Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: 465B schematics and tantalum curiosity
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýTo get a good copy of the manual, see ?. Dave is not
expensive and you will be hard put to find better scans.
?
Note that there are two versions of the manual, early and late, and it goes
by the serial number.
?
As to your ohmmeter question, I always make the measurement using the
correct polarity on the meter. Mainly this is to avoid semiconductor junction
biasing that could give false readings.
?
The main failure mode for tantalums is overvoltage causing breakdown of the
dielectric. This causes a gross overcurrent condition that can result in a small
fire unless there is some form of current limiting.
?
Regards,
Tom
?
?
|
Re: 465B schematics and tantalum curiosity
clarification on Cxxxx unreadable: I meant on the board picture, not the actual logic schematic. And it is just some are not readable, most are...but of course its the ones I want to see :-)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "pdxareaid" <public_email@...> wrote:
|
465B schematics and tantalum curiosity
Greetings,
I am waiting on replacement tantalums to show up to complete my 465B scope. While I was waiting, I thought I would dive in and do a tant survey and look for dry tants in circuits that are dangerously close to their rated voltage (and therefore subject to early failure). I have already found a couple without really looking so i thought a more in depth look might be worthwhile. I found the schematics in the service manual are not clear enough to read the component numbers (Cxxxx etc.) I could probably muddle thru it, making good guesses and cross checking, but I was wondering if someone had a better set of schematics for the 465B. I have both the standard pdf and djvu versions of the service manual (found at ) and they are both problematic. I asked this question once for the 465M and got lucky with "try this". hoping to get lucky for the 465B. Another question: I know very little about dry tants but I do know that even a brief reverse polarity connection will damage the tant. Does one need to worry about such when looking for shorted tants, realizing the volt meter is providing its own polarity for resistance readings? ie. Are tants sensitive to such a miniscule current? If not a practical worry...academically: is there some small degradation? I see there are people in here with lots of tant knowledge that might be able to comment. Phil ps. If i do the survey, I will post the results for 465B owners to fret over :-) |
Re: Normalizer calibration
Albert
Hi Jerry,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Don't you find a similar difference between 7A16P and 7A26 if you adjust an ordinary 10x probe for a square wave at the 7A16P and then transfer the probe to the 7A26? Albert I built a homemade normalizer using a 22pf 1206 cap and a 1Meg 1206 resistor. I expected it work be a 22pf normalizer. It produces a square wave with my 7A16P 20pf amplifier but shows a bit of low freq rolloff on the leading edge with a 7A26 or 7A18. The 22pf caps I am using seem to be a bit over 22pf. I am puzzled that it looks better with the 7A16p than the 7A26. How are normalizers calibrated? |
Re: 2213 no trigger
I would make the same suggestions.
They are available on Ebay for reasonable prices and a lot of the similar 22xx similar oscilloscopes use them. The 2230, 2232, 2225A, and some others use the same main board which has 3 of the CA3102 ICs so from the look of it, all of the small frame 22xx series use them. Vernonia Northern also has them (with a typo) but I suspect Ebay would be cheaper because of shipping: On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:35:08 -0700, "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@...> wrote: There are two Chinese sellers on eBay who say they have the CA3102. |
Re: Normalizer calibration
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHave you considered the stray capacitance of your packaging?
?
I would use a, say, 12 pf fixed with a 2-15 pf variable cap in parallel.
You will then need to calibrate the normalizer.
?
Regards,
Tom
?
|
Re: Help I got a Tracking Generator for my Tek 2710 but how do I install it?
Robert -
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The ribbon cable that makes the connection between the power supply board and the TG appears missing. The end that connects to the TG is a standard female IDC ribbon connector. The other end is a board mount IDC connector that is NOT pluggable but soldered to the circuit board. I bought some of these years ago from Berg (I think). I did find some photos of a T&B version (although it is a 20 pin and you need a 10 pin) I placed a picture under the 'PHOTO' section names '2710/11/12 Tracking Generator Cable'. take care. Jim
|
Re: 2213 no trigger
Hi Tom,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thx for the info. Now ordered 3 pcs. waiting 4 a couple days... Tjeenz --- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@...> wrote:
|
Normalizer calibration
Hi,
I built a homemade normalizer using a 22pf 1206 cap and a 1Meg 1206 resistor. I expected it work be a 22pf normalizer. It produces a square wave with my 7A16P 20pf amplifier but shows a bit of low freq rolloff on the leading edge with a 7A26 or 7A18. The 22pf caps I am using seem to be a bit over 22pf. I am puzzled that it looks better with the 7A16p than the 7A26. How are normalizers calibrated? Jerry Massengale
|
Re: Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.
Hi John,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for the link. it's very useful. Although I wish he had provided some more details. Typical of good engineers, he assumes that the reader already knows the skipped details. At least now I see that there is no particular adjustment or problem with the the actual first and/or second IF frequency. Could I replace his varactor with a trimmer. This only when the first Lo alone is swept. I wonder if he really needed all the complexity. I will cook something up though my scrap box is not as well stocked as his. Also, pehaps from my position, it might be better to have a level controlled VC oscillator, as the tracking gen, controlled by a phase comparator, comparing a fixed xtal osc( crytal at a submultiple with some tunability) running at the first IF, with mixture of the S/A first local osc with the tracking gen followed by a narrow band pass filter at the first IF frequency. Azzy --- In TekScopes@..., "johncharlesgord" <johngord@...> wrote:
|
Re: 2213 no trigger
Tom Jobe
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThere are two Chinese sellers on eBay who say they
have?the CA3102.
Another thought... the 2213A, 2215A, 2235, etc.?all have
three of those CA3102 chips on the mainboard.
Is there any chance of someone in your part of the world
having a?broken 22xx with some CA3102?
The part is not worth much, but the shipping to Thailand costs
a lot.
tom jobe...
?
?
?
|
Re: Tek 132 cables termination
Albert
Hi Fred,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
That 47R from tube to BNC (that's what you mean I suppose) has no function at all, works only negative on BW. For convenience of use you should also consider the overall gain of plugin plus 132. The original single termination in 93R yields a convenient sequence of gain factors 10, 5, 2.5 1 ... With 50R (and front panel adjustment) the sequence is less handy, 5, 2.5, 1.25, ... or perhaps 4, 2, 1, .4, ... The latter with double 50R termination would become 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2, ... Albert --- |
Re: 2213 no trigger
Hi David,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
After waiting for one week for the ca3102, I found out it is not available here (thailand, bangkok area). I checked the internet but come out at companies who want to have minimum order of 150usd. amazon lists them for 8 usd and shipping around 20 usd. maybe you know of a cheaper seller/location? tjeenz. --- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:
|
Re: Tek 132 cables termination
Thanks Albert, had not find that yet.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The 132 is workimg again. So I'm glad it is like I figured out it out. Think I solder indide the 132 a 51 ohm parallel to the bnc and 47 ohm in series instead of the short wire. Then it is always terminated in 98 ohm. Close enough. Then two short 50 ohm cables and if nessacary for BW two 50 ohm inline terminators on the scope. Voltage over the 50 ohm internal will be 0,5V so thats correct to be able to use the scopes standard V/div setting, and using 50 ohm in line terminators or 50 ohm 7A24 plugins ( or the 50 ohm input of my hameg) the voltage will be 0.25V so only thing I have to do is choose a lower V/div position and i do not have to use the variable in between gain on the scopes. The terminators from tek are handy small things, but the original cables I have now borrowd are very stiff and long ( so they make a big loop above my bench and you know hoe limmited my pace is ;-) ) and have as second termination a few homemade ones and those boxes used, are rather big. Do not like that because it gives mechanical stress to the bncs and if i bump an instrument on the bench to them I will kill a bnc if Murphy is around. I only need about 50 cm of cable because the 132 is placed between the two scopes. So two short pieces of RG58 with L connectors or the thin RG179 will be more comfortable. Fred pa4tim --- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote:
|
Re: How to determine if the CRT is exhausted?
aobp11
Hi Max,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If the rest of the 'scope is OK, then the 'scope itself is the best environment to test the CRT, isn't it? So how bad is the CRT in ordinary use? I could compare with my 564s. Is it irrespective of plugin? Blanking could be faulty in one of the plugins. I have no data. There is some interesting reading here #5445 and you might find more if you search for "CRT exhausted" or "CRT rejuvenation". Albert I'm in trouble with my 564, I'm not sure if the CRT is exhausted or not. |
Re: Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.
Azzy,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The basic method of making a tracking generator is to mix a frequency equal to the first IF with the first Local Oscillator to produce a signal equal in frequency to the analyzer input frequency. This is somewhat complicated in the 494P by the fact that the first IF frequency is somewhat variable (since the second local oscillator is sometimes swept). For the 0-1.8GHz band, the first IF is about 2.072 GHz. For most of the higher bands the first IF is 829MHz. For a simple 2 to 3 GHz tracking generator you could use an external 829MHz source (approximate frequency), buffer amplifiers for the first LO output and a mixer. You would need to operate at sweep widths that did not sweep the second local oscillator. Fancier tracking generators would include signal leveling and would include the second LO oscillator to allow proper operation with narrow sweeps: Take a look at what John Miles did for the 0-1.8GHz band: <<>> --John Gord --- In TekScopes@..., "Asadullah" <mirasad31415@...> wrote:
|
Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.
I have purchased a Tek 494P off Ebay yesterday. ( It is still in transit). What I must have is a tracking gen to go with her. I looked through the 494P manual but could not determine what it is. ( I am bit slow at understanding) Besides I might not be able to buy one even if I can find one.
So the big question. What will work as a substitute? Where could I find information on how to build one if possible? My current interest is in the 2 to 3 GHz range only, but might go to around 10 GHz. Even a block diagram will help. I could jury rig something to work. Any help is welcome. Thanks Azzy. |
Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins
Greetings,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The joy stick positioned the traces as a group on the CRT. I used one of those sometime in the mid or late seventies. I owned a dual beam version using the same plug-in modules as shown in the eBay listing. ?It had two vertical and two horizontal pug-ins. ?As I recall, these same scopes could also carry the Dumont name. I was initially thinking that big Fairchild dual beam scope also had the joystick, but I dug out some old photos and discovered that it did not. There was also a transistor curve tracer of the same generation and style that was manufactured under both the Dumont and Fairchild names. I always enjoyed using those instruments. Ken On 28Sep, 2012, at 9:58 PM, sipespresso wrote:
|
Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins
These were made by Dumont. Fairchild bought them out. I don't think
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Fairchild actually ever made anything new for these scopes. I used these scopes in a lab I worked in in the late 1960s. Nobody in the lab wanted them because they had a fatal flaw. They had no fan in them and they ran so hot from all the tubes that trace drift was a real problem. Everyone grabbed a Tek 535/545/547 if they could instead of using these Dumont scopes. The newbies in the lab (that was me at the time) ended up with a Dumont (Fairchild) scope on their bench longing for the day when we had enough seniority to grab one of the Tek scopes instead. The Tek scopes had a greater variety of plugins than the Dumont scopes did. -----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of gridleakrick Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:01 PM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins Fairchild made a series of very nice scopes way back when with plug-ins. A friend of mine has several of them. Beautiful construction inside. Here's one on ebay 900149352?pt=Vintage_Electronics_R2&hash=item2322598c68 Rick ================================================================= --- In TekScopes@..., Robin Whittle <rw@...> wrote:
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins
sipespresso
What does the "PATTERN POSITIONING" joystick on the Fairchild 766H do? -Kurt
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "gridleakrick" <gridleakrick@...> wrote:
|