Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: 7844
I have one of those. Real work of art.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Peter On Mar 23, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Martin Mehlhose murks24@... [TekScopes] <TekScopes@...> wrote: |
Re: 7844
opt.78 Looks perfekt with a smoke filter from Tek,
see greetings Martin Gesendet von Windows Mail Von: TekScopes@... Gesendet: ?Mittwoch?, ?23?. ?M?rz? ?2016 ?13?:?02 An: TekScopes@... So who grabbed the really nice deal on the 7844 OPT 78 that just sold on eBay? Hope it was one of y'all! Nathan KK4REY Sent using CloudMagic Email [] |
Re: Updated SG504 Head 2 Head comparison
Optimized the layout to increase ground planes. Determined fixed resistor 'calibration' values that work within the LM358 offset spec. Retuned the ref diode schottky input network as I am using different detectors. Used a 18 AWG enamelled wire 1.5cm long to feed the BNC output direct from the PCB. Established rigid 'coax' shield coverage for this 18 AWG signal wire. Established rigid 'coax' shielding for the input as well via the BNC PCB mount grounded to dual ground planes.
|
Re: TDS 54x Acquisition troubleshooting
Keep looking for corrosion damage like a component connection or opened run, or remaining crud (especially on/between IC leads) that you may have missed. An old toothbrush is good for scrubbing. It's best to wash the board again after removing the old caps, before putting in the new ones. Also, double check the polarities to be sure none are backwards.
I went through the same thing a while back - fortunately, it worked after thorough washing and scrubbing. I have stripped all the old Al SMT caps but not yet installed the replacement Ta ones - it works as-is, even without them. Ed |
Re: 7844
Craig Sawyers
No;) I didn't grab it, was asking who... Hoping it was somebody here... I was still trying toconvince the "finance committee". I do have an eBay search set for Tektronix Opt 78... Just think the blue iscool. Nathan KK4REYThe blue is surprisingly hard to look at. The eye does not focus particularly well on it, and the eye is less sensitive to blue as compared with regular green phosphor - so fast signals are significantly fainter (to the eye) with blue. It was intended for photographic attachments, since the polaroid film used was more sensitive to blue (as compared with green). I have a 7904 with a reduced scan CRT and blue phosphor for those wanting the ultimate in photographic writing speed - but it is impossible to look at for any length of time! I keep it as a rare curiosity. Craig |
Re: Timebase and CRT Issues on Tektronix Type 545A
Hi Alex,
You may have luck by visual inspection for bad components. I prefer a more systematic approach. You didn' t mention whether or not you have another scope to do measurements in th 545A? In the A generator schematic C180 + switch is shown in a dashed box, merely as "placeholder" for the actual set of hold-off capacitors (shown at A Timing Switch schematic). There is no indication that the A sweep "hangs". It might well be that the sweep circuits are at rest and are waiting for a trigger signal which never comes. I mean, the fault could be in the trigger circuits. (The troubleshooting text assumes that the trigger circuits are properly free running while the sweep circuits don' t respond to that.) I would first try to correct the B sweep since there the fault is not in the trigger circuits sine you have at least something like a trace. You never mentioned the effect of the front panel B Sweep Length knob (note that time base A only has an internal sweep length adjustment). B sweep length can be reduced to about 4 cm, that' s roughly what you have. B sweep has no front panel output like the A sweep, but you can safely measure the sweep signal at the kathode of V283B. If you don' t have a scope for that, then simply use a DMM while you set the speed very slow at 5 s/cm. If the amplitude is correct (some 150 V peak-peak) then the fault is somewhere later on, either in the horizontal display switch or in the horizontal amplifier. You showed 2 pictures with reference to time base A. Maybe you meant a channel of the vertical plugin (since time base A didn't work at all)? The second picture probably shows high frequency oscillation somewhere. But leave that for later... BTW did you already rotate all switches and pots many(!) times through there ranges? Albert |
Re: 7844
No;) I didn't grab it, was asking who... Hoping it was somebody here... I
was still trying to convince the "finance committee". I do have an eBay search set for Tektronix Opt 78... Just think the blue is cool. Nathan KK4REY Sent using CloudMagic Email [] On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 15:37, Craig Sawyers' c.sawyers@... [TekScopes] <TekScopes@...> wrote: > So who grabbed the really nice deal on the 7844 OPT 78 that just sold on eBay? They are a good and unique capability scope. Looks like some cosmetic things need sorting out, and I hope that it arrives OK and without damage. I bought mine 3 years ago for the same sort of price in the UK (40), and like yours it has a blue phosphor CRT. Let us know how it goes Crai ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links |
Re: 7844
Craig Sawyers
So who grabbed the really nice deal on the 7844 OPT 78 that just sold on eBay?They are a good and unique capability scope. Looks like some cosmetic things need sorting out, and I hope that it arrives OK and without damage. I bought mine 3 years ago for the same sort of price in the UK (?40), and like yours it has a blue phosphor CRT. Let us know how it goes Crai |
Re: Those funny 311-0603-00 pots
I've used qservice in the past without trouble. I'm in Montreal, which
although in Quebec, still remains part of Canada. Maybe you can email them to work out postage? On Wed, Mar 23, 2016, 07:05 snapdiode@... [TekScopes] < TekScopes@...> wrote:
|
Re: Those funny 311-0603-00 pots
Sorry, I did not realize you were in Canada -- I went and searched for
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
shipping in the US. If you are near the border you could get it shipped to one of those drop-box places or a friend for around $5 or $6. But it's a pain with our 75? Canuk buck and outrageous shipping charges. So some CDN alternatives: you can get Permapoxy Plastic Bonder at Crappy Tire. It is a similar chemical but I've never personally tried it or the JB Weld version on nylon. I did a test one time and found the Permapoxy to be a stronger bond than JB Weld Plastic Bonder (Crappy Tire or Home Hardware) on acrylic. All the above are around CDN $10 plus tax. Comparing the literature, Locktite Plastic Bonder specifically mentions nylon and the MSDS shows it is methacrylate based. Auto parts stores are most likely to carry it, or CDN$20 shipped via Amazon.ca. (Looking up the MSDS, I just discovered that Locktite also makes a cyanoacrylate based product called "Plastics Bonding System" that they claim will work on Teflon) On 23/03/2016 7:05 AM, snapdiode@... [TekScopes] wrote:
|
Re: Updated SG504 Head 2 Head comparison
Hi Ancel,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'm curious what change(s) did you make? And do have a suggestion as to what might cause what you're seeing? Cheers Dave -----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] Sent: 23 March 2016 02:45 To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Updated SG504 Head 2 Head comparison I started a new thread as I did some changes to the PCB layout and changed a component value to optimize the results. Version 1.1 head! Also, the Rigol DSA interpolation of the the error correction constants leads to some potential precision gaps between the fixed frequency samples used in the first set of tests. This time I used the Boonton 4210 RF meter directly (far more stable results then the Rigol SA) and added the 6Mhz reference signal into the comparison with some interesting results.Like Dennis did I exercised my arm slowly sweeping the SG504 to see ALL the issues. In summary, perhaps DavidP's head has some kind of problem as it's out of spec around 800Mhz. Of course that doesn't help me, so now I created my own. Anyhow have a look at the new Excel sheet as I charted the two heads data (across the SG504 span), logging the data once they showed any flatness amplitude variance >0.02dB from the previous sample. BTW, I am doing absolute sampling, NOT sampling referenced to the 50Khz or 6 Mhz signal. That could lead to a hidden measurement offset should there be a problem in the SG504 or the cable connections. So 6 dBm is exactly that, not referenced to anything but the Boonton. ------------------------------------ Posted by: mosaicmerc@... ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links |
Re: Timebase and CRT Issues on Tektronix Type 545A
I am not sure what kind of capacitor that is. The oil-paper ones I am
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
familiar with use a hard Bakelite case. And if that capacitor is C165, I do not think it can cause this problem. What the manual is describing is the sweep terminating early do to a problem around or after V183A. What is suppose to happen is that the sweep ends once it reaches a certain voltage level which is apparently not happening. The manual is suggesting that the circuit which detects the proper voltage level is triggering early. On 22 Mar 2016 21:44:57 -0700, you wrote:
I just found this in the manual: |
TDS 54x Acquisition troubleshooting
Hello all,
I have been a group member for a while although not an active one, I recently bought a TDS 544A and TDS 540 cheapish. Work has started on the 544A it used to: FAIL++Acq/Proc Intf, FAIL++Acquisition, FAIL++Attn/Acq Intf. The Acquisition board has been recapped, dish-washed and scrubbed down twice with a mildly basic soap (pH 8.1), corrosion was quite severe around the "time interpolator and jitter ramp" section, many cut traces. Now I get: FAIL++Acquisition It will not pass SPC either, failing on signal path. The most recent error logs are: (For POST) ERROR diagnostic test failure ctlConfidenceDiag 2.50e-9<=exp<=1.20e-8 actual 1-something (For SPC) ERROR 2260 Calibration failed Repet Cal Failed The scope is otherwise working quite well, not too far off cal, CH1 is slightly out, CH1 & CH4 are slightly noisier than CH2 & CH3 even when grounded. I do not have GPIB to access the full error messages. Any clues on what could be causing those errors are welcome. Paul |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss