¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

Commodore used MOS Technology chips, since they owned the company.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Hallberg via groups.io <n9ess=
[email protected]> wrote:

Sorry about an error in the flat pack chip I'm looking for. I wrote
TA7761P and should be TA7761F. Off topic.
Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)






On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, 12:02:35 PM CDT, Carl Hallberg via groups.io
<n9ess@...> wrote:





I have a whole tube of mcm68764L eproms. If these can replace the proms,
I will mail 5 to someone who can and wants to program them. I cannot find
data sheet on Google, so don't know specs. One of the eproms of the 5 I
did attempt to program and may or may not have been damaged. That is why 5
of them. I also have mcm68766, but may need them (or some) in the future
for Tek, HP? Will mail to contiguous United States. You pay postage. I am
looking for 2 Toshiba TA7761P. The description on internet is wrong, so
never attempted to purchase. Used in radio control.

By the way Raymond, the roms in the Commodore 64 were also Mostek. Maybe
why some of the failures.

Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)







On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, 10:33:35 AM CDT, Dave Wise <
david_wise@...> wrote:





The extra hardware for patching consisted of an FPLA (Field-Programmable
Logic Array) and a PROM. The FPLA monitored the address bus, and on
certain ranges it rerouted Chip Select from the mask roms to the patch
rom. From the processor¡¯s point of view, this replaced a couple of
instructions with a jump that led to replacement code in the PROM, which
did its thing then jumped back to the mask ROM.

This scheme was used in 1980 in the 4024/4025/4027 terminals made by the
Information Display Division at the Wilsonville plant. Later models used
EPROMs, 2732 and up if I recall correctly.

Dave Wise
IDD 1980-1995

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Raymond Domp
Frank via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2022 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766
EPROM

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 04:41 AM, Carl Hallberg wrote:


The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to
24 dip
header. I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to
check
the access time.
Physical space is the problem here, not electrical specs; the four 24-pin
ROMs are mounted end-to-end lengthwise with only 0.2" in between, which
doesn't allow for the longer 28-pin 2764's. on standard converting headers.
The two rows of two each that make up the total of four ROMs are 0.3"
apart. There would be enough space if one built a flat plug-in piggy-back
PCB and mounted the replacement EPROMs without sockets.

Standard MCM68766's (Ta <= 450ns) will do the job. I used them in one
7854. The bad IC's are not EPROMs (as Ram says) but mask ROMs, made by
Mostek. Some 'scopes are equipped with Motorola mask ROMs. Those don't
suffer from "ROM-rot". BTW, the board contains extra hardware that allows
patching of data in address ranges read from the ROMs, probably because it
was considered too slow and expensive to run new masks if a change was made.

Raymond



















Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

Sorry about an error in the flat pack chip I'm looking for.? I wrote TA7761P and should be TA7761F.? Off topic.
Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, 12:02:35 PM CDT, Carl Hallberg via groups.io <n9ess@...> wrote:





I have a whole tube of mcm68764L eproms.? If these can replace the proms, I will mail 5 to someone who can and wants to program them.? I cannot find data sheet on Google, so don't know specs.? One of the eproms of the 5 I did attempt to program and may or may not have been damaged.? That is why 5 of them.? I also have mcm68766,? but may need them (or some) in the future for Tek, HP?? Will mail to contiguous United States. You pay postage.? I am looking for 2 Toshiba TA7761P.? The description on internet is wrong, so never attempted to purchase.? Used in radio control.??

By the way Raymond, the roms in the Commodore 64 were also Mostek.? Maybe why some of the failures.

Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)







On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, 10:33:35 AM CDT, Dave Wise <david_wise@...> wrote:





The extra hardware for patching consisted of an FPLA (Field-Programmable Logic Array) and a PROM.? The FPLA monitored the address bus, and on certain ranges it rerouted Chip Select from the mask roms to the patch rom.? From the processor¡¯s point of view, this replaced a couple of instructions with a jump that led to replacement code in the PROM, which did its thing then jumped back to the mask ROM.

This scheme was used in 1980 in the 4024/4025/4027 terminals made by the Information Display Division at the Wilsonville plant.? Later models used EPROMs, 2732 and up if I recall correctly.

Dave Wise
IDD 1980-1995

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Raymond Domp Frank via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2022 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 04:41 AM, Carl Hallberg wrote:


The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to 24 dip
header.? I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to check
the access time.
Physical space is the problem here, not electrical specs; the four 24-pin ROMs are mounted end-to-end lengthwise with only 0.2" in between, which doesn't allow for the longer 28-pin 2764's. on standard converting headers. The two rows of two each that make up the total of four ROMs are 0.3" apart. There would be enough space if one built a flat plug-in piggy-back PCB and mounted the replacement EPROMs without sockets.

