¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: 2445 woes

 

I wholeheartedly agree. I'm so glad I was pointed to this group because
people who suggest blanket swap of capacitors are not my sort of thing. I
prefer to diagnose the problem by doing measurements, establish and confirm
theory what is causing the issue and only then when all is working I start
on preventive maintenance tasks. I will only get to my workshop on monday,
but I'll get back to you with the outcome

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 23:34 Siggi, <siggi@...> wrote:

Hey Ondrej,

In your shoes I'd start by measuring the -1.25 and the +1.36 reference
voltages with a DMM or the like. If they're spot on, you'll be wasting your
time looking for trace damage, and you may complicate the diagnosis and fix
by adding new failures when replacing components. I'm not saying you
shouldn't do it, just that you should start by conclusively diagnosing the
problem FIRST.

Siggi

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:17 PM Ondrej Pavelka <info@...
wrote:

Excellent idea, I have plenty experience dealing with corroded tracks
and I
am equipped to fix it. I have microscope, chemical tracers to make the
leaks glow under UV and other means of fixing this. Let me get on with it
do a proper check under the microscope and get back to you.


On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 22:03 Siggi, <siggi@...> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ondrej Pavelka <
info@...
wrote:

P.S. I found 3 leaky surface mount electrolytic caps on the board I
think
it's referred to as a A board? I will change those to prevent further
corrosion spread but what are they in charge of ? Could these be the
reason
for the troubles?
Yes, this is quite likely the problem. Your 2445B (the -B is very
important, there are important differences between the 2445 and the
2445B).
The 2445B is a drive-by-wire scope, in that the A5 board generates a
multitude of voltages with a DAC. These voltages in turn control
various
parts of the scope.
What tends to happen is that the leaking capacitors wreck the
components and PCB traces that are involved with creating the DAC's
reference current. The quick and easy way to assess the state of the
DAC
is
to measure the -1.25 and +1.36 reference voltages on the A5 board. On
some
versions of the board, these are broken out to test points, but if not
you'll have to hunt around for suitable test points to assess them.
If those are off, then that's a sure indication that your DAC reference
current network is bad.








Fixing a Tektronix 2246

 

Hi all! New to groups, so bear with me if I¡¯ve messed up something.

I have a Tektronix 2246 with some very strange symptoms, it¡¯d be great if I
could have some help diagnosing it. Basically, all I have is a flat trace,
no response from signals and no text on the top or bottom to indicate
voltage. That is, unless, I press the menu keys that pop up the previous
measurements, voltmeter, etc. if I press those, the display works.

So far, I¡¯ve:
-checked the voltage rails, all spot on
-looked around for faulty components
-replaced a leaking capacitor on the psu, even though the voltage was fine
-tried every combination of the front panel buttons/knobs

How would I go about finding the issue? Any help would be appreciated.

-Liam


Re: MCM68766 and MCM68764

 

Hi David,

Anything that will increase the number of eyeballs looking at the datasheets
will improve the chances of finding the answer.
More people will be willing to help if you make it easier to do.
Providing links to the exact datasheets you found would save any of us
willing to compare them a lot of work looking for them.
It's important to know exactly where you got each datasheet so we are
looking at the same ones you are.

Dennis Tillman W7pF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David C.
Partridge
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 1:09 AM
To: TekScopes <[email protected]>
Subject: [TekScopes] MCM68766 and MCM68764

Looking at the datasheets these devices appear the be the same, am I missing
something, or was it just a case of the MCM68766 superseding the MCM68764?

Thanks
David






--
Dennis Tillman W7pF
TekScopes Moderator


Re: Oscilloscope Sales

 

I have no idea why this happened.
Can anyone else offer an explanation?
Dennis TillmanW7pF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colin Herbert via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 2:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Oscilloscope Sales

It was ok on my computer. I wonder why that should happen? Perhaps Dennis has some idea?
Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Reed Dickinson
Sent: 03 June 2020 07:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Oscilloscope Sales

Hi:
I have no idea how that happened. Here it is again:
reed714@...
phone, after noon only714 838 6241
On Tuesday, June 2, 2020, 09:48:52 PM PDT, M Yachad <yachadm@...> wrote:

Reed

Please write your email using the AT format. The program truncated your full address after the @.

Thanks

Menahem Yachad











--
Dennis Tillman W7pF
TekScopes Moderator


Re: Digital Oscilloscopes: When Things Go Wrong

 

Hi Carl,
Thanks for the link.I like how the author compared the effect of each thing done to the raw sampled data to make it more believable
Has anybody else wondered why the author, Israel Banini, chose a site devoted to health news to put his article.
Was he hoping no one would ever find it?
Did he think all DSO users should know how to tell by looking at their feet that they might soon have a heart attack?
And finally, why does the site owner believe that the article should be crammed up against the left edge of the web page making it extremely annoying to read?

Dennis Tillman W7pF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carl Moon via groups.io
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 5:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TekScopes] Digital Oscilloscopes: When Things Go Wrong

DSOs (digital oscilloscopes) offer a great many advantages over their analog equivalents but as they say, ¡°There¡¯s no such thing as a free lunch.¡± Digital scopes sample, digitize, and store waveforms and let you for measure, analyze, and archive signals. But, that sampling process brings a few issues along as ¡°baggage.

Here is a few of them and how to handle them







--
Dennis Tillman W7pF
TekScopes Moderator


Re: 2445 woes

 

Hey Ondrej,

In your shoes I'd start by measuring the -1.25 and the +1.36 reference
voltages with a DMM or the like. If they're spot on, you'll be wasting your
time looking for trace damage, and you may complicate the diagnosis and fix
by adding new failures when replacing components. I'm not saying you
shouldn't do it, just that you should start by conclusively diagnosing the
problem FIRST.

Siggi

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:17 PM Ondrej Pavelka <info@...>
wrote:

Excellent idea, I have plenty experience dealing with corroded tracks and I
am equipped to fix it. I have microscope, chemical tracers to make the
leaks glow under UV and other means of fixing this. Let me get on with it
do a proper check under the microscope and get back to you.


On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 22:03 Siggi, <siggi@...> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ondrej Pavelka <
info@...
wrote:

P.S. I found 3 leaky surface mount electrolytic caps on the board I
think
it's referred to as a A board? I will change those to prevent further
corrosion spread but what are they in charge of ? Could these be the
reason
for the troubles?
Yes, this is quite likely the problem. Your 2445B (the -B is very
important, there are important differences between the 2445 and the
2445B).
The 2445B is a drive-by-wire scope, in that the A5 board generates a
multitude of voltages with a DAC. These voltages in turn control various
parts of the scope.
What tends to happen is that the leaking capacitors wreck the
components and PCB traces that are involved with creating the DAC's
reference current. The quick and easy way to assess the state of the DAC
is
to measure the -1.25 and +1.36 reference voltages on the A5 board. On
some
versions of the board, these are broken out to test points, but if not
you'll have to hunt around for suitable test points to assess them.
If those are off, then that's a sure indication that your DAC reference
current network is bad.






Re: 2465 Project, story so far.

 

Hey Ondrej,

you're conflating threads here - this thread is about problems in a 2465
(no-B).

Siggi

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:56 PM Ondrej Pavelka <info@...>
wrote:

Hi,
I've been through the manual but it's for 2445 I'm not sure if it covers
the B as well.
It passes all the startup tests just fine so I need to find a way to backup
the Dallas and transfer the contents over.
My programmer doenst support Dallas 1225Y but I think I'll make conversion
board to 2764 EPROM. Just slight wiring change. What I am yet to figur out
us how to transfer those contents to a new Dallas or to existing one with
new battery.


On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 22:09 Andy Warner, <andyw@...> wrote:

Do you have the service manual ? It talks about the boot process and
where
things get stopped.

I was lucky enough not to lose my NVRAM contents before I was able to
recap
and capture the nvram contents.

As I remember it, failing the RAM test (which includes the NVRAM) stops
things very early in the blinky-light POST cycle.

The section of the service manual is kind of oblique, IMO, but once you
get
how they are trying to say things it gets better.

My scope had the GPIB option, and it failed a little while after my
recap,
so I just removed it, since I know I would never use it. If you have any
options, I suggest trying to boot without them.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM <trogg58@...> wrote:

Hi all, another hopeful newbie on here, I found this site whilst
looking
for some clues to attempt repair a 2465. I have managed to get it
almost
back to life but now stuck, I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to
point me in the right direction.
Here is some background info, I have had the scope for about 12 years,
but
not really had chance to use it, the magic smoke came out about 10
years
ago when I switched it on, it got put on the shelf due to lack of time
and
left there. Now I have some time on my hands (due to being furloughed)
I
decided to dig it out and try and repair it.
After opening it up I spotted that C1018 had popped and C1016 didn¡¯t
look
good so replaced both. C1020, C1052 and C1020 also had seen better days
so
swapped them too, looking at all the other caps no obvious leaks or
bulges
so reassembled and switched on, the CRT just about came to life and
then
the smoke came out again. This time it was C1130, so I decided to
re-cap
as
advised on this forum.
I have replaced all the usual electrolytics on both PSU boards, with a
mix
of Nichicon and Panasonics, and the Rifa caps, rebuilt and hey presto
all
the voltages are well within tolerance, ripple all good too, but ¡­..
the
post test gets as far as lighting all the front panel led¡¯s and they
stay
on, CRT comes up with a static bizarre display showing four groups of
1111
across the top and bottom a central vertical line of dots, a horizontal
central line of four groups of 4 dots then a top right to bottom left
diagonal of four groups of 4 dots, (picture posted under 2465 strange
display) only focus and readout intensity controls on the front panel
work., pressing the Delta T or V have no effect.
I do believe that I am the first person to effect any repairs to this
scope as all screws are present and there are no signs of any ¡°after
manufacture¡± soldering of tampering, so its hands up I think I have
done
it
in myself.
Anyone have any ideas where to go first?
Thanks in advance¡­
John Carter



--
Andy






Re: Tektronix 7000 flexible extender project, need some advices regarding PCB design

 

I always add 0.15mm (6mil) to the diameter of the pin (rectangular pins: diagonal) and round up to the next level of precision (0.1mm, or 4mil) for holes, never had anything that did not fit. For automated component placement this number may be a bit on the tight side: my assembler asked for the double number.
The minimum annular ring for the pad is specified by the PCB manufacturer, but never less than the minimum track width (usually 6 or 8mil).
When the pad has to absorb mechanical stress (like with connectors) I make the annular ring as wide as I can get away with, sometimes I even add copper traces for extra support...


Re: 2465 Project, story so far.

 

Hi,
I've been through the manual but it's for 2445 I'm not sure if it covers
the B as well.
It passes all the startup tests just fine so I need to find a way to backup
the Dallas and transfer the contents over.
My programmer doenst support Dallas 1225Y but I think I'll make conversion
board to 2764 EPROM. Just slight wiring change. What I am yet to figur out
us how to transfer those contents to a new Dallas or to existing one with
new battery.

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 22:09 Andy Warner, <andyw@...> wrote:

Do you have the service manual ? It talks about the boot process and where
things get stopped.

I was lucky enough not to lose my NVRAM contents before I was able to recap
and capture the nvram contents.

As I remember it, failing the RAM test (which includes the NVRAM) stops
things very early in the blinky-light POST cycle.

The section of the service manual is kind of oblique, IMO, but once you get
how they are trying to say things it gets better.

My scope had the GPIB option, and it failed a little while after my recap,
so I just removed it, since I know I would never use it. If you have any
options, I suggest trying to boot without them.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM <trogg58@...> wrote:

Hi all, another hopeful newbie on here, I found this site whilst looking
for some clues to attempt repair a 2465. I have managed to get it almost
back to life but now stuck, I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to
point me in the right direction.
Here is some background info, I have had the scope for about 12 years,
but
not really had chance to use it, the magic smoke came out about 10 years
ago when I switched it on, it got put on the shelf due to lack of time
and
left there. Now I have some time on my hands (due to being furloughed) I
decided to dig it out and try and repair it.
After opening it up I spotted that C1018 had popped and C1016 didn¡¯t look
good so replaced both. C1020, C1052 and C1020 also had seen better days
so
swapped them too, looking at all the other caps no obvious leaks or
bulges
so reassembled and switched on, the CRT just about came to life and then
the smoke came out again. This time it was C1130, so I decided to re-cap
as
advised on this forum.
I have replaced all the usual electrolytics on both PSU boards, with a
mix
of Nichicon and Panasonics, and the Rifa caps, rebuilt and hey presto
all
the voltages are well within tolerance, ripple all good too, but ¡­.. the
post test gets as far as lighting all the front panel led¡¯s and they stay
on, CRT comes up with a static bizarre display showing four groups of
1111
across the top and bottom a central vertical line of dots, a horizontal
central line of four groups of 4 dots then a top right to bottom left
diagonal of four groups of 4 dots, (picture posted under 2465 strange
display) only focus and readout intensity controls on the front panel
work., pressing the Delta T or V have no effect.
I do believe that I am the first person to effect any repairs to this
scope as all screws are present and there are no signs of any ¡°after
manufacture¡± soldering of tampering, so its hands up I think I have done
it
in myself.
Anyone have any ideas where to go first?
Thanks in advance¡­
John Carter



--
Andy




Re: MCM68766 and MCM68764

 

That makes sense - also explains why my rommer that "supposedly" doesn¡¯t support MCM68766 is quite happy when told they are MCM68764!

David

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raymond Domp Frank
Sent: 05 June 2020 12:40
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] MCM68766 and MCM68764

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM, David C. Partridge wrote:


Looking at the datasheets these devices appear the be the same, am I missing
something, or was it just a case of the MCM68766 superseding the MCM68764?
AFAIR the two are mostly the same. The main/only difference is in the Enable lines. The 68764 has a Chip Enable(low) ('CE) line, which in the 68766 is an Output Enable(low) ('OE) line.
Data availability in the 68766 after 'OE is faster (100 ns) than in the 68764 after 'CE (450ns). OTOH, the ('CE) in the 68764, when high (i.e. Disabled), puts the chip in a low-power mode.
Raw read access time for both chips is the same (450ns) and 'CE is as fast as the delay from Address Valid to Data Valid with 'CE asserted. (Nominal max. times for the most popular versions).
If the low power capability of the 68764 is irrelevant, a 68766 will always do, the 68764 may not. I haven't checked if the 68764 will fulfill the 7854's timing requirements.

Raymond


Re: 2445 jumpy readout

 

Sorry for post duplication, i thought the post got lost but it was only waiting for admin approval. I have worded my questions slightly differently so maybe it will be easier to understand since I'm not native English speaker.


Re: 2465 Project, story so far.

 

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM <trogg58@...> wrote:

I have replaced all the usual electrolytics on both PSU boards, with a mix
of Nichicon and Panasonics, and the Rifa caps, rebuilt and hey presto all
the voltages are well within tolerance, ripple all good too, but ¡­.. the
post test gets as far as lighting all the front panel led¡¯s and they stay
on, CRT comes up with a static bizarre display showing four groups of 1111
across the top and bottom a central vertical line of dots, a horizontal
central line of four groups of 4 dots then a top right to bottom left
diagonal of four groups of 4 dots, (picture posted under 2465 strange
display)

Link to album: /g/TekScopes/album?id=248127.


only focus and readout intensity controls on the front panel work.,
pressing the Delta T or V have no effect.
I believe it's the A/B trig button you press to get out of the POST display.
If the "Kernel" tests are failing, you'll see a decoding chart for the lit
front-panel LEDs on page 6-13 of the service manual.


Re: 2445 woes

 

Excellent idea, I have plenty experience dealing with corroded tracks and I
am equipped to fix it. I have microscope, chemical tracers to make the
leaks glow under UV and other means of fixing this. Let me get on with it
do a proper check under the microscope and get back to you.

On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, 22:03 Siggi, <siggi@...> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ondrej Pavelka <info@...
wrote:

P.S. I found 3 leaky surface mount electrolytic caps on the board I think
it's referred to as a A board? I will change those to prevent further
corrosion spread but what are they in charge of ? Could these be the
reason
for the troubles?
Yes, this is quite likely the problem. Your 2445B (the -B is very
important, there are important differences between the 2445 and the 2445B).
The 2445B is a drive-by-wire scope, in that the A5 board generates a
multitude of voltages with a DAC. These voltages in turn control various
parts of the scope.
What tends to happen is that the leaking capacitors wreck the
components and PCB traces that are involved with creating the DAC's
reference current. The quick and easy way to assess the state of the DAC is
to measure the -1.25 and +1.36 reference voltages on the A5 board. On some
versions of the board, these are broken out to test points, but if not
you'll have to hunt around for suitable test points to assess them.
If those are off, then that's a sure indication that your DAC reference
current network is bad.




Re: 2465 Project, story so far.

 

Do you have the service manual ? It talks about the boot process and where
things get stopped.

I was lucky enough not to lose my NVRAM contents before I was able to recap
and capture the nvram contents.

As I remember it, failing the RAM test (which includes the NVRAM) stops
things very early in the blinky-light POST cycle.

The section of the service manual is kind of oblique, IMO, but once you get
how they are trying to say things it gets better.

My scope had the GPIB option, and it failed a little while after my recap,
so I just removed it, since I know I would never use it. If you have any
options, I suggest trying to boot without them.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM <trogg58@...> wrote:

Hi all, another hopeful newbie on here, I found this site whilst looking
for some clues to attempt repair a 2465. I have managed to get it almost
back to life but now stuck, I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to
point me in the right direction.
Here is some background info, I have had the scope for about 12 years, but
not really had chance to use it, the magic smoke came out about 10 years
ago when I switched it on, it got put on the shelf due to lack of time and
left there. Now I have some time on my hands (due to being furloughed) I
decided to dig it out and try and repair it.
After opening it up I spotted that C1018 had popped and C1016 didn¡¯t look
good so replaced both. C1020, C1052 and C1020 also had seen better days so
swapped them too, looking at all the other caps no obvious leaks or bulges
so reassembled and switched on, the CRT just about came to life and then
the smoke came out again. This time it was C1130, so I decided to re-cap as
advised on this forum.
I have replaced all the usual electrolytics on both PSU boards, with a mix
of Nichicon and Panasonics, and the Rifa caps, rebuilt and hey presto all
the voltages are well within tolerance, ripple all good too, but ¡­.. the
post test gets as far as lighting all the front panel led¡¯s and they stay
on, CRT comes up with a static bizarre display showing four groups of 1111
across the top and bottom a central vertical line of dots, a horizontal
central line of four groups of 4 dots then a top right to bottom left
diagonal of four groups of 4 dots, (picture posted under 2465 strange
display) only focus and readout intensity controls on the front panel
work., pressing the Delta T or V have no effect.
I do believe that I am the first person to effect any repairs to this
scope as all screws are present and there are no signs of any ¡°after
manufacture¡± soldering of tampering, so its hands up I think I have done it
in myself.
Anyone have any ideas where to go first?
Thanks in advance¡­
John Carter



--
Andy


Re: 2445 woes

 

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ondrej Pavelka <info@...>
wrote:

P.S. I found 3 leaky surface mount electrolytic caps on the board I think
it's referred to as a A board? I will change those to prevent further
corrosion spread but what are they in charge of ? Could these be the reason
for the troubles?
Yes, this is quite likely the problem. Your 2445B (the -B is very
important, there are important differences between the 2445 and the 2445B).
The 2445B is a drive-by-wire scope, in that the A5 board generates a
multitude of voltages with a DAC. These voltages in turn control various
parts of the scope.
What tends to happen is that the leaking capacitors wreck the
components and PCB traces that are involved with creating the DAC's
reference current. The quick and easy way to assess the state of the DAC is
to measure the -1.25 and +1.36 reference voltages on the A5 board. On some
versions of the board, these are broken out to test points, but if not
you'll have to hunt around for suitable test points to assess them.
If those are off, then that's a sure indication that your DAC reference
current network is bad.


Need a CRT for a 2213

 

What are the substitutes for a 154-0838-00. Thanks for any help. Tom


2465 Project, story so far.

 

Hi all, another hopeful newbie on here, I found this site whilst looking for some clues to attempt repair a 2465. I have managed to get it almost back to life but now stuck, I wonder if anyone would be kind enough to point me in the right direction.
Here is some background info, I have had the scope for about 12 years, but not really had chance to use it, the magic smoke came out about 10 years ago when I switched it on, it got put on the shelf due to lack of time and left there. Now I have some time on my hands (due to being furloughed) I decided to dig it out and try and repair it.
After opening it up I spotted that C1018 had popped and C1016 didn¡¯t look good so replaced both. C1020, C1052 and C1020 also had seen better days so swapped them too, looking at all the other caps no obvious leaks or bulges so reassembled and switched on, the CRT just about came to life and then the smoke came out again. This time it was C1130, so I decided to re-cap as advised on this forum.
I have replaced all the usual electrolytics on both PSU boards, with a mix of Nichicon and Panasonics, and the Rifa caps, rebuilt and hey presto all the voltages are well within tolerance, ripple all good too, but ¡­.. the post test gets as far as lighting all the front panel led¡¯s and they stay on, CRT comes up with a static bizarre display showing four groups of 1111 across the top and bottom a central vertical line of dots, a horizontal central line of four groups of 4 dots then a top right to bottom left diagonal of four groups of 4 dots, (picture posted under 2465 strange display) only focus and readout intensity controls on the front panel work., pressing the Delta T or V have no effect.
I do believe that I am the first person to effect any repairs to this scope as all screws are present and there are no signs of any ¡°after manufacture¡± soldering of tampering, so its hands up I think I have done it in myself.
Anyone have any ideas where to go first?
Thanks in advance¡­
John Carter


2445 woes

 

Hello to the group,
I was pointed here by very kind gentlemen on facebook. I repair various music studio gear and musical instruments as my job. I am a one man company fixing what people throw at me.

My primary scope is Tektronix 2445B which I now had for some 8 years and it has been incredibly reliable and powerful tool to have to hand. I still can't get used to the Rigol DS2072 which I also have. It just isn't so intuitive.

My scope unfortunately I starting to fail.

When I turn it on it goes through the standard boot routine but the readout on the screen is unstable it's jumping up and down a bit and it gets worse when I move the trace from channel 1 or 2 to the top or to the bottom of the screen. Surprisingly it doesn't do it as much if at all with channels 3 and 4.

Second issue which could be related is the amplitude displayed for all channels went down a lot. I can observe it even on the calibrator that it's about half of what it should be.

I noticed this problem when I was measuring voltage using the cursors I got about 2.8V and instead of 5 as it was TTL. I don't think it's to do with vertical amps because all 4 channels have exactly the same value and are still "in calibration".
I opened up the oscilloscope and checked capacitors in the low voltage supply but all of them have the correct capacitance, ESR at 100kHz is excellent and leakage current is negligible. I very much doubt this is the root cause of the issue.

Could you please point me in the right direction where to start looking for a fault and what to do with it? I looked at the service manual but there is so much information that I won't need right now I kind of gave up on searching further.

P.S. I found 3 leaky surface mount electrolytic caps on the board I think it's referred to as a A board? I will change those to prevent further corrosion spread but what are they in charge of ? Could these be the reason for the troubles?

Ondrej


Re: 475 Triggering Issue -- Will recent 468 Triggering Issue Thread Help Me?

 

...and I just stopped by to say: that person is me. {8^>)

I have therefore stopped in and joined the group to say thank you, Stan, for posting all this, and thanks to all of you; to Tom I say: you were right. I couln't believe I found this slightly arcane information. In the process, I've learned *not to touch* those tunnel diodes.

I have a 475, on which the trigger control has been drifting for a few years, requiring a more greater and greater excursion clockwise to obtain a stable trigger. Not a problem for a while, but the most recent time I fired it up, it seemed so far off the mark that I finally decided to have a good sit-down with the manual to see what might be going on. Of course, I first tried the trigger centering pot, but it, too, wound up in a far-clockwise excursion, to little effect.

I traced the problem down to having 1.4-ish volts on pins 3 and 14 of U520, instead of 0.7v as called out in the manual. The "B" trigger works as expected, is just about identical, and it has 0.7v on those pins. How this had happened, and why, was a bit beyond me. I was unsoldering resistors, thinking they'd drifted and left a transistor's bias all wrong. No dice there.

Well, then I found this thread, and here I am, "someone" seven years "in the future", benefitting from Stan's work.

Thanks again guys. My 475 was military surplus and from a pretty late production run (the manual is dated 1977), purchased from eBay for a great price, and the thing is just nearly pristine. I really lucked out. But then I'd been looking for a really nice 465 or 475 for a good while, having bought a 531 from a really nice fella in 1997 or so for $50.

Yes, the 531 still works, and works quite well.

bc


Re: TDS5054 infos...

 

Would you be able to send me the steps you followed as well please? I also tried to contact Tektronix to upgrade but got told the same thing about it not being supported :/