Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Locked
Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound? FOLLOWUP
Wrong, I think that a poorly secured welding cylinder riding in the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
backseat of a car would easily snuff the life out of you if you ran into something. IMO You would have to be very, very, stupid to carry something like that inside of your car; for a variety of reasons. People have also been known to blow up their cars due to leaking cylinders of acetylene and the like and people have been made sick and probably even killed due to suffocation hazards from gas cylinders in many kinds of enclosed spaces. Regardless, I NEVER carry gas cylinders inside of a car and I would not carry any liquified gas there either. My cylinders get carried, *strapped down*, in the *open* back of a truck or a trailer. No exceptions. The same with hazardous liquids like gasoline, MEK and acetone, etc. BLEVE? No thanks! Among other things, I've had teachers and friends that have seen cylinders dropped and the necks broken off and they have described how far a 200+ pound heavy steel cylinder can fly and the damage that it will do when it gets stopped! BTW I used to live only a few miles from where that Blue Rhino propane plant in Florida caught fire and exploded a few years ago and I watched as it repeatedly exploded a few years ago so I know what even propane can do. Also in around 1974 I was also living quite near Antelope, California when a train load of 500 pound bombs destined for VietNam caught fire and the bombs started exploding! I had returned from VietNam only days before and I instantly knew what that sound was! I do play with explosives and very large fireworks (I'm a member of the largest Pyrotechnics club in the US) as well as welding gasses and various chemicals but you can bet your asz that I THINK about what I'm doing and I don't take unnecessary risks. On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:33 AM Chuck Harris <cfharris@...> wrote:
A poorly serviced dewar full of LN2, riding in the back seat |
Re: Transformation TR503 into TR502
Ed,
I did some tests and I think I understand that the four-cavity BPF filter and the 2095 MHz oscillator are pretty good. I found that by holding a finger on the junction between the 52.5 MHz crystal and the varicap diode the system also works with the 30 Hz resolution set on the SA 7L13 and seems stable. I tried to connect both a resistor (1 Mohm) and capacitors of various capacities to ground at that point, but to no success or causing the crystal to not oscillate. Do you have any ideas for replacing the finger with a circuit solution that gives a similar result ? Thanks for your help. --Cheers Attilio |
Re: Which probe is better suited for 2465B?
Hello: Yes P6137 is the specified for the BW and Cin. Hard to find good one, many junkers out there.
For 50 Ohms use a coax like RG/198/U on a BNC. For probing wideband we use a Zo probe P6156 eg 1K Ohm resistance but very wideband. At 1 kV for HV we use the old P6015, the Freon filled units are all degassed but still can work to 10 kV. Available on epay ~ $50 but check if all parts present. General info is in the Tek Circuit Concepts book, Oscilloscope Probes, highly recommended. Enjoy, Jon |
Continued: 2465B CTT/HPIB/WR TEST 05 fail 42, all CTT fail
Hello again: The continuing saga ... (see my pervious posts re CTT and vet nonlin)
1/ New U400 channel switch 155-0236-00 has fixed the CH1, 2 nonlinearity. 2/ Chuck mentioned that the CTT test fails and TEST 05 FAIL 42 may be due to the U500 trigger hybrid 155-0239-xx, that some may work otherwise but fail in a CTT scope. I have two spares off epay, but exchanging for the original U500 gave no change. Perhaps the epay units also have the same fault? 3/ Today I tested my working 2465B CTT and 2467B CTT and both pass all tests and accurately measure the 10.000 output of a Leo Bodnar GPS. I have now exchanged the working units U500 trigger hybrids into the fault unit, but again no change, all faults still present. 4/ The option board has an EEPROM, could that be the culprit? I have also exchanged it with a working unit and same result. IF I remove the options board and place the 4 jumpers on A1 board, the self-tests without any options pass fine. Any ideas for next steps are appreciated. All the Best, Jon |
Re: Which probe is better suited for 2465B?
Hi Giuseppe
For probing 50 ohm signals it's best to use a simple passive low resistance probe. This also works well for fast logic signals. This will outperform all standard probes. Links to a couple of designs here: It's just a resistor, a length of 50 ohm co-ax and terminate your scope with 50 ohms. On a 2465B there's a switch for this. On lesser instruments you'll need a T and termination. For high voltage you need a probe that is rated for that voltage.The P4100 looks suitable. Just take care around high voltages. If the high voltage comes from a low impedance source, such as a transformer direct from mains/line then it can kill you. I survived the experience but it hurt. A lot. Jeffrey |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
2n4416 JFETs, although not cheap, have been used have been used as clamp diodes to protect the inputs of
ultralow current instruments. Max leakage @20 Volts is 100 pA. Ciss is 4 pF Max. They might be quite fast since the 2n4416 is a VHF amplifier device. |
Re: 54 CA, to fix it or not to fix it, that is the question
Fix it!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I had the same dilemma.? ? Let me just preface what I did by adding that my 545 is my main scope - the one I go to and turn on if I need to look at something.? So I need a working CA.? I had 2 of them.? One had broken and scratchy pots and didn't work, so I at one point I even wrote "for parts" in magic marker across the front, the intent being to use it to fix the other.? Then, my other unit stopped working one day and it turned out the "for parts" unit sort of worked.? So I ended up keeping it and fixing both of them so I have an active spare. ? It helped that A) I can't really "scrap" anything, and am inclined to fix it like the Morlocks, and B) I happened to have some pots from another plug in that I had earlier scrapped for real and C) there is a series of these plug-ins in which the failure mode of the pots is that the plastic around the center shaft cracks, and the set screw can no longer be tightened.? ?I have a lathe so I machined a metal reinforcing ring that holds the pot tight on the shaft.? I bet a skillfully selected piece of tubing or pipe will work too. ? ?I am sure some suitable donors will turn up at a hamfest or on e-bay that are in far worse shape than yours, and they you can scrap that plug in "guilt free" and have two working units in the end. ? Dan On Monday, February 22, 2021, 05:20:09 PM EST, Leon Robinson <leon-robinson@...> wrote:
Number 1 sounds like more fun. If I remember right I think I have a 53/54C out in the storage shed Leon Robinson ?K5JLR -------- Original message -------- From: Joe <The-Lohrbach-Family@...> Date: 02/22/2021? 1:53 PM? (GMT-06:00) To: [email protected] Subject: [TekScopes] 54 CA, to fix it or not to fix it, that is the question Hello, sorting some of my plug-ins in very different condition I have come across the following "almost twins": 1. A well known CA plug-in, in working order, has always been a good work horse with my 545B 2. A 54CA plug-in, once bought in a bundle for parts. Wiring etc looks rather similar - but not in detail! - to the CA unit, and at least all tubes and the two-potentiometer-combo at the rear faceplate are missing. So now I have three choices: 1. Look for the pots and fix it. I think I should have all necessary tubes. 2. Keep and leave it as it is to have the parts at hand if I ever needed to repair the CA. 3. Sell it, because CAs never die. I have just created a photo album showing the questioned items and would like to hear some opinions. Thanks in advance! Regards, Joe |
Which probe is better suited for 2465B?
