开云体育

I have a battery BMS that I am reverse engineering.
I have a resistor with a code that I have never seen and cannot find any information on.
The resistor is a SMT device marked 4L0.
The L appears to be a multiplier.
The resistor measures as a short with the equipment that I have.
I suspect that the resistor is in the milli Ohm range.
Could be 0.004 or 0.0004 Ohms or others.
This does not comply with the EIA-96 format, that I can see.

Any help??

Thanks
Glenn

I have a battery BMS that I am reverse engineering.
I have a resistor with a code that I have never seen and cannot find any
information on.
The resistor is a SMT device marked 4L0.
The L appears to be a multiplier.
The resistor measures as a short with the equipment that I have.
I suspect that the resistor is in the milli Ohm range.
Could be 0.004 or 0.0004 Ohms or others.
This does not comply with the EIA-96 format, that I can see.

Any help??

Thanks
Glenn

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417
Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@... AMSAT LM 2178
QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR
"It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the licen

Ok, perhaps I can clear up a bit of this.

Remember that in the 70's to 90's (roughly) there were no (to speak of) FPGA IC's so digital design was lots of 14, 16, 20, and maybe 40 pin chips, depending on the design.? The more (and perhaps most) complicated chips were 8 bit microprocessors, 64K address space, etc.? If you don't know exactly how this maps out, consider that the processor in your smart phone is a genius, and the processors of that time were, if at all, clever chimpanzees (with apologies to Ham and Bonzo).

So we have designs with a lot of chips, lots of discrete parts, and so on.? Tektronix was doing well in oscilloscopes, but had no share (much) in the test equipment market.? You'd need pulse generators, sine wave generators, function generators, meters, power supplies, and others.

So Tektronix looked at the market for test equipment, and likely noticed several things:? 1) a lot of test equipment setups needed a function generator, meters, power supplies and other goodies. 2) they weren't making any of them, 3) these things were expensive and they were fairly large in size.? 4) a small size test setup, rack mount, desk top, or even portable (look up TM515), well, that could be useful., and 5) if they could figure out a way to sell bits 'n' pieces, and allow people to just buy what they needed, well, maybe there's a market there.

Enter the TM500 series.? Very few have microprocessors, having been designed before the widespread use of such (now, if it DOESN'T have one, it's worthy of note).

Most are discrete circuitry, some have ICs, some have some complex digital circuitry (a counter is not absolutely a simple design..... especially period and time measurements).

So what Tek did is to design a standard sized frame (same width as the 7000 series), same height as the 7000 series, but more shallow.? (saved manufacturing costs).? They provided three DC supplies, a + 11, a +35 and a -35.? Once regulated down, each bulk supply could be used for a number of projects.? They also supplied, *per plugin slot*, three AC windings which could be connected and used to make isolated power supplies in each module (and you need this for meters, for instance).? The DC supplies were all pretty much referenced to a common ground.? In addition, the connector (per module) had a LOT of unused pins.? Those pins could connect to individual circuits in the module, and would allow the backplane to be wired in such a way that the front panel connections would be duplicated on the backplane.? This would allow dedicating slots to a particular configuration, and minimizing front panel connections.? An example would be wiring the output of a power supply to a DMM, or? wiring the output of a frequency source to a counter.? All done under the table.

For power supplies, there are 1,2,3,4,5 and 6? slot frames.? The 5 slot frame is in a luggage style sealed enclosure, and was designed to be able to be shipped on an aircraft, so you could take your test equipment with you.? Tektronix also had oscilloscope modules ranging from small, low bandwidth modules, to storage, to 80 Mhz dual channel scope plugins (double width).

Modules evolved in capability as time went on, so you have 3.5 digit DMMS without autoranging, 3.5 digit DMMs with autoranging, simplified lower cost DMMS, and the like.? Pulse generators went from general purpose to 250 Mhz generators to a specialized 70+ volt output generator with variable rise times.? Function generators were sine, square wave, triangle wave, ramp, pulse, etc.... All depended on which one.? Some had built in frequency modulators and could do (to an extent) pulse trains.

There were power supplies, single, dual, and triple outputs, oscilloscope modules, function generators, pulse generators, meters, frequency counters, digital delays, logic analyzers, and so on (check the TEKWIKI for a good idea, or look in the catalogs).

One problem (at least one) was the development of ATE (hereinafter known as Automatic Test Equipment), in other words, run by a computer.? Tek brought out the TM5000 series, with a slightly different design, but including two very specific extras, a microprocessor controlling everything, and an IEE-488 (GPIB/HPIB) interface.? This allowed the test equipment to make measurements, set up conditions, and such under computer control. They had computer controlled switches and digital input/output modules.

Other modules would include such specialized things as optical (fiber optics) measurements, and the like (don't have any of them!)

So in short:? A modular equipment system consisting of a rack, and plugin modules designed to be used in test equipment setups, very capable of being customized.? Need a rack with 5 DMMS?? go for it.? Rack with 3 counters and 3 signal generators?? Easy. Next setup?? unplug the modules, put them back in stock, get the new modules out, plug them in, and you've reconfigured the whole thing.

WIthin the limits of the equipment and the technology of the time, it was a very good idea.

Harvey


On 1/1/2021 6:52 PM, Lawrance A. Schneider wrote:

TM500 - Ok, it fits a very large set of modules.? Why?? Are there modules that do things that can only be done using a particular module?? Yes, I could read the specs for dozens and dozens of the modules, but that would confuse my unwashed brain even further.? Is this admirable project useful in a way that my R&S RTB2000 and my Tek2465b would find it useful?

I do not want to in any way diminish the project.? I looks to be a true work of art and engineering.? But I have no 'modules' and certainly no power supply for same.? My oldest scope is my pride and joy: 2465BDM.? Why would I accumulate these modules?

I hope no-one hammers me into the ground.? I'm simply TOTALLY IGNORANT of these modules and the power supply for same.

Thank you,??????????? larry

On Jan 1, 2021, at 5:10 PM, Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote:

?Ok, perhaps I can clear up a bit of this.

Remember that in the 70's to 90's (roughly) there were no (to speak of) FPGA IC's so digital design was lots of 14, 16, 20, and maybe 40 pin chips, depending on the design. The more (and perhaps most) complicated chips were 8 bit microprocessors, 64K address space, etc. If you don't know exactly how this maps out, consider that the processor in your smart phone is a genius, and the processors of that time were, if at all, clever chimpanzees (with apologies to Ham and Bonzo).

So we have designs with a lot of chips, lots of discrete parts, and so on. Tektronix was doing well in oscilloscopes, but had no share (much) in the test equipment market. You'd need pulse generators, sine wave generators, function generators, meters, power supplies, and others.

So Tektronix looked at the market for test equipment, and likely noticed several things: 1) a lot of test equipment setups needed a function generator, meters, power supplies and other goodies. 2) they weren't making any of them, 3) these things were expensive and they were fairly large in size. 4) a small size test setup, rack mount, desk top, or even portable (look up TM515), well, that could be useful., and 5) if they could figure out a way to sell bits 'n' pieces, and allow people to just buy what they needed, well, maybe there's a market there.

Enter the TM500 series. Very few have microprocessors, having been designed before the widespread use of such (now, if it DOESN'T have one, it's worthy of note).

Most are discrete circuitry, some have ICs, some have some complex digital circuitry (a counter is not absolutely a simple design..... especially period and time measurements).

So what Tek did is to design a standard sized frame (same width as the 7000 series), same height as the 7000 series, but more shallow. (saved manufacturing costs). They provided three DC supplies, a + 11, a +35 and a -35. Once regulated down, each bulk supply could be used for a number of projects. They also supplied, *per plugin slot*, three AC windings which could be connected and used to make isolated power supplies in each module (and you need this for meters, for instance). The DC supplies were all pretty much referenced to a common ground. In addition, the connector (per module) had a LOT of unused pins. Those pins could connect to individual circuits in the module, and would allow the backplane to be wired in such a way that the front panel connections would be duplicated on the backplane. This would allow dedicating slots to a particular configuration, and minimizing front panel connections. An example would be wiring the output of a power supply to a DMM, or wiring the output of a frequency source to a counter. All done under the table.

For power supplies, there are 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 slot frames. The 5 slot frame is in a luggage style sealed enclosure, and was designed to be able to be shipped on an aircraft, so you could take your test equipment with you. Tektronix also had oscilloscope modules ranging from small, low bandwidth modules, to storage, to 80 Mhz dual channel scope plugins (double width).

Modules evolved in capability as time went on, so you have 3.5 digit DMMS without autoranging, 3.5 digit DMMs with autoranging, simplified lower cost DMMS, and the like. Pulse generators went from general purpose to 250 Mhz generators to a specialized 70+ volt output generator with variable rise times. Function generators were sine, square wave, triangle wave, ramp, pulse, etc.... All depended on which one. Some had built in frequency modulators and could do (to an extent) pulse trains.

There were power supplies, single, dual, and triple outputs, oscilloscope modules, function generators, pulse generators, meters, frequency counters, digital delays, logic analyzers, and so on (check the TEKWIKI for a good idea, or look in the catalogs).

One problem (at least one) was the development of ATE (hereinafter known as Automatic Test Equipment), in other words, run by a computer. Tek brought out the TM5000 series, with a slightly different design, but including two very specific extras, a microprocessor controlling everything, and an IEE-488 (GPIB/HPIB) interface. This allowed the test equipment to make measurements, set up conditions, and such under computer control. They had computer controlled switches and digital input/output modules.

Other modules would include such specialized things as optical (fiber optics) measurements, and the like (don't have any of them!)

So in short: A modular equipment system consisting of a rack, and plugin modules designed to be used in test equipment setups, very capable of being customized. Need a rack with 5 DMMS? go for it. Rack with 3 counters and 3 signal generators? Easy. Next setup? unplug the modules, put them back in stock, get the new modules out, plug them in, and you've reconfigured the whole thing.

WIthin the limits of the equipment and the technology of the time, it was a very good idea.

Harvey

On 1/1/2021 6:52 PM, Lawrance A. Schneider wrote:
TM500 - Ok, it fits a very large set of modules. Why? Are there modules that do things that can only be done using a particular module? Yes, I could read the specs for dozens and dozens of the modules, but that would confuse my unwashed brain even further. Is this admirable project useful in a way that my R&S RTB2000 and my Tek2465b would find it useful?

I do not want to in any way diminish the project. I looks to be a true work of art and engineering. But I have no 'modules' and certainly no power supply for same. My oldest scope is my pride and joy: 2465BDM. Why would I accumulate these modules?

I hope no-one hammers me into the ground. I'm simply TOTALLY IGNORANT of these modules and the power supply for same.

Thank you, larry

TM500 - Ok, it fits a very large set of modules. Why? Are there modules that do things that can only be done using a particular module? Yes, I could read the specs for dozens and dozens of the modules, but that would confuse my unwashed brain even further. Is this admirable project useful in a way that my R&S RTB2000 and my Tek2465b would find it useful?

I do not want to in any way diminish the project. I looks to be a true work of art and engineering. But I have no 'modules' and certainly no power supply for same. My oldest scope is my pride and joy: 2465BDM. Why would I accumulate these modules?

I hope no-one hammers me into the ground. I'm simply TOTALLY IGNORANT of these modules and the power supply for same.

Thank you, larry

Hi Jared,

Very nice implementation of this Power Supply Tester. Hat off.

By the way around April this year a nice 067-1201-99 was sold for USD
148.95 (BIN and eBay) and its TM5000 counterpart (067-0995-99) sold in
October this year for USD 349.99 (also BIN and eBay).

May I suggest the 067-0938-00 (Notch FIlter) as a new Project. Scarce and
pricey. Last one sold for USD 349.95 (BIN and eBay).

Greetings,

Egge Siert

Steve

I in 2014 did a paper for SMPTE, Belden contributed 100m reels of cables
to the project, both TP and coax of 18 different types.
We ran digital audio signals with rate to 24.576 MHz and looked at atten,
phase dist, etc.
Should have checked the prop delay too!

With 100 m cables, it would have been ~ 328 ns/dielectric prop factor x
1.4 so about 500 ns.

Jon

Does anyone know of a source for the cable-end receptacle that mates with the plug shown in this photo


The inside is metal, and I wonder if the original line cord had a metal ground ring that mated with it, like some of the larger twist-lock connectors do.

In lieu of finding the receptacle, I thought I'd replace it with the early hubbell 'midget' (pre NEMA) twist-lock connectors, but even those are too large for this hole, and I'd love not have to modify the chassis. The screw spacing is 1 1/2", and the chassis opening is 1 1/8"

thanks,
Paul