开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date

Re: Tek 7904 Display Problem

 

--- In TekScopes@y..., "Don Crano" <donc@s...> wrote:
Hi All

My old faithful 7904 has started to have a little problem with the
display.

It will run for hours or days with no problem. Then it will start
to drift
the display up and down, this is the trace/s and readouts as well.
Note this
is not on oscillation up and down. It will shift up for awhile,
then drop
down lower then it should be for awhile. I am talking about a 1/2
CM or so.
Everything is always on screen, it just gets annoying after awhile.

I found I can turn off the readouts and it will stop. Turn the
readouts back
on, and it will be fine again for a few hours or days.
Hello Don,

I had this problem. It turned out to be the channel switch hybrid
U625 (part nr. 1555-0060). This is located on a 'mezzanine' PCB
behind the two vertical plugins.
Some other sources mentioned the two 1W metal film resistors on the
vertical amplifier.

hope this helps

Patrick


Re: 465 Scan Expansion Mesh

John Rehwinkel
 

Yes, I put some of that mesh under a regular optical microscope here
and found the same thing you did . . . it is etched rather than woven.
I was surprised to discover that . . .
I have a friend who has an electron microscope -- if anyone cares to
lend me a bit of mesh, I'd be glad to get pictures of it and post
them. Naturally, I'd return the mesh too if you like.

-- John Rehwinkel KG4L
spam@...


Re: 465 Scan Expansion Mesh

 

Stan,

Yeah, try to get most people to agree that the addition of the engine
computer on a car was a step forward. I think the step forward was
the fact that I have yet to not have a computerized car start within
2-3 seconds whether the temperature was -10°F or +110°F. The step
backward is how, with so many vehicles being produced that (1)
manufacturers over the world haven't settled on a common computer
platform and (2) that to replace one costs as much as my full-blown
home computer. I think the latter is simply because the
manufacturers have us poor consumers by the kahoonies and know it.

And back to the mesh vs. other methods. Not only can one compare
meshless CRTs from the 1960's to the 465/475 and now to the digital
scopes, but look at the digital scope displays. They're going to be
limited not only because of the ±1 digit bobble, but because of the
finite resolution of an LCD or a tri-color CRT dot pitch. No point
in using ADCs with resolution better than the display resolution
unless you have a method of "magnifying" the vertical and/or
horizontal to take advantage of the increase ADC resolution. I've
not looked up the LCD and color CRT specs to see where the two
resolutions converge. Might be interesting! It's an issue not
unlike having a 4-1/2 digit DMM display and only 0.5% accuracy on DCV
and 1% accuracy on ACV.

By the way, I had forgotten about the phosphor change. The P31 is
more durable, that's for sure. I have seen a few P11's that were
wrecked on 7904's and 485's that were being used for nuclear research
out in Amarillo. They were always set up with a camera (obviously,
with a P11) waiting for a single-shot event with the intensities
cranked up to max. They were a BIG market for the 7104 in the OKC
field office.

And regarding nuclear research, I remember a field engineer telling
me about selling a lot of transient digitizers to the nuclear
research community. They'd put a TD down a hole with a bomb with the
cabling leading to the blockhouse a couple of miles away. They'd
blow up the bomb and the TD would send the signal out of all the
stuff they were monitoring -- about 1?s before it went into total
meltdown -- and then in the blockhouse monitoring station, they'd
wait for the signal to show up and then after it was captured, high-
speed clamps shut the lines down so the the massive EMP that was
right on the tail of the data didn't totally destroy all the
monitoring equipment. But the poor transient digitizers .... they
got to make one and only one measurement in their entire lives before
that serial number ceased to exist. Danged expensive probe!

Dean


Re: 465 Scan Expansion Mesh

Stan or Patricia Griffiths
 

dhuster@... wrote:

And Stan, I don't know that I agree 100% about the mesh being a bad
deal compared to what the 535 had. I've never seen a burned CRT in a
scope with a mesh and you can't say that about the old ones. The
mesh diffused the beam enough that the CRT was pretty burn
resistant. To me, the ???1 digit bobble of a digital scope is far
worse to look at than the fuzzy trace of a 465.

Dean
Hi Dean,

It is great to hear other opinions and views on this sort of thing especially
from someone who was as close to the situation as you have been.

I suspect the difference in burned phosphors was due to the change from P2 to
P31 for a standard phosphor in most general purpose scopes. Both of those
phosphors look very much alike to the eye, being blue-green in color. I
think that phoshor change took place about 1965 or so. Scopes shipped before
that time with P2 phosphors where MUCH easier to burn . . . I don't think I
have ever seen a CRT with a mesh and P2 at the same time . . .

Yes, I put some of that mesh under a regular optical microscope here and
found the same thing you did . . . it is etched rather than woven. I was
surprised to discover that . . .

Whether the fuzzy trace was a bad tradeoff or not is another one of those
opinion issues. I just talked to one guy who told me he could see stuff
(tiny wrinkles) in the trace of a 454 that just are not there in the display
of the same signal on a 475, even though the 475 has 50 MHz more bandwidth
and a much larger screen. The position I am coming from is that I was a
Sales Engineer for Tek at the time mesh CRT's were introduced and I can tell
you that MANY customers noticed the difference and were not pleased . . .
they always expected the new model to be better, in every respect, than the
one it replaced, sort of like cars. Well, they aren't always better in
performance. Sometimes they are better in price, instead. Sort of like cars
. . .

Stan
w7ni@...


TEK 2230 Power UP and Service manual

Don Crano
 

Does anyone happen to have a Service Manual for the Tek 2230, they would
like to sell?

And does anyone know what the power up error:
CDT : uncaled : min = 84
might be about.


Thanks in advance!

Don


Re: 465 Scan Expansion Mesh

 

I believe you're right, Stan. I'd heard both explanations.
Actually, the geometry story doesn't pan out well if you've ever seen
one of the guns outside of the jug. the mesh is hemispherical in
shape. If it dealt with geometry, I'd expect an odd shape to
compensate for the extremes of the rectangular screen. For those who
have never seen one, it is interesting. Very, very delicate, and so
fine that when you hold it up to the light, it's like a diffraction
grating, splitting the light up into different colors. It's also so
fine that it will hold water. One little puff of air and you dimple
it permanently. I send a piece of a mesh to friend Dale Johnson
(used to work for Tek in the Dallas Service center, but at the time
was working for a company that serviced scanning electron
microscopes. He put the piece of mesh under a scope and the view was
really interesting. It's quiet obvious that it's etched and not a
woven screen that one first envisions. I don't know whatever
happened to the Polaroid of that scan that I had. It should would
make for an interesting post, but that was 25 years ago!

Sometimes, during manufacturing, a little dirt gets inside the jug
and finds its way to the mesh. The resulting display is a small spot
on the CRT that just can't be illuminated by the beam because of the
shadow effect it creates. I was rather irritated one time when a new
465B came in with that exact problem and the factory wasn't going to
honor a warranty replacement of the jug because it was "still within
all specifications of CRT anomolies". I put myself in the customer's
shoes and decided that I wouldn't put up with a something like that
in the windshield of a new car. Why should the customer put up with
a manufacturing defectlike that in his $3500 scope? We replaced the
CRT anyway and shoved the old one down factory's throat. Tek was
starting to change from a very customer-oriented organization to a
very money-conscious outfit.

And Stan, I don't know that I agree 100% about the mesh being a bad
deal compared to what the 535 had. I've never seen a burned CRT in a
scope with a mesh and you can't say that about the old ones. The
mesh diffused the beam enough that the CRT was pretty burn
resistant. To me, the ±1 digit bobble of a digital scope is far
worse to look at than the fuzzy trace of a 465.

Dean


Tek 2230 Digital scope options

 

Does anyone know where I can pick up the GPIB OPT 10 for the Tek 2230
or the RS232 option?
Thanks,
Vince Coppola


Re: Tek 7904 Display Problem

Don Crano
 

Hi Mark,

Yeah I remember posting a list of the YaHoo groups I belong to.