Got the scope without probes,
Is getting a couple of P6137 the right ones to be used as a general purpose probes? What about HF/VHF/UHF 50Ohm signals? Could I tap these with a dummy load or do I need 50 Ohm specific probes/cables? I also need to measure about 900-1100VDC and I was thinking to use el-cheapo P4100 Probes. Any recommendation about it? TIA Giuseppe Marullo IW2JWW - JN45RQ |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
Chuck Harris wrote:
A cousin gave me a broken 12 transistor radio when we were kids.My family visited Florida the first time in '66, when I was 13. Two of my cousins got into a fight, and one threw their dad's transistor radio at the other. Parts went everywhere! The two boys were stunned that I could just look at the pieces and broken wires to put it back together, and make it work before their dad found out. The older brother was my age. He was so intrigued that he developed an interest in Electronics. After High School he worked for his EE degree, and went to work for Northern Telcom. |
Locked
Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound? FOLLOWUP
Chuck Harris
A poorly serviced dewar full of LN2, riding in the back seat
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
of your car, will quite easily snuff your life out, without you ever even knowing there is a problem... Your welding gas cylinders won't do that. -Chuck Harris - wrote: I have welding equipment including Oxy-Acetylene and Helium, CO2 and |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
Chuck Harris
A cousin gave me a broken 12 transistor radio when we were kids.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Being a junior electrical engineer in training, I couldn't help but tear it apart to see what made it tick... or rather, not tick... Inspection showed that the transistors were grouped in pairs, one marked, one unmarked. Further inspection showed that the pairs were in parallel. Measuring the transistors showed that the marked transistors behaved just like transistors, but the unmarked transistors were open circuit. A pair of pliers revealed that the unmarked transistor cans were empty. I learned a lot about the world from that 12/6 transistor radio! -Chuck Harris Tom Lee wrote: Jim Williams found an even more shameless example, where there were two dead transistors soldered to ... nothing. But they were counted in the AM radio advertisement. |
Re: Help replacing a resistor/inductor in SG503
The last place I worked had two schemes (technically three, but those products were pretty much dead by the time I got there.? The two part numbers systems were supposed to be kept separate, but over time they started to co-mingle on new products.? Then we bought two Israeli companies that were eventually merged; it was a real mess, but the best thing we did was insist that they convert their systems to our primary one.? There were a few snafus, but it went pretty smoothly, all things considered.??
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Another issue we had was that our main assembly house would append their own codes (suffixes) to our part numbers, and so all correspondence from them had to have the codes stripped off before data could be entered back into our master scheduling database.?? 12 digits in a row is nuts; you're just asking for all sorts of problems! -Dave On Monday, February 22, 2021, 03:53:11 PM PST, Michael A. Terrell <terrell.michael.a@...> wrote:
Jim Ford wrote: Worst I ever saw was at Powerwave Technologies back in the early 2000's.? With the many acquisitions, they ended up with about a half dozen schemes, XXX-XXXXX, XXXX-XXXX, XXX-XXXXX-XXX, etc. And the worst of all, XXXXXXXXXXXX; yep, that really was 12 digits in a row with no dashes!? At least XXXX-XXXX-XXXX would have been tolerable.? C'mon, man!Probably createted by an MBA who had never even seen the \actual components. |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
Hey, at least you're talking about a scope, Ozan. Some of us pushed the boundaries quite a lot lately with our discussion of part numbering schemes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jim Ford ------ Original Message ------
From: "Ozan" <ozan_g@...> To: [email protected] Sent: 2/22/2021 9:28:15 PM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute? Keithley 616 has the MOSFET protection scheme Ed described. I checked my Keithley 196, it uses JFETs for protection diodes. |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
Keithley 616 has the MOSFET protection scheme Ed described. I checked my Keithley 196, it uses JFETs for protection diodes.
I know I am going off topic but Heathkit IO-4235 oscilloscope has a "feature" that blows up B-E junction of power supply BJT Q101(and releasing the magic smoke of couple of zeners with it) if not loaded. Ozan |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
jerry finn
The Heath IO-103 Oscope used L842 (or 2N3854) in a C-E config as input protection for vert and hori channels.?
This scope had a variety of problems that I won't go into here, but one problem was related to a few of those transistors not providing consistent performance (capacitance and breakdown voltages).? I think I finally got that fixed.? Other serous problems included hori-vert channel cross coupling, excessive vert? thermal drift, and a few others.? A litany of design errors.? The only Heathkit that truly disappointed me, of the more than 14 kits I built. |
Re: 2N3904 B-E junction as fast diode substitute?
Ed,
I swear that I remember seeing exactly the same model radio! I think it was sold in Woolworth's. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:02 PM Leon Robinson <leon-robinson@...> wrote:
|
Locked
Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound? FOLLOWUP
I have welding equipment including Oxy-Acetylene and Helium, CO2 and
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
25/75 gas for MIG and TIG and the same companies sell all of that also sell liquified gasses so I doubt that I'd have any trouble getting liquid N2. Liquid O2, possibly, but not liquid N2 which in realtively inert and doesn't support combustion. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 9:31 PM Chuck Harris <cfharris@...> wrote:
The large dewars are nice, but they have to have a very hard vacuum |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss