¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

Google them, They are available from US suppliers
Jim
Ei2BB
On 26 October 2012 10:09, David C. Partridge <david.partridge@...> wrote:

?

I think they should exist (different geometry) but have never found one - any members in Japan?

Regards,
David Partridge


-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Stefan Trethan
Sent: 26 October 2012 09:13
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Now that that's sorted, anyone willing to find out if there really is such a thing as a JIS screwdriver that is different to a philips?

ST



Re: Rise time check of 067-0587-02, Signal Pickoff via rigid extender?

 

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:02:52 +0100, "Craig Sawyers"
<c.sawyers@...> wrote:

My S-4 samplers sure do although I hear the S-6 samplers are better. I am
still
working through the details of calibrating my 7S11/S-4 plug-ins to see how
bad the samplers are.

As far as I know, the blow-by is only a problem about 10ns after a fast
edge
so it will not be a problem in this case.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:45:00 -0700, Miroslav Pokorni <mpokorni@...>
wrote:

I was told that S-6 has a big blow-by and caution is advised when
blaming device under test for bad signal.
Let's not forget that the S4 was introduced in 1969 - 43 years ago. It was
$795.
The S6 came in in 1971 - 41 years ago, costing $875.

These correspond to around $10,000 in today's money.

That we are still using these 14GHz sampling heads now says something for a
technology design that is rooted in the 1960's, to its ruggedness, and its
raw capability. And we pay buttons for them.

So let's not get too snitty about "how bad the samplers are".

Craig
Maybe I should have said, "how bad the settling time up to 25ns of the
two S-4 samplers that I have is compared to other S-4 and S-6
samplers".

Mine are not noisy and do not drift but as others have noticed, in
general the under 25ns settling time response of the S-4 does not
compare well to its contemporary peers and is often a problem.

If anybody has suggestions for improving the S-4 settling time, I am
all ears. My current plan is to use S-2 samplers instead.


Re: 7000 series on-screen displays boards

 

It looks like it would be very difficult to substitute one for the
other as well. The 7834 has the row and column data switches on the
main interface board so the readout circuits are effectively on two
different boards connected by an additional pair of coaxial cables. I
should have noticed that since my 7834 is still partially
disassembled.

So, you definitely cannot use the 7704 (it has a very different
layout) or 7834 readout boards. If you check the readout board
schematic or layout for the specific oscilloscope, at least the
difference is readily apparent.

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC), d.seiter@... wrote:

I looked one of the x-refs I have, and it lists the same RO board number for most 7K scopes,?with the exception of the 7704 (non-A), and the 7834.? I'm pretty sure that primary PCB?had at least one major ?layout change in it's many revisions,?because I recall?checking dissimilar boards to ensure the part numbers matched.

-Dave?

----- Original Message -----

From: "David" <davidwhess@...>
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:20:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 7000 series on-screen displays boards

As far as I know, all of the 7000 series readout boards are
interchangeable. There was a late model readout board that used a
different design in the 7623B or 7633 but I suspect it will work as
well.

You might need to make or extend the coaxial lines and ribbon cables
if they are not long enough or even present. The frequencies involved
are not high so RG-174/RG-178 size coaxial cable will be more than
adequate as a replacement for the coaxial cable Tektronix used.

The N suffix plug-ins just lack the readout signal circuits. They
will work fine but will not generate a readout. Usually this was an
option but some plug-ins like the 7CT1N curve tracer never had readout
circuitry.

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:53:22 -0400, Michael Dunn < md@... >
wrote:

My 7613 has no OSD board. Can these be found, and retrofitted?

Would a 7844 use the same board?

And do some plugins not work with that? (N suffix???)

thanks
Michael


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Stefan Trethan
 

This is true for the shaft diameter, but due to the difference in
profile a pozidrive 1 will most often be confused with a philips 2 and
vice-versa. The pozidriv 2 will not engage a philips size 2 screw. So
you'll most likely want to look at one size smaller than you are used
to for philips.


ST

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:05 AM, David C. Partridge
<david.partridge@...> wrote:
Pozidriv screwdrivers are the same size as Philips screwdrivers, just the bit geometry differs. #000 through to #4, though normally you'll only see #1 to #4.


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

I think they should exist (different geometry) but have never found one - any members in Japan?

Regards,
David Partridge

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Stefan Trethan
Sent: 26 October 2012 09:13
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Now that that's sorted, anyone willing to find out if there really is such a thing as a JIS screwdriver that is different to a philips?


ST


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

Pozidriv screwdrivers are the same size as Philips screwdrivers, just the bit geometry differs. #000 through to #4, though normally you'll only see #1 to #4.

Most Tektronix equipment use #1 and #2, though I have encountered #0 as well.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of David DiGiacomo
Sent: 26 October 2012 03:47
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

I paid $2.00 + $2.25 shipping for one on Ebay. Now I'm kicking myself for waiting so long. This is definitely worth it. The one I bought (I have no affiliation with the seller) is called "GearWrench 80084 #1 x 3-1/8" Pozi Insulated Screwdriver". The seller has 362 of them at this 'Buy It Now' price so he is not likely to run out any time soon.
For people who bought these, is #1 the right size, or do I need #2?
How about #0?


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Stefan Trethan
 

Now that that's sorted, anyone willing to find out if there really is
such a thing as a JIS screwdriver that is different to a philips?


ST


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Albert
 

Sure sooner or later (probably sooner!) you will need that #2 as well. For instance, try to remove the PS unit from a 7000 'scope. Or the plastic rear panel from a plugin.
Usually the boards and components (like attenuator houses and shields) are mounted with #1 screws. But then, the relay board in a PG506 is mounted with #2.
And... the feet of my 465 require #2, not #1.

Albert

--- I had a 465 apart on the bench and I tried
the #1 screwdriver on every screw I saw on the 465 and it was the correct
size. The #2 screwdriver did not fit anything on the 465, nor did it seem
like a #0 screwdriver would be useful. I think the 7000 scopes have some
larger screws that might require the #2 Pozidriv, but that remains to be
seen.
tom jobe...


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

I find that Pozidriv #1 fits all the Pozidriv screws in my Tek, HP and Racal equipment. I do have Pozidriv #0 for use on some microscopes and I have the larger Pozidriv drivers though I have never seen screws they fit, perhaps because I don't do things in wood.

I gave a brief presentation comparing Pozidriv and Phillips screws and drivers to my local home shop machinist club. Since few of the members there do much with electronics, no one was familiar with Pozidriv.

Most of us complain about the difficulty of loosening really tight Phillips head screws because the driver cams out of the head. True. In fact this "feature" was designed into the Phillips head as an early attempt to limit torque from automatic screwdrivers; the plan was to force the driver to cam out and disengage the head when high torque was reached, before the driver sheared off the screw head. So, the difficulty of keeping a Phillips driver from slipping was deliberate in the Phillips head design. Pozidriv is far less prone to cam out of the Pozidriv heads. Torx, of course, is better, but developed later.

Attached is a brief pdf comparing the features of Pozidriv and Phillips.

Larry


On 10/25/2012 8:04 PM, Tom Jobe wrote:
After reading about the virtues of Pozidriv on Tekscopes, I ordered some of
the #1 Pozidriv screw drivers from your eBay vendor, as well as some #2
Pozidriv screwdrivers from another vendor....
I must say that the Pozidriv scheme seems like what we should have on
everything that uses an X type of fastener. The torque you apply does not
try to force the screwdriver out of the screw head like it does with the
Phillips arrangement.
...

--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)


Re: 7000 series on-screen displays boards

 

I looked one of the x-refs I have, and it lists the same RO board number for most 7K scopes,?with the exception of the 7704 (non-A), and the 7834.? I'm pretty sure that primary PCB?had at least one major?layout change in it's many revisions,?because I recall?checking dissimilar boards to ensure the part numbers matched.

?

-Dave?


From: "David"
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:20:29 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 7000 series on-screen displays boards

?

As far as I know, all of the 7000 series readout boards are
interchangeable. There was a late model readout board that used a
different design in the 7623B or 7633 but I suspect it will work as
well.

You might need to make or extend the coaxial lines and ribbon cables
if they are not long enough or even present. The frequencies involved
are not high so RG-174/RG-178 size coaxial cable will be more than
adequate as a replacement for the coaxial cable Tektronix used.

The N suffix plug-ins just lack the readout signal circuits. They
will work fine but will not generate a readout. Usually this was an
option but some plug-ins like the 7CT1N curve tracer never had readout
circuitry.

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:53:22 -0400, Michael Dunn <md@...>
wrote:

> My 7613 has no OSD board. Can these be found, and retrofitted?
>
> Would a 7844 use the same board?
>
> And do some plugins not work with that? (N suffix???)
>
>thanks
>Michael


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

I also got the $10 HF security set last weekend. ?I've been meaning to get a Pozi set for a long time, but single drivers were always $$$ if you could find them. ?I got a tool catalog from one of the electronic specialty houses a few weeks ago, and it only had Pozi bits as part of a larger set. ?

I really don't like the quality of most Harbor Freight items, but when I just need a quick and dirty solution, it's cheaper/quicker than other local stores. ?In this case, the case smelled nasty, but after a week of outgassing in the car it's ok. ?The case also doesn't stay closed, but you get what you pay for...

Years ago I bought a small grinder/buffer from them because I needed a small unit with adjustable speed. ?The problem was that placing anything more than a tiny load on the motor caused it to slow down a great deal. ?Still, it worked for what I needed it for.

-Dave



From: "Tom Jobe"
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:04:33 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

After reading about the virtues of Pozidriv on Tekscopes, I ordered some of
the #1 Pozidriv screw drivers from your eBay vendor, as well as some #2
Pozidriv screwdrivers from another vendor. They all arrived promptly, and I
was thoroughly impressed with how well the right tool fits and works with
the original Tektronix screws. I had a 465 apart on the bench and I tried
the #1 screwdriver on every screw I saw on the 465 and it was the correct
size. The #2 screwdriver did not fit anything on the 465, nor did it seem
like a #0 screwdriver would be useful. I think the 7000 scopes have some
larger screws that might require the #2 Pozidriv, but that remains to be
seen.
I must say that the Pozidriv scheme seems like what we should have on
everything that uses an X type of fastener. The torque you apply does not
try to force the screwdriver out of the screw head like it does with the
Phillips arrangement.
tom jobe...
PS Thanks everyone for the Pozidriv enlightenment!







----- Original Message -----
From: "David DiGiacomo"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek


> I paid $2.00 + $2.25 shipping for one on Ebay. Now I¡¯m kicking myself for
> waiting so long. This is definitely worth it. The one I bought (I have no
> affiliation with the seller) is called ¡°GearWrench 80084 #1 x 3-1/8" Pozi
> Insulated Screwdriver¡±. The seller has 362 of them at this ¡®Buy It Now¡¯
> price so he is not likely to run out any time soon.

For people who bought these, is #1 the right size, or do I need #2?
How about #0?


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
?? ?http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TekScopes/

<*> Your email settings:
?? ?Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
?? ?http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TekScopes/join
?? ?(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
?? ?TekScopes-digest@...
?? ?TekScopes-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
?? ?TekScopes-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
?? ?http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Re: Estate sale scopes...

 

I think a larger plane, like a 747, would make a great house. ?I also like the idea of a tripod, so you can level the house if needed.?

-Dave



From: "Alexandre Souza - Listas"
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:56:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Estate sale scopes...

?


Crazy people... :oD

---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Sawyers" <c.sawyers@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Estate sale scopes...

>> You made us look very hard for the Tek connection:
>>
>> <>
>> <>
>> <>
>> <>
>> <>
>
> I can just see it now. "I've bought a plane, dear" "You've done WHAT??"
> "Yes - the good news is that it'll double up as a storage facility for the
> test gear collection"
>
> Craig
>
>


Re: Estate sale scopes...

Peter Gottlieb
 

I know someone who got a full 747 cockpit, mounted it to the side of his house, restored it, and wired it to computers as a simulator.

