开云体育

I have these 5 tapes for the 4041, any chance someone has a working 4041 still and can back them up? If they aren't dead that is. I'd be willing to pay for shipping both ways and for your time.

4041 DDU Checkout Software Version 1.1 4041 System Verification RLSE # 2.8 S45F010 opt.04 TEK-EZ TEST Vol.I-Generator 4200 Mod DNS Version 5.1 (DNS0012) S45F010 opt.04 TEK-EZ TEST Vol.II-Translator 4200 Mod DNS Version 5.1 (DNS0012) Likely a blank tape, (but still would like to see if it has data and back it up if it does)

I really need the TEK-EZ TEST Vol.I/Vol.II 4200 Mod tapes specifically for my DAS 9200 / 4200 series TEK terminal and have been looking for a 4041 for a long time but never seen one for sale yet.

Hello everyone,
My name is Jack, and I have a 575 that I am trying to understand better, and to calibrate and fix a couple of small things. The present issue is that I can’t get the single family switch on the step generator to do anything. The repetitive position works as it should, but switching to single family makes all curves displayed on repetitive, disappear.
I have the instruction manual for the instrument, and the schematics for all the different blocks. I have cleaned the switch contacts, but am at a loss.
Any suggestions for me would be greatly appreciated. I have very limited diagnostic capabilities.
Very sincerely,
Jack

The cam switch drum is one of the many plastic parts in the 7000 and 500 series with this issue. The material becomes brittle and develops chalky white residue on the surface. From what I gather, the problematic plastic is delrin or acetal resin.

One of the reasons I divested myself from this series. The intricate plastic parts break left and right, and when they do, you have quite a problem on your hands.

Karin,

There was a request by another list member for help acquiring pages that
are missing from the various 7934 PDF copies of the May 1986 revision
manual out on the internet. I was trying to figure out how closely the 7934
manual, revision May 1986, found on the TekWiki site, matches an actual,
original 7934 manual as published by Tektronix. So far, it is clear that
pages 3-1, 6-22 and 6-23 are missing from the PDF copy on the TekWiki site.
In addition, the copy on the TekWiki site has many pages that appear to be
partial scans of larger pages.

It would be useful, if tedious, for someone who owns an original copy of
the May 1986 manual to do a page-by-page comparison to see what other
differences exist between an original manual and the copy on TekWiki.

I have a 7934 and an original 7934 manual published by Tektronix, revision
May 1996, *revised August 1987*, from which I have scanned the above listed
three missing pages and added them to my local copy of the May 1986
revision. I may decide to replace the PDF copy on TekWiki with my updated
copy. The pages between the two revisions appear to be consistent.

I am also in the process of scanning my August 1987 revision which I will
also put on the TekWiki site, but that will take some time because of the
large number of foldout pages. You probably know how that goes.

My intent has been to provide an accurate copy of *a* 7934 manual for
others to access.

DaveD
KC0WJN
Mims, FL


On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 19:15 Karin Johnson via groups.io <karinann=
[email protected]> wrote:

I have an original Tektronix service manual for the 7934, dated First
printing May 1986, I also have two, count them two, 7934.
Is there any question I may answer for you?????

Karin Anne Johnson P.E. K3UU
Palm Harbor, Florida

Just as a sidebar, my manual in section 7, last page is 7-74.

Karin

I had problems with broken individual cams and bushings in the attenuator of a 7A29, which I think are the same gray plastic. I had to do some tricky repairs to put them all back together. The story starts here and there are some nice pictures associated:

/g/TekScopes/message/206747

In my case, the cams did not wear down or anything like that - they just broke open from around the shafts. The plastic was still shiny and had good surface, but simply cracked apart I think due to being too flimsy to take the stresses - those should have been stouter or of a stronger material. I also think the too-radical lift in the cam and follower design and lack of lubrication aggravated the situation, as described in the discussion and picture captions. OTOH, I also noted that the bushings are low stress items yet cracked anyway, so there's an aging/chemical deterioration issue too.

Ed

I have an original Tektronix service manual for the 7934, dated First printing May 1986, I also have two, count them two, 7934.
Is there any question I may answer for you?????

Karin Anne Johnson P.E. K3UU
Palm Harbor, Florida

Look under "Surface Delamination."

Greg

Hi Wamor,

Would this work on a TDS620A?

Rafael

To me, that appears like someone has used an incompatible contact cleaner or such on it.

Russ

I would very much appreciate those scans

Mark
W7HPW

Real Radios Glow in the Dark

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 07:39 AM, Dave Daniel wrote:

I have sent pp. 31, 6-22 and 6-23 to Mark, the OP.

Where and who is "Mark, the OP"? Could you consider uploading just those 3 pages, 3-1, 6-22 and 6-23 to TEKSCOPES files area? That would help anyone, including me, update the old manual until such time as Mark can insert those pages into that copy, where ever that is? Then I don't have to remember to update or download a newer copy at some time in the future.
Thanks so much for taking the time to do this,
Bill

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:17 AM, Sigur?ur ?sgeirsson wrote:

I've never seen such a thing (/g/TekScopes/album?id=301415),
how strange. I wonder if anyone here knows what sort of plastic Tek used
for these?

I have some (PG506 for one, IIRC) cam switches that are cracked on the ends, and I expect they're on borrowed time. Nothing as bad as in Clark's photos, though.

I've never looked closely at one of those drums, but it looks to me that it
would be relatively straightforward to 3D print a replacement nowadays.

I've had the same thought, more recently with 7A29 cam lobes. Those are a slightly different beast, but suffer severely from cracking (and I have one that's missing entirely).

Thinking about this for the more typical long cam drums, I suspect one could convert the dotted alignment diagrams in the service manual to a table, and produce cam rings for an individual contact using a given column of on/off sequences for a given contact to generate the lobes (assuming equal intervals?) on a given drum diameter. I think this would be straightforward in OpenSCAD, but have never looked closely at the ramp geometry. Stacking those rings would give you the full cam drum, and then there'd be a mildly annoying detent gear and/or bearing section at the ends, plus grooves for circlips. I suspect that would be tedious, unless it could be parameterized somehow.

All purely academic speculation, as my free time is about to go towards outdoor chores instead of playing with the 3D printer.

Adam

I was fortunate to find an NOS replacement for one drum , 105-0509-00. That allows me to experiment with the bad unit; however, I am not sure where to start. One thought is to find a compatible resin, cyanoacrylate or epoxy to “rehydrate” and seal the parched surface. Hopefully I can find something to fill the cracks and create a smooth surface and restore internal strength. If successful, I can apply it to the other drum, 105-0510-00. If it doesn’t work, then I need to find or fabricate a replacement.

Last time I did serious IEEE programming was writing a driver using PLM-86 for one of the competitors in the MATE program.? That was a LONG time ago.? TMS9914 I think was the chip.

Harvey.

Hey Clark,

I've never seen such a thing (/g/TekScopes/album?id=301415),
how strange. I wonder if anyone here knows what sort of plastic Tek used
for these?

I've never looked closely at one of those drums, but it looks to me that it
would be relatively straightforward to 3D print a replacement nowadays.
I've recently dusted off my 2nd hand Prusa, so now everything looks like a
nail to me :). The commercial sintering services should be able to produce
a better part than the original. Even a lowly FDM printer should be able to
produce a usable part, though perhaps a little bit of beveling would be
necessary to avoid sharp overhangs.
The problem would be to produce the CAD design, maybe I'll go see if I have
something to play with in my box of mystery modules...

Siggi

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 8:29?PM Clark Foley via groups.io <clarkfoley=
[email protected]> wrote:

I recently acquired a PG502 from Tek surplus (aka Country Store) and found
several setting to be intermittent. Expecting that a good cleaning would be
in order, I was astonished to find that cam switch drum appears to be
decomposing. It looks dull, powdery and parched like mud flats after a
dessert gully washer!
In fact, there was a lot of fine debris on the contact board. Cleaning the
board and the contacts made no difference because the cam lobes are
deteriorating. I have not touched the cam drum with any cleaner or other
chemicals.
This unit was used in the production test area; perhaps its entire life.
It was last cal’d June 2022. Perhaps it is the result of 45 years of
continuous up time in a rack.

I have never seen a cam drum look like this.

Has anyone seen such a thing?
(See photo gallery for “Decomposing Cam Switch Drum.”)

On Mar 23, 2025, at 13:15 , Adam R. Maxwell via groups.io <amaxwell@...> wrote:

At this point, anything could be bad as far as I'm concerned, including my reasoning to get to the VR as a potential problem.

I ran the 492 long enough for it it wake up again, and tried swapping a cold VR module in…and it kept working with a full scale peak, which ruled out the VR (and calls into question my notes on power levels).

After powering off for a 1/2 hr or so, it was back to showing the 100 MHz reference as -50 dBm instead of -20 dBm. I'm now fairly sure the 829 MHz 2nd converter is the culprit:

More careful power measurements (paying attention to ref level setting), the 110 MHz IF out from the 829 MHz second converter is -55 dBm when working, and -70 to -65 dBm when not working. Both seem low; I have -40 dBm out from the 2072 MHz 2nd converter IF output, in the working and non-working cases, and my reading of the schematic (drawing <14>) is that it should not be losing that going to P232.

I think this points back to the IF select section inside the 829 MHz 2nd converter, which was my original hypothesis at the start of this dumb thread. For grins, I heated the converter up gently with a heat gun and actually saw the peak jump 30 dBm. Cooled the converter down with cold packs and lost that 30 dBm again, then heated back up with a heat gun and gained it back, so the experiment is repeatable.

What I don't know is if this points to a bad solder joint? I thought semiconductors generally behave badly when heated.

thanks,
Adam

Have you checked its functions, or are you too scared ?????
;-)

On 2025-03-23 11:46 AM, Harvey White wrote:

IIRC, an IEEE-488 address can be any number from 1 to 32. (0 is reserved).

Almost. Valid addresses are 0 thru 30, with 31 reserved for Untalk or Unlisten.

Steve Hendrix

On 2025-03-23 10:19 AM, Radu Bogdan Dicher via groups.io wrote:

My initial question was meant to ask a slightly different thing though (I
did a bad job explaining). Is it customary to just plug GPIB into a running
instrument while making sure the address is different than any other
(previously) connected instrument, and then start to talk to the
instrument through it? Or doing it while the instrument is off is a safer,
"best practice" procedure?

If your incorrect address of 4 instead of 14 was written in hex or octal rather than decimal, I'd suspect a bad DIP switch. But IEEE-488 addresses are usually stated in decimal, and context in the rest of your post suggests decimal, so that's probably the wrong explanation.

There should be no problem with hot-plugging, unless there is a data transfer occurring at the same time. Indeed, an instrument would probably be least likely to disturb a transfer in progress if it were powered for at least a few seconds before plugging it in. There's a spec for what fraction of instruments on a bus are allowed to be unpowered - I forget now but it's something like 1/3 or 1/2. As long as you're not actively transferring data at the time, there's no harm in hot-plugging. The original spec calls out terminating resistors to both Vcc (5V always, in that day) and Gnd. I have found that newer instruments sometimes use a simple 1K to 3.3V, which is a very rough Thevenin equivalent.

Thanks for the compliment on my KISS-488 manual!

Steve Hendrix