开云体育

Posts to this topic are now on moderation.

Roy,

I've had a few complaints about your posts on this thread. If I receive more, I will need to consider banning you from the group, which I'd prefer not to do.

David (Moderator).

Me too ?

Roy

Your tone is highly aggressive, and I think you're just looking for a fight, for some reason which it's above my pay grade to understand.

I'll debate you anytime on technical accuracy, but I decline to engage your ego.

There are enough contradictions in your statements to make mincemeat here.

End of subject.

Menahem

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 09:40 PM, M Yachad wrote:

What's your point?

It's clearly laid out in my previous post.
Did you read it?
Or are you saying you disagree with it?
Or maybe you don't understand it?
Or maybe you can't articulate your point of view?
Or maybe you just don't want to discuss it?
All... IMO... valid positions.
But then maybe you don't understand that point either?
Don't know because "what's your point" doesn't say very much about those positions.

--
Roy Thistle

Thanks for this collection, just like a trip down memory lane. Nice to see all the Ampex manuals being saved, I kept hoping to see an ACR-25 collection.
So many shops had a bookcase full of the same items, sadly most have been carted off to the shreader.
Thanks again for all your great work.

Gerry (broadcast engineering retired)

Roy

What's your point?

Menahem

On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 12:18 PM, M Yachad wrote:

there is NO SHORTAGE of Chinese capacitors made in 2025, which still fail in
the same way as those 26 years ago

I don't agree.
For example... Kemet manufactures in China... and Kemet manufactured capacitors, are stocked by Digikey, Mouser, Farnell ... et. al.
Those capacitors don't suffer from improper electrolyte formulation... that particular failing has passed.
Anyway, there are no shortage of people, dropping in... and dropping out... of this forum who are beginners.
Of course, there are many, very qualified individuals posting... but, there are beginners too...
... who are unfamiliar with the density, and electro-mechanical complexity, of what Tek jammed into a 400 series scope.... and not just those models too.
IMO... anybody... who is a 'professional' .... and is of the opinion... that un-soldering... and resoldering... doesn't risk damage to PCBs... has been working in sales too long.
Everybody lifts pads, or causes solder bridges, once in a while.
And that's considering the 'right' tools, flux, and solder, are available.

--
Roy Thistle

Hello,

I have scanned some Tektronix Television Products related material, including:
Tektronix TSG7 Instruction Manual
Tektronix SPG1 SPG2 Instruction Manual (has information regarding the SPG2A update)
Tektronix 1480-series Waveform Monitor Instruction Manual (with schematics)
Tektronix Television Products Catalog 1980

They can currently be found on my Internet Archive account ( ) . I will see about getting them up on the tekwiki.

Also I am curious if anyone has any manuals or materials for TSG7 "Opt AB" (manual 070-4908-00) and SPG2A "Opt AA" (manual 070-4905-00). I am able to find descriptions of them in other service literature, but no manuals for themselves. Nice to see the 1485 "Mod W5F" is on the tekwiki!

I have a big binder of Tektronix TV Products from 1976 that I will try and scan and upload soon, too.

-Michael Bierlein

Some more trouble. Blank screen.
Still boots because I have the 1kHz on the probe comp signal and when put on CH1 it goes from "ready" to "trig'd" from the trigger "main level" pot.
I'll measure the crt's power supplies next.
Renaud

Actually, I spoke (or asked) a little too soon. I was browsing an area of my basement behind the cobwebs and discovered I had this metered variac laying around. I'm assuming this will do the trick.



David

Roy,
this is very spot on topic.

I hope I have the proper tools (desoldering gun and several types of solder, hot air station, ESR meter and optical and video microscopes.
My only missing tools probably are a trinocular microscope and a Metcal, but prices...

Anyway I understand what you are saying. I have several FT-102 hybrid transceivers, I am fond of the "best of both worlds" at the time, solid state except for PA and it has peculiar quirks when it comes to restoration, like relays installed UNDER a band switch and so on.
An official Yaesu service refused to take a peek, saying you come here with a problem and return home with a different one.

One of the most skilled man about it, Malcom NC4L does only restoration on this specific model and he does agree, capacitors are seldom to be replaced and he is against total recapping as a proactive measure.

I still got a kit, never found the courage to start the process, the radios are old and with a lot of brittle wires that need to be handled very carefully when moving around boards.

Probably it depends on what you are restoring, specific timeframe about capacitor acquisition (remember the ABIT mobo "problem") and a lot of other factors.

Still, I would rather get a bag of components someone has selected for me, there are simply too choices when it comes to them, you really need to have experience in component selection in itself and in the specific device you are restoring, 2465B is not the average scope.

I have a IC-751A that currently I am "restoring" and I am tempted as well. Lots of caps inside, ouch.

Giuseppe Marullo
IW2JWW - JN45RQ

Roy,
Generally, it's best to troubleshoot a problem and solve it.

BUT, in THIS case, what we have here, thanks to all the efforts of these capable and experienced techs here, is that ALL the problems have ALREADY been "Troubleshot", and condensed into ONE bunch of tasks to do now. These problems and defects are now "KNOWN".

So, why try to reinvent the wheel, when somebody else has already travelled the road down which you want to walk, and solved the problem which you have now?

That is the concept of SOLVING "KNOWN" defects, and that is the rationale behind the Recapping exercise (which in the case of my kit, includes not only capacitors, but resistors as well)!

Those capacitor problems of c. 1999 which you mentioned have NOT gone away - there is NO SHORTAGE of Chinese capacitors made in 2025, which still fail in the same way as those 26 years ago, and understanding the Chinese mindset of "profit at any cost", we can expect the no-name and counterfeit components to continue to fail in the future. It's got nothing to do with anti-Chinese prejudice - it's simply the way that China does business.

Therefore the choice of BRAND and Model is very important, far more important than the cost.

And if the tech who does the work is sloppy and unprofessional, then of course the chances of his damaging the PCB and causing catastrophic failure are present and real, and it makes no difference whether he replaces one cap or 50 caps.
By the same token, a thoroughly professional tech will have 100% success, whether he replaces one cap or 50.

Generally most of the techs who are active in this forum have extremely high professional work standards and technique, and can be trusted to do work with 100% success rate.

"Learn from the mistakes of others, because you will not live long enough to solve them all yourself"

Menahem

Ironic that the tek logo looks a bit coarsely digitised for an analog scope

The aging process for 157-0125-00 is documented on page 36 of the tube aging pdf on tekwiki.



It’s also mentioned on page 110 in the tube specification list which shows the tek part numbers of the raw tubes they would have used and later reassign the part number to the selected one



Nothing about specific brand names but still interesting info if you haven’t seen those documents

It's great you've submitted this information here. I'm sure this will help
some folks down the line. Way to go.

On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 6:51?PM rich.meyer@... via groups.io
<rich.meyer@...> wrote:

The Tektronix 155-0124-00 is a hard part to find. I was able to repair my
2235 scope with an alternate part. I used a Tektronix 234-1008-20 which
was made by Maxim for Tektronix. The Military version of the 2235 was the
AN/USM488. The Military National Stock Number (NSN) for this part was
5962-01-062-7562, which is also the 234-1008-20. I located this part on
eBay, replaced it, and got my 2235 operational again.

The Tektronix 155-0124-00 is a hard part to find. I was able to repair my 2235 scope with an alternate part. I used a Tektronix 234-1008-20 which was made by Maxim for Tektronix. The Military version of the 2235 was the AN/USM488. The Military National Stock Number (NSN) for this part was 5962-01-062-7562, which is also the 234-1008-20. I located this part on eBay, replaced it, and got my 2235 operational again.

Jim,

I had gotten some of those very tubes in the 1990s. I didn't use them until I (tried) to calibrate my 547 a few years ago and found them a little less than wonderful than actual 6DJ8s to the point that I wondered if they were even related to 6DJ8s. They didn't always work well in place of 6DJ8s. I hope you have better luck with yours.

(As I have only 1A1 plug-ins, I can't help you with the chassis rods.)

All gone, looks like I missed out again.

I recently bought a 3B3 via ebay, that I got cheap because it had been damaged. The only obvious damage was that one of the long, round, chrome plated chassis rods was badly bent. I thought I had some good, salvaged, 3-series rods so I figured this might be an easy fix.

First surprise: I don't find any chassis rods in my stash of Tek spares. I managed to straighten this one. It's not bad, but if someone has a good one they'd like to part with, I'll pay a reasonable price for one. Note that the 3-series chassis spacing rods are ~12-3/16" long, longer than the 1 or Letter series rods. This is a late rod, with the crimped hex at one end.

Second surprise: One of the 6DJ8s has the getter turned completely white. It had been knocked sideways by whatever had bent the rod, so I figured there must be a crack around one of the base pins, which had been bent. No such cracks appeared, but I finally noticed that the pinch tip at the top of the tube had been completely broken off. Sad, but at least I have a few spare 6DJ8s.

However, this dead 6DJ8 is unusual. There is no etched ID anywhere. In typical red ink, it says NATIONAL, with the National logo, then the Tek part number, 157-0125-00, then MADE IN JAPAN. Oddly, 6DJ8 does not appear anywhere.

The 157-0125-00 is an aged and selected version of the 6DJ8. So, with the Tek part number inked onto the glass envelop, the ageing and selecting must have been done in Japan, by the original manufacturer. Or perhaps they were able to control their production carefully enough to make the ageing and selecting unnecessary. I'd love to know how this was done.

Or maybe this was done so late in Tek history that no one cared. There are some additional numbers in red ink on the tube: 51A, 83781, and 8729. The last one might be a date code.

So, at some point in time (1987?) Tek contracted with Richardson Electronics, in the Chicago area, to make 157-0125-00s (6DJ8s) for them, with the National label on them. Then Richardson turned around and subcontracted them to Japan (Toshiba, Matsushita, Hitachi?) to make the actual tube. I have to assume that this was all done with Tek's approval, but it still seems odd, especially with no 6DJ8 marking. This was probably a very nice tube, and probably still is, except for being full of air and the consequently blown getter.

Have you ever seen a National, or any other brand, tube with the 9 digit Tek part number printed right on it?

--
Jim Adney
Madison, WI USA