¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: 465B schematics and tantalum curiosity

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

To get a good copy of the manual, see ?. Dave is not expensive and you will be hard put to find better scans.
?
Note that there are two versions of the manual, early and late, and it goes by the serial number.
?
As to your ohmmeter question, I always make the measurement using the correct polarity on the meter. Mainly this is to avoid semiconductor junction biasing that could give false readings.
?
The main failure mode for tantalums is overvoltage causing breakdown of the dielectric. This causes a gross overcurrent condition that can result in a small fire unless there is some form of current limiting.
?
Regards,
Tom
?
?

----- Original Message -----
From: pdxareaid
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 12:00 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] 465B schematics and tantalum curiosity

?

Greetings,
I am waiting on replacement tantalums to show up to complete my 465B scope.

While I was waiting, I thought I would dive in and do a tant survey and look for dry tants in circuits that are dangerously close to their rated voltage (and therefore subject to early failure). I have already found a couple without really looking so i thought a more in depth look might be worthwhile. I found the schematics in the service manual are not clear enough to read the component numbers (Cxxxx etc.) I could probably muddle thru it, making good guesses and cross checking, but I was wondering if someone had a better set of schematics for the 465B. I have both the standard pdf and djvu versions of the service manual (found at ) and they are both problematic. I asked this question once for the 465M and got lucky with "try this". hoping to get lucky for the 465B.

Another question: I know very little about dry tants but I do know that even a brief reverse polarity connection will damage the tant. Does one need to worry about such when looking for shorted tants, realizing the volt meter is providing its own polarity for resistance readings? ie. Are tants sensitive to such a miniscule current? If not a practical worry...academically: is there some small degradation? I see there are people in here with lots of tant knowledge that might be able to comment.
Phil
ps. If i do the survey, I will post the results for 465B owners to fret over :-)


Re: 465B schematics and tantalum curiosity

 

clarification on Cxxxx unreadable: I meant on the board picture, not the actual logic schematic. And it is just some are not readable, most are...but of course its the ones I want to see :-)

--- In TekScopes@..., "pdxareaid" <public_email@...> wrote:

Greetings,
I am waiting on replacement tantalums to show up to complete my 465B scope.

While I was waiting, I thought I would dive in and do a tant survey and look for dry tants in circuits that are dangerously close to their rated voltage (and therefore subject to early failure). I have already found a couple without really looking so i thought a more in depth look might be worthwhile. I found the schematics in the service manual are not clear enough to read the component numbers (Cxxxx etc.) I could probably muddle thru it, making good guesses and cross checking, but I was wondering if someone had a better set of schematics for the 465B. I have both the standard pdf and djvu versions of the service manual (found at ) and they are both problematic. I asked this question once for the 465M and got lucky with "try this". hoping to get lucky for the 465B.

Another question: I know very little about dry tants but I do know that even a brief reverse polarity connection will damage the tant. Does one need to worry about such when looking for shorted tants, realizing the volt meter is providing its own polarity for resistance readings? ie. Are tants sensitive to such a miniscule current? If not a practical worry...academically: is there some small degradation? I see there are people in here with lots of tant knowledge that might be able to comment.
Phil
ps. If i do the survey, I will post the results for 465B owners to fret over :-)


465B schematics and tantalum curiosity

 

Greetings,
I am waiting on replacement tantalums to show up to complete my 465B scope.

While I was waiting, I thought I would dive in and do a tant survey and look for dry tants in circuits that are dangerously close to their rated voltage (and therefore subject to early failure). I have already found a couple without really looking so i thought a more in depth look might be worthwhile. I found the schematics in the service manual are not clear enough to read the component numbers (Cxxxx etc.) I could probably muddle thru it, making good guesses and cross checking, but I was wondering if someone had a better set of schematics for the 465B. I have both the standard pdf and djvu versions of the service manual (found at ) and they are both problematic. I asked this question once for the 465M and got lucky with "try this". hoping to get lucky for the 465B.

Another question: I know very little about dry tants but I do know that even a brief reverse polarity connection will damage the tant. Does one need to worry about such when looking for shorted tants, realizing the volt meter is providing its own polarity for resistance readings? ie. Are tants sensitive to such a miniscule current? If not a practical worry...academically: is there some small degradation? I see there are people in here with lots of tant knowledge that might be able to comment.
Phil
ps. If i do the survey, I will post the results for 465B owners to fret over :-)


Re: Normalizer calibration

Albert
 

Hi Jerry,

Don't you find a similar difference between 7A16P and 7A26 if you adjust an ordinary 10x probe for a square wave at the 7A16P and then transfer the probe to the 7A26?

Albert

I built a homemade normalizer using a 22pf 1206 cap and a 1Meg 1206 resistor. I expected it work be a 22pf normalizer. It produces a square wave with my 7A16P 20pf amplifier but shows a bit of low freq rolloff on the leading edge with a 7A26 or 7A18. The 22pf caps I am using seem to be a bit over 22pf. I am puzzled that it looks better with the 7A16p than the 7A26. How are normalizers calibrated?



Jerry Massengale


Re: 2213 no trigger

 

I would make the same suggestions.

They are available on Ebay for reasonable prices and a lot of the
similar 22xx similar oscilloscopes use them. The 2230, 2232, 2225A,
and some others use the same main board which has 3 of the CA3102 ICs
so from the look of it, all of the small frame 22xx series use them.

Vernonia Northern also has them (with a typo) but I suspect Ebay would
be cheaper because of shipping:



On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:35:08 -0700, "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@...>
wrote:

There are two Chinese sellers on eBay who say they have the CA3102.
Another thought... the 2213A, 2215A, 2235, etc. all have three of those CA3102 chips on the mainboard.
Is there any chance of someone in your part of the world having a broken 22xx with some CA3102?
The part is not worth much, but the shipping to Thailand costs a lot.
tom jobe...



----- Original Message -----
From: tjeenz
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 2:34 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2213 no trigger



Hi David,

After waiting for one week for the ca3102, I found out it is not available here (thailand, bangkok area). I checked the internet but come out at companies who want to have minimum order of 150usd.
amazon lists them for 8 usd and shipping around 20 usd. maybe you know of a cheaper seller/location?

tjeenz.

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:43:12 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@...> wrote:
>
> >I removed u460. (ca3102 from rca). it is broken (20ohm between 1 and 14 in both directions)
> >also i found a diode connected on the top to pin 12. i couldn't detect pin 12 in the schematics... now start looking for a ca3102
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:50:17 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@...> wrote:
>
> >> Voltage U460 pin3 and 9 is -8.6V, R456 is ok.
> >> pin 1 and 8 are 3.5V not 2.2
>
> That fits with pin 1 being 3.5 volts instead of 2.2 volts. The low
> resistance between the collector and base is pulling that node up via
> the high output of U480C.
>
> Pin 2 and pin 10 at about 0.0 volts while pin 3 is -8.6 volts suggests
> that the emitters of U460E and U460B is open as well.
>
> Pin 12 and pin 5 are connected internally to the substrate. The
> CA3102 is built on a junction isolated process so the substrate
> connects to each transistor via a diode which is reverse biased to
> provide isolation.
>
> >> u460 is unfortunately not on a socket.
>
> When replacing U460, I would cut the collet pins out of an IC socket
> and individually install them into the PC board to make a low profile
> socket for the new IC.
>
>
>
> >> To access u460 and area, i see i have to remove some components. I will start on that a.s.a.p. but a question: some loose contact in the timebase switch. sometimes it generates only half screen image when i move with that knob. is that the pot-meter in the middle?
>
> From what I remember of the 2213, the timebase switch uses a different
> and unreliable design from the other 22xx series oscilloscopes.
> Someone else may have suggestions for repairing it.
>




Re: Normalizer calibration

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Have you considered the stray capacitance of your packaging?
?
I would use a, say, 12 pf fixed with a 2-15 pf variable cap in parallel. You will then need to calibrate the normalizer.
?
Regards,
Tom
?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 8:32 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Normalizer calibration

?

Hi,

I built a homemade normalizer using a 22pf 1206 cap and a 1Meg 1206 resistor. I expected it work be a 22pf normalizer. It produces a square wave with my 7A16P 20pf amplifier but shows a bit of low freq rolloff on the leading edge with a 7A26 or 7A18. The 22pf caps I am using seem to be a bit over 22pf. I am puzzled that it looks better with the 7A16p than the 7A26. How are normalizers calibrated?

Jerry Massengale


Re: Help I got a Tracking Generator for my Tek 2710 but how do I install it?

 

Robert -

The ribbon cable that makes the connection between the power supply board and the TG appears missing. The end that connects to the TG is a standard female IDC ribbon connector. The other end is a board mount IDC connector that is NOT pluggable but soldered to the circuit board. I bought some of these years ago from Berg (I think). I did find some photos of a T&B version (although it is a 20 pin and you need a 10 pin) I placed a picture under the 'PHOTO' section names '2710/11/12 Tracking Generator Cable'.

take care.
Jim




Hi Jim, Rich and Rolynn

I am so sorry I have not been back to reply for almost a week but my Dog got really sick on Sunday and looked like he was not going to make it, so I pretty much dropped everything and took 3 days off from work so I could get him to the Vet so they could figure out what had happened (seems like he contracted some kind of massive cardio infection).

After that he was home on Meds but very sick so I stayed with him during the days and my wife took care of him in the evenings while I slept and then I took over the night shift when she went to bed. He is doing much better now but is still not out of the woods yet.

I wanted you guys to know that I took the advice from Rolynn and purchased an ebay auction supposedly for all the cables for a 27xx. The only problem is that the guy could not guarantee me that the TG cables are in the lot but looking at the pictures I think they are there.

Can you guys take a look and tell me if I got lucky or picked door Number 2 (LOL).

Scroll down to the bottom he has multiple pictures.



I pulled the trigger on this just after the Dog got sick, so I had very little time to really check it out properly but I figured Rolynn knew that the cables where in the pictures.

I will be back soon, but things are still a bit rough because now I have a serious back log at work but I will try to log in again tommorow.

Thanks again for all the help guys.
Robert
KD8MJR





--- In TekScopes@..., "dreadlk" <dreadlk@> wrote:

Rolynn Thank you so very much for that :)
I will be in touch soon.

--- In TekScopes@..., "ROLYNN PRECHTL K7DFW" <k7dfw@> wrote:


I think my biggest hurdle is going to be getting the proper Semi Rigid cables that are needed I
have no clue where to buy these........


Re: 2213 no trigger

 

Hi Tom,

Thx for the info. Now ordered 3 pcs. waiting 4 a couple days...

Tjeenz

--- In TekScopes@..., "Tom Jobe" <tomjobe@...> wrote:

There are two Chinese sellers on eBay who say they have the CA3102.
Another thought... the 2213A, 2215A, 2235, etc. all have three of those CA3102 chips on the mainboard.
Is there any chance of someone in your part of the world having a broken 22xx with some CA3102?
The part is not worth much, but the shipping to Thailand costs a lot.
tom jobe...



----- Original Message -----
From: tjeenz
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 2:34 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2213 no trigger



Hi David,

After waiting for one week for the ca3102, I found out it is not available here (thailand, bangkok area). I checked the internet but come out at companies who want to have minimum order of 150usd.
amazon lists them for 8 usd and shipping around 20 usd. maybe you know of a cheaper seller/location?

tjeenz.

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:43:12 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@> wrote:
>
> >I removed u460. (ca3102 from rca). it is broken (20ohm between 1 and 14 in both directions)
> >also i found a diode connected on the top to pin 12. i couldn't detect pin 12 in the schematics... now start looking for a ca3102
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:50:17 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@> wrote:
>
> >> Voltage U460 pin3 and 9 is -8.6V, R456 is ok.
> >> pin 1 and 8 are 3.5V not 2.2
>
> That fits with pin 1 being 3.5 volts instead of 2.2 volts. The low
> resistance between the collector and base is pulling that node up via
> the high output of U480C.
>
> Pin 2 and pin 10 at about 0.0 volts while pin 3 is -8.6 volts suggests
> that the emitters of U460E and U460B is open as well.
>
> Pin 12 and pin 5 are connected internally to the substrate. The
> CA3102 is built on a junction isolated process so the substrate
> connects to each transistor via a diode which is reverse biased to
> provide isolation.
>
> >> u460 is unfortunately not on a socket.
>
> When replacing U460, I would cut the collet pins out of an IC socket
> and individually install them into the PC board to make a low profile
> socket for the new IC.
>
>
>
> >> To access u460 and area, i see i have to remove some components. I will start on that a.s.a.p. but a question: some loose contact in the timebase switch. sometimes it generates only half screen image when i move with that knob. is that the pot-meter in the middle?
>
> From what I remember of the 2213, the timebase switch uses a different
> and unreliable design from the other 22xx series oscilloscopes.
> Someone else may have suggestions for repairing it.
>


Normalizer calibration

 

Hi,

I built a homemade normalizer using a 22pf 1206 cap and a 1Meg 1206 resistor. I expected it work be a 22pf normalizer. It produces a square wave with my 7A16P 20pf amplifier but shows a bit of low freq rolloff on the leading edge with a 7A26 or 7A18. The 22pf caps I am using seem to be a bit over 22pf. I am puzzled that it looks better with the 7A16p than the 7A26. How are normalizers calibrated?

Jerry Massengale


Re: Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.

 

Hi John,

Thanks for the link. it's very useful. Although I wish he had provided some more details. Typical of good engineers, he assumes that the reader already knows the skipped details.

At least now I see that there is no particular adjustment or problem with the the actual first and/or second IF frequency. Could I replace his varactor with a trimmer. This only when the first Lo alone is swept.
I wonder if he really needed all the complexity.

I will cook something up though my scrap box is not as well stocked as his.

Also, pehaps from my position, it might be better to have a level controlled VC oscillator, as the tracking gen, controlled by a phase comparator, comparing a fixed xtal osc( crytal at a submultiple with some tunability) running at the first IF, with mixture of the S/A first local osc with the tracking gen followed by a narrow band pass filter at the first IF frequency.


Azzy

--- In TekScopes@..., "johncharlesgord" <johngord@...> wrote:

Azzy,

The basic method of making a tracking generator is to mix a frequency equal to the first IF with the first Local Oscillator to produce a signal equal in frequency to the analyzer input frequency. This is somewhat complicated in the 494P by the fact that the first IF frequency is somewhat variable (since the second local oscillator is sometimes swept). For the 0-1.8GHz band, the first IF is about 2.072 GHz. For most of the higher bands the first IF is 829MHz.

For a simple 2 to 3 GHz tracking generator you could use an external 829MHz source (approximate frequency), buffer amplifiers for the first LO output and a mixer. You would need to operate at sweep widths that did not sweep the second local oscillator.

Fancier tracking generators would include signal leveling and would include the second LO oscillator to allow proper operation with narrow sweeps: Take a look at what John Miles did for the 0-1.8GHz band:
<<>>

--John Gord



--- In TekScopes@..., "Asadullah" <mirasad31415@> wrote:

I have purchased a Tek 494P off Ebay yesterday. ( It is still in transit). What I must have is a tracking gen to go with her. I looked through the 494P manual but could not determine what it is. ( I am bit slow at understanding) Besides I might not be able to buy one even if I can find one.
So the big question. What will work as a substitute? Where could I find information on how to build one if possible? My current interest is in the 2 to 3 GHz range only, but might go to around 10 GHz.
Even a block diagram will help. I could jury rig something to work.
Any help is welcome. Thanks

Azzy.


Re: 2213 no trigger

Tom Jobe
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

There are two Chinese sellers on eBay who say they have?the CA3102.
Another thought... the 2213A, 2215A, 2235, etc.?all have three of those CA3102 chips on the mainboard.
Is there any chance of someone in your part of the world having a?broken 22xx with some CA3102?
The part is not worth much, but the shipping to Thailand costs a lot.
tom jobe...
?
?
?

----- Original Message -----
From: tjeenz
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 2:34 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2213 no trigger

?

Hi David,

After waiting for one week for the ca3102, I found out it is not available here (thailand, bangkok area). I checked the internet but come out at companies who want to have minimum order of 150usd.
amazon lists them for 8 usd and shipping around 20 usd. maybe you know of a cheaper seller/location?

tjeenz.

--- In TekScopes@..., David wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:43:12 -0000, "tjeenz" wrote:
>
> >I removed u460. (ca3102 from rca). it is broken (20ohm between 1 and 14 in both directions)
> >also i found a diode connected on the top to pin 12. i couldn't detect pin 12 in the schematics... now start looking for a ca3102
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:50:17 -0000, "tjeenz" wrote:
>
> >> Voltage U460 pin3 and 9 is -8.6V, R456 is ok.
> >> pin 1 and 8 are 3.5V not 2.2
>
> That fits with pin 1 being 3.5 volts instead of 2.2 volts. The low
> resistance between the collector and base is pulling that node up via
> the high output of U480C.
>
> Pin 2 and pin 10 at about 0.0 volts while pin 3 is -8.6 volts suggests
> that the emitters of U460E and U460B is open as well.
>
> Pin 12 and pin 5 are connected internally to the substrate. The
> CA3102 is built on a junction isolated process so the substrate
> connects to each transistor via a diode which is reverse biased to
> provide isolation.
>
> >> u460 is unfortunately not on a socket.
>
> When replacing U460, I would cut the collet pins out of an IC socket
> and individually install them into the PC board to make a low profile
> socket for the new IC.
>
>
>
> >> To access u460 and area, i see i have to remove some components. I will start on that a.s.a.p. but a question: some loose contact in the timebase switch. sometimes it generates only half screen image when i move with that knob. is that the pot-meter in the middle?
>
> From what I remember of the 2213, the timebase switch uses a different
> and unreliable design from the other 22xx series oscilloscopes.
> Someone else may have suggestions for repairing it.
>


Re: Tek 132 cables termination

Albert
 

Hi Fred,

That 47R from tube to BNC (that's what you mean I suppose) has no function at all, works only negative on BW.
For convenience of use you should also consider the overall gain of plugin plus 132. The original single termination in 93R yields a convenient sequence of gain factors 10, 5, 2.5 1 ... With 50R (and front panel adjustment) the sequence is less handy, 5, 2.5, 1.25, ... or perhaps 4, 2, 1, .4, ... The latter with double 50R termination would become 2, 1, 0.5, 0.2, ...

Albert

---
Think I solder inside the 132 a 51 ohm parallel to the bnc and 47 ohm in series instead of the short wire. Then it is always terminated in 98 ohm. Close enough. Then two short 50 ohm cables and if nessacary for BW two 50 ohm inline terminators on the scope. Voltage over the 50 ohm internal will be 0,5V so thats correct to be able to use the scopes standard V/div setting, and using 50 ohm in line terminators or 50 ohm 7A24 plugins ( or the 50 ohm input of my hameg) the voltage will be 0.25V so only thing I have to do is choose a lower V/div position and i do not have to use the variable in between gain on the scopes.
---
Fred pa4tim


Re: 2213 no trigger

 

Hi David,

After waiting for one week for the ca3102, I found out it is not available here (thailand, bangkok area). I checked the internet but come out at companies who want to have minimum order of 150usd.
amazon lists them for 8 usd and shipping around 20 usd. maybe you know of a cheaper seller/location?

tjeenz.

--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote:

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:43:12 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@...> wrote:

I removed u460. (ca3102 from rca). it is broken (20ohm between 1 and 14 in both directions)
also i found a diode connected on the top to pin 12. i couldn't detect pin 12 in the schematics... now start looking for a ca3102
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:50:17 -0000, "tjeenz" <tjeenz@...> wrote:

Voltage U460 pin3 and 9 is -8.6V, R456 is ok.
pin 1 and 8 are 3.5V not 2.2
That fits with pin 1 being 3.5 volts instead of 2.2 volts. The low
resistance between the collector and base is pulling that node up via
the high output of U480C.

Pin 2 and pin 10 at about 0.0 volts while pin 3 is -8.6 volts suggests
that the emitters of U460E and U460B is open as well.

Pin 12 and pin 5 are connected internally to the substrate. The
CA3102 is built on a junction isolated process so the substrate
connects to each transistor via a diode which is reverse biased to
provide isolation.

u460 is unfortunately not on a socket.
When replacing U460, I would cut the collet pins out of an IC socket
and individually install them into the PC board to make a low profile
socket for the new IC.



