¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

Trust me it's the phones auto correct turning opamp into obama :)
I know I was just kidding. I also had my share of funny auto correct stories.

I think I had the timebase measurements AC coupled and there was no change
in level. I haven't checked the DC. I will do that tomorrow when I'm back
at the workshop.
The goal is to find if sweep trigger is not coming (no gate) or sweep trigger comes but sweep doesn't happen. DC levels are important to understand the state of the sweep circuit.

At the end most likely it will be a dirty switch. You can make a good guess which one by looking sheet <10> and see which switches only change in the last three settings. However, we can also pinpoint which one by electrical debug.

BAV21 looks OK as a replacement, it has better specs in some areas. The swing at the restorer input is ~ 100Vpp max, so the diodes in the grid bias area will not see more than 200V. Close to max spec but could be a good initial debug step. If others see a problem please chime in.

Ozan


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

Just use good sockets!? I usually socket the ICs in all my projects because I hate desoldering them should the need arise, and I try to use machined sockets where possible.
-Dave

On Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 08:43:15 AM PDT, Jared Cabot via groups.io <jaredcabot@...> wrote:

Well, I'm glad it wasn't my design that was in error. :D

I'm interested in why the opamps popped too, I wonder if there is a bodge that can be added to existing units to protect the opamps from this issue, and maybe be added into the board layout for future board revisions.

I might add a suggestion to socket the opamps in the manual too. At least they are cheap parts to replace...


Jared.


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

Trust me it's the phones auto correct turning opamp into obama :)

I think I had the timebase measurements AC coupled and there was no change
in level. I haven't checked the DC. I will do that tomorrow when I'm back
at the workshop.

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 18:17 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:


I have cleaned thoroughly the entire area with IPA and now I have steady
-2950. This also resolved the problems at the Obama where now I have
Please no politics in the group :)

basically zeroes at pins 2 and 3 and 0.6V at pin 6, the grid bias seating
is changing the U1665 but has no visible impact on the trace.
It looks like your HV supply is in good shape now.

The Z out DC is now 16 to 165V when I regulate this but there is no
impact
on the trace
With these new measurements observations are pointing to faulty diodes.


Regarding the timing

I can see triangle wave and pulse on respective outputs and they change
shape /frequency as I change the timing basically making them narrower
but
this trend stops and they don't change shape in last few settings but
remain exactly the same.
Flat at what voltage level? Compared to good waveforms are these waveforms
at the max/min of the good waveforms are at a different DC voltage?

Ozan






Re: Alert for 519 owners - The significance of the Gold GR Connectors

 

Agreed, but I should point out again that I have seen 2 or 3 gold plated GR connectors that are not 125 ohm, and one of my 519s has no gold plating at all on it's connectors (and they are 125 ohm types).? So while basically true, there are exceptions to the rule.
-Dave

On Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 10:19:49 AM PDT, Dennis Tillman W7pF <dennis@...> wrote:

Hi Charles and Dave and Sean,
The RATIO of the diameter of the INSIDE of the OUTER conductor to the OUTER diameter of the INSIDE conductor and the dielectric constant of the medium in between the conductors determines the impedance of a coaxial cable (or adapter). This is why, if you look inside the gold plated end, you will see the center conductor is a completely different size than the 50 ohm center conductor.

Tek gold plated the 125 ohm ends of these GR connectors to distinguish them from the 50 ohm end. ANY gold plated GR connector is a 125 ohm impedance and guaranteed to be part of the original set of 50 ohm to 125 ohm adapters and tools which came with every 519 in a beautiful mahogany box. I had one of those boxes many years ago. My friend Barrie Gilbert bought it from my friend who had most of the adapters that went with it when Barrie came to my house to pick up his 519.

A picture of the outside of the mahogany box is at

Unfortunately I no longer have a picture of the inside of the box with the adapters.

By the way, the price he is asking for these adapters ($12 each) is ridiculously cheap. DO NOT HESITATE to use his BUY IT NOW option. There are many, many others who will take the extra ones from you for twice what you pay for these four.

Dennis Tillman W7pF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2021 1:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Alert for 519 owners

I need the N50/T125 ones to finish my set of 519 accessories. Anyone want to split these with me if I buy them? I do not need two more T50/T125s.

