开云体育

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 11:57 AM, <maxim.vlasov@...> wrote: Hi Maxim, > > the routine in question can be easily identified by LA and disassembled > Has anyone ever called you an optimist

6802 shares the 6800 instruction set, however for the inverse assembler for HP/Agilent 165xx, 166xx and 167xx still a different adapter is required due to the slightly different bus timing (or one can

That is only natural with that setup, i.e. a basically open-ended 50 Ohm cable driving the 1 MOhm input with a signal having higher-frequency content. Adjusting the input capacitance (often resulting

I'm working on my second 468 and I noticed some horizontal jitter. There is no jitter from the rear vert signal output. What does that mean? What I'm wondering is what is being bypassed when looking

Chuck, I read again the input capacitance adjustment procedure for CH1/CH2. I have no 15pF normalizer and the high voltage calibration generator. I can observe that when 1 MOhm input on the scope

Depends on what you call "substantially similar". Yes, the 6502 derives from the 6800 (6802) but architecturally, it is much simpler (it was developed to save costs against the 6800 with the 6502's

Hello Siggi, Thank you for your excellent explanation. I also assume that performance wise the system is almost in spec but just slightly below the margin. Therefore I wanted to start from changing

Strictly speaking, a square wave that goes from zero to some voltage is not DC. The term "wave" should be a clue to that. It is an AC signal with a DC offset. I don't remember, did I call it AC? I

Or, "Square Wave". -Chuck Harris Harvey White wrote:

A useful term is "pulsating DC", or perhaps unipolar pulses, if you wish. Harvey

I plan on doing the requested 366- knobs but I think I will do the 670- PCB assemblies first. It is quite large so it is going to take some time.

Based on requests we have scanned the 311- resistors and it is now on tekwiki.org. It is 701 pages

Sorry for the crappy language ("...between 0 and another level of the same polarity...") in my previous message. I hope what I meant is clear. As regards the web interface idiosyncrasy that I

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Chuck Harris wrote: Chuck, Re. > > No, DC puts out a DC voltage, Square wave puts out a selectable > frequency square wave signal. > In daily speak, we often use "AC"

Further to Chuck's latest remarks on quoting (snippets of) messages I'd like to report an idiosyncrasy that I just noted: Using the web editor, I usually select part of the message that I am reacting

No, DC puts out a DC voltage, Square wave puts out a selectable frequency square wave signal. The DC position is for calibrating the PG506 using a DVM. -Chuck Harris Craig Cramb wrote:

Not everyone sees a chain of all of the messages that have ever existed on the groups server, when they see your message. I am one of those someones, as are most everyone on this group that gets the

Hi Craig, So is this: in response to this: ? The voltage calibration output signal from the PG506 normally pulsates (as a square wave) between 0V and the amplitude as set, at about 1 kHz. The "DC"

In regulated supplies, there are often over current protection circuits that are used in lieu of fuses. These circuits reduce the voltage from the power supply in an attempt to reduce the current,

The signals from the PG506, while in calibrate voltage mode are all 0 to whatever positive volts... not bipolar. The calibration routine CAL02 does *n0t* always tell you about an out of range