To access u460 and area, i see i have to remove some components. I will start on that a.s.a.p. but a question: some loose contact in the timebase switch. sometimes it generates only half screen image when i move with that knob. is that the pot-meter in the middle?
From what I remember of the 2213, the timebase switch uses a different
and unreliable design from the other 22xx series oscilloscopes.
Someone else may have suggestions for repairing it.


Re: Tek 132 cables termination

 

Thanks Albert, had not find that yet.

The 132 is workimg again.

So I'm glad it is like I figured out it out.
Think I solder indide the 132 a 51 ohm parallel to the bnc and 47 ohm in series instead of the short wire. Then it is always terminated in 98 ohm. Close enough. Then two short 50 ohm cables and if nessacary for BW two 50 ohm inline terminators on the scope. Voltage over the 50 ohm internal will be 0,5V so thats correct to be able to use the scopes standard V/div setting, and using 50 ohm in line terminators or 50 ohm 7A24 plugins ( or the 50 ohm input of my hameg) the voltage will be 0.25V so only thing I have to do is choose a lower V/div position and i do not have to use the variable in between gain on the scopes.

The terminators from tek are handy small things, but the original cables I have now borrowd are very stiff and long ( so they make a big loop above my bench and you know hoe limmited my pace is ;-) ) and have as second termination a few homemade ones and those boxes used, are rather big. Do not like that because it gives mechanical stress to the bncs and if i bump an instrument on the bench to them I will kill a bnc if Murphy is around.

I only need about 50 cm of cable because the 132 is placed between the two scopes.
So two short pieces of RG58 with L connectors or the thin RG179 will be more comfortable.

Fred pa4tim

--- In TekScopes@..., "Albert" <aodiversen@...> wrote:

Hi Fred,

Did you read messages around #41521 ?

IIRC (but not sure) the Type 132 should not be used without a plugin because of those too high voltages. The -150 V needs some minimum load because of the 1.5k bypass resistor in the regulator.
Also without plugin the grids of the signal input tubes would be NC.

Albert

But if it is so simple I gues the Tek Engineers would had
figured that out instead of using 93 ohm and seperate
teminstors. So what am I ovelooking ?
----
1A7a without tubes and a CA gave no smoke. Voltage with plugin inserted are OK and regulate well if I use the variac. But without a plugin they are way off. -150 is -198V, and the rest is also very much higher.
---
Fred pa4tim


Re: How to determine if the CRT is exhausted?

aobp11
 

Hi Max,
If the rest of the 'scope is OK, then the 'scope itself is the best environment to test the CRT, isn't it? So how bad is the CRT in ordinary use? I could compare with my 564s.
Is it irrespective of plugin? Blanking could be faulty in one of the plugins.
I have no data. There is some interesting reading here #5445 and you might find more if you search for "CRT exhausted" or "CRT rejuvenation".
Albert

I'm in trouble with my 564, I'm not sure if the CRT is exhausted or not.
The tube is the 154-0410-00 (T5640-200).
I don't find neither electrical specs nor some test method to measure cathode emission to determine if my CRT needs replacement.
Any suggestion is appreciated, thanks!

Max


Re: Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.

 

Azzy,

The basic method of making a tracking generator is to mix a frequency equal to the first IF with the first Local Oscillator to produce a signal equal in frequency to the analyzer input frequency. This is somewhat complicated in the 494P by the fact that the first IF frequency is somewhat variable (since the second local oscillator is sometimes swept). For the 0-1.8GHz band, the first IF is about 2.072 GHz. For most of the higher bands the first IF is 829MHz.

For a simple 2 to 3 GHz tracking generator you could use an external 829MHz source (approximate frequency), buffer amplifiers for the first LO output and a mixer. You would need to operate at sweep widths that did not sweep the second local oscillator.

Fancier tracking generators would include signal leveling and would include the second LO oscillator to allow proper operation with narrow sweeps: Take a look at what John Miles did for the 0-1.8GHz band:
<<>>

--John Gord

--- In TekScopes@..., "Asadullah" <mirasad31415@...> wrote:

I have purchased a Tek 494P off Ebay yesterday. ( It is still in transit). What I must have is a tracking gen to go with her. I looked through the 494P manual but could not determine what it is. ( I am bit slow at understanding) Besides I might not be able to buy one even if I can find one.
So the big question. What will work as a substitute? Where could I find information on how to build one if possible? My current interest is in the 2 to 3 GHz range only, but might go to around 10 GHz.
Even a block diagram will help. I could jury rig something to work.
Any help is welcome. Thanks

Azzy.


Tracking Gen for a Tek 494P.

 

I have purchased a Tek 494P off Ebay yesterday. ( It is still in transit). What I must have is a tracking gen to go with her. I looked through the 494P manual but could not determine what it is. ( I am bit slow at understanding) Besides I might not be able to buy one even if I can find one.
So the big question. What will work as a substitute? Where could I find information on how to build one if possible? My current interest is in the 2 to 3 GHz range only, but might go to around 10 GHz.
Even a block diagram will help. I could jury rig something to work.
Any help is welcome. Thanks

Azzy.


Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins

 

Greetings,

The joy stick positioned the traces as a group on the CRT.

I used one of those sometime in the mid or late seventies.

I owned a dual beam version using the same plug-in modules as shown in the eBay listing. ?It had two vertical and two horizontal pug-ins. ?As I recall, these same scopes could also carry the Dumont name.

I was initially thinking that big Fairchild dual beam scope also had the joystick, but I dug out some old photos and discovered that it did not.

There was also a transistor curve tracer of the same generation and style that was manufactured under both the Dumont and Fairchild names.

I always enjoyed using those instruments.

Ken

On 28Sep, 2012, at 9:58 PM, sipespresso wrote:

?

What does the "PATTERN POSITIONING" joystick on the Fairchild 766H do? -Kurt

--- In TekScopes@..., "gridleakrick" <gridleakrick@...> wrote:
>
> Fairchild made a series of very nice scopes way back when with plug-ins. A friend of mine has several of them. Beautiful construction inside.
> Here's one on ebay
>
> Rick
> =================================================================
>
> --- In TekScopes@..., Robin Whittle wrote:
> >
> > I don't recall seeing Iwatsu or any other company producing a scope with
> > plugins similar to the Tek 7000 series. Here is an Iwatsu TS-8123
> > Storagescope, in non-working condition, which failed to get a bid on
> > eBay for USD$150:
> >
> >
> >
> > - Robin
> >
>



Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins

 

These were made by Dumont. Fairchild bought them out. I don't think
Fairchild actually ever made anything new for these scopes.
I used these scopes in a lab I worked in in the late 1960s. Nobody in the
lab wanted them because they had a fatal flaw. They had no fan in them and
they ran so hot from all the tubes that trace drift was a real problem.
Everyone grabbed a Tek 535/545/547 if they could instead of using these
Dumont scopes.

The newbies in the lab (that was me at the time) ended up with a Dumont
(Fairchild) scope on their bench longing for the day when we had enough
seniority to grab one of the Tek scopes instead.

The Tek scopes had a greater variety of plugins than the Dumont scopes did.

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf
Of gridleakrick
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:01 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins

Fairchild made a series of very nice scopes way back when with plug-ins. A
friend of mine has several of them. Beautiful construction inside.
Here's one on ebay

900149352?pt=Vintage_Electronics_R2&hash=item2322598c68
Rick
=================================================================

--- In TekScopes@..., Robin Whittle <rw@...> wrote:

I don't recall seeing Iwatsu or any other company producing a scope
with plugins similar to the Tek 7000 series. Here is an Iwatsu
TS-8123 Storagescope, in non-working condition, which failed to get a
bid on eBay for USD$150:



- Robin



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Iwatsu scope with 7000-like plugins

sipespresso
 

What does the "PATTERN POSITIONING" joystick on the Fairchild 766H do? -Kurt

--- In TekScopes@..., "gridleakrick" <gridleakrick@...> wrote:

Fairchild made a series of very nice scopes way back when with plug-ins. A friend of mine has several of them. Beautiful construction inside.
Here's one on ebay

Rick
=================================================================

--- In TekScopes@..., Robin Whittle <rw@> wrote:

I don't recall seeing Iwatsu or any other company producing a scope with
plugins similar to the Tek 7000 series. Here is an Iwatsu TS-8123
Storagescope, in non-working condition, which failed to get a bid on
eBay for USD$150:



- Robin