¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

IC programmers slightly OT

Mark Wendt (Contractor)
 

Anybody familiar with the Xeltec line of programmers? Good, bad, indifferent? I see a batch of 'em all the time on Ebay, some going for seemingly high prices.

Thanks,
Mark


Re: 2400 series of scopes -- automatic voltage measurement

Steve
 

Hi Victor,

Yes, I was referring specifically to a 2456B.

TEK specifications indicate that the automatic voltage reading is good up to 1MHz. Interesting that you are seeing it function up to 200MHz.

Thanks.

Steve

On 2/18/2013 10:33 PM, victor_j_silva wrote:
I assume you mean a 2445A/65A/67 and 2445B/65B/67B.

I know the 24xx Digital Scopes have no such limit.

I just tried using a 1.2V sine wave and was able to measure pk-pk accurately to over 200MHz.

Maybe it depends on the signal amplitude.

--Victor

--- In TekScopes@..., Steve <steve65@...> wrote:
Looking for confirmation of my understanding of the Tek specs for
automatic voltage measurement in the 2400 series scopes.

Am I right in understanding that automatic voltage measurement is
spec'ed to 1MHz? And that it is not spec'ed to function accurately above
1MHz?

That's what I get from my reading of the the catalog pages and the
service manual. Am I reading those documents correctly?

Thanks.

Steve


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

 

I had sent a response earlier but it didn't appear to have made it.

I checked some of the voltages on the board, but can't say I entirely know what to make of all of them (newb alert again hah)

Ok, I've got 94v on the unregulated rail
On the op-amp, pin 1 vref is 10.00v Pin 2 from the voltage divider is reading as ~1v or just under. Pin 1 is reading 15.19v.

Q1222: Emitter 8v, base is grounded of course, and 11.6v on the collector.

Q1220: (sorry, not sure which is emitter/base/collector, I'd have to look up a datasheet - more newb showing through). So looking down on the power supply as it's mounted in the chassis: 11.3v on the left pin, 94.7v on the middle pin (must be the collector) and 11.8v on the right pin.

Q1221: 94v on the collector, 11.1v on the base and 10.6v on the emitter.

I didn't measure Q1223 - hard to reach that one.

R1212: 94v on the unregulated rail side, 10.5v on the other side of it.
R1220: 94v on the unregulated rail side, 9v on the other side.

Curious how I got 15.19v on pin 1 of U1281A with a 10v ref and a 1v comparison from the voltage divider off the regulated line - looking at the datasheet it looks like it should be operating as two separate op-amps with one half regulating the 87v line and the other the 42v line, so I fired it up again and checked the voltage on all of it's pins:

pin 1: 15.57v
pin 2: 1.05v
pin 3: 10.00v
pin 4: -6.86v
pin 5: 10.00v
pin 6: 1.58v
pin 7: 15.58v
pin 8: 16.42

So thinking about it for a bit, the schematic shows a voltage of -1.53v for pin 1 (a far cry from the 15v I'm getting)which I assume is the voltage I should see when the line is regulated to 82v. And I assume then that the 16.42v is the positive power for U1281, and the -6.86v is the supply that lets it pull Q1222 low when the voltage from the voltage divider feeding pin 2 = the 10v ref from pin 3.

So I guess I learned something, but as far as using the voltages to give me an indication as to what's gone wrong I'm not sure. That will take a better man (or woman) that's more educated than I! I would have to resort to the shotgun repair method at this point - replace all the components :) (certainly not to the point of wanting to shoot the scope yet lol)

As a note, when reading these voltages they can vary a bit while checking them. Sometimes it's not uncommon to see some of the voltages vary ~0.5v it seems, so that accounts for some of the variance in the first vs 2nd measurements in areas. Earlier I was reading ~9.5v on the 87v regulated line, but tonight it was just under 9v.

Thanks!
Chris

--- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@...> wrote:

Chris

The CR1244 is across the B-E junction of the transistor, so in circuit it
would not measure Open like a diode out of the circuit would.

I have my board out waiting for the inverter board to dry from it's
cleaning, and I measure .706V forward (of the diode) and .581V reverse
(instead of open, which is forward for the transistor junction.)

You could measure all the voltages Q1220, Q1221, Q1222, and Q1224 E,B and C
along with U1281A pin 1, 2 and 3 CR1220 anode to see what is out of wack

John



-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:37 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

John,
A HUGE thank you on checking that and giving me your value! I was hoping
the short wasn't in the main board somewhere as that doesn't look like fun
to pull in the least.

I just checked the resistance from the pin 7 (blue 87v wire) on the
connector (power supply still out and on the bench) and I got a value of
25.55Kohm, so it would appear I should be OK to go at that (assuming that
powering something else up on the main board doesn't cause it to
short/overload the supply). I was testing the diodes on the power supply
and diode CR1244 is giving me 0.538V forward and 0.630v reverse. I think I
might pull it and check it out of the board later tonight after I eat etc.

Thanks for the help!
Chris

--- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@> wrote:

Chris

The problem could be in the 87V regulator

Or

Their could be a short/low Resistance some where in the load

I have a 2465B open and I measured a load resistance of 25.3K to ground on
Pin 7 of J121 (87V, the blue wire) with the power supply unplugged from
the J121 connector
unit

John

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On
Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:40 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

All voltages measured in the scope with everything hooked up. I just got
done checking the voltages pre-regulator.

At J233A I get:
pin 5 (87v unregulated) 97.6v
Pin 3 (42v unregulated) 49.0v

And at J234A I get:
pin 5 (15v unregulated) 18.94v
Pin 4 (5v unregulated) 6.64
Pin 2 (-5v unregulated) -6.92v
Pin 1 (-15v unregulated) -18.54v

Based on the unregulated values, I believe the issue must lie in the
regulator portions, and since I'm getting the 97.6v pre-regulated it would
seem to me the voltage doubler is working. I also double checked and
verified the 10v reference voltage at the test point on the main board as
well as the J121 connector that feeds the main board. (I figured this was
important to double check as the regulators all are based off the 10v
reference as I read it). Of course this is where I wish to learn more - I
understand what the individual components do but I still somewhat struggle
to see what the assembly as a whole is doing, which is why I'm trying to
get
into all this, so maybe my understanding is skewed. :)

At any rate, it would seem to me that with the unregulated voltages where
they're at, that the issue would have to lie within the follow area:


Yes? No? I mean I have the correct voltages on the left side of those
three
groups, and the wrong voltages on the right side, so it would seem that's
where I should look next?

Thanks for helping this newb out!

Chris


--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@> wrote:

The +87 is from a doubler and added to the +42. I would take a close
look
at the three 10 uF caps and all the diodes in that area. Be sure to only
use
fast diodes for any replacements.

Since you recapped this unit, don't overlook the fact that bad
capacitors
can come from the factory new. Did you measure all these voltages in the
scope or on an external load?




Regards,
Tom



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Tek 485

 

I forgot to add:
The problem originated by accidentally touching the ground lead of a probe to line voltage!


Re: T935A seized pots help

 

Hello Andrew
Ship it to me I can repair it for a small charge.
I am in UK. EX Tek.


Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

 

Chris

The CR1244 is across the B-E junction of the transistor, so in circuit it
would not measure Open like a diode out of the circuit would.

I have my board out waiting for the inverter board to dry from it's
cleaning, and I measure .706V forward (of the diode) and .581V reverse
(instead of open, which is forward for the transistor junction.)

You could measure all the voltages Q1220, Q1221, Q1222, and Q1224 E,B and C
along with U1281A pin 1, 2 and 3 CR1220 anode to see what is out of wack

John

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:37 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

John,
A HUGE thank you on checking that and giving me your value! I was hoping
the short wasn't in the main board somewhere as that doesn't look like fun
to pull in the least.

I just checked the resistance from the pin 7 (blue 87v wire) on the
connector (power supply still out and on the bench) and I got a value of
25.55Kohm, so it would appear I should be OK to go at that (assuming that
powering something else up on the main board doesn't cause it to
short/overload the supply). I was testing the diodes on the power supply
and diode CR1244 is giving me 0.538V forward and 0.630v reverse. I think I
might pull it and check it out of the board later tonight after I eat etc.

Thanks for the help!
Chris

--- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@...> wrote:

Chris

The problem could be in the 87V regulator

Or

Their could be a short/low Resistance some where in the load

I have a 2465B open and I measured a load resistance of 25.3K to ground on
Pin 7 of J121 (87V, the blue wire) with the power supply unplugged from
the J121 connector
unit

John

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On
Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:40 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

All voltages measured in the scope with everything hooked up. I just got
done checking the voltages pre-regulator.

At J233A I get:
pin 5 (87v unregulated) 97.6v
Pin 3 (42v unregulated) 49.0v

And at J234A I get:
pin 5 (15v unregulated) 18.94v
Pin 4 (5v unregulated) 6.64
Pin 2 (-5v unregulated) -6.92v
Pin 1 (-15v unregulated) -18.54v

Based on the unregulated values, I believe the issue must lie in the
regulator portions, and since I'm getting the 97.6v pre-regulated it would
seem to me the voltage doubler is working. I also double checked and
verified the 10v reference voltage at the test point on the main board as
well as the J121 connector that feeds the main board. (I figured this was
important to double check as the regulators all are based off the 10v
reference as I read it). Of course this is where I wish to learn more - I
understand what the individual components do but I still somewhat struggle
to see what the assembly as a whole is doing, which is why I'm trying to
get
into all this, so maybe my understanding is skewed. :)

At any rate, it would seem to me that with the unregulated voltages where
they're at, that the issue would have to lie within the follow area:


Yes? No? I mean I have the correct voltages on the left side of those
three
groups, and the wrong voltages on the right side, so it would seem that's
where I should look next?

Thanks for helping this newb out!

Chris


--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@> wrote:

The +87 is from a doubler and added to the +42. I would take a close
look
at the three 10 uF caps and all the diodes in that area. Be sure to only
use
fast diodes for any replacements.

Since you recapped this unit, don't overlook the fact that bad
capacitors
can come from the factory new. Did you measure all these voltages in the
scope or on an external load?




Regards,
Tom



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: DC504 counter display

 

If it displays a "8" as a "0" and a "0" as a "U" it is almost certainly a driver issue.
If it were a bad display segment the "0" would display as a "0" if the "8" displayed as a "0".

Do all positions display the same incorrect digits?

73
Glenn
WB4UIV

At 11:52 PM 2/18/2013, you wrote:


Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?

HankC



Tek 485

 

I have two Tektronix scopes: a 485 and a 2465. Both of them need a little TLC, but I'm going to focus on the 485 at the moment as it is non-functional. I'm not an experienced electronics tech, but I'm not a complete novice either.

I really like the blue phosphor of the 485. For the moment the traces will show up, but the traces don't respond to input on either channel. I think the problem lies with the attenuator cards, but I'm not 100% sure thats the only problem. This I know for sure: if I take my signal gen and hook up its output to the place on the vertical amplifier where the attenuator plugs in, the signal is displayed on the scope. Another strange symptom is that on Channel 1, if the impedance is on the 50 Ohm setting, the trace is there, but on the 1 MegaOhm setting it disappears. Any thoughts guys? Have any experience with this sort of thing?

I've taken out the channel 1 attenuator and have it in my hands right now. Where should I start troubleshooting?

Thanks!

John


Re: DC504 counter display

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Tektronix had propensity to use chip IC sockets. Try to remove display package and reseat it. That might re-establish pin connection. Sometimes it takes several re-seatings to clear the socket.

Miroslav Pokorni

On 2/18/2013 9:18 PM, David wrote:

?

Going by the schematic, the display digits are multiplexed which is
the common configuration so if the middle horizontal segment is
working on at least some digits, then the 7 segment display driver is
fine. If some segments of every 7 segment display work, then the
column display driver is fine as well.

That pretty much narrows any problem to bad display segments or
possibly an open connection to the missing display segments. I would
normally consider the later less likely than the former except that
two of the same segment are missing.

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:52:57 -0800 (PST), HankC hankc918@...>
wrote:

>Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
>I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
>So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
>In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?
>
>HankC


Manual / schematic for Leader 524S counter?

Dave C
 

Um... that's a model 824S counter.

Dave

-=-=-=-

Anybody have the user guide for this counter? (Leader user guides always include the schematic.)

Thanks,
Dave


Re: DC504 counter display

 

--- In TekScopes@..., HankC <hankc918@...> wrote:

Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?

HankC
Common problem - FND357 displays go bad - fixed mine with two new LED displays. 6 bucks each, do a google search to see who might have them cheap.

Cheers,
Taylor


Manual / schematic for Leader 524S counter?

Dave C
 

Anybody have the user guide for this counter? (Leader user guides always include the schematic.)

Thanks,
Dave


Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?

 

I agree with what Don posted. The 640 ohms is just the resistance of
the inner conductor of the coaxial cable for a x1 oscilloscope probe.
I measured about 250 ohms on a x1 probe I happen to have in reach.

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 04:55:41 -0000, "Philip" <ndpmcintosh@...>
wrote:

Yeah. It doesn't have any markings on it other than the name "Fairchild" on the cable, and I am glad I checked it before I actually tried to test it.

In looking at an old but classic oscilloscope book it mentions a "direct" probe that has essentially 0 resistance used for checking low impedance, low frequency circuits. And, it also describes the "isolation" probe which has an R of 4.7 to 10kOhms. It might be something intended to serve as one of these.

It looks like it is from the early 60's and perhaps was used on the Fairchild 766H. I doubt there would be much current use for this probe.



Be careful with that!

Danger, 640 Ohms!


On 2/18/2013 5:50 PM, Alex wrote:

640 ohms ought to be enough for anyone.


Re: DC504 counter display

 

Going by the schematic, the display digits are multiplexed which is
the common configuration so if the middle horizontal segment is
working on at least some digits, then the 7 segment display driver is
fine. If some segments of every 7 segment display work, then the
column display driver is fine as well.

That pretty much narrows any problem to bad display segments or
possibly an open connection to the missing display segments. I would
normally consider the later less likely than the former except that
two of the same segment are missing.

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:52:57 -0800 (PST), HankC <hankc918@...>
wrote:

Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?

HankC


Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?

 

Yeah. It doesn't have any markings on it other than the name "Fairchild" on the cable, and I am glad I checked it before I actually tried to test it.

In looking at an old but classic oscilloscope book it mentions a "direct" probe that has essentially 0 resistance used for checking low impedance, low frequency circuits. And, it also describes the "isolation" probe which has an R of 4.7 to 10kOhms. It might be something intended to serve as one of these.

It looks like it is from the early 60's and perhaps was used on the Fairchild 766H. I doubt there would be much current use for this probe.


Be careful with that!

Danger, 640 Ohms!


On 2/18/2013 5:50 PM, Alex wrote:

640 ohms ought to be enough for anyone.


Re: DC504 counter display

 

More than likely the LED read outs.

Chris VK4CVL

At 03:52 PM 19/02/2013, you wrote:

?

Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?

HankC


DC504 counter display

 

Anyone familiar with the TM500 counter, model DC504 ?
I just picked one up & I noticed a couple of the digits are missing the middle horizontal segment.
So, it displays an "8" as a "0", or a "0" as a "U".
In your experience, is this a display problem or one of the chips driving the display ?

HankC


Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?

Don Black
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I think you are measuring the inner conductor resistance. This is made of resistance wire (often wound in a spiral) to damp reflections back the cable. The cable isn't terminated (the input impedance of the scope is 1 Meg) and like any transmission line energy is reflected where it isn't absorbed by matching termination. This is a compromise to damp such reflections, useful at low frequencies.
Tektronix explains their techniques in their concept book series, the one you want is called 'Oscilloscope Probe Circuits". It's available to download on the Internet and is an excellent guide to probe design. Silicon Chip also has a good article on probes a while back that I think explained it.

Don Black.


?

I'm wondering if it could be an RF probe.?

> >
> > Another I have studied is an old Fairchild that is in good condition that
> has a resistance of 640 ohms end to end on the center conductor. To what use
> could one put to such a probe?
> >
>



Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

 

John,
A HUGE thank you on checking that and giving me your value! I was hoping the short wasn't in the main board somewhere as that doesn't look like fun to pull in the least.

I just checked the resistance from the pin 7 (blue 87v wire) on the connector (power supply still out and on the bench) and I got a value of 25.55Kohm, so it would appear I should be OK to go at that (assuming that powering something else up on the main board doesn't cause it to short/overload the supply). I was testing the diodes on the power supply and diode CR1244 is giving me 0.538V forward and 0.630v reverse. I think I might pull it and check it out of the board later tonight after I eat etc.

Thanks for the help!
Chris

--- In TekScopes@..., "John Snyder" <Kochcal@...> wrote:

Chris

The problem could be in the 87V regulator

Or

Their could be a short/low Resistance some where in the load

I have a 2465B open and I measured a load resistance of 25.3K to ground on
Pin 7 of J121 (87V, the blue wire) with the power supply unplugged from the J121 connector
unit

John

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:40 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tektronix 2465 capacitors etc.

All voltages measured in the scope with everything hooked up. I just got
done checking the voltages pre-regulator.

At J233A I get:
pin 5 (87v unregulated) 97.6v
Pin 3 (42v unregulated) 49.0v

And at J234A I get:
pin 5 (15v unregulated) 18.94v
Pin 4 (5v unregulated) 6.64
Pin 2 (-5v unregulated) -6.92v
Pin 1 (-15v unregulated) -18.54v

Based on the unregulated values, I believe the issue must lie in the
regulator portions, and since I'm getting the 97.6v pre-regulated it would
seem to me the voltage doubler is working. I also double checked and
verified the 10v reference voltage at the test point on the main board as
well as the J121 connector that feeds the main board. (I figured this was
important to double check as the regulators all are based off the 10v
reference as I read it). Of course this is where I wish to learn more - I
understand what the individual components do but I still somewhat struggle
to see what the assembly as a whole is doing, which is why I'm trying to get
into all this, so maybe my understanding is skewed. :)

At any rate, it would seem to me that with the unregulated voltages where
they're at, that the issue would have to lie within the follow area:


Yes? No? I mean I have the correct voltages on the left side of those three
groups, and the wrong voltages on the right side, so it would seem that's
where I should look next?

Thanks for helping this newb out!

Chris


--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@> wrote:

The +87 is from a doubler and added to the +42. I would take a close look
at the three 10 uF caps and all the diodes in that area. Be sure to only use
fast diodes for any replacements.

Since you recapped this unit, don't overlook the fact that bad capacitors
can come from the factory new. Did you measure all these voltages in the
scope or on an external load?




Regards,
Tom



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: What use for a 640 Ohm 1x Probe?

 

I'm wondering if it could be an RF probe.? http://n5ese.com/rfprobe1.htm

> >
> > Another I have studied is an old Fairchild that is in good condition that
> has a resistance of 640 ohms end to end on the center conductor. To what use
> could one put to such a probe?
> >
>