Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
i always hated memorizing alot of math "forms" and grinding out long equations. im still into making the final adjustments on the test bench. before personal com,puters. unless you had a way of
By
arthurok <arthurok@...>
·
#24896
·
|
File - Posting Rules
Please edit any posts/replies to the list to minimize quoted material to that required for continuity. Please do not send personal replies to the list. List replies go to the original sender by
By
TekScopes@...
·
#24895
·
|
Re: Standard Ampitude Caibrator 067-502?
We used the Standard Amplitude Calibrator on the bench in Test-Final to cal the instruments after being cycled. There was no proceedure known to me that used the amplifier section of the SAC and I
By
ROLYNN PRECHTL K7DFW
·
#24894
·
|
Re: Standard Ampitude Caibrator 067-502?
I think there was more to it than simply omitting the amp. Stan has several -00's in which it was deliberately removed. This has always mystified me. Perhaps it failed to meet spec so egregiously that
By
Dave Wise
·
#24893
·
|
rm503 power xformer resistance question
Hi Does anyone know what the primary resistance is for T620 is. The power supply in mine doesn't work right. I have 500 volts at the plate of the 6dq6 and the thing is oscillating after I replaced
By
Ray
·
#24892
·
|
Re: Tek 50 ohm cable type
012-0649-00: CABLE ASSY,RF; 50 OHM COAX,28.5 L SMA BOTH ENDS "MEETS REQUIREMENTS FOR TYPE RG-223/U CABLE AS SPECIFIED IN MIL-C-17D AND MIL-C-17/84." This is a purchased cable, so the _exact_ cable is
By
geopatr@...
·
#24891
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
The guy has a point that this is all pretty basic stuff. But then "pretty basic" means a lot of things to a lot of people -- so it's then a social issue to filter one's own mutterings :) I'm guilty as
By
Kuba Ober <ober.14@...>
·
#24889
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
If x^2=y, then sqrt(y)=x -1^2 is definitely not -1, so it makes no sense for sqrt(-1) being -1. To support negative y's, you need a special factor for x: x then becomes a product of this special
By
Kuba Ober <ober.14@...>
·
#24890
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
I remember Feynman talking about this lesson, that his father taught him as a small boy. Feynman was distressed while walking one day with his father that one of his friends had made him feel dumb
By
Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...>
·
#24888
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
Or, putting it another way, dimensions aren't vectors: they have no direction. Cheers, Kuba
By
Kuba Ober <ober.14@...>
·
#24887
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
Methinks that once you get the underlying concepts straght, you'll see it the other way. Nope, and I'm bewildered as to why you'd think that way. You get a very ordinary square with positive
By
Kuba Ober <ober.14@...>
·
#24884
·
|
Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.
I doubt that. They know how to use it, but they likely have no more understanding than anyone else. There's a difference between knowing how to apply something, and understanding it. I'd hazard a
By
Kuba Ober <ober.14@...>
·
#24885
·
|
Re: Help! No sweep on tek 464
Todd, Go to ftp://bama.sbc.edu/downloads/tek/464/ Download the manual. If you don't have the viewer, Go to Lizardtech. Check the power supply voltages. Look in the manual for troubleshooting
By
Bill R <bill1904@...>
·
#24886
·
|
Re: Bringing up a 555
I think their frequency response is somewhat limited (kHz), and of course they are nonlinear and lack sensitivity at the beginning of the travel, but otherwise they are great. I keep several for
By
Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@...>
·
#24883
·
|
Re: Bringing up a 555
iron vane meters are still being manufactured for panel meter applications. "simpson electric and other manufactures" they are genuine true rms responding. a simpson 260 multimeter is not true rms
By
arthurok <arthurok@...>
·
#24882
·
|
Re: Bringing up a 555
Hi Arthur, It isn't really what I believe that counts here. I was just repeating what Tektronix has written in the service manual for 555 required equipment. I think they specify an Iron vane movement
By
Stan and Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
·
#24881
·
|
Re: Help! No sweep on tek 464
check to see if it will work in x/y mode "don t burn the tube"
By
arthurok <arthurok@...>
·
#24880
·
|
Help! No sweep on tek 464
Well, To make a long story short, I"ve been trying to get a newly aquired 464 up and running which now has no sweep. I recieved the scope last month and seemed to function perfectly until last week
By
toddlovas
·
#24879
·
|
Re: 2754P Frequency Loops Cal
That's a bit surprising; do you have an operator's manual for it? I'll look around on my shelf and see what I have in the way of 2750-series docs, but I'm not immediately optimistic. 200 Hz. This is
By
gleamfollower <jmiles@...>
·
#24878
·
|
FS: Tektronix Catalogs
Hello, I have the following Tektronix Catalogs for sale: 1967, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1994.
By
BSugarberg <bsugarberg@...>
·
#24877
·
|