Sean







--
Dennis Tillman W7pF
TekScopes Moderator


Alert for 519 owners - The significance of the Gold GR Connectors

 

Hi Charles and Dave and Sean,
The RATIO of the diameter of the INSIDE of the OUTER conductor to the OUTER diameter of the INSIDE conductor and the dielectric constant of the medium in between the conductors determines the impedance of a coaxial cable (or adapter). This is why, if you look inside the gold plated end, you will see the center conductor is a completely different size than the 50 ohm center conductor.

Tek gold plated the 125 ohm ends of these GR connectors to distinguish them from the 50 ohm end. ANY gold plated GR connector is a 125 ohm impedance and guaranteed to be part of the original set of 50 ohm to 125 ohm adapters and tools which came with every 519 in a beautiful mahogany box. I had one of those boxes many years ago. My friend Barrie Gilbert bought it from my friend who had most of the adapters that went with it when Barrie came to my house to pick up his 519.

A picture of the outside of the mahogany box is at

Unfortunately I no longer have a picture of the inside of the box with the adapters.

By the way, the price he is asking for these adapters ($12 each) is ridiculously cheap. DO NOT HESITATE to use his BUY IT NOW option. There are many, many others who will take the extra ones from you for twice what you pay for these four.

Dennis Tillman W7pF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2021 1:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Alert for 519 owners

I need the N50/T125 ones to finish my set of 519 accessories. Anyone want to split these with me if I buy them? I do not need two more T50/T125s.

Sean







--
Dennis Tillman W7pF
TekScopes Moderator


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

I have cleaned thoroughly the entire area with IPA and now I have steady
-2950. This also resolved the problems at the Obama where now I have
Please no politics in the group :)

basically zeroes at pins 2 and 3 and 0.6V at pin 6, the grid bias seating
is changing the U1665 but has no visible impact on the trace.
It looks like your HV supply is in good shape now.

The Z out DC is now 16 to 165V when I regulate this but there is no impact
on the trace
With these new measurements observations are pointing to faulty diodes.


Regarding the timing

I can see triangle wave and pulse on respective outputs and they change
shape /frequency as I change the timing basically making them narrower but
this trend stops and they don't change shape in last few settings but
remain exactly the same.
Flat at what voltage level? Compared to good waveforms are these waveforms at the max/min of the good waveforms are at a different DC voltage?

Ozan


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

The UF4004 vs BAV21.

BAV is same speed with 50ns recovery but 250V, UF4004 is 400V and higher
current at the same speed.

I have BAV21 in stock, I'd have to order in the UF4004s

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 16:46 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:

Behavior of your 485 is changing over time so some of these comments may
not apply to current state of the scope but here is my feedback:

If you look at pins 2 and 3 of U1624 what voltage do you measure
(should
be essentially the same and close to 0V).
Pin 2 is zero pin 3 is 1.9V
This means the regulation loop (U1624) thinks HV voltage is too low and
working as hard as it can to increase the voltage but can't increase
anymore (railed). When you look at pin 6 do you see it railed (>10V)? In
this condition HV supply is not regulated anymore.

I'm not sure what's going on today I turned it on and I measure 2963V on
the HV spot.
However, I also saw this post that now voltage is OK. Did pin 3 also
changed to ~ 0V?

Does the HV voltage change when you turn intensity knob? Maybe there is
some interaction and when you change some settings HV voltage is changing.
Or something might be baking and recovering ...

The Z OUT DC can be controlled from -70 through -170 and finishes around
-50

This should not be possible. If I am not missing a supply connection,
minimum supply of that block is -5V. In normal operation "Z OUT DC" starts
from ~ 14V and goes higher for lower intensity. What voltage do you see at
the left side of R1792 (collector of Q1772)?

Only possibility I can see is a DC path from the HV line, which would also
explain why HV supply is low. Suspect components are C1684, C1664, C1663.
You can also try cleaning the HV area more thoroughly in case there is some
conductive residue.