I know what you mean about the older scopes and their fine trace lines. My
old 453 is still on of my favorites, I can sync it on anything I feed into
it.<g> Under it sits a 475A with it's mixed mode delay is nice, but does
not have the fine trace of the ol 453. On a Tekmobile 3 I have the 7904,
with the two lower shelfs each holding a TM504A, and both fully loaded with
plug-ins. So it is my mobile work bench, I can take it any where around the
layout as need be.<g> I really do not have a count of the 7K and TM plug-ins
I have and what works and does not work. But I am sure I do not have them
all. Then on my bench I have a 2230 for what ever analog/digital I might
need.

Don

Remember Always Have Fun and Enjoy!,
Don Crano Akron, Oh NMRA #096211
mailto:donc@...
Visit Model Railroading with DCC at:

Join Model Railroading with DCC Web Ring.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Gurries <gurriesm@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Tek 7904 Display Problem


BTW Hi Mark Gurries glad to see you on the list.
Hi Don.

Been watching the list for a while. It was from one of your email on the
DCC list that I learned about this list. Anyway...

I told Jim Williams here at Linear Tech about this list. (My Lab bench
is next to his.) But he is not one to use PC's. That Jim for ya. For
those who are not familiar with Jim, he is one of out treasured assets at
the company. Hi writes many application notes for our IC and tackling
problems and parts that cause most of us to glaze over our eyes in terms
of the accuracy or noise level requirements. Things like how do you
verify all 24 bits of a 24 bit DAC!

The trick around here to getting a Tek scope fixed and checked out by Jim
Williams is to get an old 500 or 400 series scope in the lab. Tell Jim
about it, and the fact that it does not work annoys Jim to no end.
Before you know it, he is digging into the scope and fixing everything.
Not that we cannot fix out own scopes mind you, but, Jim does a faster
and better job than anyone I know. It fun to watch him and of course you
learn along the way the history and debug tricks.

We have about every make of Tek scope at the company labs. We have lots
of 547's working in parallel with the latest Tek Scopes. We just got
around to setting up an old 556 dual beam on another engineers lab bench.
454's are another favorite. A few of the guys have 7K stuff like yours.
One of my employees has every 7K plug in made including some test
adapters if I recall correctly. It amazing to see the latest scopes
setup right next to an old classic. The biggest reason we like the old
400 and 500 series scopes is the very fine trace and excellent noise
floor. When Jim sets up his 556 with two 1A4 plugins showing 8 traces
that are all beautifully detailed (4 of the traces are on a different
time base to boot) published in a App note, we sometimes get letters and
calls about the scope photo alone! How did you do that?

We think that our lab is one of the biggest consumers of electricity in
Silicon Valley with all these Tube Tek scopes on and possibly the source
of all the blackouts here in California. We already went though one air
conditioner! ;-0


Best Regards,

Mark Gurries
gurriesm@...

---------------------------------------------------------
Promotor of the DCC Standard for Model trains.
Model Railroad Club and NMRA DCC presentations are at:

--------------------------------------------------------
Audio Enthusiast (Love SAE equipment)


----------------------------------------------------------


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
TekScopes-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


Re: 465 Display Help Needed

Stan or Patricia Griffiths
 

CRT Mesh comment below:

dhuster@... wrote:

A few comments on what has been offered so far.

The characteristic fuzziness of a 465/475 and 7K scopes over their
earlier cousins (and which apparently is NOT your problem since you
describe major "focus" problems) is due to the inclusion of a scan
expansion mesh within the jug through which the electron beam has to
pass, causing a small amount of beam scatter. The mesh is there to
improve geometry.
My understanding of the reason an expansion mesh was used in 465 and later
vintage tubes was really to improve the vertical and horizontal sensitivity
of the CRT such that expensive transistors would no longer be necessary in
the vertical and horizontal scope amplifiers. It was mostly a manufacturing
cost reduction measure with a spot size tradeoff. Not a good tradeoff, in my
opinion.

