¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

File - Posting Rules

 

Please edit any posts/replies to the list to
minimize quoted material to that required for continuity.

Please do not send personal replies to the list.
List replies go to the original sender by default.
If you want to also reply
to the list, use Reply-to-all (or whatever it's called in your
mailer), or manually add the TekScopes address. Do this if your
reply would be of interest to the list. Otherwise, just reply to the
sender.

Those congesting the list with with either of the above may have
posting rights revoked. Only by following these
simple rules will we have a "clean" archive.
They also reduce inbox clutter, make digests much nicer to read,
improve searches, and reduce the chance of having old messages deleted.

To post to the group, mail to:

TekScopes@...

I occasionally get emails meant for the group mistakenly sent to TekScopes-owner@...! I just delete these, so please watch where you're sending...

If you post or have posted to the Photos section, please make sure your files are fairly small (<100K). See the bottom of this message for further instructions.

If you do not wish to belong to TekScopes, you may
unsubscribe by sending an email to

TekScopes-unsubscribe@...

You may also visit the Yahoo web site to modify your
subscription:



Check out the files, links, and photos sections,
and remember, you can search the group's archives from its home page,
or when reading messages. The group's home is at:



Regards,
Michael Dunn
Listowner, TekScopes



Keeping Photos Small:

There's no point uploading large images to the photos section, as Yahoo severely limits the size and quality that others can view them at. I reserve the right to delete oversize files without warning. Therefore:

I would ask anyone who has uploaded large (>100K) files (you can
see file sizes by selecting list instead of thumbnail view) to either:

1. Delete the full-sized version via Yahoo by first viewing it. There is then a link (top-center) that allows deletion.

2. Replace it with a reduced-size version.

3. Delete it.


slightly OT: HP 3589A Spectrum / Network Analyzer: Trace Math syntax

martin_u_fischer
 

Hello TekScope Community,

apologies for the slightly OT; please admit the following questions:

I am looking for informations about Trace Math in the HP 3589A
Spectrum / Network Analyzer.
The Product Data Sheet merely mentions some characteristics of this
feature.
The HP 3589A Operator?s Guide downloaded the from the Agilent website
doesn?t even mention this feature.

Does anybody have any further informations about or experience with
Trace Math syntax in this Model?
Or do I miss a dedicated manual covering this topic?

Any hint will be highly appreciated.

Regards
Martin

mailto:Martin.Fischer@...


Re: Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

John Miles
 

There should be no birdies whatsoever except for the big one at 0 Hz. You
have a problem (possibly bad cabling in the front end, although what local
signals would be coming through at 41 MHz and 300 MHz, I don't know...)
Interrupt the RF signal path (as recommended in my earlier reply) until you
see where they're coming from.

-- john, KE5FX

-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...]On
Behalf Of Chris Johnson
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:56 AM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?


I've got a 492 that I haven't had for very long and I'm still
exploring the possibilities with it. It has options 1,2, and 3.


Re: Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

Luis Cupido
 

Exactly, that is why I'm asking.
because for no input my 492 is absolutely clean in the
range 0 to 1.8GHz.

lc.

----- Original Message -----
From: "arthurok" <arthurok@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>; "Luis Cupido" <cupido@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?


i normally look for birdies with no input "shorted with a terminator" when checking a radio receiver or spec ana
----- Original Message -----
From: Luis Cupido
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?


Chris,

With what signal at the input ?

Luis C.
ct1dmk.


Re: Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

arthurok
 

i normally look for birdies with no input "shorted with a terminator" when checking a radio receiver or spec ana

----- Original Message -----
From: Luis Cupido
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?


Chris,

With what signal at the input ?

Luis C.
ct1dmk.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Johnson" <strangequark65@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:55 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

> I've got a 492 that I haven't had for very long and I'm still
> exploring the possibilities with it. It has options 1,2, and 3.
>
>
> It's a very clean performer and seems to meet its sensitivity specs
> and is reasonably close to calibrated.
>
>
> I do notice a few birdies in it, and while I don't expect any spetrum
> analyzer to be entirely free of birdies, I'd just like to know if the
> ones I'm seeing in this unit are about normal.
>
>
> Of course it has some noise below 100 MHz. I see a spur at about 34
> MHz that's about 20 dB above the noise floor with the video filter set
> to narrow.
>
> At 41 MHz, there's another spur that's about 15 dB above the noise floor.
>
> At 50 MHz, +25 dB.
>
> At 69 MHz, +8 dB.
>
> At 75 MHz, +12.
>
> At 85 MHz, +19
>
> At 93 MHz, +20.
>
> At 99 MHz, +18.
>
> At 100 MHz, +19.
>
> There's a big one at 300 MHz, +25.
>
> At 350 MHz, +20.
>
> At 400 MHz, +10.
>
> At 500 MHz, +10.
>
> Below 100 MHz, there are smaller spurs between the larger ones,
> typically less than 10 dB above the noise floor.
>
> Above 500 MHz, it's very clean.
>
> The apparent magnitude of the spurs does vary somewhat according to
> the span and resolution in use.
>
> All figures reported are in minimum noise mode with the ref level and
> attenuation adjusted to as to yield the largest apparent magnitude
> of the spurs.
>
>
> So is this about right for a 492 or is it more in need of calibration
> (or even repair) than I thought?
>
>
> CJ
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


Re: Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

Luis Cupido
 

Chris,

With what signal at the input ?

Luis C.
ct1dmk.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Johnson" <strangequark65@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:55 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Birdies on a 492....what's normal?


I've got a 492 that I haven't had for very long and I'm still
exploring the possibilities with it. It has options 1,2, and 3.


It's a very clean performer and seems to meet its sensitivity specs
and is reasonably close to calibrated.


I do notice a few birdies in it, and while I don't expect any spetrum
analyzer to be entirely free of birdies, I'd just like to know if the
ones I'm seeing in this unit are about normal.


Of course it has some noise below 100 MHz. I see a spur at about 34
MHz that's about 20 dB above the noise floor with the video filter set
to narrow.

At 41 MHz, there's another spur that's about 15 dB above the noise floor.

At 50 MHz, +25 dB.

At 69 MHz, +8 dB.

At 75 MHz, +12.

At 85 MHz, +19

At 93 MHz, +20.

At 99 MHz, +18.

At 100 MHz, +19.

There's a big one at 300 MHz, +25.

At 350 MHz, +20.

At 400 MHz, +10.

At 500 MHz, +10.

Below 100 MHz, there are smaller spurs between the larger ones,
typically less than 10 dB above the noise floor.

Above 500 MHz, it's very clean.

The apparent magnitude of the spurs does vary somewhat according to
the span and resolution in use.

All figures reported are in minimum noise mode with the ref level and
attenuation adjusted to as to yield the largest apparent magnitude
of the spurs.


So is this about right for a 492 or is it more in need of calibration
(or even repair) than I thought?


CJ





Yahoo! Groups Links



Birdies on a 492....what's normal?

Chris Johnson
 

I've got a 492 that I haven't had for very long and I'm still
exploring the possibilities with it. It has options 1,2, and 3.


It's a very clean performer and seems to meet its sensitivity specs
and is reasonably close to calibrated.


I do notice a few birdies in it, and while I don't expect any spetrum
analyzer to be entirely free of birdies, I'd just like to know if the
ones I'm seeing in this unit are about normal.


Of course it has some noise below 100 MHz. I see a spur at about 34
MHz that's about 20 dB above the noise floor with the video filter set
to narrow.

At 41 MHz, there's another spur that's about 15 dB above the noise floor.

At 50 MHz, +25 dB.

At 69 MHz, +8 dB.

At 75 MHz, +12.

At 85 MHz, +19

At 93 MHz, +20.

At 99 MHz, +18.

At 100 MHz, +19.

There's a big one at 300 MHz, +25.

At 350 MHz, +20.

At 400 MHz, +10.

At 500 MHz, +10.

Below 100 MHz, there are smaller spurs between the larger ones,
typically less than 10 dB above the noise floor.

Above 500 MHz, it's very clean.

The apparent magnitude of the spurs does vary somewhat according to
the span and resolution in use.

All figures reported are in minimum noise mode with the ref level and
attenuation adjusted to as to yield the largest apparent magnitude
of the spurs.


So is this about right for a 492 or is it more in need of calibration
(or even repair) than I thought?


CJ


Acquisition of 535A and 581 - info for a 7000-er?

 

Good day,

A friend of mine has offered me two tube scopes of unknown provenance,
he believes however that they are not working. They are

Type 581 Serial #001067
Type 535A Serial #025668

BAMA has provided me with manual for the 535A (even seems to be the
right vintage), but I came up short on the 581 - any pointers? I
don't know what/if any plugins will be coming (the scopes are
currently a long way away from both of us).

This will be my first foray into the earlier offerings from Tek. I
understand that both of these scopes will use letter and 1-series
plugins, the 581 needing the 81 adapter. Any other gotchas? I will
of course peruse the archives, but I would welcome any tips useful to
someone used to working on 7000-era gear. Ahh, yes, I know that the
voltages tend to be a bit higher, and that I probably could stand to
get a 100x probe!


PS503 wanted

 

I'm need fairly urgent need of a working PS503 and there don't seem to
be any around at the usual places. If anybody has one surplus to
requirements please let me know. Location Australia.

TIA

EJP


Re: In search of the "Safest" bench test setup

 

But the charge on even a pretty large CRT, at least in the olden
times, before flatscreens, had pretty impressive HV like 25 kV, and
you can get a nasty surprise, but not worse. After all, it's DC,and
the capacitance isn't all that large.

Now, I know this is going to provoke a lecture and thread ad infinitum
(you know who you are), but really, we did take at least *some* care,
like making sure a five tube ac/dc set really had the chassis at
neutral and that neutral and hot weren't interchanged. Of course
you're going to get shocked if you reach stupidly into a power supply
that has a 300-0-300 VAC transformer secondary, but if you're lucky,
it'll be the dc which *will* fling you across the room, not lock your
muscles and kill you. People learn fast from such experiences, at
least those who didn't grab the transformer secondary with both hands.

I know that I was immensely pleased to have the transistor come along
just at the right time to spare me shocks but mostly wiring the
accursed filaments.

Regards,

Jonathan





--- In TekScopes@..., Kuba Ober <ober.14@...> wrote:

1. With all power off to everything, discharge the test point I
plan to
probe to ground. In other words , I treat it like a big capacitor. As
we know , even with all protection in place, if you "get across" a big
cap in a DUT you can be on the way to the undertaker
You're right, but it doesn't have to be big, or even a designated
capacitor.
Mind the parasitics! The CRT with its parastic anode capacitance is
enough to
zap you big time.

Cheers, Kuba


Re: TM5006

 

There is no surplus stores in the Charleston area that have electronic equipment. There will be a hamfest in the Charleston area Feb 3, 2007.

73
Glenn
WB4UIV

At 04:15 PM 01/31/07, arievanstappen wrote:
I am searching for a TM5006 rack and they are at this moment often on
ebay.
The only problem is the transportcost which will is very high for
sending to Europe.
Does somebody know a TM 5006 rack for sale in the neighbourhood of
Charleston SC (which I will visit next week).
Also an address from a electronic surplus store in Charleston SC is
welcom




Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: In search of the "Safest" bench test setup

Michael Bender
 

Kuba Ober wrote:
1. With all power off to everything, discharge the test point I plan to
probe to ground. In other words , I treat it like a big capacitor. As
we know , even with all protection in place, if you "get across" a big
cap in a DUT you can be on the way to the undertaker
You're right, but it doesn't have to be big, or even a designated capacitor. Mind the parasitics! The CRT with its parastic anode capacitance is enough to zap you big time.
Also while the "shock" might not kill you, falling backwards
or bumping into something from your reflexive action might
cause you to break your neck or get impaled on something, or
have something big fall on top of you.

mike


This might be interesting for those interested in IBM - Tek history....

faustian.spirit
 

found this link searching for another document:



Guess everybody has known that one since years :)

Cheers,

Andy


OT - Need Schematic For B&K 3050 Audio Generator

 

Hi Folks,

My instruction manual for my B&K 3050 sine/square generator is missing
the schematic. If it's like my other B&K test equipment, the
schematic is generally just a folded loose sheet inserted into the
back of the manual. Anyway, mine is missing.

Can anyone help me out?

Thanks,
Mike, WB0LDJ


Re: 496P Scams on eBay

Chuck Harris
 

Kuba Ober wrote:
My assumption is that they are hijacking accounts.
I've recently sold, but not received payment or
shipped, a lovely Sencore SG80.
Why did you ship before being paid?!
Read again: "but not received payment or shipped, a lovely..."

The bidder was from Bulgaria; he called and everything. His website was
awesome! I don't believe they have PayPal in the
Baltic States and was warned to beware.

Turns out that he wanted to make a wire transfer.
Hmmmmm, account info.
I don't know where's the problem in the US mentality about not giving out the bank account numbers. If your bank is so bad that someone just knowing your address and account number can do unauthorized transactions, you're gonna be screwed anyway -- look for a better bank.
In Europe, bank account numbers appear on stationery -- next to the address, along with VAT/EIN numbers etc. To do a transaction, you either have to go online and have the credentials (password & token-generated number), or have a proper ID and go to the branch. Easy.
I'd like to amplify one thing further. Everything that is needed for a
wire transfer *into* your account is on the bottom of your check.

There really isn't any reason to worry. Your bank will *not* wire anything
out of your account unless you have prearranged the transaction. You can
do it by phone, but it will require you to know all of the magic numbers
and runes both they, and you know about you.

-Chuck Harris


TM5006

arievanstappen
 

I am searching for a TM5006 rack and they are at this moment often on
ebay.
The only problem is the transportcost which will is very high for
sending to Europe.
Does somebody know a TM 5006 rack for sale in the neighbourhood of
Charleston SC (which I will visit next week).
Also an address from a electronic surplus store in Charleston SC is
welcom


Re: Geography.. was 496 Scams

J Forster
 

[snip]

The bidder was from
Bulgaria; he called and everything. His website was
awesome! I don't believe they have PayPal in the
Baltic States and was warned to beware.


Last time I looked, the Baltic states were Estonia, Lithuania, and
Latvia.

Bulgaria is in the Balkans.

-John


Re: 496P Scams on eBay

Kuba Ober
 

My assumption is that they are hijacking accounts.
I've recently sold, but not received payment or
shipped, a lovely Sencore SG80.
Why did you ship before being paid?!

The bidder was from
Bulgaria; he called and everything. His website was
awesome! I don't believe they have PayPal in the
Baltic States and was warned to beware.

Turns out that he wanted to make a wire transfer.
Hmmmmm, account info.
I don't know where's the problem in the US mentality about not giving out the
bank account numbers. If your bank is so bad that someone just knowing your
address and account number can do unauthorized transactions, you're gonna be
screwed anyway -- look for a better bank.

In Europe, bank account numbers appear on stationery -- next to the address,
along with VAT/EIN numbers etc. To do a transaction, you either have to go
online and have the credentials (password & token-generated number), or have
a proper ID and go to the branch. Easy.

BTW, you do know that you can instantly open an empty "receive-only" online
checking account at most banks? Who said you can only have one checking?

Cheers, Kuba


Re: In search of the "Safest" bench test setup

Kuba Ober
 

1. With all power off to everything, discharge the test point I plan to
probe to ground. In other words , I treat it like a big capacitor. As
we know , even with all protection in place, if you "get across" a big
cap in a DUT you can be on the way to the undertaker
You're right, but it doesn't have to be big, or even a designated capacitor.
Mind the parasitics! The CRT with its parastic anode capacitance is enough to
zap you big time.

Cheers, Kuba


slightly OT, need schematics for C1-122 russian scope..

Holm Tiffe
 

The subject says it, but it isn't fully ot: The C1-122 is a Tektronix
7603 lookalike, the 1st. was the C1-91, the C1-122 ist the 2nd. edition,
Plugins have the same connector Pinout but with metric pin distances and
the Plugins are a mechanically a little greater.
It should be possible to get a Tek 7000 Plugin to work in those scopes
whit an mechanical adapter, but not vice versa...

The electronics are totally different...

I've got this scope from ebay for only 1,99 Euros, with the hint, that
there is something wrong in the HV supply. I've found, that both fuses
on the primary side of the main PSU are blown, so I've searched first in
the PSU for problems (that is a mechanical hell, had to remove around
40 screws to get to the switching transistors....).
Unfortunately the HV plate was fallen out of the assembly, disconnecting a
few of the connectors and I don't know where tho plug them now (only 3
connectors, 5 wires), so I need a shematic from the PSU to reconnect them
properly.

Can someone here help me please?

Kind Regards,

Holm

PS:

ebay number is 190068339560 for those who are interested in a picture of
the C1-122...

--
FreibergNet.de IT Systems Holm Tiffe Administration, Development
09627 Bobritzsch Hauptstrasse 19, phone +49 3731 4193411, www.freibergnet.de
Bereich Server & Technik: Am St.Niclas Schacht 13, 09599 Freiberg
phone +49 3731 419010, mobile +49 172 8790 741, fax +49 3731 4196026