In almost all the "beam too bright" cases HV diodes were bad so it is a
good idea to replace them all as a good measure. I am not an expert in HV
DC restorers but if you look at past discussions UF4004 was recommended by
Tom as a replacement. A random diode won't work.

For time base issues, in the problematic 3 fastest settings how does the
"A Sweep" and "A gate" signals look? They are easily available at the
back
of the scope with a BNC connection.
Both if the signals don't change past the 10nS setting they stay the same
for 5 2 and 1ns

I assume slower than 5ns you see a pulse at "A gate" and a triangle wave
at "A sweep". In 5/2/1ns are they both flat? Flat at ground or some other
voltage? Is the flat voltage same as the lowest point or highest point of
proper signals (when sweep slower than 5ns)?

Ozan











Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

+75 to +110

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 17:37 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:


The grid bias changes the voltage at TP1665 but does not have any visible
impact on the trace
What voltage range do you see at TP1665 when you change grid bias. No need
to re-measure, just ballpark numbers you remember. Especially the sign,
positive or negative voltage.
Ozan






Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

The HV area is now lot better

I have cleaned thoroughly the entire area with IPA and now I have steady
-2950. This also resolved the problems at the Obama where now I have
basically zeroes at pins 2 and 3 and 0.6V at pin 6, the grid bias seating
is changing the U1665 but has no visible impact on the trace.


The Z out DC is now 16 to 165V when I regulate this but there is no impact
on the trace


Regarding the timing

I can see triangle wave and pulse on respective outputs and they change
shape /frequency as I change the timing basically making them narrower but
this trend stops and they don't change shape in last few settings but
remain exactly the same. Screen is blank or picture drifts in partially
from the side but cannot be centered

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 16:46 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:

Behavior of your 485 is changing over time so some of these comments may
not apply to current state of the scope but here is my feedback:

If you look at pins 2 and 3 of U1624 what voltage do you measure
(should
be essentially the same and close to 0V).
Pin 2 is zero pin 3 is 1.9V
This means the regulation loop (U1624) thinks HV voltage is too low and
working as hard as it can to increase the voltage but can't increase
anymore (railed). When you look at pin 6 do you see it railed (>10V)? In
this condition HV supply is not regulated anymore.

I'm not sure what's going on today I turned it on and I measure 2963V on
the HV spot.
However, I also saw this post that now voltage is OK. Did pin 3 also
changed to ~ 0V?

Does the HV voltage change when you turn intensity knob? Maybe there is
some interaction and when you change some settings HV voltage is changing.
Or something might be baking and recovering ...

The Z OUT DC can be controlled from -70 through -170 and finishes around
-50

This should not be possible. If I am not missing a supply connection,
minimum supply of that block is -5V. In normal operation "Z OUT DC" starts
from ~ 14V and goes higher for lower intensity. What voltage do you see at
the left side of R1792 (collector of Q1772)?

Only possibility I can see is a DC path from the HV line, which would also
explain why HV supply is low. Suspect components are C1684, C1664, C1663.
You can also try cleaning the HV area more thoroughly in case there is some
conductive residue.

In almost all the "beam too bright" cases HV diodes were bad so it is a
good idea to replace them all as a good measure. I am not an expert in HV
DC restorers but if you look at past discussions UF4004 was recommended by
Tom as a replacement. A random diode won't work.

For time base issues, in the problematic 3 fastest settings how does the
"A Sweep" and "A gate" signals look? They are easily available at the
back
of the scope with a BNC connection.
Both if the signals don't change past the 10nS setting they stay the same
for 5 2 and 1ns

I assume slower than 5ns you see a pulse at "A gate" and a triangle wave
at "A sweep". In 5/2/1ns are they both flat? Flat at ground or some other
voltage? Is the flat voltage same as the lowest point or highest point of
proper signals (when sweep slower than 5ns)?

Ozan











Peter Keller Article #file-notice

Paul Humel
 

While surfing the web, I came across this link entitled "Tektronix CRT History" by Peter Keller. It may be of interest to the group.


I'm a newbie here, so I'm not sure if the link above will work. If not, just google Keller Tektronix CRT History October 2006.

Paul Humel


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

The grid bias changes the voltage at TP1665 but does not have any visible
impact on the trace
What voltage range do you see at TP1665 when you change grid bias. No need to re-measure, just ballpark numbers you remember. Especially the sign, positive or negative voltage.
Ozan


Re: Tek 2225 that wont power up after a knock :-(

 

C914 reads as 12uF with an ESR of 1.2 - is that reasonable ???
It is a bit low in capacitance but it is not the reason for the failure. However, I would replace it anyway since you removed it and it was stressed by high voltage.
Ozan


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

I thoroughly cleaned the entire HV area with IPA and now the 2950V is
steady while before it would drift slowly down to 2800 and even further

The grid bias changes the voltage at TP1665 but does not have any visible
impact on the trace

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, 15:54 Mlynch001, <mlynch002@...> wrote:

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:45 AM, Ondrej Pavelka wrote:


On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 22:42 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:




I checked the DC recovery diodes in the HV supply as listed in other
thread

(all under the plastic cover and they are ok.
Any other suggestions?
Note that checking the leakage of those diodes is important, just a DVM
diode check doesn't discover problems.
I would second this part of the post. I had a similar failure on a 475
and traced it to a bad restorer diode. The only way that I was able to
locate the problem was using a 5 On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 22:42 Ozan, <
ozan_g@...> wrote:


I checked the DC recovery diodes in the HV supply as listed in other
thread
(all under the plastic cover and they are ok.
Any other suggestions?
Note that checking the leakage of those diodes is important, just a DVM
diode check doesn't discover problems.

I would second this part of the comment. I had a 475 with a similar
failure and symptoms. A simple DMM diode test showed the diode as ¡°good¡±.
When I removed it and tested it on the 576 curve tracer the problem
became apparent, as soon as I checked it on the CT, it exhibited a very
strange breakdown at higher voltages. So replacing the diode and
associated capacitor with a known good diode and capacitor repaired the
problem.

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR






Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

Behavior of your 485 is changing over time so some of these comments may not apply to current state of the scope but here is my feedback:

If you look at pins 2 and 3 of U1624 what voltage do you measure (should
be essentially the same and close to 0V).
Pin 2 is zero pin 3 is 1.9V
This means the regulation loop (U1624) thinks HV voltage is too low and working as hard as it can to increase the voltage but can't increase anymore (railed). When you look at pin 6 do you see it railed (>10V)? In this condition HV supply is not regulated anymore.

I'm not sure what's going on today I turned it on and I measure 2963V on
the HV spot.
However, I also saw this post that now voltage is OK. Did pin 3 also changed to ~ 0V?

Does the HV voltage change when you turn intensity knob? Maybe there is some interaction and when you change some settings HV voltage is changing. Or something might be baking and recovering ...

The Z OUT DC can be controlled from -70 through -170 and finishes around -50
This should not be possible. If I am not missing a supply connection, minimum supply of that block is -5V. In normal operation "Z OUT DC" starts from ~ 14V and goes higher for lower intensity. What voltage do you see at the left side of R1792 (collector of Q1772)?

Only possibility I can see is a DC path from the HV line, which would also explain why HV supply is low. Suspect components are C1684, C1664, C1663. You can also try cleaning the HV area more thoroughly in case there is some conductive residue.

In almost all the "beam too bright" cases HV diodes were bad so it is a good idea to replace them all as a good measure. I am not an expert in HV DC restorers but if you look at past discussions UF4004 was recommended by Tom as a replacement. A random diode won't work.

For time base issues, in the problematic 3 fastest settings how does the
"A Sweep" and "A gate" signals look? They are easily available at the back
of the scope with a BNC connection.
Both if the signals don't change past the 10nS setting they stay the same for 5 2 and 1ns
I assume slower than 5ns you see a pulse at "A gate" and a triangle wave at "A sweep". In 5/2/1ns are they both flat? Flat at ground or some other voltage? Is the flat voltage same as the lowest point or highest point of proper signals (when sweep slower than 5ns)?

Ozan


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

Well, I'm glad it wasn't my design that was in error. :D

I'm interested in why the opamps popped too, I wonder if there is a bodge that can be added to existing units to protect the opamps from this issue, and maybe be added into the board layout for future board revisions.