Compare the output stages of the 547, 453, and 454 scopes to what you see in
the 465 and 475 and you will see what I am talking about.

Stan
w7ni@...


Re: 465 Display Help Needed

 

A few comments on what has been offered so far.

The characteristic fuzziness of a 465/475 and 7K scopes over their
earlier cousins (and which apparently is NOT your problem since you
describe major "focus" problems) is due to the inclusion of a scan
expansion mesh within the jug through which the electron beam has to
pass, causing a small amount of beam scatter. The mesh is there to
improve geometry.

If oscillations within the vertical system is the problem, then
inputting a sine wave will show a thicker trace at the peaks and a
thinner trace at the zero-crossing points. Also, you'll see the
signal from the vertical deflection plate pins on back to the source
of oscillation.

Open elements inside the jug can cause defocusing.

Don't forget that astigmatism and focus interact and one may be the
problem where the other is not. If you can "round up" an unfocused
stationary dot on the CRT with the astigmatism control, then focus is
your problem. If not, the astigmatism circuit may be at fault.

Make sure the LV power supplies are clean, correct and ripple-free.


Re: 465 Display Help Needed - another thought

 

--- In TekScopes@y..., ashtonb@j... wrote:
--- In TekScopes@y..., Kurt Graber <kurtg@s...> wrote:


billw101@a... wrote:

Hello, I have been pulling problems out of a 465 that I recently
acquired. The last remaining problem is the inability to get a
sharp
focus on the trace with any combination of intensity, focus or
astigmatism. I have checked everything in the CRT circuits with
the
exception of the high voltage, crt bias and cathode bias, until
I
get
the use of an HV probe. Can anyone tell me if I am looking in
the
right area or suggest any common failure modes? The low voltage
supplies all check good and noise free. Thanks for any help.
...........................................



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


A common problem or failure is the opening of the voltage divider
circuit
that the focus and astig tap into.
I am unfamilier with your particular scope but the chances are
good
that one
of the resistors has opened up. I have seen many cases !!! you
don't
need a
HV probe , just take your meter and ohm them out. They will not
appear burned
but they have a tendancy to open up due to the high
voltage.......this will
cause an unsharp trace and many cases no trace at all (just a
haze)...Good
Luck
Another point: the 46x, 47x series just wasn't as sharp as the tube
scopes! or even and especially - the 454, 454A. Some engrs. think
the 454A best 150 MHz scope ever (2mV/DIV, all the delay
triggering)
or sometimes ~ 200 MHz if all went well on that assembly..

I can see the clear difference bewtween say, a 475A and the 454As
-
tiny wiggles just visible on 54-A disappear into the thick trace of
475 (or 465).

Just in case you're trying to do better than it Can!


Ashton
AShton, yes I have heard that same thing about the 465, however after
troubleshooting I am further able to describe the problem. The
transition of the trace either falling or rising is poorly defined
and instead of one sharp edge I see almost a centimeter of blur. I
have been through the video output amplifier from one end to the
other but I still have the symptom that any capacitance such as a
scope lead hung on either vertical deflection output causes the
amplifier to go into high freq. oscillation and the trace becomes a
fog. I will press on but there is definitely something wrong with
this thing.

Bill


Re: 465 Display Help Needed - another thought

Stan or Patricia Griffiths
 

billw101@... wrote:

AShton, yes I have heard that same thing about the 465, however after
troubleshooting I am further able to describe the problem. The
transition of the trace either falling or rising is poorly defined
and instead of one sharp edge I see almost a centimeter of blur. I
have been through the video output amplifier from one end to the
other but I still have the symptom that any capacitance such as a
scope lead hung on either vertical deflection output causes the
amplifier to go into high freq. oscillation and the trace becomes a
fog. I will press on but there is definitely something wrong with
this thing.

Bill
Hi Bill,

I would take a close look at the input FET's to make sure they are the
original type. Sometimes they will short or open and the repair techinician
will use whatever FET is handy and not bother with the correct part. This
can cause all sorts of oscillation problems and stuff like you are seeing.

Stan
w7ni@...


Re: 465 Display Help Needed - another thought

 

--- In TekScopes@y..., Kurt Graber <kurtg@s...> wrote:


billw101@a... wrote:

Hello, I have been pulling problems out of a 465 that I recently
acquired. The last remaining problem is the inability to get a
sharp
focus on the trace with any combination of intensity, focus or
astigmatism. I have checked everything in the CRT circuits with
the
exception of the high voltage, crt bias and cathode bias, until I
get
the use of an HV probe. Can anyone tell me if I am looking in the
right area or suggest any common failure modes? The low voltage
supplies all check good and noise free. Thanks for any help.
...........................................



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to


A common problem or failure is the opening of the voltage divider
circuit
that the focus and astig tap into.
I am unfamilier with your particular scope but the chances are good
that one
of the resistors has opened up. I have seen many cases !!! you
don't
need a
HV probe , just take your meter and ohm them out. They will not
appear burned
but they have a tendancy to open up due to the high
voltage.......this will
cause an unsharp trace and many cases no trace at all (just a
haze)...Good
Luck
Another point: the 46x, 47x series just wasn't as sharp as the tube
scopes! or even and especially - the 454, 454A. Some engrs. think
the 454A best 150 MHz scope ever (2mV/DIV, all the delay triggering)
or sometimes ~ 200 MHz if all went well on that assembly..

I can see the clear difference bewtween say, a 475A and the 454As -
tiny wiggles just visible on 54-A disappear into the thick trace of
475 (or 465).

Just in case you're trying to do better than it Can!


Ashton


Re: *Cheap* Equipment sources

 

--- In TekScopes@y..., Michael Dunn <mdunn@c...> wrote:
Just a little poll of sorts: I'm wondering where we all find
old
equipment -- at least the stuff we get for real cheap!

I and a friend on this list have found pretty much all our
stuff
at "garage sales" held at a local university. We're talking REAL
cheap. C$10-$20 (U$7-14) for anything from a 502A to a 549 or 556!
$5 for a plug-in. Usually in very good condition. How about you?
Hello Michael, and thanks for helping me get past the sign-on glitch.
As you can see, posting now works too [I think - we'll see].

I started accumulating Teks (beyond a couple for use) ~ 3 years ago
pre- eBay for me.. A fireman in LA had an ad in Nuts&Volts.. ended
up sending along an initial 10ish scopes (mostly 453s) and a year
later, more things.

Truck rate and such seems about only way to handle high ship'g cost,
but that means ~ 300ish # to come out reasonably. This may not be
true in '01 (?).

Now I have to read some back posts. I've mainly used Tek scopes
forever - only lately repair / calibrate, but without the tricks that
experience teaches (might tell about the 2430 with no warning about
needing an extra fan - except buried in the Service Manual. Ugh.
All those labels about imploding CRTs but - not one saying "cool it -
Now!")

Ashton Brown
Sonoma county, No. Calif.


Re: *Cheap* Equipment sources

Jams & Kandy Nunn
 

I started my collection with a 535a that I purchased at a garage sale for $1. The scope came with CA plug-in and a set of probes. I always admired the Tek scopes from the 60's and thought that it would be fun to fix it or take it apart. I ended up doing both and spending a lot more than a buck to get it working. My other "sea story" is a 545a that I purchased from a TV station last year. The scope was calibrated! has the "old" style cart, 4 probes, a CA and a M plug-in and a 1L5 (not working) all the original manuals and I found the original purchase order in the operators manual compartment, total cost was $60.

Most of what I purchase I find on E-bay or the TRW swap meet (I live in LA).

Jim Nunn


Re: 465 Display Help Needed

Kurt Graber
 

billw101@... wrote:

Hello, I have been pulling problems out of a 465 that I recently
acquired. The last remaining problem is the inability to get a sharp
focus on the trace with any combination of intensity, focus or
astigmatism. I have checked everything in the CRT circuits with the
exception of the high voltage, crt bias and cathode bias, until I get
the use of an HV probe. Can anyone tell me if I am looking in the
right area or suggest any common failure modes? The low voltage
supplies all check good and noise free. Thanks for any help.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
TekScopes-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
A common problem or failure is the opening of the voltage divider circuit
that the focus and astig tap into.
I am unfamilier with your particular scope but the chances are good that one
of the resistors has opened up. I have seen many cases !!! you don't need a
HV probe , just take your meter and ohm them out. They will not appear burned
but they have a tendancy to open up due to the high voltage.......this will
cause an unsharp trace and many cases no trace at all (just a haze)...Good
Luck


Re: *Cheap* Equipment sources

Michael
 

I and a friend on this list have found pretty much all our stuff
at "garage sales" held at a local university. We're talking REAL
cheap. C$10-$20 (U$7-14) for anything from a 502A to a 549 or 556!
$5 for a plug-in. Usually in very good condition. How about you?
Gee, half your luck! I've never seen any Tek stuff at garage sales (not that
I go to many), and paid A$600 (around US$1200) for my (as new) 7603; but I
was given a TM503 with a DM501A (faulty) and three plug-in kits in exchange
for a satellite TV receiver. Meanwhile I have (mostly) fixed the DM501 and
keep looking... :)

Kind regards,
:)
Michael


Re: *Cheap* Equipment sources

ronald h. driggers
 

I paid 25 for the 545a, most of the plugins cost 15 to 20, bought one on
ebay as well as some of my manuals, some of the stuff is in a salvage yard,
near by, but they run 25 to 45 dollars depending on the size and weight,
they look at the scrap value, bought the ca and the 130 lc meter this
weeking for 20 dollars for the two, more than i want to spend but i am in a
bad area for old tek stuff. I have found others but can not pay shipping.
You seem to buy much cheaper than i can, the 556 i got was 20.00 dolllars,
may not be an easy repair though. Since this is a hobby cheaper would be
MUCH better for me. I have payed more for manuals than equipment.

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Dunn <mdunn@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: [TekScopes] *Cheap* Equipment sources


Just a little poll of sorts: I'm wondering where we all find old
equipment -- at least the stuff we get for real cheap!

I and a friend on this list have found pretty much all our stuff
at "garage sales" held at a local university. We're talking REAL
cheap. C$10-$20 (U$7-14) for anything from a 502A to a 549 or 556!
$5 for a plug-in. Usually in very good condition. How about you?


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Dunn | Surround Sound Decoder & Stereo Enhancer
Cantares | Self-Amplified Speakers, Test Equipment
74 George St. | Ambisonic Surround Sound CDs and Recording
Waterloo, Ont. | (519) 744-9395 (fax: 744-7129)
N2J 1K7 | mdunn@...
Canada |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
TekScopes-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



*Cheap* Equipment sources

Michael Dunn
 

Just a little poll of sorts: I'm wondering where we all find old equipment -- at least the stuff we get for real cheap!

I and a friend on this list have found pretty much all our stuff at "garage sales" held at a local university. We're talking REAL cheap. C$10-$20 (U$7-14) for anything from a 502A to a 549 or 556! $5 for a plug-in. Usually in very good condition. How about you?


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Dunn | Surround Sound Decoder & Stereo Enhancer
Cantares | Self-Amplified Speakers, Test Equipment
74 George St. | Ambisonic Surround Sound CDs and Recording
Waterloo, Ont. | (519) 744-9395 (fax: 744-7129)
N2J 1K7 | mdunn@...
Canada |
-----------------------------------------------------------------


465 Display Help Needed

 

Hello, I have been pulling problems out of a 465 that I recently
acquired. The last remaining problem is the inability to get a sharp
focus on the trace with any combination of intensity, focus or
astigmatism. I have checked everything in the CRT circuits with the
exception of the high voltage, crt bias and cathode bias, until I get
the use of an HV probe. Can anyone tell me if I am looking in the
right area or suggest any common failure modes? The low voltage
supplies all check good and noise free. Thanks for any help.