of the same segment are missing.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:52:57 -0800 (PST), HankC hankc918@...>
wrote:
>Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
>I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are
missing the middle horizontal segment.
>So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
>In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips
driving the display ?
>
>HankC
|
Manual / schematic for Leader 524S counter?
Um... that's a model 824S counter.
Dave
-=-=-=-
Anybody have the user guide for this counter? (Leader user guides always include the schematic.)
Thanks, Dave
|
Re: DC504 counter display
--- In TekScopes@..., HankC <hankc918@...> wrote: Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ? I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment. So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U". In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?
HankC
Common problem - FND357 displays go bad - fixed mine with two new LED displays. 6 bucks each, do a google search to see who might have them cheap. Cheers, Taylor
|
Manual / schematic for Leader 524S counter?
Anybody have the user guide for this counter? (Leader user guides always include the schematic.)
Thanks, Dave
|
Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?
I agree with what Don posted. The 640 ohms is just the resistance of the inner conductor of the coaxial cable for a x1 oscilloscope probe. I measured about 250 ohms on a x1 probe I happen to have in reach. On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:55:41 -0000, "Philip" <ndpmcintosh@...> wrote: Yeah. It doesn't have any markings on it other than the name "Fairchild" on the cable, and I am glad I checked it before I actually tried to test it.
In looking at an old but classic oscilloscope book it mentions a "direct" probe that has essentially 0 resistance used for checking low impedance, low frequency circuits. And, it also describes the "isolation" probe which has an R of 4.7 to 10kOhms. It might be something intended to serve as one of these.
It looks like it is from the early 60's and perhaps was used on the Fairchild 766H. I doubt there would be much current use for this probe.
Be careful with that!
Danger, 640 Ohms!
On 2/18/2013 5:50 PM, Alex wrote:
640 ohms ought to be enough for anyone.
|
Re: DC504 counter display
Going by the schematic, the display digits are multiplexed which is the common configuration so if the middle horizontal segment is working on at least some digits, then the 7 segment display driver is fine. If some segments of every 7 segment display work, then the column display driver is fine as well. That pretty much narrows any problem to bad display segments or possibly an open connection to the missing display segments. I would normally consider the later less likely than the former except that two of the same segment are missing. On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:52:57 -0800 (PST), HankC <hankc918@...> wrote: Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ? I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment. So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U". In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?
HankC
|
Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?
Yeah. It doesn't have any markings on it other than the name "Fairchild" on the cable, and I am glad I checked it before I actually tried to test it.
In looking at an old but classic oscilloscope book it mentions a "direct" probe that has essentially 0 resistance used for checking low impedance, low frequency circuits. And, it also describes the "isolation" probe which has an R of 4.7 to 10kOhms. It might be something intended to serve as one of these.
It looks like it is from the early 60's and perhaps was used on the Fairchild 766H. I doubt there would be much current use for this probe.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Be careful with that!
Danger, 640 Ohms!
On 2/18/2013 5:50 PM, Alex wrote:
640 ohms ought to be enough for anyone.
|
Re: DC504 counter display
More than likely the LED read outs.
Chris VK4CVL
At 03:52 PM 19/02/2013, you wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
?
Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing
the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0"
as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving
the display ?
HankC
|
Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ? I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment. So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U". In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?
HankC
|
Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?
I think you are measuring the inner conductor resistance. This is
made of resistance wire (often wound in a spiral) to damp
reflections back the cable. The cable isn't terminated (the input
impedance of the scope is 1 Meg) and like any transmission line
energy is reflected where it isn't absorbed by matching termination.
This is a compromise to damp such reflections, useful at low
frequencies.
Tektronix explains their techniques in their concept book series,
the one you want is called 'Oscilloscope Probe Circuits". It's
available to download on the Internet and is an excellent guide to
probe design. Silicon Chip also has a good article on probes a while
back that I think explained it.
Don Black.
?
I'm
wondering if it could be an RF probe.?
> >
> > Another I have studied is an old
Fairchild that is in good condition that
> has a resistance of 640 ohms end to end
on the center conductor. To what use
> could one put to such a probe?
> >
>
|
|
Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.
John, A HUGE thank you on checking that and giving me your value! I was hoping the short wasn't in the main board somewhere as that doesn't look like fun to pull in the least.
I just checked the resistance from the pin 7 (blue 87v wire) on the connector (power supply still out and on the bench) and I got a value of 25.55Kohm, so it would appear I should be OK to go at that (assuming that powering something else up on the main board doesn't cause it to short/overload the supply). I was testing the diodes on the power supply and diode CR1244 is giving me 0.538V forward and 0.630v reverse. I think I might pull it and check it out of the board later tonight after I eat etc.