I might add a suggestion to socket the opamps in the manual too. At least they are cheap parts to replace...


Jared.


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

most likely the peaks on V+ ( or inputs)? exceeded max for the 741...had it happen a lot on equipment in implanters....we also had walking wounded which would sometimes work and well sometimes do funny things...PIA to find at times so down time and my time was expensive and the part cheap....shotgun approach worked...also adding mov to the supply rails helped.
¸é±ð²Ô¨¦±ð

On 3/17/21 7:04 AM, ebrucehunter via groups.io wrote:
I can only speculate why the 741s didn't like the unfiltered rectifier output as +Vs, but suspect the capacitor at the (+) input may have caused excessive input current as the device was violently cycled. As both 741s failed, there seems to be a weakness. A 741 Spice model might provide insight.

Now to investigate the DM502 and DM504 I haven't used in years and find a source for replacement capacitors.

Bruce, KG6OJI
-----------------
Why did the open filter capacitor destroy the 741s? Surely open filter capacitors is a problem the tester should identify and not itself fail from.

Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)Larry




Re: Very Inexpensive 7623A, but Problems

 

Ozan,

Thanks, that makes a lot more sense now.

I will run through and check all the connections from the LV regulator to the other boards (a nice, easy check that can be done with the power OFF).

I have not tried to adjust R881 at all. I've been coming at this backwards the whole time, mostly because I was distracted by the physical damage to the LV regulator in shipping. I need to be more methodical in my investigation and measurement.

-- Jeff Dutky


Re: 485 super weak brightness control

 

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:45 AM, Ondrej Pavelka wrote:


On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 22:42 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:




I checked the DC recovery diodes in the HV supply as listed in other
thread

(all under the plastic cover and they are ok.
Any other suggestions?
Note that checking the leakage of those diodes is important, just a DVM
diode check doesn't discover problems.
I would second this part of the post. I had a similar failure on a 475 and traced it to a bad restorer diode. The only way that I was able to locate the problem was using a 5 On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, 22:42 Ozan, <ozan_g@...> wrote:


I checked the DC recovery diodes in the HV supply as listed in other
thread
(all under the plastic cover and they are ok.
Any other suggestions?
Note that checking the leakage of those diodes is important, just a DVM
diode check doesn't discover problems.

I would second this part of the comment. I had a 475 with a similar failure and symptoms. A simple DMM diode test showed the diode as ¡°good¡±. When I removed it and tested it on the 576 curve tracer the problem became apparent, as soon as I checked it on the CT, it exhibited a very strange breakdown at higher voltages. So replacing the diode and associated capacitor with a known good diode and capacitor repaired the problem.

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR


Re: PS 5010 troubleshooting (no negative, erratical display)

 

Third update: I made some experiments and found out that, once I let some current flow (200mA), the blinking stops and the display is steady.

Then I tested the module in may "Rack"-TM5006 frame, and to my surprise the display was fine there. Back into the other frame it.... still.... was.... fine!!
I decided to do some alignments and put the module back in the racked frame, this time in the high-power compartment at the right. Well, the display started acting up again, and remained so in both frames! Suspecting the hi-power switch on the module I did the same as I did to the front-back-switch, a lot of actuations. And indeed, that cured the fault.

So my conclusions are:

- the PS5010 is well built and rather precise power supply... :-)
- the linear switches used in many Tek equipments are prone to contact problems that can have all sorts side effects. Actuating all these switches should be the first thing to do when troubleshooting.

I didn't resort to cleaning the switches, just actuating seems to do the job, at least for a good while. If the supply acts up again I know what to do.

cheers
Martin


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

I can only speculate why the 741s didn't like the unfiltered rectifier output as +Vs, but suspect the capacitor at the (+) input may have caused excessive input current as the device was violently cycled. As both 741s failed, there seems to be a weakness. A 741 Spice model might provide insight.

Now to investigate the DM502 and DM504 I haven't used in years and find a source for replacement capacitors.

Bruce, KG6OJI
-----------------
Why did the open filter capacitor destroy the 741s? Surely open filter capacitors is a problem the tester should identify and not itself fail from.

Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)Larry