Standard MCM68766's (Ta <= 450ns) will do the job. I used them in one 7854. The bad IC's are not EPROMs (as Ram says) but mask ROMs, made by Mostek. Some 'scopes are equipped with Motorola mask ROMs. Those don't suffer from "ROM-rot". BTW, the board contains extra hardware that allows patching of data in address ranges read from the ROMs, probably because it was considered too slow and expensive to run new masks if a change was made.

Raymond


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

The Motorola ROMs may be better than the Mostek mask ROMs but they are not immune to ROM rot. The Motorola ROMs in my 7854 went bad.


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

On my mini-board I have brought out the three pins required for programming the onboard EEPROM into a header provision so you can directly program the EEPROM without any high voltage programmers.
-Ram

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 05:01 AM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


Hi RAM,
I realize that I didn't even mention your solution/device, which I think is
very elegant. Programming the device may be a complication for some though.
Can a simple device like the popular TLS-866 (different versions), possibly
with some sort of adapter, be made to do the job? The elevated programming
voltage for UV-erasable EPROMs (not available on recent versions of the
TLS-866) won't be needed of course.


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

I have a whole tube of mcm68764L eproms.? If these can replace the proms, I will mail 5 to someone who can and wants to program them.? I cannot find data sheet on Google, so don't know specs.? One of the eproms of the 5 I did attempt to program and may or may not have been damaged.? That is why 5 of them.? I also have mcm68766,? but may need them (or some) in the future for Tek, HP?? Will mail to contiguous United States. You pay postage.? I am looking for 2 Toshiba TA7761P.? The description on internet is wrong, so never attempted to purchase.? Used in radio control.??

By the way Raymond, the roms in the Commodore 64 were also Mostek.? Maybe why some of the failures.

Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022, 10:33:35 AM CDT, Dave Wise <david_wise@...> wrote:





The extra hardware for patching consisted of an FPLA (Field-Programmable Logic Array) and a PROM.? The FPLA monitored the address bus, and on certain ranges it rerouted Chip Select from the mask roms to the patch rom.? From the processor¡¯s point of view, this replaced a couple of instructions with a jump that led to replacement code in the PROM, which did its thing then jumped back to the mask ROM.

This scheme was used in 1980 in the 4024/4025/4027 terminals made by the Information Display Division at the Wilsonville plant.? Later models used EPROMs, 2732 and up if I recall correctly.

Dave Wise
IDD 1980-1995

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Raymond Domp Frank via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2022 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 04:41 AM, Carl Hallberg wrote:


The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to 24 dip
header.? I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to check
the access time.
Physical space is the problem here, not electrical specs; the four 24-pin ROMs are mounted end-to-end lengthwise with only 0.2" in between, which doesn't allow for the longer 28-pin 2764's. on standard converting headers. The two rows of two each that make up the total of four ROMs are 0.3" apart. There would be enough space if one built a flat plug-in piggy-back PCB and mounted the replacement EPROMs without sockets.

Standard MCM68766's (Ta <= 450ns) will do the job. I used them in one 7854. The bad IC's are not EPROMs (as Ram says) but mask ROMs, made by Mostek. Some 'scopes are equipped with Motorola mask ROMs. Those don't suffer from "ROM-rot". BTW, the board contains extra hardware that allows patching of data in address ranges read from the ROMs, probably because it was considered too slow and expensive to run new masks if a change was made.

Raymond


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

The extra hardware for patching consisted of an FPLA (Field-Programmable Logic Array) and a PROM. The FPLA monitored the address bus, and on certain ranges it rerouted Chip Select from the mask roms to the patch rom. From the processor¡¯s point of view, this replaced a couple of instructions with a jump that led to replacement code in the PROM, which did its thing then jumped back to the mask ROM.

This scheme was used in 1980 in the 4024/4025/4027 terminals made by the Information Display Division at the Wilsonville plant. Later models used EPROMs, 2732 and up if I recall correctly.

Dave Wise
IDD 1980-1995

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Raymond Domp Frank via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2022 8:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 04:41 AM, Carl Hallberg wrote:


The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to 24 dip
header. I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to check
the access time.
Physical space is the problem here, not electrical specs; the four 24-pin ROMs are mounted end-to-end lengthwise with only 0.2" in between, which doesn't allow for the longer 28-pin 2764's. on standard converting headers. The two rows of two each that make up the total of four ROMs are 0.3" apart. There would be enough space if one built a flat plug-in piggy-back PCB and mounted the replacement EPROMs without sockets.

Standard MCM68766's (Ta <= 450ns) will do the job. I used them in one 7854. The bad IC's are not EPROMs (as Ram says) but mask ROMs, made by Mostek. Some 'scopes are equipped with Motorola mask ROMs. Those don't suffer from "ROM-rot". BTW, the board contains extra hardware that allows patching of data in address ranges read from the ROMs, probably because it was considered too slow and expensive to run new masks if a change was made.

Raymond


Re: 475 Electrolytic Cap Replacement

 

I used this to find capacitors for my 475. Those that you have listed are already obsolete but the rule you posted helped me find what I was looking for. I will update what I used once I have finished and have a working scope. I do not want to post anything that I later find did not work out. All of the caps I purchased are between the original specs and 2x original on the capacitance. I understand that voltage only needs to be at least as high as the original. It is ok to put a 50v cap in place of a 35v. Higher capacitance will put more stress on the power supply, but too low capacitance will cause it to not work properly.

Finding the original replacement knobs and modpots is also turning out to be a challenge, but it is manageable. I watch ebay daily and sometimes I can get really great deals on stuff. VintageTek museum has been a great help. Shipping from Canada makes getting parts from any supplier there cost prohibitive for me at this time.


Peltola Connectors

 

If anyone is troubleshooting 7000 series circuit boards, be especially careful when re-inserting the Peltola connector wire. It is very easy to have the protruding wire miss the receiving hole and short out to the outside receptacle ground. It is always essential to use an ohmmeter to make sure the connection is not a short prior to applying electrical power. The short will easily damage or destroy the associated electronics.


Re: tek 453 external trigger input

 

Hello,

The upper right bnc only affects the delayed signal. Why not try the one for the A time base, at the lower right?

A simple 1-volt p-p signal works fine for a trigger level. Also, try using Line as a source too, along with an input signal that is far-off from 60 (or 50 Hz), to see the difference. The trace should shift around a lot more.

The manual has steps to check the triggering, and explains how it works. I would start with that if you haven't already.

It could be that the circuit problem is down-stream of any of the inputs.

On 4/6/2022 4:08 AM, nanovnauser@... wrote:
Hi all,ive just got around to looking at my 453 fet model,its lost its triggering,i want to use the external trigger input on the top r/h bnc,just for diagnosis,what signal is needed,ie level frequency etc?,TIA.




Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 06:06 AM, Ram wrote:


Raymond - thanks for correcting me on the ROM rot in mask ROMs.
Hi RAM,
I realize that I didn't even mention your solution/device, which I think is very elegant. Programming the device may be a complication for some though. Can a simple device like the popular TLS-866 (different versions), possibly with some sort of adapter, be made to do the job? The elevated programming voltage for UV-erasable EPROMs (not available on recent versions of the TLS-866) won't be needed of course.

Raymond


tek 453 external trigger input

 

Hi all,ive just got around to looking at my 453 fet model,its lost its triggering,i want to use the external trigger input on the top r/h bnc,just for diagnosis,what signal is needed,ie level frequency etc?,TIA.


Re: Tek 453 resistor specs -- Horiz amp

 

The diode addition is around Q664, half of the slope comparator pair of transistors. (B-time base) There is also an extra resistor. The soldering looks very neat, as if it was done at the factory, but I suspect someone else added these.
I could post a photo, or a sketch, but maybe a brief description would be enough to jog someone memory.

The extra resistor is placed along R665, one end connected to R665, the other end to R653. The two diodes are connected in series, One end of this series is connected to R665, the other to D653 and R653. D653 has a fine wire coiled around it and soldered to each lead on the diode. One of the two extra diodes has the a mark in the middle of the body, but no cathode mark is visible; it is glass-bodied. The anode of the other one is connected to R665.

Any ideas on why this extra circuitry is there? The slope switch for the B-time base works as expected when the B-Sweep Mode switch is in the "Triggerable after Delay Time " position., but not when it is in "B-Starts after Delay Time" position. The manual is not specific on what position the B-Mode switch can be in (works both ways or not), but my guess is that the slope should change in either position using the Slope switch. Same goes for the level knob (for B) -- it only works while in the "Triggerable after Delay Time" setting.

Unless there is a good reason to leave it in, my plan is to lift the leads and see what happens. I'll leave the fine wire around D653 there.


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

Brian - The schematic is quite simple and I'd be happy to share it in reply to a PM.
Raymond - thanks for correcting me on the ROM rot in mask ROMs.
Best - Ram


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 04:41 AM, Carl Hallberg wrote:


The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to 24 dip
header.? I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to check
the access time.
Physical space is the problem here, not electrical specs; the four 24-pin ROMs are mounted end-to-end lengthwise with only 0.2" in between, which doesn't allow for the longer 28-pin 2764's. on standard converting headers. The two rows of two each that make up the total of four ROMs are 0.3" apart. There would be enough space if one built a flat plug-in piggy-back PCB and mounted the replacement EPROMs without sockets.

Standard MCM68766's (Ta <= 450ns) will do the job. I used them in one 7854. The bad IC's are not EPROMs (as Ram says) but mask ROMs, made by Mostek. Some 'scopes are equipped with Motorola mask ROMs. Those don't suffer from "ROM-rot". BTW, the board contains extra hardware that allows patching of data in address ranges read from the ROMs, probably because it was considered too slow and expensive to run new masks if a change was made.

Raymond


Re: 468 Storage Mode board problem?

 

The z-axis response adjustment may help. You may need to turn up the intensity. You should see the leading edge of the triggering signal in any case.

--
Bob Haas


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

The MCM68766 can always be replaced by a 2764 using a 28 dip socket to 24 dip header.? I don't have a 7854 and didn't look up the specs, but need to check the access time.? I built a few adapters for the Commodore 64 computer and 1541 disk drive.? The rom in the 1541 was close to the TO3 voltage regulator and the heat seemed to cause failures.? Replacements worked great.? If details are needed and you can't find it on the internet, I can look through my junk for the method I used.? I also copied Commodore? roms to MCM68766.??

Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 05:58:21 PM CDT, Raymond Domp Frank <hewpatek@...> wrote:





On Tue, Apr? 5, 2022 at 06:31 AM, Ram wrote:


For 7854 owners who have been suffering from the ROM Rot problem with their
EPROMS
A few years ago, our member Holger L¨¹bben designed a replacement ROM card using commonly available components.
He had complete sets and kits available. See this thread:
/g/TekScopes/topic/76166880#170558
The board contains the complete operating software and also supports the diagnostic mode, to be selected by an on-board switch..
I'm lucky enough to have one and it works very well.
AFAIK, it's out of stock and he does not intend to produce more.

Raymond


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 06:31 AM, Ram wrote:


For 7854 owners who have been suffering from the ROM Rot problem with their
EPROMS
A few years ago, our member Holger L¨¹bben designed a replacement ROM card using commonly available components.
He had complete sets and kits available. See this thread:
/g/TekScopes/topic/76166880#170558
The board contains the complete operating software and also supports the diagnostic mode, to be selected by an on-board switch..
I'm lucky enough to have one and it works very well.
AFAIK, it's out of stock and he does not intend to produce more.

Raymond


Re: (7854) A Drop-In Replacement for the MCM68766 EPROM

 

Nice. Is the schematic public?


Re: 7104 Vertical Switch circuit board

 

That's what made the board so easy to see:? square with a hybrid in the center.
-Dave

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 10:44:38 AM PDT, Gary Robert Bosworth <grbosworth@...> wrote:

Dave: Thanx for looking.? If you ever come across a Vertical Switch circuit
board from a 7104, please contact me.? I suspect there are few individual
boards just laying around.? The board makes use of a custom Tektronix
thin-film hybrid U668 #155-0173-00 which is not 2nd-sourced.

Gary

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM Dave Seiter <d.seiter@...> wrote:

? Hi Gary,
I looked the PCB up in the 7104 manual and then checked my stash of
boards, and I don't see anything that comes close.? I did have a full set
from a 7104 that was taken out out by a forklift (upper left side hit), but
I don't see any of the lower section items, so I may have sold the entire
lower half at some point.? I do have a few other hulks, but they are
"functional", so I don't want to part one out.
Sorry!? I was hoping...
-Dave
? ? On Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 07:30:08 AM PDT, Gary Robert Bosworth <
grbosworth@...> wrote:

? Dave: I will try to verify the part number when I get home this evening.
As for now, the Tektronix Component Number is A16, and the Tektronix Part
Number is 670-4769-01.? I need a fully populated Vertical Channel Switch
circuit board for the 7104 oscilloscope.? Thank you for your assistance in
this matter.

Gary


On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:12 PM Dave Seiter <d.seiter@...> wrote:

? I might have one; do you know the p/n off hand?
-Dave
? ? On Monday, April 4, 2022, 07:16:34 AM PDT, Gary Robert Bosworth <
grbosworth@...> wrote:

? I need a Vertical Switch circuit board for a 7104 oscilloscope. Please
let me know if you have a scrap one laying around that you would like to
sell.

Gary











--
Gary Robert Bosworth
grbosworth@...
Tel: 310-317-2247











--
Gary Robert Bosworth
grbosworth@...
Tel: 310-317-2247


Re: Looking for TDS600/700 etc Java software.

 

Hey Jared,

I guess I confused this with the TTiP link
. Doesn't look like this goes
beyond the -A scopes, if the readme files are to be trusted.
My TDS784D has the HDD option, but it never occurred to me to look at the
HD. Maybe I should pop it out one of these days and see what might be
lurking there.

Siggi

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:20 PM Jared Cabot via groups.io <jaredcabot=
[email protected]> wrote:

Unfortunately, that's just the user manual (I was the one who added most
of the recent info on that page. So, so far, I haven't been able to find
any apps at all.
I tried running an undelete on the HDD option I acquired too, but the data
was too far gone to extract anything, so that was a dead-end too.