Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: How Many Scopes?
I can count 12 from my desk, there's about 10 or so (parts and
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
fixer candidates) around the corner and maybe 4 or 5 5000 series in the other room. They include many 4xx series, a few 7000 mainframes and a few 24xx scopes. Also a 335 and a couple of 2xx scopes plus a couple of oddballs. About a dozen are fully operational and the rest are in the repair queue or parts donors. So no, I don't think you can specify an upper limit. And, I have it on good authority, that I'm perfectly normal. I just got a 2465b the other week. I will be thinning the herd, although I really hate shipping. Even when pared down, I think I'll be left with around a dozen or so. Well, maybe more if I'm honest. Paul On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:48:41PM +0000, David Slipper wrote:
--
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Rochester MI, USA Aurora Group, Inc. | Security, Systems & Software paul@... | Unix & Windows |
Re: How Many Scopes?
Craig Sawyers
What Craig, no 24**'s ??Got to draw the line somewhere. My long-suffering wife already points out that there is a fine dividing line between collecting and restoring Tek gear and mental illness ;-) Oh - almost forgot my "handbag" scope - a lightweight four channel 60MHz Tek 2004B. My only real foray into digital storage oscilloscopes (other than the 7854 and 7912HB that is) Craig |
Re: How Many Scopes?
Hmmmm....
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Let S = the number of 'scopes that one currently owns. Let D = the number of 'scopes that one acquires in the next 24 hour period that one buys one or more 'scopes. Let T = the number of 'scopes that one would deem to be "too many". Then T = S + D + 1. T, of course, increments every time one buys one or more 'scopes. QED. DaveD On 12/6/2018 4:19 PM, John Ferguson via Groups.Io wrote:
Without actually knowing anything, I now have two 2445B's, one 2465, and just now a 2445 plus the cute little SC501 that fits in a TM case.? The first 2445b was bought to use, then the second because it worked well on all but channel one whose attenuator hadn't been adequate for oomph of whatever Bozo plugged it into. I had one of our colleagues re-cap the power supply, change the NVRAM for a FRAM, and replace the leaking SMD caps and fix the damage they'd done. This scope is now VERY nice. |
Re: How Many Scopes?
What Craig,? no 24**'s ??
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 12/6/18 5:23 PM, Craig Sawyers wrote:
Thinking that no rational person needs so many scopes I offered it to the local university scienceOK - 7904, 7904A, 7834 ,7844, 7104, 7313, 7623B, 7633, 7603, 7704A, 7854, 7403N, 7912HB, 7934 |
Re: How Many Scopes?
Craig Sawyers
Thinking that no rational person needs so many scopes I offered it to the local university scienceOK - 7904, 7904A, 7834 ,7844, 7104, 7313, 7623B, 7633, 7603, 7704A, 7854, 7403N, 7912HB, 7934 545A, 545B, 564 , 575, 576, 577D2, 575 mod 122C, 585A, 475/DM44, 453 That is kind of the tip of the iceberg. Pass the tablets and a glass of water. Craig |
Re: How Many Scopes?
On 06/12/18 21:19, John Ferguson via Groups.Io wrote:
So I'm back to where I was at the end of last week with too many scopes.A1: N+1 scopes, the next one being better for some purposes A2: a support group. Try: (tea)-group-therapy-thread/ but note that after the first 10,000 responses it degenerates :) |
Re: How Many Scopes?
tom jobe
You're not 'missing' anything!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Life is good and people are great! On 12/6/2018 1:19 PM, John Ferguson via Groups.Io wrote:
Without actually knowing anything, I now have two 2445B's, one 2465, and just now a 2445 plus the cute little SC501 that fits in a TM case.? The first 2445b was bought to use, then the second because it worked well on all but channel one whose attenuator hadn't been adequate for oomph of whatever Bozo plugged it into. I had one of our colleagues re-cap the power supply, change the NVRAM for a FRAM, and replace the leaking SMD caps and fix the damage they'd done. This scope is now VERY nice. |
Re: 7S12 versus 7T11(A)/7S11 for general purpose sampling
Thanks, Albert.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I will indeed put a 7T11 or 7T11A on my wishlist.? Yes, it can be a pain to get a signal to trigger on for the S-51 or S-53.? I am fortunate enough to have both. I figured the 7S12 had the TDR capability while the 7S11 + 7T11 did not, so I opted for the 7S12.? Then I? needed a 2nd channel, so I bought a 7S11 and another S-4.? Working well so far. Thanks again.? Jim F Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message --------From: Albert Otten <aodiversen@...> Date: 12/6/18 1:17 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: [TekScopes] 7S12 versus 7T11(A)/7S11 for general purpose sampling
Hi Jim, Since your question is not related to the problems in the "7T11 horizontal memory" thread I opened this new topic for my answer. With the 7S12 you would also need an S-53 and an S-51 head for the same triggering capabilities as the 7T11. The most annoying aspects of the 7S12 for general purpose use are the heavy crank-handle drive (versus a multiturn TIME POSITION pot in the 7T11) and lack of internal triggering capability. The trigger output of sampling heads (not all heads have this) is simply terminated in 50R in the 7S12 and not used at all. Sometimes you need the slower sweep ranges of the 7T11. The 7S12 goes to 20 ps/div, the 7T11 to 10 ps/div. The 7T11 can do random sampling, the 7S12 can't. I know that the quality of random sampling is not overwhelming, but this capability is perhaps a strong argument to convince the committee. Albert On Thu, Dec? 6, 2018 at 07:25 PM, Jim Ford wrote:
|
Re: How Many Scopes?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Harvey White Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 4:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] How Many Scopes? On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:19:16 -0500, you wrote: You're missing space for more scopes. Depending on what you think of as the service life of the scope, coupled with how long you will be using it, and throw in the little bit that these scope parts are in limited supply..... I'd like to have a good working scope, one working spare, and enough parts units to be able to replace almost everything once. Having said that, you may want to look into calibration equipment for your scopes, if you want to start doing that yourself. Those plugins will fit in a TM506 right next to the SC501. Hi Harvey, I¡¯m actually up to my ears with other projects and one of our members here in the US does terrific repairs and calibrations. This is probably not very smart but I compared the measurement I get on the other scopes to the calibrated one and find them pretty close, certainly close enough for what I do. Best regards, john |
Re: How Many Scopes?
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:19:16 -0500, you wrote:
You're missing space for more scopes. Depending on what you think of as the service life of the scope, coupled with how long you will be using it, and throw in the little bit that these scope parts are in limited supply..... I'd like to have a good working scope, one working spare, and enough parts units to be able to replace almost everything once. Having said that, you may want to look into calibration equipment for your scopes, if you want to start doing that yourself. Those plugins will fit in a TM506 right next to the SC501. Harvey Without actually knowing anything, I now have two 2445B's, one 2465, and |
Re: How Many Scopes?
Without actually knowing anything, I now have two 2445B's, one 2465, and just now a 2445 plus the cute little SC501 that fits in a TM case.? The first 2445b was bought to use, then the second because it worked well on all but channel one whose attenuator hadn't been adequate for oomph of whatever Bozo plugged it into. I had one of our colleagues re-cap the power supply, change the NVRAM for a FRAM, and replace the leaking SMD caps and fix the damage they'd done. This scope is now VERY nice.
Now I had a really good 2445B and the second one which also now has FRAM and better caps on A5, but whatever PS caps were in it. It works ok manually but the Parametric functions don't work. It was a lab scope so footless, no handle,? and missing those nice rubber things on the rear. So fool that I was I thought I'd buy just those things ..... hah, hah, hah - cheaper to buy a parts scope which is where the 2465 came from. Someone had let it down a bit ungently on the time knob, destroyed the knob and broke the VAR pot shaft.? I was able to find a complete right-side panel on ebay and when it replaced the bad one all was well and the scope worked nicely although the trace could lose a bit of weight. I also discovered that the shaft on the trace-intensity knob had also been there for the great fall, so it was replaced and now the thing is perfect, more or less. Thinking that no rational person needs so many scopes I offered it to the local university science dept who had mentioned to me that they needed a good analog scope - Voila they would get the 2465. But then when I was cleaning it up, I decided to keep it. There was a 2445 cheap on Ebay which allegedly needed repair. It didn't and it is really nice - so FAU gets that one. And its trace is really fine. So I'm back to where I was at the end of last week with too many scopes. Most of the problem seems to be with "parts" scopes.? If I got one that actually didn't work it would be what I'd expected, but the damn things keep showing up with nothing serious wrong with them. And I cannot bring myself to scrap a working scope.? I doubt if any of you can either. What am I missing? |
7S12 versus 7T11(A)/7S11 for general purpose sampling
Hi Jim,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Since your question is not related to the problems in the "7T11 horizontal memory" thread I opened this new topic for my answer. With the 7S12 you would also need an S-53 and an S-51 head for the same triggering capabilities as the 7T11. The most annoying aspects of the 7S12 for general purpose use are the heavy crank-handle drive (versus a multiturn TIME POSITION pot in the 7T11) and lack of internal triggering capability. The trigger output of sampling heads (not all heads have this) is simply terminated in 50R in the 7S12 and not used at all. Sometimes you need the slower sweep ranges of the 7T11. The 7S12 goes to 20 ps/div, the 7T11 to 10 ps/div. The 7T11 can do random sampling, the 7S12 can't. I know that the quality of random sampling is not overwhelming, but this capability is perhaps a strong argument to convince the committee. Albert On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 07:25 PM, Jim Ford wrote:
|
Re: 7T11 horizontal memory
Say, since I have the 7S12 and 7S11, is there any reason to obtain a 7T11 or 7T11A?? Aside from the fact that it's another cool piece of Tek gear to own, I mean.? IOW, do I have a justification before the finance committee (my wife ;) )?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
TIA. Jim F Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message --------From: Albert Otten <aodiversen@...> Date: 12/6/18 2:56 AM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 7T11 horizontal memory
On Wed, Dec? 5, 2018 at 10:19 PM, cmjones01 wrote: Just to be sure that the fault is in the 7S11, you might check that the terrible rise time is also present when you use the 7S11 in combination with an ordinary timebase unit in stead of the 7T11. You probably did not verify that you could adjust the dot response for loop gain one, it only "improved not much". I would check this first of all. The sampling head has an internal GAIN adjustment that could be too far off to correct with the 7S11 dot response adjustment. You can probably tell that I'm new to theI followed the normal(?) route. I started with sampling units for the 564, then for the 7000 series and now I also have a CSA803A? with SD-20 and SD-26. Still waiting for a good opportunity to buy an SD-24. Albert |
Re: TDS3032 does not boot. LCD backl-ight and fan working.
" @Dave, when you have had the bad NVRAM installed, how did the no-boot
situation look? I.e., was it also a white screen, no beeps and no relay clicks, or did it at least show the DPO splash screen? " Gosh, I'm afraid I am of no help then. I looked through old message threads I had on here from the last month and found my message concerning the fake NVRAM from China: ""After re-assembly, it will not boot past the "Digital Phoshor Oscilloscope" splash screen. During bootup, you do hear the hear the relays click, the splash screen flickers a bit and the floppy drive seeks. The splash screen never goes away. "" My TDS3032 did get to the splash screen and locked up with the fake Chinese i.c.. Sorry. The NVRAM is probably about the only thing you can fix on that main board. It cost about $38.00. You have to decide if it's worth a shot. I wonder if you removed it (lot of careful de-soldering - use a powered de-soldering pump (i.e. Hakko 808). Maybe if you removed it it would boot to the splash screen, then you know. If it is still totally dead, I doubt there is much you can fix. Look for a XTAL near the microprocessor and make sure it is good and not broken (if scope was dropped). I will be getting mine back with calibration seals, so I will not be able to open it to help do comparisons with you. Dave On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:42 AM benj3867 via Groups.Io <benj3867= [email protected]> wrote: @Dave, when you have had the bad NVRAM installed, how did the no-boot |
Re: 7T11 horizontal memory
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 10:19 PM, cmjones01 wrote:
Just to be sure that the fault is in the 7S11, you might check that the terrible rise time is also present when you use the 7S11 in combination with an ordinary timebase unit in stead of the 7T11. You probably did not verify that you could adjust the dot response for loop gain one, it only "improved not much". I would check this first of all. The sampling head has an internal GAIN adjustment that could be too far off to correct with the 7S11 dot response adjustment. You can probably tell that I'm new to theI followed the normal(?) route. I started with sampling units for the 564, then for the 7000 series and now I also have a CSA803A with SD-20 and SD-26. Still waiting for a good opportunity to buy an SD-24. Albert |
Re: Tube test adaptor for Tektroinx 575 was: Re: [TekScopes] FS: miscellaneous Tektronix manuals
Another thing to consider (if you are feeding tube filaments via AC
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
power) and want to minimize hum is to use twisted pair wiring to distribute AC power to the tube filament socket connections (rather than individual single conductor wires which are haphazardly separated from each other). Twisted pair tends to minimize inductive (magnetic) radiation within the equipment/chassis that could otherwise occur with separated wires supplying AC to the tube socket filament pins; the magnetic field (at 60 hz) can lead to audio hum. Of course, it's also OK to use single conductor wires which are twisted together in "paired" wiring for the filament power distriubtion. Mike Dinolfo N4MWP On 12/5/18 10:06 PM, Jim Ford wrote:
Yep, a colleague several decades ago told me if you ever work with audio tubes, try D.C. for the heater instead of A.C., you'll like it.? I never forgot that, although I have not worked with tubes much. |
Re: Tube test adaptor for Tektroinx 575 was: Re: [TekScopes] FS: miscellaneous Tektronix manuals
Yep, a colleague several decades ago told me if you ever work with audio tubes, try D.C. for the heater instead of A.C., you'll like it.? I never forgot that, although I have not worked with tubes much.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jim F Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message --------From: Harvey White <madyn@...> Date: 12/5/18 5:23 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Tube test adaptor for Tektroinx 575 was: Re: [TekScopes] FS: miscellaneous Tektronix manuals
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC), you wrote: Brad,Here's another one, and you may want to think of this in a high end application. The original heaters (called filaments) were the same as light bulbs, simply tungsten wires that were heated to boil off electrons. These were the first heaters, and needed 'A' batteries to run them. (the "B" batteries provided plate voltages, and the "C" batteries provided bias voltages, which were difficult to do without a negative supply since the filament was both the cathode and the electron supply.? You simply couldn't have the cathodes at any different potential since they were supplied by the same battery) Now another problem was that because the heaters had relatively small thermal inertia (they heated up and cooled down quickly), the use of AC for the heaters induced hum on the signal ... think of it, your electron supply was increasing and decreasing with the AC supply voltage. So the solution was to put the heater inside a tube, but electrically isolated from it.? So the heater could run off AC, and the thermal inertia of the tube (called the cathode), kept the electron flow more even. You could even self bias the tubes by elevating the cathode above ground. Lead to a lot of nice designs. Now, there's still a bit of hum induced by the heater in the cathode sleve.? (cathode sleve has materials on it that release electrons when heated). In your amplifier/preamp/whatever, you *may* get a reduction in hum by running the heater from DC. Just a thought, you may want to look it up. Harvey
|
Re: Tube test adaptor for Tektroinx 575 was: Re: [TekScopes] FS: miscellaneous Tektronix manuals
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC), you wrote:
Brad,Here's another one, and you may want to think of this in a high end application. The original heaters (called filaments) were the same as light bulbs, simply tungsten wires that were heated to boil off electrons. These were the first heaters, and needed 'A' batteries to run them. (the "B" batteries provided plate voltages, and the "C" batteries provided bias voltages, which were difficult to do without a negative supply since the filament was both the cathode and the electron supply. You simply couldn't have the cathodes at any different potential since they were supplied by the same battery) Now another problem was that because the heaters had relatively small thermal inertia (they heated up and cooled down quickly), the use of AC for the heaters induced hum on the signal ... think of it, your electron supply was increasing and decreasing with the AC supply voltage. So the solution was to put the heater inside a tube, but electrically isolated from it. So the heater could run off AC, and the thermal inertia of the tube (called the cathode), kept the electron flow more even. You could even self bias the tubes by elevating the cathode above ground. Lead to a lot of nice designs. Now, there's still a bit of hum induced by the heater in the cathode sleve. (cathode sleve has materials on it that release electrons when heated). In your amplifier/preamp/whatever, you *may* get a reduction in hum by running the heater from DC. Just a thought, you may want to look it up. Harvey
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss