开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

GPIB workflow

 

Hi all,
As I'm exploring GPIB in my environment on multiple instruments, a newbee question - is GPIB essentially hot swappable?

Differently put, can I typically just hook it up to an instrument that's running and expect it to smoothly connect? Or is it typically better to connect GPIB while the instrument is off, then turn it on, so it'd scan its "peripherals" during the booting sequence and this would guarantee it's connecting with no issues?

I assume there's a rule of thumb, instead of a situation where maybe all instruments may be different and it's hard to tell what's the best approach.

I've connected it plenty before, but 95% of the time it's been hooked up to one instrument and so "hot swapping" wasn't a consideration.

This is for a TDS754D, reason I'm posting on this board, but I'm looking for some input applicable to any instrument/brand.

Thank you,
Radu.


Re: Adapter PCBs for 148-003x-00 relay replacement

 

Hello everyone,

its been a while since my last post. There were a lot of things which kept me from posting an update.
Nevertheless, I finally managed to do some measurements of my relay replacements. The VNA at work was blocked all the time. Therefore, I had to find a different way to measure the relays. In the Album there are now the measurement result of almost all possible combinations you can have in a DPDT relay. /g/TekScopes/album?id=299851

All in all the replacements perform quite a bit worse than the originals. This is not surprising as the original relays are close to perfect in terms of HF coupling (tiny cross sections with relatively large gaps between adjacent parts). The PCB in contrast provides 'long' traces in parallel.

As the VNA was not available I had to measure the relays with a automated setup composed of my 60MHz function generator as signal source and my digital oscilloscope as measurement device. Due to the noise floor of the oscilloscope and the low output level of the funtion generator dynamics of the measurement was not crazy high.
To get an impression how much coupling would be possible at the given distances between pins, I always measured one complete trace without any DUT at all (the traces called 'Fixture').
Nevertheless, the measurements always show that the replacement performs not as good as the original relay, but I think this is the price you will have to pay to get a relaibly switching relay.

Regarding leckage current I will try to perform a few measurements to see if the required 0.2nA is achivable or not. I hope the next update will not be delayed as much as this one.

Right now I have 4 unpopulated panels left over (each with 36x 148-0034-00 and 30x 148-0035-00 relays). Plus some additional ones of the first panel which were already populated with SMT components.
If you are interested, send me a message off list with your needs and we can discuss how I can help you.

Best regards,

Wolfgang


Re: Succesfully upgraded TDS620 to TDS640.

 

Wamor,

If you see the service manual, there is an annotation: "Version ID resistor
placement: place U4 & R12-R17 only on boards that have exceeded the ID
number 11110XXX. In this case, the version number is decoded via pins 2,3,4
of U4. R7,R9,R11 are not placed & pins 5-9 of U3 are wired high"

Regarding TDS640 ID,
I sent the ID from TDS640A to you. I do not have them for TDS640, but I can
see that TDS520,TDS540, and your TDS620 have the same IDs.

Regarding AUX and Ch,
Aux input has a simplified schematics than Channel on two channel boards.
Maybe new firmware will fix the wrong names. And maybe some additional
calibrations will be needed after the wrong hardware error will be fixed.

Regarding NVRAM backup,
See tektool program here:
!-(firmware-flash-tools-for-old-tds-series)/
This one do not work on my PCII/IIA card, which i bought for Field
Adjustment, but works on Prologix, as i know.

WBR,

Peter

сб, 22 мар. 2025?г. в 18:27, wamor2006 via groups.io <tektronix=
[email protected]>:

Hi Peter,

No problem, your are not encouraging me. This only gives me more energy to
sort this out.
Could you give me the ID to set with U3 for the TDS640 which you have in
your table?
And maybe also for the TDS620?
I saw some pictures in the internet of the TDS640 CPU board and there the
resistors connected to U3 are the same as on my TDS620 CPU board?
When I look at the pictures I also see that the version numbers of the
software are the same
Another reason that H?kan is right.
What I also see on my scope that the extra channels are identified on the
screen as AUX1 and AUX2 and not CH3 and CH4 what I was expecting.

Yes, your right. I need to find the firmware for the TDS640 then. I will
post a new question on this group for that.
Maybe I could remove the resistors connected to U3 and connect switches to
check each configuration.
Its only 7 new possibilities. I hope I don't destroy my scope when doing
this. Or corrupt the NVRAM.
I did the same with the acquisition board which worked really well.
I am still busy creating a program in Labview to backup the NVRAM using
the Prologix GPIB interface.

Regards,

Wamor






Looking for TDS640 firmware

 

Hello all,

I have upgraded my TDS620 scope to display 4 (=>TDS640) by reconfiguring the acquisition board resistors.
The scope is reporting to be a TDS640 and the channels are visible and working.
Only in the log-file the scope is reporting that the number of channels is incorrect every time at startup.
I’ve learned on this forum that the firmware for the TDS640 differs from the TDS620 firmware but that version-numbers is the same.
Could someone maybe supply me with the TDS640 firmware?

Regards,

Wamor


Re: Succesfully upgraded TDS620 to TDS640.

 

Hi Peter,

No problem, your are not encouraging me. This only gives me more energy to sort this out.
Could you give me the ID to set with U3 for the TDS640 which you have in your table?
And maybe also for the TDS620?
I saw some pictures in the internet of the TDS640 CPU board and there the resistors connected to U3 are the same as on my TDS620 CPU board?
When I look at the pictures I also see that the version numbers of the software are the same
Another reason that H?kan is right.
What I also see on my scope that the extra channels are identified on the screen as AUX1 and AUX2 and not CH3 and CH4 what I was expecting.

Yes, your right. I need to find the firmware for the TDS640 then. I will post a new question on this group for that.
Maybe I could remove the resistors connected to U3 and connect switches to check each configuration.
Its only 7 new possibilities. I hope I don't destroy my scope when doing this. Or corrupt the NVRAM.
I did the same with the acquisition board which worked really well.
I am still busy creating a program in Labview to backup the NVRAM using the Prologix GPIB interface.

Regards,

Wamor


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Bob,

Yes, thank you. I see that I concluded that it doesn't have sections 8 and 9 because I was looking at the end of the PDF, which are the Change Information pages. I do see the duplicate pages.

Without a copy of the original manual (or an original manual itself) I can't tell what else might be incorrect with the online copies. Since many of the pages of the online copies are partial pages, I'd have to compare the pages in the online PDFs to an original manual. Perhaps someone out there could do that, but since the 7934 is pretty rare, I doubt that there is anyone who is paying attention to this thread who will do that.

I have sent pp. 31, 6-22 and 6-23 to Mark, the OP. That will have to suffice, for now. I may upload my revised PDF that contains those three missing pages. I can scan my original that is a later revision, but that will take a lot of time due to the fold-out pages.

DaveD
KC0WJN

On 3/22/2025 9:16 AM, mst3krules via groups.io wrote:
The copy I look at came from this link:



Part No. 070-5880-00
MANUAL Product Group No. 42
First Printing May 1986

It has what I assume is section 8, which isn't numbered, then section 9 followed by a section of Manual Change Information then the duplicate pages.

Bob



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: Succesfully upgraded TDS620 to TDS640.

 

Hi Wamor,

As far as I see the IDs on my boards, in my table, and your ID, the ID
refers to something else. TDS520,TDS540,TDS620 use the same ID. Sorry to be
encouraging.
Maybe, H?kan is right. The only question is, where can we get the firmware
from the TDS640?

I'm doing similar research: how to convert TDS544A to TDS644A. The processor
board is the same, the Acquisition board is different. The firmware of the
TDS544A board does not see the Acquisition board from the TDS644A

Regards,

Peter

пт, 21 мар. 2025?г. в 15:57, wamor2006 via groups.io <tektronix=
[email protected]>:

Hello Peter,

On my scope U4 is not mounted so there is no setting.
On U3 I got the following configuration:
KD24 KD25 KD26 KD27 KD28 KD29 KD30 KD31
U3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Any suggestion how to setup the scope to TDS640 with the configuration?

Regards,

Wamor






Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

The copy I look at came from this link:



Part No. 070-5880-00
MANUAL Product Group No. 42
First Printing May 1986

It has what I assume is section 8, which isn't numbered, then section 9 followed by a section of Manual Change Information then the duplicate pages.

Bob


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

I don't see any duplicate pages in the TekWiki copy of the 7934 manual.

Also, the May 1986 PDF ends with section 7. My copy (Aug 1987) has sections 8 and 9.

I'm a bit confused. It would be helpful if someone out there has an original, printed copy of the May 1987 (unrevised) copy of the manual.

DaveD
KC0WJN

On 3/22/2025 7:24 AM, mst3krules via groups.io wrote:
Pages 459 - 467

Bob



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Thanks.

DaveD
KC0WJN


On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 07:24 mst3krules via groups.io <mst3krules=
[email protected]> wrote:

Pages 459 - 467

Bob






Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Pages 459 - 467

Bob


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Could you send to me the logical PDF page numbers of the pages to which you
refer?

Thanks.

DaveD
KC0WJN


On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 07:15 mst3krules via groups.io <mst3krules=
[email protected]> wrote:

I forgot to mention but I also noticed that there appears to be duplicate
pages 6-16 to 6-20 and 7-18 to 7-21 at the rear of the manual. I did not
compare them to see if there was any differences.

Bob






Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

I forgot to mention but I also noticed that there appears to be duplicate pages 6-16 to 6-20 and 7-18 to 7-21 at the rear of the manual. I did not compare them to see if there was any differences.

Bob


Re: [TekScopes2] [TekScopes] 7934 Service Manual

 

Dang. I forgot to write that I also added the missing page 3-1 to the May 1986 revision.

DaveD
KC0WJN

On 3/22/2025 5:56 AM, Dave Daniel via groups.io wrote:
All,

Ok, I've unbound my 7934 manual and I started scanning the missing pages.

It turns out that my manual copy is Revision May 1986, but *Revised Aug 1987*.

Per Bob's email below:
Pages x, 9-12 and 9-24 are the last pages of their respective sections and are blank pages in my manual with no page numbers (but the facing pages are consistent).

My section 7 ("Replaceable Electrical Parts") is much different than the section 7 in the May 1986 revision. Updating the May 1986 revision with my section 7 would make the former revision inconsistent, so I do not plan to do that. My manual has no page 7-61; my section 7 ends at page 7-54. However, I would guess that page 7-61 in the May 1986 revision is the last page of section 7 and therefore blank and not numbered.

I have added pages 6-22 and 6-23 to my local copy of the May 1986 revision that is on the TekWiki site. I think that that omission is the only true error in the TekWiki manual revision. I will update the copy on TekWiki, hopefully later today (I am on EDT). In the meantime, I can send a copy of pages 6-22 and 6-23 to anyone that can't wait for me to update the copy on TekWiki. Please PM me in that case. kc0wjn at gmail dot com.

Comments and questions welcome; those should probably be handled privately at this point so as to not clutter up the list.

DaveD
KC0WJN

On 3/21/2025 7:04 PM, Dave Daniel via groups.io wrote:
Thank you.

Sigh. I guess I'll have to unbind my copy and add those to the copy on
TekWiki.

DaveD
KC0WJN


On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 17:56 mst3krules via groups.io <mst3krules=
[email protected]> wrote:

Looking through the manual, of the pages with numbers, the following are
missing:

X, 3-1, 6-22, 6-23, 7-61, 9-12, 9-24

Bob







--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

All,

Ok, I've unbound my 7934 manual and I started scanning the missing pages.

It turns out that my manual copy is Revision May 1986, but *Revised Aug 1987*.

Per Bob's email below:
Pages x, 9-12 and 9-24 are the last pages of their respective sections and are blank pages in my manual with no page numbers (but the facing pages are consistent).

My section 7 ("Replaceable Electrical Parts") is much different than the section 7 in the May 1986 revision. Updating the May 1986 revision with my section 7 would make the former revision inconsistent, so I do not plan to do that. My manual has no page 7-61; my section 7 ends at page 7-54. However, I would guess that page 7-61 in the May 1986 revision is the last page of section 7 and therefore blank and not numbered.

I have added pages 6-22 and 6-23 to my local copy of the May 1986 revision that is on the TekWiki site. I think that that omission is the only true error in the TekWiki manual revision. I will update the copy on TekWiki, hopefully later today (I am on EDT). In the meantime, I can send a copy of pages 6-22 and 6-23 to anyone that can't wait for me to update the copy on TekWiki. Please PM me in that case. kc0wjn at gmail dot com.

Comments and questions welcome; those should probably be handled privately at this point so as to not clutter up the list.

DaveD
KC0WJN

On 3/21/2025 7:04 PM, Dave Daniel via groups.io wrote:
Thank you.

Sigh. I guess I'll have to unbind my copy and add those to the copy on
TekWiki.

DaveD
KC0WJN


On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 17:56 mst3krules via groups.io <mst3krules=
[email protected]> wrote:

Looking through the manual, of the pages with numbers, the following are
missing:

X, 3-1, 6-22, 6-23, 7-61, 9-12, 9-24

Bob






--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: More 2465B SRAM Trouble

 

On Friday, March 21, 2025 at 06:57:58 PM PDT, Roy Thistle via groups.io <roy.thistle@...> wrote:

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:54 PM, Craig Cramb wrote:


Where did you come up with the Tek-derived US Army service manual
It's on Tekwiki, at least it is there now.

--
Roy Thistle


Re: More 2465B SRAM Trouble

 

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:54 PM, Craig Cramb wrote:


Where did you come up with the Tek-derived US Army service manual
It's on Tekwiki, at least it is there now.

--
Roy Thistle


Re: Hello/Tek 547 issues.

 

Andy,

By your video, the high voltage condensers are ceramic. It is possible/likely one or more of the 5W blue resistors will be open. I have seen these open in 500 series before due to being run close to or over the rated wattage.

Mark


Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Thank you.

Sigh. I guess I'll have to unbind my copy and add those to the copy on
TekWiki.

DaveD
KC0WJN


On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 17:56 mst3krules via groups.io <mst3krules=
[email protected]> wrote:

Looking through the manual, of the pages with numbers, the following are
missing:

X, 3-1, 6-22, 6-23, 7-61, 9-12, 9-24

Bob






Re: 7934 Service Manual

 

Looking through the manual, of the pages with numbers, the following are missing:

X, 3-1, 6-22, 6-23, 7-61, 9-12, 9-24

Bob