Thanks for the help! Chris
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@...> wrote: Chris
The problem could be in the 87V regulator
Or
Their could be a short/low Resistance some where in the load
I have a 2465B open and I measured a load resistance of 25.3K to ground on Pin 7 of J121 (87V, the blue wire) with the power supply unplugged from the J121 connector unit
John
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:40 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.
All voltages measured in the scope with everything hooked up. I just got done checking the voltages pre-regulator.
At J233A I get: pin 5 (87v unregulated) 97.6v Pin 3 (42v unregulated) 49.0v
And at J234A I get: pin 5 (15v unregulated) 18.94v Pin 4 (5v unregulated) 6.64 Pin 2 (-5v unregulated) -6.92v Pin 1 (-15v unregulated) -18.54v
Based on the unregulated values, I believe the issue must lie in the regulator portions, and since I'm getting the 97.6v pre-regulated it would seem to me the voltage doubler is working. I also double checked and verified the 10v reference voltage at the test point on the main board as well as the J121 connector that feeds the main board. (I figured this was important to double check as the regulators all are based off the 10v reference as I read it). Of course this is where I wish to learn more - I understand what the individual components do but I still somewhat struggle to see what the assembly as a whole is doing, which is why I'm trying to get into all this, so maybe my understanding is skewed. :)
At any rate, it would seem to me that with the unregulated voltages where they're at, that the issue would have to lie within the follow area:
Yes? No? I mean I have the correct voltages on the left side of those three groups, and the wrong voltages on the right side, so it would seem that's where I should look next?
Thanks for helping this newb out!
Chris
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@> wrote:
The +87 is from a doubler and added to the +42. I would take a close look at the three 10 uF caps and all the diodes in that area. Be sure to only use fast diodes for any replacements.
Since you recapped this unit, don't overlook the fact that bad capacitors can come from the factory new. Did you measure all these voltages in the scope or on an external load?
Regards, Tom
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?
I'm wondering if it could be an RF probe.? http://n5ese.com/rfprobe1.htm
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
> > > > Another I have studied is an old Fairchild that is in good condition that > has a resistance of 640 ohms end to end on the center conductor. To what use > could one put to such a probe? > > >
|
Re: 2246 Mod A - no trace
Priya,
You could probably use ch3 to probe for the comparisons as a last resort on the following.
I would set up identical conditions on both ch2 and ch1. then on ch 2 compare signal traces starting at the input. Place the same signal on both leads(channels). Check the U175 relay driver on ch2 and find out if any are high. You can also check the U171/U172 if your input to the U174/U175 does not match. But they appear to do different jobs on given pins. Probably best to test at the inputs of U174 & U175. Then go forward till you lose identical signal. Since you don't have U174 installed, just the socket instead, U171 may be calling for one of the relays in the Ch1 circuit to be pulled in or activated if you prefer. Then jumper where U174 should be on the affected driver. If as you say the relays are all operating as they should, you should expect the ch1 and ch2 relays to all align identically. It is possible one of the relays just isn't pulled in correctly. You can also check test point 1A (AT117 pin 7) in the ch1 circuit, and At127 pin 7 to ensure the they match once you get both attenuators aligned the same.
Don't forget, BE CAREFUL! Don't blow up ch2!!
Nick Nielsen
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" <priya_jakatdar@...> wrote: Update: I soldered an IC socket in U174 thinking that I would connect leads to it externally to diagnose the Ch1 issue and now the trace has completely disappeared! The beam finder works, but when I release the beam finder button, there is nothing on the screen other than the vert and hor selection displays. The menus are all fine and the time cursors work fine too - just no signal trace. Checked all the voltages and they are fine.
I assume that I have to use another scope to trace the vertical amplifier area, but would appreciate any tips here - if the vertical amplifier was bad, would it not also affect the beam finder, displays and menus?
Priya Jakatdar.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" <priya_jakatdar@> wrote:
I put the scope back together and it runs fine on Ch2, Ch3 and Ch4 including time & frequency measurements. All secondary voltages are well within the spec range (7.48V, -7.47V, 5.2V, -5.2V, 15.1V, -15.9V etc), so I have not made any adjustment to the 44VDC rail to avoid calibrating the scope from scratch. Will use it this way for now and let it run for some time to be sure nothing else is wrong or will fail before attempting further repair.
The issue with Ch1 and voltage measurements is a charred U174 transistor relay driver IC (Intersil 3082) that appears to have caused the SMPS to fail in the first place. I have not replaced the chip thinking there may be a larger issue with or around U174. The Ch1 individual relays are all working fine (tested with a Kikusui constant-voltage constant-current supply) and drawing 25 mA or 12 mA according to their spec. When I do get some time later, I am thinking about validating the Shift Register output pins of U171 that drives U174 first and then maybe installing an IC socket rather than soldering a new U174.
I have searched the archives and not found anything specific with respect to U174. Any thoughts or previous experience with this will be greatly appreciated.
I want to thank everyone's help in getting my scope back into working condition. I have learned a lot about my 2246 and it is mainly because of you guys.
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote:
Tom,
I was only able to get enough time to assemble the SMPS into the chassis with just the main board and it runs fine - without the 40W series bulb:). The voltages are a bit off (5.28V, 7.46V etc) but I won't adjust anything till the proc board and the pot boards are in and providing normal operating load.
That's for the weekend. More to come.
Thanks for taking the time to make resistance measurements - very similar to mine.
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" wrote:
Hi Priya, Resistances were taken on a nice working 2246 with a Fluke 110 which does not have enough voltage to forward bias the diodes. I tried this Fluke meter on some standard diodes and some Schottky diodes and there was not much of a connection either way, just a little leakage depending on the polarity There is not much difference from your readings, and no obvious indication of a problem on any of the voltages. I will add my readings on to the end of your list.
+5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm - 106 ohm -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm - 53 ohm -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm - 590 ohm +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm - 483 ohm +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm - 152 ohm -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm - 150 ohm +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) - 2.5 M ohm? impossible to get a good reading +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000 - 9000 ohm I guess the next step is to see what happens when you put the scope back together tonight. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: Mover To: TekScopes@... Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 12:20 PM Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2246 Mod A main board overloading the SMPS
Tom & Francis,
I discovered what it is - the ultra cautious in me had left a 40W light bulb in series with the isolation transformer secondary providing AC line power to the scope. It was there originally to prevent further collateral damage to the scope through my repair and testing. With any load exceeding the load provided by the fan, the SMPS pulls enough current through the light bulb that the AC line power to the scope drops below the 80V required to keep the SMPS running. This shuts down the SMPS and the 40W bulb comes on as the SMPS restarts - absolutely normal behavior. I had completely forgotten about the light bulb till this afternoon when I chanced to glance at it cycling with the SMPS and then I had an AHA moment!
Regardless, I did measure resistances (with a Fluke 116 - don't own a meter recommended by TEK) and here they are: > +5:100 ?? - mine is 99 ohm > -5:50 ?? - mine is 41 ohm > -15:500 ?? - mine is 750 ohm > +15:400 ?? - mine is 583 ohm > +7.5:150 ?? - mine is 134 ohm > -7.5:180 ?? - mine is 143 ohm > +58: 7500 ?? - mine is almost open ( 8M ohm) > +130: 9000 ?? - mine is 10,000
Other than the 58V resistance probably becuase my meter can't drive the diodes, my measurements looks fine.
I ran it without the series light bulb and it happily drives a 10 ohm resistor from the 5V and regulation is excellent at 5.05 VDC. With the light bulb in series, it won't run anything more than the fan. Indeed, the fan is not sufficient load to test the SMPS.
Believe I am ready to put the SMPS back into the scope tonight. I apologize to everyone who I misled with my earlier post on this and thanks as always for quick and thoughtful responses. You guys are great!
Priya.
--- In TekScopes@..., "Francis" wrote: > > Hi, > > several things: > > as Tom Jobe suggested, you can do the following: > with the scope disconnected from the mains, check the resistances > between ground and each supply. As Tek says, use an ohmeter that is able to forward bias diodes, usually a low range. > > Values are > +5:100 ?? > -5:50 ?? > -15:500 ?? > +15:400 ?? > +7.5:150 ?? > -7.5:180 ?? > +58: 7500 ?? > +130: 9000 ?? > > these values are taken from a 2245A manual, but should not be > very different on your scope. If one is significantly lower, > check the related circuitry. > > The fan is not a sufficient load for the SMPS. When I make > my trials, I use 2 4.7 ?? paralleled on the +5v. > If the supply still ticks, try to disconnect the crowbar protection, > or tie together the gate and the cathode of the SCR. Maybe some > overvoltage due to a dying cap can fire it. Same recommendation > about Q2208 (base tied to ground). > > --- In TekScopes@..., "Mover" wrote: > > > > Alas - if only it were that simple ... > > > > I finally fixed my SMPS and put it back into the chassis with only the main board. It runs in chirp mode - about every 1 sec there is a clicking sound - the secondary voltages rise and then something gets overloaded and the SMPS shuts down and then cycles again. > > > > I quickly disconnected power, isolated the SMPS and again verified that the SMPS is fine on its own with just the cooling fan load with a steady internal 44 VDC. No new or collateral damage thankfully. > > > > There are no obvious shorts on any of the supply lines on the main board. The issue may still very well be with the SMPS being unable to handle load even though the fan runs fine and the other voltages are fine. > > > > I assume that chirp mode is a common issue with these SMPS supplies. What have others done to (1) find whether the issue is with the SMPS or with the main board and if the latter, (2) which supply line or lines is drawing too much current and how to isolate the problem further? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Priya. > > >
|
Re: T935A seized pots help
You are right. It is necessary to get the lube to the shaft of the control.
If that is internal to the scope, you will need to open the scope up to where
you can get to the control. I have found that the cause is the grease on the
control shaft has dried up making it hard to turn.
?
Good luck,
Tom
?
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 10:35
PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] T935A seized
pots help
?
I have a T912 which had tight controls on the brightness and something else
(focus?). I managed to free them up a bit but they need more TLC. These pots
are located back inside the scope with plastic shafts running from the knobs
to the pots. I'm not sure if it's the pots are tight or the shafts in the
front panel bushings. These bushes release with a snap action by pulling the
shaft forward; it's detailed in the manual which warns considerable force may
be required. I'm worried about aging plastic breaking if I try to remove them.
I intend to try some lubricant as a first step. I hadn't considered deoxit,
have you found that effective on plastic? I was going to try isopropyl alcohol
first, then perhaps some oil. I've had success with silicon lubricant on
plastic if you can get it into the bearing. Are the pots you're dealing with
mounted on the front panel or remotely like mine. Please keep posting on your
progress. I have also considered the plastic might have swollen slightly, any
thoughts? The T912 is a storage scope and a in a brief trial I couldn't
seem to get it to store, but I may not have been holding my mouth right. Have
to read the instructions again. Nice little scope.
Don Black.
On
19-Feb-13 8:11 AM, Tom Miller wrote:
?
I would try to put a little thin oil down the shaft. Take the knobs off
and just apply a drop or two to the shaft and allow it to soak in for a
while. It may take a few applications to break it free.
?
?
Tom
?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:44
PM
Subject: [TekScopes] T935A seized
pots help
?
Hi,
First posting on this group, hope someone can help....
I have a T935A scope which has developed a problem and I'd like to
try and fix it as its a very useful portable scope.
Basically two of the front panel variable pots, the Y2 axis variable
and the X axis variable have seized solid. Y1 seems okay.
So before I strip the scope down, which looks to be quite a job to
get the relevant pcbs out, has anybody come across this before?
Is there much hope that I can fix the existing pots or do they need
to be replaced (any suggestions for good suppliers that will ship to the
UK?).
Many thanks,
Andrew
|
Re: T935A seized pots help
I have a T912 which had tight controls on the brightness and
something else (focus?). I managed to free them up a bit but they
need more TLC. These pots are located back inside the scope with
plastic shafts running from the knobs to the pots. I'm not sure if
it's the pots are tight or the shafts in the front panel bushings.
These bushes release with a snap action by pulling the shaft
forward; it's detailed in the manual which warns considerable force
may be required. I'm worried about aging plastic breaking if I try
to remove them. I intend to try some lubricant as a first step. I
hadn't considered deoxit, have you found that effective on plastic?
I was going to try isopropyl alcohol first, then perhaps some oil.
I've had success with silicon lubricant on plastic if you can get it
into the bearing. Are the pots you're dealing with mounted on the
front panel or remotely like mine. Please keep posting on your
progress. I have also considered the plastic might have swollen
slightly, any thoughts?
The T912 is a storage scope and a in a brief trial I couldn't seem
to get it to store, but I may not have been holding my mouth right.
Have to read the instructions again. Nice little scope.
Don Black.
On 19-Feb-13 8:11 AM, Tom Miller wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
?
I would try to put a little thin oil down the shaft.
Take the knobs off and just apply a drop or two to the
shaft and allow it to soak in for a while. It may take a
few applications to break it free.
?
?
Tom
?
----- Original Message
-----
Sent: Monday,
February 18, 2013 3:44 PM
Subject: [TekScopes]
T935A seized pots help
?
Hi,
First posting on this group, hope someone can
help....
I have a T935A scope which has developed a
problem and I'd like to try and fix it as its a very
useful portable scope.
Basically two of the front panel variable pots,
the Y2 axis variable and the X axis variable have
seized solid. Y1 seems okay.
So before I strip the scope down, which looks to
be quite a job to get the relevant pcbs out, has
anybody come across this before?
Is there much hope that I can fix the existing
pots or do they need to be replaced (any suggestions
for good suppliers that will ship to the UK?).
Many thanks,
Andrew
|