¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

Folks!
VI... Ouch!That is the lamest of the Text editors. I know that lots of
folks here will shout at me, saying that it's perfect!
I can even acknowledge... as we know that when someone gets used to any
command line interface that it kills any GUI but... c'mon!
Well, I`m a dinosaur, and even me could never get used to THAT! command
line interface!

I have used Ventura Publisher (was fine) and Page Maker (Very good), but
those were really pro tools, meant for people who worked on the Print Shops
and serious graphical publishing.
They were meant for people who would import the raw text (typed as plain
text) and then would apply, in a structured way, all the formatting and
styling templates.
When done this way, you would see their advantage, but when one would just
jump at it to do a one time work... It was even worse than Word.
Word, despite coming from the evil MS, does quite a decent job at doing, at
once, text editting AND Desktop Publishing.

I never tried in a more involved fashion, but I think that any Open License
Text editor of nowadays, like Star Office or Libre-Office, probably do a
good job as much as Word.

Rgrds,

Fabio




2018-04-03 22:08 GMT-03:00 Mark Wendt <wendt.mark@...>:

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 21:04 snapdiode via Groups.Io <snapdiode=
[email protected]> wrote:

Well he agreed to attribute it to me. I guess that settles whether it s
my
PDF or not.
I'm not looking for money, but I did it with Word. Word!

BTW if anyone can suggest a better tool to "Desktop publish" (remember
when that was the killer app?) I'd love hear it.
vi? ;-)

Mark




Re: TM504 11.4 volt reading at over 14 volts

 

Thanks chuck :)


Re: Desk Top Publishing ...After this lets take this off line

 

There are desktop publishers and there are desk top publishers...what are you mainly planning on doing? More? clean up scans like the 1S1 or write a book? Is your personal time valuable ( i.e. are you willing to spend money on software that makes the task easier and faster)

-DC
manuals@...

On 4/3/2018 9:04 PM, snapdiode via Groups.Io wrote:
Well he agreed to attribute it to me. I guess that settles whether it s my PDF or not.
I'm not looking for money, but I did it with Word. Word!

BTW if anyone can suggest a better tool to "Desktop publish" (remember when that was the killer app?) I'd love to hear it.


--
Dave
Manuals@...
www.ArtekManuals.com


Re: 485 power supply switching transistors Q1834 and Q1844

 

I want to thank EVERYONE. Wow. I'm operating above my pay-grade working on these and between the manual (theory of operation) and your suggestions I will be awhile understanding what's going on. At least a little bit. But then that's why I enjoy this it's a learning exercise. I have some specific tech questions but want to mull things over some more and will ask in a new thread with an appropriate subject.

I actually have two 485 both inop. Both blew fuses but the other stopped with replacement of the big caps; this one obviously is still not happy. I think I'm going to button this one up for now (I'm short on space) and focus on the other.

Just for future Googlers:

2N6308 is listed obsolete and not in stock at Digikey or Mouser; but TEDSS.com has them reasonable and they're all over eBay. TEDDS sometimes has stuff and I've had good service. I may get a handful cause they're cheap and apparently oem so how bad can they be.
BU208A is listed obsolete if at all and not in stock but also eBay and plentiful.

So thanks again. I'll jot this all down in the notebook and be back with questions on the 'at least it don't blow the fuse up' scope after more book study.


Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 21:04 snapdiode via Groups.Io <snapdiode=
[email protected]> wrote:

Well he agreed to attribute it to me. I guess that settles whether it s my
PDF or not.
I'm not looking for money, but I did it with Word. Word!

BTW if anyone can suggest a better tool to "Desktop publish" (remember
when that was the killer app?) I'd love hear it.
vi? ;-)

Mark


Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

Well he agreed to attribute it to me. I guess that settles whether it s my PDF or not.
I'm not looking for money, but I did it with Word. Word!

BTW if anyone can suggest a better tool to "Desktop publish" (remember when that was the killer app?) I'd love to hear it.


Re: TM504 11.4 volt reading at over 14 volts

Chuck Harris
 

This is normal behavior.

The 11.4V is an unregulated supply, and is
expected to be high when unloaded, and to be
about 11.4V when fully loaded, and at the
minimum power line voltage.

-Chuck Harris

lop pol via Groups.Io wrote:

Adding a plugin dropped the voltage to 13.2V


Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

Thanks all.


Re: OT: my mail address may be blacklisted (Attn: Fabio Trevisan & Phillip Potter)

 

Max

There are a a handful of companies that collect and publish lists and/or software that automatically for a local ISP block known spammers. If a major email provider like GMAIL shows up hosting too many spammers then these companies often take the approach of black listing ALL gmail addresses as the cheap and easy way out. Their stated position is that gmail has a moral responsibility to police who it gives an account to. My web hosting company 1and1.com hosts web sites very inexpensively and like gmail attracts spammers.? The SPAM list collectors sometimes focus on IP addresses and not the actual email senders. Again a cheap and easy way for hosting companies to cut down on the volume of useless traffic which costs them money. A couple of times a month I find myself on certain spam blacklists to certain receiving ISPs ( Free.FR is one of the worst at appointing themselves as their customers censor ...ironically the free.fr server is in Germany ...are you getting the message France?). About 20 years ago at the dawn of SPAM I had a small consulting company. I was using a small local ISP provider at the time. They put in one of the spammer blocker systems in without notifying the customer base. In the end they blocked email from a prospective client without my knowledge or permission and in the end cost me a 5 figure consulting contract. I sued them and they quickly settled out of court ( I suspect funded in part by the SPAM list software vendor) on the condition that I accept a a defacto gag order and not name names publicly. I accepted the money and then promptly changed ISP's no one should independently decide who you get email from IMO. Someday the industry will find a way to manage the problem the safest way is to police your own email and use filtering or tagging of your choice IMO

Good luck
-DC
manuals@...


On 4/3/2018 9:57 AM, unclebanjoman wrote:
I don't know really why that happens. My e-mail address is active by 20 years.
I'm using the same (paid) server since then. Only in last three/four months I've noted that very irritating inconvenience.

Max

Dave

Manuals@...
www.ArtekManuals.com


Re: OT: my mail address may be blacklisted (Attn: Fabio Trevisan & Phillip Potter)

 

Max,
Ah, sorry, I just replied to you in PM, so the rest of the group won't see it.
I did receive your private message some 2 weeks ago and I replied to it.
I use gmail and your message didn't fall on the spam folder.
I just forwarded that reply from two weeks ago again to you. Lets see if you receive it.
Rgrds,
Fabio


Re: TM504 11.4 volt reading at over 14 volts

 

Adding a plugin dropped the voltage to 13.2V


Re: Repairing a Tektronix 2445B ... (ARG)

 

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 10:29 Siggi <siggi@...> wrote:

Hey there fgswww(?),
Ah, Fernando it is, my apologies for not noticing your name in the from:
field.


Look at page 6-13 of the service manual, where it describes the "Kernel
Tests" and "Exerciser Routines". The front panel LEDs likely have a message
for you relating to the specific failure the MPU has detected.
If you can post a video of the front panel as the scope is powered on, we
could help decipher the message, and/or verify your decoding...

NB: My 2430 was in a bad way - eventually I found it was bad RAM. It gave
me occasion to exercise the MPU diagnostic jumper. On the 2445B, that'd be
P503. When you flip it to the "DIAG" setting, the MPU reads a NOP
instruction hard-wired to the data bus. This causes the MPU to generate
read cycles for the entire address space, which allows you to verify that
the MPU is working to some extent, and to verify the address decoding logic
against a repeating access pattern.

Do you have a second scope to turn on your 2445B?


TM504 11.4 volt reading at over 14 volts

 

No ripple just voltage is too high. Any ideas?


Re: - Early Telequipment 'Scope

jim
 

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018, 1:35:15 PM PDT, Leslie Austin <Manxduke@...> wrote:

Adrian, I was unaware of the "facelift", certainly never seen anything
looking earlier than a stock S31 or D31.

I used to have a C1 calibrator, but now have a C3.

Les.


Just for fun, I did a search thru the Wireless World collection on "Americanradiohistory.com" for the years 1950-1960.tLotsa pictures in the new equipment blurbs about telequipment ...I've got a D54 that I used for years ...now shelved ...
Jim


Re: - Early Telequipment 'Scope

 

Adrian, I was unaware of the "facelift", certainly never seen anything looking earlier than a stock S31 or D31.

I used to have a C1 calibrator, but now have a C3.

Les.

On 03/04/18 20:35, Adrian wrote:
Hi Les,

Thanks for the informative reply! First - serial numbers, not on the back but? yes, stamped into a lower chassis rail is "666." (that number, I hope, is not an omen!) and hand written and varnished over on the power transformer is "58666". Until I find out different I'm assuming 58 could be the year and 666 the serial number. If so then that would probably make this one of the last 'pre-facelift' Serviscopes produced and whether they called it an S31 at that point I don't know.

It is very similar in physical construction to an S31 and the only schematic differences I've spotted so far between the S31 and what I see in front of me are: No series anode resistors on the rectifier (EZ81), slight asymmetry between the +ve and -ve 'Y' amp input stages (ECF80s) in terms of the anode and grid biasing arrangements and the input attenuator is 'missing' the probe matching trimmer caps.

I just won an equally beat-up S31 which I'm collecting on Friday so I'll do a compare and contrast when I get it home. I also got a TQ 'C1' Scope Calibrator a few weeks back - Serial number 3 - so an early model as well!? I've got that working nicely too, in fact you can just see part of it's chassis, the covers are going out for painting, in the picture of the scope which is displaying it's output.

As far as the Tek involvement goes, the article in TekTalk announcing the addition of Telequipment to Tektronix is dated Spring 1967 so about then I guess?

True double beam? Yes, when I made the move to Electronics Technician at the Cavendish labs in the late '60s one of the first things I was handed was a heap of dead or dying? D43s - they had dozens and dozens of them in the teaching and research labs - to repair/recalibrate. A very nice instrument for the money but fried themselves all the time. Convection cooling is nice and quiet but sadly just not adequate for continuous use!

I hope we can find out more early history, I wonder if there are any ex Telequipment folk out there because it would be great to get it written down.

All the best,
Adrian


On 4/3/2018 7:28 PM, Leslie Austin wrote:
That is an interesting scope you have there Adrian. I have seen or owned many S31 scopes, but that one is different to anything I have seen. There seem to be many differences, but without doubt it is either a prototype or an early model unknown to me. Every one I have seen had a serial number on the back, does this? Every S31 (and S32, S32A, D32, S/D33, S/D43, D*53*) I have seen had two covers, inverted L shape, with two screws retaining handle and sides. I have never seen WHITE OEM knobs!

I had a rather special device, obviously based on the S31, but it was a TV monochrome CRT tester. The rear panel had been "turned around" so that the S31 ID info was on the inside. Different transformer clearly different circuit, and all valves had been removed. I decided it was a project to be "analysed", and I used to bring it out on Christmas day to kill time, but as so often happens, it never got finalised. I offered it FOC on a UK forum, got an assurance it would be "completed", but 12months later found it had? had the CRT removed and the rest scrapped. Hmm!

But back to TQ generally. I don't know when the takeover took place, but by 1968, Tek were certainly getting involved. I have here a conversion list of TQ part numbers, for example, the mains transformer for the S31 had been part number T1, but now became 150-0071-00, which is clearly a Tek part number. The list is dated May 1968.

It is interesting to look at the front of TQ scopes. Early models clearly fitted with UK sourced knobs; Mostly black with some red "outers" with stacked controls. Common from S31 thro to the DM53A, but from the DM64 (terrible 'scope, TEK CRT), D*63, D65/66/67, D75, D83 they all had US sourced TEK knobs, and knob prices shot up!

There is a 1973 US version catalogue of Telequipment scopes available online, the knob styles can be clearly seen there.

Every TQ scope from S31 had TRIGGERED sweep, until then all cheaper UK scopes were non-triggered. That is what made them so useful for any decent TV repair shop, and affordable.

TQ also produced suitably modified scopes for the US firm Perkin-Elmer. A variation of the S51 was produced as a heart monitor. I think I still have a bare board for one, and some circuitry for it.

C.M. Jones referred to his D31, with true dual gun/beam tube. Quite a few of the early "D" scopes had dual guns, most with single timebase but dual Y-amps. There were however the D55, D55A and D56 which had true dual guns, dual Y amps, AND dual timebases!

Earlier I referred to the DM64, with its lousy TEK bistable CRT. However TQ produced the D53S, DM53A and the DM63. These were REAL storage scopes with variable persistence, all using GEC storage tubes. They were quality, and on a DM53A I could store a trace, switch off the scope, and switch back on a couple of MONTHS later, with the trace still stored!

I used to buy, service, calibrate and sell scopes from 1979 for about 10 years. I quickly learned that anything with valves, other than TQ or TEK were best left to others, stuff like Hartley, and Advance reminded me of some Pye Colour TVs, terrible.

I still have a few service docs on the late '60s and 70s TQ scopes, and if an S31 landed in front of me now, I would enjoy servicing and calibrating it.

Les.


On 03/04/18 14:34, Adrian wrote:
So once upon a time, in Olde Merrie England, there was a company that produced cheap but adequate oscilloscopes which they sold around the world. Then, one day they decided to remodel them to make them more appealing to their cousins in a land far away across the sea. This must have worked because a few years later one of their cousins, a Mr Tek Tronix, sailed all the way across the sea to England and bought the entire company!

Ahem, sorry!...... Meanwhile, back at the point.... I acquired a basket case of an early (pre '58 facelift) Serviscope which may be either an early S31 or a forerunner of it. This example had obviously done service as a parts mule prior to being stored carefully for a decade or two in the corner of a particularly wet and muddy field. After spending way more hours and money than it will ever be worth in a million years it is pretty much up and running and, as it is devoid of its case, I would like to find a picture so I can re-make a reasonable facsimile of it.

In more detail, the thing is very close in both appearance and schematic to an S31. It is constructed in a point-to-point way with tag-strip and not a PCB in sight. The front panel is finished in silver (was once anyway!) hammer finish paint with white legends and black & white knobs. From the looks of it the case must have been a 5-sided box a la the S51 and was retained by two 1/4 turn fasteners on the rear panel.

Some pix here: /g/TekScopes/album?id=42175 Please ignore the tacked-on components, they were just to get it going and will be replaced with more authentic looking parts shortly. The chassis mounted caps and selenium rectifiers have been hollowed out and re-filled already!

From my use of google at least, information on Telequipment Ltd and
its products prior to the product facelift and subsequent takeover seems scarce, most of the very little I know has been thanks to the VintageTek museum page and a link to the spring '67 article in TekTalk about the acquisition. Bob Haas and Dave Brown at VintageTek have been really helpful and burrowed around their archives but not found anything. I was wondering if anyone in this group may know, or could point me at, people who could help fill in the gap. Apart from anything else Telequipment is a bit of UK industrial history that should not be lost?

...and if you have been, thanks for reading!
Best,
Adrian






Re: tektronics 2465b 400mhz nvram battery info

 

HI mirco,
Both ramlow.dat and ramhigh.dat are 8k in size, each of these programs copies half of the nvram.
Please copy ramlow.dat into the new nvram to be used for replacement, remove u2360 or u2260( eprom) from a5 board which contains the scope firmware andreplace the eprom with new nvram with ramlow.dat programmed into it .Turn the machine on, after 2 to 3minutes (copy should only take 100ms), short pin 1 and 2 on the 6802 cpu (u2140), to force Non maskable interrupt(NMI) for cpu.While shorting these two pins, also move jumper p503 to "diag" position to force cpu reset. The scope is then powered off. The last two steps prior to scope turn off may not be necessary, but are precautionary, in case with power down, brown out causes erratic read/write cpu behaviour.
The above procedure is repeated with ramhigh.dat. Remember to unshort pins 1 and 2 of cpu and put p503 back to "norm" position prior to restarting the scope, with the second program.
The old nvram contents (which contains the cal data) can be found in the new nvram starting at location 200hex. to 11FFhex inclusive. Both the ramlow.dat and ramhigh.dat programs copy the old nvram data into these locations.
For the next steps use a PC with a hex editor to combine the lower 1000hex bytes (obtained using ramlow.dat program) and upper 1000hex bytes data (using ramhigh.dat program) together. To combine the lower 1000 hex bytes with the upper 1000 hex bytes, simply append the upper 1000H bytes to lower 1000H bytes so the new combined data file will be 2000H bytes long. 2000 Hex bytes is the size of the nvram, Location 0 of the combined data needs to be copied to address 0 on nvram and last byte at position 1fff of the combined data needs to be copied to address location 1fff of the nvram.

hope it helps
Cheers
Das


Re: - Early Telequipment 'Scope

 

Hi Les,

Thanks for the informative reply! First - serial numbers, not on the back but? yes, stamped into a lower chassis rail is "666." (that number, I hope, is not an omen!) and hand written and varnished over on the power transformer is "58666". Until I find out different I'm assuming 58 could be the year and 666 the serial number. If so then that would probably make this one of the last 'pre-facelift' Serviscopes produced and whether they called it an S31 at that point I don't know.

It is very similar in physical construction to an S31 and the only schematic differences I've spotted so far between the S31 and what I see in front of me are: No series anode resistors on the rectifier (EZ81), slight asymmetry between the +ve and -ve 'Y' amp input stages (ECF80s) in terms of the anode and grid biasing arrangements and the input attenuator is 'missing' the probe matching trimmer caps.

I just won an equally beat-up S31 which I'm collecting on Friday so I'll do a compare and contrast when I get it home. I also got a TQ 'C1' Scope Calibrator a few weeks back - Serial number 3 - so an early model as well!? I've got that working nicely too, in fact you can just see part of it's chassis, the covers are going out for painting, in the picture of the scope which is displaying it's output.

As far as the Tek involvement goes, the article in TekTalk announcing the addition of Telequipment to Tektronix is dated Spring 1967 so about then I guess?

True double beam? Yes, when I made the move to Electronics Technician at the Cavendish labs in the late '60s one of the first things I was handed was a heap of dead or dying? D43s - they had dozens and dozens of them in the teaching and research labs - to repair/recalibrate. A very nice instrument for the money but fried themselves all the time. Convection cooling is nice and quiet but sadly just not adequate for continuous use!

I hope we can find out more early history, I wonder if there are any ex Telequipment folk out there because it would be great to get it written down.

All the best,
Adrian

On 4/3/2018 7:28 PM, Leslie Austin wrote:
That is an interesting scope you have there Adrian. I have seen or owned many S31 scopes, but that one is different to anything I have seen. There seem to be many differences, but without doubt it is either a prototype or an early model unknown to me. Every one I have seen had a serial number on the back, does this? Every S31 (and S32, S32A, D32, S/D33, S/D43, D*53*) I have seen had two covers, inverted L shape, with two screws retaining handle and sides. I have never seen WHITE OEM knobs!

I had a rather special device, obviously based on the S31, but it was a TV monochrome CRT tester. The rear panel had been "turned around" so that the S31 ID info was on the inside. Different transformer clearly different circuit, and all valves had been removed. I decided it was a project to be "analysed", and I used to bring it out on Christmas day to kill time, but as so often happens, it never got finalised. I offered it FOC on a UK forum, got an assurance it would be "completed", but 12months later found it had? had the CRT removed and the rest scrapped. Hmm!

But back to TQ generally. I don't know when the takeover took place, but by 1968, Tek were certainly getting involved. I have here a conversion list of TQ part numbers, for example, the mains transformer for the S31 had been part number T1, but now became 150-0071-00, which is clearly a Tek part number. The list is dated May 1968.

It is interesting to look at the front of TQ scopes. Early models clearly fitted with UK sourced knobs; Mostly black with some red "outers" with stacked controls. Common from S31 thro to the DM53A, but from the DM64 (terrible 'scope, TEK CRT), D*63, D65/66/67, D75, D83 they all had US sourced TEK knobs, and knob prices shot up!

There is a 1973 US version catalogue of Telequipment scopes available online, the knob styles can be clearly seen there.

Every TQ scope from S31 had TRIGGERED sweep, until then all cheaper UK scopes were non-triggered. That is what made them so useful for any decent TV repair shop, and affordable.

TQ also produced suitably modified scopes for the US firm Perkin-Elmer. A variation of the S51 was produced as a heart monitor. I think I still have a bare board for one, and some circuitry for it.

C.M. Jones referred to his D31, with true dual gun/beam tube. Quite a few of the early "D" scopes had dual guns, most with single timebase but dual Y-amps. There were however the D55, D55A and D56 which had true dual guns, dual Y amps, AND dual timebases!

Earlier I referred to the DM64, with its lousy TEK bistable CRT. However TQ produced the D53S, DM53A and the DM63. These were REAL storage scopes with variable persistence, all using GEC storage tubes. They were quality, and on a DM53A I could store a trace, switch off the scope, and switch back on a couple of MONTHS later, with the trace still stored!

I used to buy, service, calibrate and sell scopes from 1979 for about 10 years. I quickly learned that anything with valves, other than TQ or TEK were best left to others, stuff like Hartley, and Advance reminded me of some Pye Colour TVs, terrible.

I still have a few service docs on the late '60s and 70s TQ scopes, and if an S31 landed in front of me now, I would enjoy servicing and calibrating it.

Les.


On 03/04/18 14:34, Adrian wrote:
So once upon a time, in Olde Merrie England, there was a company that produced cheap but adequate oscilloscopes which they sold around the world. Then, one day they decided to remodel them to make them more appealing to their cousins in a land far away across the sea. This must have worked because a few years later one of their cousins, a Mr Tek Tronix, sailed all the way across the sea to England and bought the entire company!

Ahem, sorry!...... Meanwhile, back at the point.... I acquired a basket case of an early (pre '58 facelift) Serviscope which may be either an early S31 or a forerunner of it. This example had obviously done service as a parts mule prior to being stored carefully for a decade or two in the corner of a particularly wet and muddy field. After spending way more hours and money than it will ever be worth in a million years it is pretty much up and running and, as it is devoid of its case, I would like to find a picture so I can re-make a reasonable facsimile of it.

In more detail, the thing is very close in both appearance and schematic to an S31. It is constructed in a point-to-point way with tag-strip and not a PCB in sight. The front panel is finished in silver (was once anyway!) hammer finish paint with white legends and black & white knobs. From the looks of it the case must have been a 5-sided box a la the S51 and was retained by two 1/4 turn fasteners on the rear panel.

Some pix here: /g/TekScopes/album?id=42175 Please ignore the tacked-on components, they were just to get it going and will be replaced with more authentic looking parts shortly. The chassis mounted caps and selenium rectifiers have been hollowed out and re-filled already!

From my use of google at least, information on Telequipment Ltd and
its products prior to the product facelift and subsequent takeover seems scarce, most of the very little I know has been thanks to the VintageTek museum page and a link to the spring '67 article in TekTalk about the acquisition. Bob Haas and Dave Brown at VintageTek have been really helpful and burrowed around their archives but not found anything. I was wondering if anyone in this group may know, or could point me at, people who could help fill in the gap. Apart from anything else Telequipment is a bit of UK industrial history that should not be lost?

...and if you have been, thanks for reading!
Best,
Adrian




Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

You're describing the F7523A1 MOD WQ Test Set, a.k.a. TS-43531U. The
assembly of plugins/mainframe has its own Tek manual.

Dave Casey

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Craig Sawyers <c.sawyers@...
wrote:
Hi Dennis

Just been looking at that exceptionally extensive list. There are versions
of the SG505 and AA501 that
aren't listed:

SG505 MOD WQ
SG505 MOD WR
AA501A MOD WQ

These all fit together in a power frame with specific rear interface
connections to link them all
together into a measurement suite.

I have photos, and partial schematics of the SG505 versions.

Craig

My apologies.
The correct link is


Dennis Tillman W7PF





Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

Craig Sawyers
 

Hi Dennis

Just been looking at that exceptionally extensive list. There are versions of the SG505 and AA501 that
aren't listed:

SG505 MOD WQ
SG505 MOD WR
AA501A MOD WQ

These all fit together in a power frame with specific rear interface connections to link them all
together into a measurement suite.

I have photos, and partial schematics of the SG505 versions.

Craig

My apologies.
The correct link is


Dennis Tillman W7PF


Re: Your opinion on using other people's work

 

That's what I thought.

Thanks.

DaveD

On 4/3/2018 12:37 PM, John Griessen wrote:
On 04/03/2018 01:03 PM, Dave Daniel wrote:
If one does that, is there a way to keep people from making money on the product without spending a lot of money on legal fees?
No. Copyright is a "right to sue" is all.

For recouping the cost of a rare 7000 manual, the best route would be to ask on this list for a group of interested
folks to share the cost of scanning it and deliver them the results with an agreement that it is rights reserved derivative copyright and not www publish it.