Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 04:43 PM, Jim Adney wrote:
Using the resistor color code, brown-white would translate to 19. The brown-red combination on a white background indicates 12 - or 21. The CRT socket however only has 14 pins. The background color is not used and yes, below 10 only one color is printed on the (white) background.Because, using the resistor color code, brown-white translates to 12, the CRT Yes, this was standard Tek. Often, the harmonica connectors (the linear ones, pushed onto rows of pins on a PCB) are molded in colors indicating the last digit of the socket number. HP (Agilent) had a similar habit, using color codes for the PCB ejectors. Raymond |
Re: 0.25R resistor in calibrator ground
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:35 PM Albert Otten <aodiversen@...> wrote:
Thank you for confirming this, Albert. My previous message got somewhat mangled in transit so I'll try to post the text again here: Further to this discussion on the 0.25R anti-ground-loop resistor on tube-era calibrator outputs, I looked further in to why my 127's calibrator output ground seemed to be open-circuit. It turned out that there was actually a manufacturing error. There's an arrangement of plastic bushes and fibre washers to keep the calibrator socket's outer from being in contact with the front panel. In my 127, one of the fibre washers was in the wrong place, so the bottom of the volts/millivolts divider chain was connected to chassis ground, and both ends of the 0.25R resistor R898 were also connected to chassis ground. The calibrator socket outer wasn't connected to anything at all. It was completely floating. The paint seals on the screws were still intact, so it must have left the factory that way in 1960. The only reason I noticed is that in my office the power sockets have no ground connection, so when by chance I powered the 127 from a different outlet to the scope I was testing it with, they had no common ground connection via their power cables. Trying to view the calibrator output it seemed to be imposed on about 100V of mains hum, which I blamed on a faulty cable. But the cable was blameless. It was an actual Tek assembly error! I guess nobody had ever noticed due to never having tried to connect the calibrator to an ungrounded device. I've moved the offending washer now and the wiring matches the schematic diagram. It all works as it should now. Chris |
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 05:25 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:
The wire actually is white, with a brown and a red stripe. Guess why?Because, using the resistor color code, brown-white translates to 12, the CRT pin number it goes to. And for pins 1-9, I'll bet there will be only one stripe. Nice catch, I wouldn't have gotten it without your hint. Was this standard Tek practice? |
Re: 0.25R resistor in calibrator ground
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:17 PM, cmjones01 wrote:
561B (mentioned by keantoken) manual page 3-5 bottom left: "R183, which is about ten times the resistance of the braid of a 42-inch coax cable, cancels any ground loop current that may exist between the CAL OUT connector and some other instrument chassis." I didn't look in other manuals. Albert |
Re: 0.25R resistor in calibrator ground
Further to this discussion on the 0.25R anti-ground-loop resistor on
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
tube-era calibrator outputs, I looked further in to why my 127's calibrator output ground seemed to be open-circuit. It turned out that there was actually a manufacturing error. There's an arrangement of plastic bushes and fibre washers to keep the calibrator socket's outer from being in contact with the front panel. In my 127, one of the fibre washers was in the wrong place, so the bottom of the volts/millivolts divider chain was connected to chassis ground, and both ends of the 0.25R resistor R898 were also connected to chassis ground. The calibrator socket outer wasn't connected to anything at all. It was completely floating. The paint seals on the screws were still intact, so it must have left the factory that way in 1960. The only reason I noticed is that in my office the power sockets have no ground connection, so when by chance I powered the 127 from a different outlet to the scope I was testing it with, they had no common ground connection via their power cables. Trying to view the calibrator output it seemed to be imposed on about 100V of mains hum, which I blamed on a faulty cable. But the cable was blameless. It was an actual Tek assembly error! I guess nobody had ever noticed due to never having tried to connect the calibrator to an ungrounded device. I've moved the offending washer now and the wiring matches the schematic diagram. It all works as it should now. Chris On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:49 PM Dave Wise <david_wise@...> wrote:
|
454 Fireworks Followup to the Followup
Well,
I finally got me some 2N3442s from mouser. Good news: the HV sparking problem was definitely cause by the 75V regulator going short. Bad news: there appears to be no vertical deflection. But, there's a caveat to that. I'm pretty certain the problem lies downstream of the front end amplifiers because the channel 1 out signal is present and responds to vertical position control when viewed on another oscilloscope. Another symptom is that the spot is about 1 cm long in the X dimension when the time base is slowed down. I'm hoping the 75V rail going high didn't take out a bunch of stuff! Sean |
Re: Fast probe prices?
That dang Jeff Dutky keeps making me spend money on test equipment!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
LOL. Last I'd checked there wasn't any availability. R&L has them now! Get 'em while their hot! Dave On Tuesday, April 6, 2021, 09:00:11 PM PDT, Jeff Dutky <jeff.dutky@...> wrote:
Jonathan Pyle wrote: Good News! You can remedy both deficits by the acquisition of a TinaSA: The TinySA is a spectrum analyzer that can operate on signals between 100 KHz and 960 MHz (in two ranges), it can generate sine waves up to 350 MHz, and square waves up to 960 MHz, and it fits in the palm of your hand. Make sure you buy from one of the reliable sources: When I bought mine, earlier this year, I paid less than $60. I bought through the Zeenko store on AliExpress. It did take more than a month or the item to arrive, as I did not pay or expedited shipping. -- Jeff Dutky |
Re: Fast probe prices?
Jonathan Pyle wrote:
Good News! You can remedy both deficits by the acquisition of a TinaSA: The TinySA is a spectrum analyzer that can operate on signals between 100 KHz and 960 MHz (in two ranges), it can generate sine waves up to 350 MHz, and square waves up to 960 MHz, and it fits in the palm of your hand. Make sure you buy from one of the reliable sources: When I bought mine, earlier this year, I paid less than $60. I bought through the Zeenko store on AliExpress. It did take more than a month or the item to arrive, as I did not pay or expedited shipping. -- Jeff Dutky |
Re: Fast probe prices?
Charles --
I tested the RF probe from Ukraine that I got on eBay (). I tested it with my 1S1 and my Leo Bodnar 30 picosecond pulse generator (10 MHz) and found that the measured risetime through the RF probe was around 300 picoseconds, which is the same as when the pulse generator is plugged directly into the 1S1. However, the RF probe did add a lot of "ringing" to the waveform. See the photo in this album: /g/TekScopes/album?id=262713 I'm not sure this is a fair test, though, because a 30 picosecond risetime contains frequencies well beyond the stated bandwidth of the probe (1.5 GHz), so maybe that messes things up? The RF probe comes with a nice telescoping needle probe point, but I desoldered it because I thought it might introduce noise. Removing it did not have any noticeable effect. I soldered an SMA socket to the RF probe input for purposes of attaching the pulse generator without any long leads. (The pulse generator wants 50 ohms so I used a T and a 50 ohm terminator.) I did another test with a 10MHz signal from my Koolertron function generator (low cost Amazon product) through a 3-foot BNC cable (well within the bandwidth of the probe). The waveform looks the same through the RF probe, just noisier. I don't have a function generator that can produce frequencies in the hundreds of MHz, and I don't have a spectrum analyzer that can test the frequency response of the RF probe (see the eevblog post above). For $21.20 including shipping I think it's a pretty handy device. (Shipping to the U.S. took only eight days.) |
Re: 2465 blower
Monty Montgomery
Also consider that some of us are pretty good at 3D printing blowers
that will fit onto a case fan hub ;-) Monty (the other one) On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:03 PM cheater cheater <cheater00social@...> wrote:
|
Re: 2465 blower
Don't forget that PC fans are good and bad. If you want something good
buy Noctua, or, in a pinch, BeQuiet. On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:28 AM durechenew via groups.io <durechenew@...> wrote:
|
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 02:54 AM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:
Please forget my above remark. It's wrong.That's done to improve focus tracking (making focus less dependent on beam Raymond |
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 01:25 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:
That's done to improve focus tracking (making focus less dependent on beam current i.e. screen brightness). Raymond |
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 02:33 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:
The links are fine. I just wouldn't add the quotes because they are of no help, at least not to me, neither in Firefox nor in Chrome. Either highlight the whole url, including the trailing digits, and open in a new tab (right click) or have groups.io send messages as mail as well. In messages, you may just click the links; they are complete, at least in Thunderbird. Raymond |
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 01:25 AM, Dave Peterson wrote:
Hi Dave, Spoiler alert! Don't look any further if you want to think about it a bit more, but here's the giveaway: Brown and red stripes for the wire connected to pin 12 of the CRT, etc. Strictly following standard color code. Pin numbers below 10 have just one stripe on a white background. Raymond |
Re: Early 465 CRT "mesh" or "Post Accelerator Grid".
Uploaded a couple of new pictures, though I see that the one Raymond uploaded does also show VR1434/C1434. Just didn't realize yesterday those were the pin 12 drivers.
This one shows the same diagram with the two components highlighted: "/g/TekScopes/photo/262670/3203258?p=Name,,,20,0,0,0" This one is a close up without the annotations that should make them more visible: "/g/TekScopes/photo/262670/3203259?p=Name,,,20,0,0,0" But that's assuming the above links actual go to the pictures added. The forum system is definitely weird: the new added pictures are not in any kind of order relative to the existing album pictures. So just hoping for the best here. Dave |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss