¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Type 106

 

Hi Stephen,

I'm not sure my paper manual has that information so good to see it in the scanned copy from TekWiki. Apparently they still used clip-in silicon Schottky diodes which I don't find by that part number but that's pretty minor.

BTW, this document is of interest:



I particularly like the last two sentences on page 7 of that document. You don't see that very much anymore.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen" <stephen.nabet@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2021 1:44:49 AM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:11 PM, n4buq wrote:


Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll
find direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
If you look at the end of the manual, starting on page 96, you¡¯ll find the
replacement procedure and parts list for those obsolete GaAs diodes.

Hope this helps.



Re: Type 106

 

After a few hours of use, 2 more bridge rectifiers went bad (shorted). First it was D222, and today it¡¯s D262. I¡¯m gonna replace them all.


Re: Type 106

 

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:11 PM, n4buq wrote:


Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll
find direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
If you look at the end of the manual, starting on page 96, you¡¯ll find the replacement procedure and parts list for those obsolete GaAs diodes.

Hope this helps.


Re: Type 106

 

Yes, indeed, that's very good advice, Jim. Even if you don't pop the diodes outright, they can become very leaky.

-- Cheers,
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 12/17/2021 21:02, Jim Ford wrote:
I bet an anti-static wriststrap is in order when working with these tiny junctions.? ? ? ? ? Jim Ford?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Tom Lee <tomlee@...> Date: 12/17/21 8:53 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106 I took a look at the tekwiki page and saw those custom packages. Pretty cool looking -- like scaled-down old-style point-contact "catwhisker" detectors from the days of crystal radio.If it were my unit, I'd remove the holders and just solder the replacements directly onto the board to avoid all the parasitics that would come from trying to make the replacement diodes physically emulate the original ones. But that's me.The manual has some pages on small differences between the GaAs and Si diode circuits, by the way, so you might want to take a look at that info if you haven't already.-- Cheers,Tom-- Prof. Thomas H. LeeAllen Ctr., Rm. 205350 Jane Stanford WayStanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305-4070 12/17/2021 18:54, n4buq wrote:> Thanks, Tom.? The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses).? I suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.>> Thanks,> Barry - N4BUQ>> ----- Original Message ----->> From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>>> To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>>> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM>> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106>> Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and>> having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky>> candidates. A few that come to mind are:>>>> MBD101>> BAV17>> HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)>>>> These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's>> not enough to matter.>>>> I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.>>>> -- Cheers>> Tom>>>> -->> Prof. Thomas H. Lee>> Allen Ctr., Rm. 205>> 350 Jane Stanford Way>> Stanford University>> Stanford, CA 94305-4070>> >>>> On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:>>> Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise>>> outputs?? I think one or two of mine are bad.? The +OUTPUT works but not the>>> -OUTPUT.? Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the>>> junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not>>> correct at all.>>>>>> I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find>>> direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.>>>>>> Thanks,>>> Barry - N4BUQ>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----->>>> From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>>>>> To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM>>>> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106>>>> Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong>>>> with the +/-10 rails. Got it.>>>>>>>> However, regarding:>>>> "Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both>>>> emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218.? According to the>>>> schematic, this should be the same.? But apparently not">>>> You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you>>>> don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually>>>> connected like they should be.>>>> Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are>>>> missing...>>>>>>>> Pete>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>



Re: Type 106

 

I bet an anti-static wriststrap is in order when working with these tiny junctions.? ? ? ? ? Jim Ford?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

-------- Original message --------From: Tom Lee <tomlee@...> Date: 12/17/21 8:53 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106 I took a look at the tekwiki page and saw those custom packages. Pretty cool looking -- like scaled-down old-style point-contact "catwhisker" detectors from the days of crystal radio.If it were my unit, I'd remove the holders and just solder the replacements directly onto the board to avoid all the parasitics that would come from trying to make the replacement diodes physically emulate the original ones. But that's me.The manual has some pages on small differences between the GaAs and Si diode circuits, by the way, so you might want to take a look at that info if you haven't already.-- Cheers,Tom-- Prof. Thomas H. LeeAllen Ctr., Rm. 205350 Jane Stanford WayStanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305-4070 12/17/2021 18:54, n4buq wrote:> Thanks, Tom.? The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses).? I suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.>> Thanks,> Barry - N4BUQ>> ----- Original Message ----->> From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>>> To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>>> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM>> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106>> Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and>> having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky>> candidates. A few that come to mind are:>>>> MBD101>> BAV17>> HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)>>>> These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's>> not enough to matter.>>>> I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.>>>> -- Cheers>> Tom>>>> -->> Prof. Thomas H. Lee>> Allen Ctr., Rm. 205>> 350 Jane Stanford Way>> Stanford University>> Stanford, CA 94305-4070>> >>>> On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:>>> Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise>>> outputs?? I think one or two of mine are bad.? The +OUTPUT works but not the>>> -OUTPUT.? Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the>>> junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not>>> correct at all.>>>>>> I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find>>> direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.>>>>>> Thanks,>>> Barry - N4BUQ>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----->>>> From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>>>>> To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM>>>> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106>>>> Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong>>>> with the +/-10 rails. Got it.>>>>>>>> However, regarding:>>>> "Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both>>>> emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218.? According to the>>>> schematic, this should be the same.? But apparently not">>>> You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you>>>> don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually>>>> connected like they should be.>>>> Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are>>>> missing...>>>>>>>> Pete>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>


Re: OT: microwave oven blows fuse

 

Crap!? I read this after I got it all put back together and seems to be working!? So, Ben, I need to replace which switch?? The top and bottom switches are indeed NC, and the monitor switch in the middle is NO.? Thanks.? ? ? ? ?JimSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

-------- Original message --------From: "benwetzel via groups.io" <benwetzel@...> Date: 12/17/21 7:15 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TekScopes] OT: microwave oven blows fuse Hello everyone, I have been reading on this board and not knowing the answers till I got to this post.? I have been repairing commercial food equipment for 20 plus years and microwaves are part of that.? What is going on here is the door interlock switch is worn out, the hook on the door latch has worn the plastic in the interlock switch and messed up the timing of the limit switches.? The door interlock has three switches, primary, secondary, and the monitor.? As the door opens, both primary and secondary must open before the Monitor closes.? Primary and secondary are in both legs of power supplied to high voltage transformer, in this case hot and neutral.? Monitor is across both legs, again hot and neutral in this case.? This causes a dead short and blows the main fuse if either primary or secondary interlock switch is not open before the Monitor closes.? Primary and secondary are normally open and monitor is normally closed.? If the HV transformer burns and causes high current draw this usually blows the breaker for the outlet and leaves fuse in microwave fine.? The reason for this is to prevent opening the door with magnetron putting out microwaves and cooking the person that opens the door or pacemaker interference.? If we run into a unit that has a blown main fuse we automatically replace the door interlock switch, don't pass go just do it.? The door hook slamming into the plastic of the interlock switch wears the plastic where it eventuality makes the primary and secondary not open fast enough before monitor closes and blows the extremely fast blow fuse preventing relay or limit switch contacts from welding closed.? You need a new interlock switch and fuse.


Re: Type 106

 

I took a look at the tekwiki page and saw those custom packages. Pretty cool looking -- like scaled-down old-style point-contact "catwhisker" detectors from the days of crystal radio.

If it were my unit, I'd remove the holders and just solder the replacements directly onto the board to avoid all the parasitics that would come from trying to make the replacement diodes physically emulate the original ones. But that's me.

The manual has some pages on small differences between the GaAs and Si diode circuits, by the way, so you might want to take a look at that info if you haven't already.

-- Cheers,
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 12/17/2021 18:54, n4buq wrote:
Thanks, Tom. The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses). I suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and
having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky
candidates. A few that come to mind are:

MBD101
BAV17
HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)

These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's
not enough to matter.

I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.

-- Cheers
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070


On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find
direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete






Re: 465M parts

 

Did you check the 32v unregulated supply voltage? There is a jumper, but there is also definitely a fuse in the 32v Unregulated supply located on the A1 board. Check the 455 POWER SUPPLY schematic, see F736. 32V unregulated supply feeds the HV transformer T550, if F736 is blown, the HV transformer does not receive any power. No power to the HV transformer, no HV. The 32v supply will also be out of action, as the 32v supply is also derived from the 32V unregulated supply. I have a 455 and I had this very problem with mine.

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR


Re: OT: microwave oven blows fuse

 

Thank you very much, Ben. That squares with the information provided by some other contributor. I'd never studied the complete logic of how the safety interlocks worked. Good to know that there exists a failure mode that can pop the fuse, yet doesn't involve the power supplies.

-- Cheers,
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 12/17/2021 19:15, benwetzel via groups.io wrote:
Hello everyone, I have been reading on this board and not knowing the answers till I got to this post. I have been repairing commercial food equipment for 20 plus years and microwaves are part of that. What is going on here is the door interlock switch is worn out, the hook on the door latch has worn the plastic in the interlock switch and messed up the timing of the limit switches. The door interlock has three switches, primary, secondary, and the monitor. As the door opens, both primary and secondary must open before the Monitor closes. Primary and secondary are in both legs of power supplied to high voltage transformer, in this case hot and neutral. Monitor is across both legs, again hot and neutral in this case. This causes a dead short and blows the main fuse if either primary or secondary interlock switch is not open before the Monitor closes. Primary and secondary are normally open and monitor is normally closed. If the HV transformer burns and causes high current draw this usually blows the breaker for the outlet and leaves fuse in microwave fine. The reason for this is to prevent opening the door with magnetron putting out microwaves and cooking the person that opens the door or pacemaker interference. If we run into a unit that has a blown main fuse we automatically replace the door interlock switch, don't pass go just do it. The door hook slamming into the plastic of the interlock switch wears the plastic where it eventuality makes the primary and secondary not open fast enough before monitor closes and blows the extremely fast blow fuse preventing relay or limit switch contacts from welding closed. You need a new interlock switch and fuse.




Re: OT: microwave oven blows fuse

 

Hello everyone, I have been reading on this board and not knowing the answers till I got to this post. I have been repairing commercial food equipment for 20 plus years and microwaves are part of that. What is going on here is the door interlock switch is worn out, the hook on the door latch has worn the plastic in the interlock switch and messed up the timing of the limit switches. The door interlock has three switches, primary, secondary, and the monitor. As the door opens, both primary and secondary must open before the Monitor closes. Primary and secondary are in both legs of power supplied to high voltage transformer, in this case hot and neutral. Monitor is across both legs, again hot and neutral in this case. This causes a dead short and blows the main fuse if either primary or secondary interlock switch is not open before the Monitor closes. Primary and secondary are normally open and monitor is normally closed. If the HV transformer burns and causes high current draw this usually blows the breaker for the outlet and leaves fuse in microwave fine. The reason for this is to prevent opening the door with magnetron putting out microwaves and cooking the person that opens the door or pacemaker interference. If we run into a unit that has a blown main fuse we automatically replace the door interlock switch, don't pass go just do it. The door hook slamming into the plastic of the interlock switch wears the plastic where it eventuality makes the primary and secondary not open fast enough before monitor closes and blows the extremely fast blow fuse preventing relay or limit switch contacts from welding closed. You need a new interlock switch and fuse.


Re: Internal Drive Mechanism for 7B53N (et., al.) Sweep Speed Cam

 

I will have to try removing that retaining ring and go from there. I'm afraid that even if I can do that and release the tubing so that it comes out the front, I still may not be able to get the disk out of the larger hole in the back of the drum but I don't have anything to lose at this point so I'm going to give it a try.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Adney" <jadney@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 3:44:35 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Internal Drive Mechanism for 7B53N (et., al.) Sweep Speed Cam
Yes, it's clearly been a long time since I've had to work on one of these. I was
thinking that pulling the drive dog forward would disengage the drive dogs from
the rear drum, but that bothered me, as something in the back of my mind kept
saying, "A Sweep in front, B Sweep in back."

So the interlocking is done by the knobs and the drive dogs continue to turn the
rear drum even when its shaft is pulled forward.

Thanks, that makes more sense.

For the original poster: If the front knob does not turn the B drum, does it
turn the 1/8" B drum's shaft? If it does, but the B shaft does not turn the B
drum, then the drive dog has either shattered (most likely) or come loose from
the shaft. You'll have to remove that retaining washer from the shaft to get it
apart. That can be tricky, or you can destroy the washer and buy a new one at
your local hardware store.

Does anyone have a better name for that kind of retaining washer? It looks like
an internal star lockwasher, but the inside spikes flare in one direction so
that it can be pushed on but can't be easily pulled off. McMaster-Carr calls
them Push-On External Retaining Rings.



Re: Type 106

 

"BAV17" (typo).

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "n4buq" <n4buq@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 9:00:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
On second look, the DAV17 comes in a DO-35 package. I think I can solder some
small-diameter tubing to the leads right up against the diode's body and clip
it in to the existing holders.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "n4buq" <n4buq@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 8:54:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Thanks, Tom. The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends
that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses). I
suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and
having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky
candidates. A few that come to mind are:

MBD101
BAV17
HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)

These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's
not enough to matter.

I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.

-- Cheers
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070


On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find
direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete









Re: Type 106

 

On second look, the DAV17 comes in a DO-35 package. I think I can solder some small-diameter tubing to the leads right up against the diode's body and clip it in to the existing holders.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "n4buq" <n4buq@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 8:54:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Thanks, Tom. The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends
that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses). I
suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and
having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky
candidates. A few that come to mind are:

MBD101
BAV17
HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)

These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's
not enough to matter.

I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.

-- Cheers
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070


On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find
direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete








Re: Type 106

 

Thanks, Tom. The existing diodes are tiny glass(?) cylinders with metal ends that clip into small holders (much like the old fashioned clip-in fuses). I suppose I'll be doing some plumbing for whatever I find to replace them.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lee" <tomlee@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 7:14:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and
having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky
candidates. A few that come to mind are:

MBD101
BAV17
HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)

These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's
not enough to matter.

I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.

-- Cheers
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070


On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise
outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the
-OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the
junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not
correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find
direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete







Re: 465M parts

 

Interesting! Unlike the 465M, the 455 has no fuse in the HV Oscillator supply. In fact it shows as a jumper in place of the fuse. That could blow up a few things easily.


Re: Type 106

 

Based on the fast-rise circuitry of the 106 and PG506 being similar and having similar specs, you would seem to have several good Si-Schottky candidates. A few that come to mind are:

MBD101
BAV17
HSMS-282x (15V breakdown makes these an upgrade over the stock diodes)

These have slightly higher capacitance than the GaAs originals, but it's not enough to matter.

I'm sure others will chime in shortly with their recommendations.

-- Cheers
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 12/17/2021 16:11, n4buq wrote:
Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the -OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete




Re: Type 106

 

Speaking of a 106, anyone know anything about the GaAs diodes in the Fast Rise outputs? I think one or two of mine are bad. The +OUTPUT works but not the -OUTPUT. Input to the two diodes on the -OUTPUT side looks okay but at the junction between the two, the signal is not correct and the output is not correct at all.

I've never seen diodes constructed like these before and don't expect I'll find direct replacements but am wondering could be used as replacements.

Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ

----- Original Message -----
From: "saipan59 (Pete)" <saipan1959@...>
To: "tekscopes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 4:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Type 106
Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong
with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both
emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the
schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you
don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually
connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are
missing...

Pete



Re: Recommended ventilation clearance around a 2465 scope

 

Nothing better than a fan AND a heat sink for the Horizontal Chip. Digikey
has one but you have to drill your own holes in it. Part Number HS273-ND


Re: Type 106

 

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:00 AM, saipan59 (Pete) wrote:


What about D213 and D216? You can simply measure the voltage at the cathode of
D213, and the anode of D216 (or at the Base of the associated transistor, if
that's easier to get to). Should be around 10V.
If the diodes are open, the output voltage would be just about what you are
seeing (around 16 to 18V).

It pretty much HAS TO BE either the transistors, the Zener diodes, or an
external short across the transistors (both of them).

Pete
Yes, but no. Everything is fine. As you understood, I was not probing at the right place. I was misled by the +/- 9.1V beneath the capacitors, so I probed there because it was an easy access.


Re: Type 106

 

Ah, so your earlier "my bad" message meant to say that nothing is actually wrong with the +/-10 rails. Got it.

However, regarding:
"Instead of checking voltages between chassis ground and directly at both emitters, I probed between ground and + C215/ C218. According to the schematic, this should be the same. But apparently not"
You MUST get the same values at the Emitters and at +C215 and -C218 ! If you don't, you've got a measurement problem, OR those caps are not actually connected like they should be.
Note that those rails *may* appear to work fine, even if C215 and C218 are missing...

Pete