Peter

On 10/25/2012 8:56 PM, Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote:


Crazy people... :oD

---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Sawyers" <c.sawyers@... <mailto:c.sawyers%40tech-enterprise.com>>
To: <TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com>>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Estate sale scopes...

You made us look very hard for the Tek connection:

<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
I can just see it now. "I've bought a plane, dear" "You've done WHAT??"
"Yes - the good news is that it'll double up as a storage facility for the
test gear collection"

Craig

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <>
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5353 - Release Date: 10/25/12


Re: 468 triggering issue

 

Jerome,

One way to measure ripple on a DC supply line without a scope is to cap-couple into your Fluke with like a 1 uF or so cap. The cap blocks the DC from the meter, so the meter will only measure the ripple (AC) component. Just put the cap in series with the + meter lead. Observe polarity and remember to flip it for a negative supply (or just flip the meter leads and keep cap on + lead). Set the Fluke to AC volts. The 87 III reads true-RMS, not peak-to-peak. The cap's voltage rating should be higher than the voltage of the DC supply line that you're measuring!!! And be careful!!! Oh, you might want to slightly load the meter side with like a 1M ohm or so resistor so the cap's leakage current doesn't affect the readings. The meter should be about a 10M ohm load. Make a table of measured Vrms for all supplies, then convert to Vp-p (assume a sinewave). Someone in the group please chime in here if I'm advising Jerome incorrectly, or if I'm missing something. (It's been a long time since I've done this, since I have so many Tek scopes. LOL.)

The old Simpson 260 analog meters had a 0.1 uF cap (inside meter) at the meter's OUTPUT terminal. This terminal is mainly for measuring audio frequency levels on a DC bias, not 60 or 120 Hz ripple levels. But you can get relative measurements, even at 60 Hz. See the schematics and operator manuals at .

I'm no expert on replacing the large caps. I used solderwick and 2 soldering irons for my 468 repair job. 2 were bad/open, but I went on and replaced all 4 (or is it 5??) I do not have a vacumm desoldering iron. I just removed as much solder as possible with the wick, and heated 2 joints simultaneously then VERY gentley rocked/pushed the cap sideways a little, removed heat, repeated on other joints and in opposite direction, repeat, repeat, repeat, until it was removed. Not easy with just 2 hands - 2 people is better. I did lift a few of the doughnut pads, but if I remember correctly, they were the un-connected ones, so that really didn't matter. Remember, a few jumper's are needed, since the metal 3/4-terminal cans do that, but 2-leaded caps don't. I don't think any desoldering iron that Radio Shack sells will have a tip with a large enough hole, but I'm not sure on that. I took some before and after pics. Maybe I'll post them, but they're others in the photos section of Tek Scopes.

If you get back to troubleshooting the trigger circuit, don't worry so much about the signal level. I beleive the 468's calibrator is 300 mVp-p, not 500. You're mainly looking for some kind of a signal at the pin 7s.

Glad to help and hang in there,
Jimmy

--- In TekScopes@..., "jeromequelin" <jerome.quelin@...> wrote:




Thanks Jimmy, I am always very excited to hear from you (and from everyone else of course!)

Since my rudimentary Global Specialties 2001 function generator seems to be quite out of spec (according to my Fluke 87 III, recently calibrated) I decided I'd apply the 1kHz signal from the calibrator (It's not 500mV as specified in the manual but I thought it might stille give me something). Maybe I can somehow try getting a 500 mV 1kHz square wave from my SG and try again? As for the voltages I did check them for ripple and they all appeared to be fine (I did that with my Fluke) but a second thorough check sure is in order now. I'll do this tonight as well as checking the DC voltages around U445. It looks like the trigger board is going to have to go and I'll give the coupling and source switches a good cleaning.

As for the replacement of the electros do you recommend I get a vacuum desoldering gun (of the like of the Hakko 808) or would my low tech solder pump and whick would do the trick on a multilayer board? Somewhow I doubt it. I have seen that Radio Shack sells a cheapo soldering iron/solderpump combo that might just do the trick. Maybe I can try with this?

I'm going to have a nice chunk of time this weekend for experiments so I'll follow closely all your recommendations as usual and will get back to you with some (hopefully) positive results this time. Thanks again for all your help, I'm having so much fun :)

Cheers everyone,
Jerome.

--- In TekScopes@..., "jtjewell83" <jtjewell83@> wrote:

Jerome,

Did you apply the 1 kHz square wave to both Ext. Trigger inputs, like the manual says? If you did and you don't have a signal at pin 7 of each IC, I'd say you have a problem in one or more of the SOURCE or COUPLING switches (possible water damage maybe????). Oh, have you checked the +8 and -8 volt supplies at least at Q430A/R433 (+8V) and Q430B/R???-can't read schematic (-8V)?

Also, check the DC voltages around U445, if you haven't already. Some are on schematic (in the ovals).

I thought you had already check ripple on all the supplies, but I cannot remember for sure.

I had to replace the big electrolytic caps in one of my 468s. It's a job, but if done carefully, you'll get good results. Maybe about 8 hours total for me, including time spent to order the new caps. You do not have to remove the Interface Board to it, just the Trigger Board. Be carefull and try not to damage the pads/traces too much. And you'll need to add a few jumpers for the negative/can side of several of the caps. Plenty on that in the archives for 465, 475, 468. Make sure you get polarity right on each cap too!!! Post back if you're not sure about this.

Jimmy

--- In TekScopes@..., "jeromequelin" <jerome.quelin@> wrote:



Hello Jimmy and everyone else,

I finally have some time to give you a little summary of what I did. I followed Jimmy's advice and put together a sound card oscilloscope probe (even did an attenuator circuit for voltages above 1V) and probed a few test points on the A12 trigger board. Sadly on pin 7 of U240 and U445 I cannot seem to get a signal that makes any sense (nothing that the sound card scope can trigger on) and this lackluster signal doesn't seem to be a result of my very precarious probe because I could detect and trigger quite nicely on the 1kHz calibrator signal with it. I did set up the scope according to the manual (ext. trigger on both trigger A and B, AC coupled, external triggers...) but I could not make sense of what I observed on these two pins.

I did make two new observations:
1. whenever I probed U445 the scope triggered briefly, just like when I twiddled the slope switch. It happened every time I made contact with my sound card probe and every time I removed the probe.
2. This is a grim discovery : it looks like a couple of the large electro caps (C926 and C935 by the looks of it) from the main power supply have been releasing their corrosive guts and left a black trail around them... this is not good as I think I can't easily replace these guys... (and removing the A15 interface board on which they dwell seems like quite a production!)

All in all I think the sound card scope option just isn't going to cut the mustard. I am going to put this project on the side for maybe a month or until I can finally get hold of a functioning scope. In the meantime I'm going to start giving this little guy a good cleaning and maybe work on replacing these electros if at all possible!

Thanks so much for all your willingness to help me with my meager experience and scarce test equipment (I know this kind of long distance troubleshooting can be very frustrating for those helping!).

Jerome.

PS: I am located in the USA, near Princeton, NJ.

--- In TekScopes@..., "jtjewell83" <jtjewell83@> wrote:


Jerome,

I'm thinking you're going to need a scope to trace signals (unless you
get really lucky with your DMM!!!).

For a free PC sound card based scope, try this one:
<> . Make up a
simple cable that plugs into your sound card's line or mic input on one
end, and like a DMM probe tip (signal) and alligator clip (ground) on
the other. Then play with this with like some AA batteries, a 9-volt
battery, AC adapter with an AC output, etc., etc., to get comfortable
with this s/w. I'm thinking all or most sound cards have AC-coupled
inputs, so DC sources may not shown an indication when connected, except
maybe a quick spike. (I've never used this s/w much, just with the
internal mic in my laptop.) Hopefully, 9 volts DC won't damage the
average sound card's line or mic input. Maybe someone else in the group
knows of a better free PC sound card scope. I know there're others in
the TekScope archives.

Once you get that going and understand approximate peak-to-peak signal
levels, then start looking at what kind of signals you've got at pin 7
of U240 and U445 on the Trigger Gen. and Sweep Logic Board. Sheet 6,
A&B Tigger Generator. It looks like Q230A/B and Q430A/B have plenty of
drive capability (assuming they are good), so the sound card's Line
Input impedance shouldn't be a problem at these test points (44 and 41
respectively). Mainly concetration on U445, since that's for the A
sweep. The waveforms are just before the schematic. Let us know if you
do something like this, and we'll go from there.

If someone can think of something better for this situation, please feel
free to chime in.

Oh, what part of the world are you located? Maybe there's a group
member nearby that could help you.

Jimmy


--- In TekScopes@..., "jeromequelin" <jerome.quelin@>
wrote:

Yes I have but it won't trigger either. It looks like other than the
triggering issue the storage mode is fully functioning (the markers
seem
to work, the various display modes, norm, enveloppe, avg, seem to
behave
normally). I didn't have much time to work on it today but I read the
theory of operation some more and decided to start checking
transistors.
I checked Q119 (it's alright) whose emitter is used to generate the
trigger signal for ch1. Would you recommend that I start checking
every
transistor on the triggering board?
PS: I "fixed" the problem with ch1 and 2 traces being always on, a
problem I had created by mis-plugging a connector (P307)

Jerome.
--- In TekScopes@..., "jtjewell83" jtjewell83@ wrote:

Jerome,

Have you tried triggering while in storage mode?

Jimmy


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

Tom Jobe
 

After reading about the virtues of Pozidriv on Tekscopes, I ordered some of the #1 Pozidriv screw drivers from your eBay vendor, as well as some #2 Pozidriv screwdrivers from another vendor. They all arrived promptly, and I was thoroughly impressed with how well the right tool fits and works with the original Tektronix screws. I had a 465 apart on the bench and I tried the #1 screwdriver on every screw I saw on the 465 and it was the correct size. The #2 screwdriver did not fit anything on the 465, nor did it seem like a #0 screwdriver would be useful. I think the 7000 scopes have some larger screws that might require the #2 Pozidriv, but that remains to be seen.
I must say that the Pozidriv scheme seems like what we should have on everything that uses an X type of fastener. The torque you apply does not try to force the screwdriver out of the screw head like it does with the Phillips arrangement.
tom jobe...
PS Thanks everyone for the Pozidriv enlightenment!

----- Original Message -----
From: "David DiGiacomo" <daviddigiacomo@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek


I paid $2.00 + $2.25 shipping for one on Ebay. Now I???m kicking myself for waiting so long. This is definitely worth it. The one I bought (I have no affiliation with the seller) is called ???GearWrench 80084 #1 x 3-1/8" Pozi Insulated Screwdriver???. The seller has 362 of them at this ???Buy It Now??? price so he is not likely to run out any time soon.
For people who bought these, is #1 the right size, or do I need #2?
How about #0?


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Screwdriver for Pozidriv (Pozi) Screws used by Tek

 

I paid $2.00 + $2.25 shipping for one on Ebay. Now I¡¯m kicking myself for waiting so long. This is definitely worth it. The one I bought (I have no affiliation with the seller) is called ¡°GearWrench 80084 #1 x 3-1/8" Pozi Insulated Screwdriver¡±. The seller has 362 of them at this ¡®Buy It Now¡¯ price so he is not likely to run out any time soon.
For people who bought these, is #1 the right size, or do I need #2?
How about #0?


Re: Tek 475 malfunction

 

And is the Trigger light on? And can you explain further what you mean by "a fuzzy hint of a trace" --- Is it like off screen at the left, top, etc.?

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:

Is the CRT shield in place? On my 7834, I had very similar symptoms
while the CRT shield was removed.

Be sure to check all of the low voltage supply voltage levels and
their ripple.

Does the Beam Find control have any effect? Could it be stuck on?

I would check the focus circuit. How did you measure the -2450
voltage?

Then I would work my way through the z-axis circuits.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:08:29 -0000, "james_young44" <jasyoung@...>
wrote:

Greetings,
I have recently joined this group in hopes of helping me keep my Tek scopes working in good shape. The best Tek I have is a 7603 with a pair of 7A18's and a 7B53A.

I also just bought a 475 portable scope because it's easier to tote around than the 7603. That was my thinking anyway.

However the 475 has a "no trace" issue, in that there is no trace evident under any normal circumstances. I followed the Troubleshooting chart in the maintenance manual and got so far as to have the leads to the deflection plates disconnected. Still no life on the screen, no central dot.

Using an abnormal setting of the focus and intensity, with a slow sweep rate, I get a fuzzy hint of a trace. Intensity fully CW, focus fully CCW with a 50ms sweep. This is with the deflection wires disconnected, sweep is line triggered, no vertical input.

The voltages on the bottom look fine with my DVM; the -2450V is good with a VOM. I have no way to test the HV.

I should look at the Z-axis amplifier? Are there problematic tantalums on there? What voltage should I see at the intensity grid on the CRT?

This scope is in very pretty cosmetic condition and it'd be nice if it would work. Thanks very much for any and all assistance.

Best regards,
Jim Young
Oberlin, OH


Re: S-1 Sampler Module Weirdness

 

I wonder if there is a more recent S-1 manual. The S-2 manual might
be helpful as well but I have not checked it in detail yet.

I do not care about getting my S-1 into stock condition. I already
know what replacement sampling diodes to use so once I get a GR to BNC
or SMA adapter, I will fix the trigger pickoff and begin reverse
engineering the discrepancies.

I suspect the most difficult problem will be finding a suitable
avalanche transistor if necessary.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:29:49 -0000, "Albert" <aodiversen@...>
wrote:

Hi David,

My S-1 is above B100000 and has exactly the same Strobe board.
I don't see a 670 code at the sampler board, but the 388 code is 388-0949-01, also marked S-1 and PB.
The preamp board is 670-0168-00 marked S-2 and PA, probably an older board, with 3 adjustments R22, R46 and C13.

Albert

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:

I double checked with a low ohms multimeter and the measured values
are consistent with the 100 and 1K markings.

The strobe board is different from the one shown in my S-1 manual
(hand printed 670-0164-01 instead of etched 670-0164-00) but is marked
S-1. It does not even have a spot for the snap off current adjustment
R57.

The pre-amp board is almost the same as the one shown in my S-1 manual
but all of the adjustment trimmers except for transient response have
been replaced with fixed components.

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:46:34 -0000, "Albert" <aodiversen@...>
wrote:

Hi David,

Are you sure it's not a pair of 100R resistors? The collector should be terminated in 50R. So if really 1k and 100R I doubt this is a modification by the factory.

Albert

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@> wrote:

I recently picked up an S-1 sampling module and found something odd.
The serial number is B100000+, it has date codes from 1982, the preamp
circuit board is part number 670-0163-01 instead of 670-0163-00, the
strobe board is 670-0164-01 instead of 670-0164-00, and the sampler
board is 670-0165-03 instead of 670-165-00. There is a marking on the
sampler board which says "Type S-1 PB" instead of "Type S-1 P". The
strobe board has some layout and circuit differences.

Besides having the two sampling diodes soldered into place, the
trigger pickoff was cut at Q17 and the collector of Q17 parallel
terminated into 91 ohms at 1.4 volts with a pair of 1/8 watt carbon
composition resistors (1.0 KOhms and 100 Ohms) that match the other
1/8 watt carbon composition resistors so it looks like a factory
modification.

Did Tektronix make a special purpose S-1 sampling module?


Re: diode 151-0040-00

 

--- In TekScopes@..., "andersen_bill@..." <andersen_bill@...> wrote:

Hi looking for a suitable replacement for this diode.

I can cross this number to a 1N2609 but my sources have no stock.

Recomendations?

Thnaks, B


Re: Estate sale scopes...

Alexandre Souza - Listas
 

Crazy people... :oD

---
Enviado do meu Motorola PT550
Meu site:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Sawyers" <c.sawyers@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Estate sale scopes...


You made us look very hard for the Tek connection:

<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
I can just see it now. "I've bought a plane, dear" "You've done WHAT??"
"Yes - the good news is that it'll double up as a storage facility for the
test gear collection"

Craig