Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- TekScopes
- Messages
Search
Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
Jared,
Is there a way to easily bring the EBC of each pass transistor to the front panel? These transistors are items that often fail and need to be tested, especially on these old frames. Not trying to throw a wrench into the works, but those pass transistors are a major point of failure and they can cause all sorts of damage to the plug ins when they are bad. Even if you could add some pads near the appropriate connections at the rear to allow those of us who wanted to add such functionality at our option? -- Michael Lynch Dardanelle, AR |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
If you remember the initial problem, and I think I do, one problem is that the transistors had either broken or missing insulators.? Considering what people can do to "fix" things, some sort of resistance to frame tests seems to be a good idea.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
*How* you test for this, and beta, and if the transistors are even properly connected, that's another matter. All depends on what you do. Harvey On 1/1/2021 11:06 PM, Roy Thistle wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 06:08 PM, Harvey White wrote:..the pass transistors were on a nice metal frame that got rid of a lot of heatYes... but, do they have to be "tested" by incorporating a "fuse tester" in the tester. Seems inelegant to me. |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
I think I did hear that this happened to someone.? However, a phasing test is simple to do amongst other tests.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Harvey On 1/1/2021 11:03 PM, Roy Thistle wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 06:08 PM, Harvey White wrote:... needs to make sure that the AC windings [on the frame] areBut why? (Surely, frames didn't leave the factory, with miswired phasing [it's been mentioned plug-in were non-disposable back in the day!] ) |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 03:52 PM, Lawrance A. Schneider wrote:
For the scopes... probably not... unless you had a frame... and needed a relatively rough source source of +_ 15V, or +5 volts, for an active probe... so probably not. For the why of the accumulation?... well in my case... I tell myself that I'm interested in the engineering that went into the plug-ins... of which there's plenty of, to learn from... but, I think the real reason is that they're so darn cute... with all those knobs, dials, and push buttons thingys. (Some people collect stamps, or turtles ... I don't judge.) |
Re: OT Resistor identification
Thanks for the help.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I had not seen that coding before. A very good day. I learned something. Glenn On 1/1/2021 10:44 PM, Chris Wilkson via groups.io wrote:
It could be a 4mR resistor. ROHM makes SMD shunt resistors in that range. "4L0" would indicate a 4mR resistor, 5% tolerance in the PMR Series. --
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417 Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@... AMSAT LM 2178 QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class of the Amateur that holds the license" |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 06:08 PM, Harvey White wrote:
Yes... but, do they have to be "tested" by incorporating a "fuse tester" in the tester. Seems inelegant to me. |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 06:08 PM, Harvey White wrote:
But why? (Surely, frames didn't leave the factory, with miswired phasing [it's been mentioned plug-in were non-disposable back in the day!] ) And as to all the gremlins, re-arranging the wiring, before the frame hits the GoodWill... is that a thing? Hands up if that's happened to you. |
Re: Crystals - was(Re: Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603)
Yes, ?I once bought some crystals for an HP3456A from krystaly ¨C I found them helpful and easy to deal with.
Regards Kerry From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Tam Hanna <tamhan@...> Reply to: <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, 2 January 2021 at 3:11 am To: <[email protected]> Subject: [TekScopes] Crystals - was(Re: Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603) Hello, these people might be useful: www.krystaly.cz/en/Products/Crystals No affilation. But I speak a few words of Slovak and are in the region...so if I can help, I will in the frame of my possibilities. With compliments for 2021 Tam -- With best regards Tam HANNA Enjoy electronics? Join 15k7 other followers by visiting the Crazy Electronics Lab at |
Re: OT Resistor identification
It's using the RKM code convention (and IEC thing, IIRC). Your guesses were pretty good. 4L0 means 4 milliohms.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--Cheers Tom -- Prof. Thomas H. Lee Allen Ctr., Rm. 205 350 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4070 On 1/1/2021 19:29, Glenn Little wrote:
I have a battery BMS that I am reverse engineering. |
Re: OT Resistor identification
It could be a 4mR resistor. ROHM makes SMD shunt resistors in that range. "4L0" would indicate a 4mR resistor, 5% tolerance in the PMR Series.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
See the datasheet here: On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 07:30 PM, Glenn Little wrote:
|
OT Resistor identification
I have a battery BMS that I am reverse engineering.
I have a resistor with a code that I have never seen and cannot find any information on. The resistor is a SMT device marked 4L0. The L appears to be a multiplier. The resistor measures as a short with the equipment that I have. I suspect that the resistor is in the milli Ohm range. Could be 0.004 or 0.0004 Ohms or others. This does not comply with the EIA-96 format, that I can see. Any help?? Thanks Glenn -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417 Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@... AMSAT LM 2178 QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class of the Amateur that holds the licen |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 03:52 PM, Lawrance A. Schneider wrote:
My perspective being an electronics, amateur radio and RF engineering born again newbie with more from a chemist, with a chemometrics, programming, lab qualification/validations and leadership perspective was to lead on my calibrations equipment development so I'd have a way to utilize the CG5001 as well as have a more analog system for whatever came next, like the 7904. I wound up investing in a TM5006 which came with the DMM and power supply modules. I've since invested in the Function Generator. Harvey couldn't of said any better. I also have a goal to make a module, though most likely for the 7904 that's a NIR-Vis-UV spectrophotometer. I do have a PMI 1038 with a range of SNA modules... that inspired (or corrupted me) to set a goal to make microwave related spectrum analysis modules also. So technically, I do have the D14 where I can possibly have a go at a 5000 serial module also. Reminds me to look into an excuse for investing in a HP9836 not only for, the NS20/NS201's, a Tektronix application. Hhhmmm, maybe a custom module? Now, the TM500/5000 series mainframe tester is on my mind as a "must have at some time" and will fit in to the project plans as convoluted as they can. Why would I accumulate these modules?I'm not a mind reader... for whatever you find useful or enjoyable or as a goal in this life. |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
I should mention one other thing.? To make the inboard power supplies more possible, and to remove heat from the module, TEK put in a general purpose PNP power transistor and a general purpose NPN power transistor in the frame.? They put in one per slot.? The general idea was to use them for the pass transistors for an on-board regulated positive supply, and an on board regulated negative supply.? The regulator controllers were on the board, the pass transistors were on a nice metal frame that got rid of a lot of heat easily.? These need to be tested.? Your average module tester needs to make sure that the AC windings are properly phased and connected, the DC supplies are within spec (they're all bulk supplies with the exception of the TM5000 low voltage supply: regulated).? The last item is to make sure that the pass transistors are isolated from the frame, and are operational.? Plugins needing more 5 volts or so than could be well built may have a switching supply from 11.5 volts.? Other supplies needed may have 3 terminal regulators or not, but a power supply design for any module generally had to do something.? 11.5 volts unregulated with a 3 volt minimum drop across a 7805 drops down to 8.5 volts, and the regulator is good for an amp or so, so about 7.5 watts/amp drawn, and the case could be the heatsink IF the NPN transistor were not used.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Harvey On 1/1/2021 8:09 PM, Harvey White wrote:
Ok, perhaps I can clear up a bit of this. |
Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
I'm also very interested, but pulling the trigger does depend on the approximate price.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dave S. On Friday, January 1, 2021, 05:19:54 PM PST, EJP <esmond.pitt@...> wrote:
Larry With the greatest respect, you're putting the cart before the horse. You have ten committed purchasers, and I am sure many more like me who are waiting to see the price. So why not get a price for ten and let us know? Regards EJP |
Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
Larry
With the greatest respect, you're putting the cart before the horse. You have ten committed purchasers, and I am sure many more like me who are waiting to see the price. So why not get a price for ten and let us know? Regards EJP |
Re: A question from the unwashed relative to: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
Thank you very much, Harvey, for that great historical summary!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
¡ª Happy New Year Tom Sent from my iThing, so please forgive typos and brevity. On Jan 1, 2021, at 5:10 PM, Harvey White <madyn@...> wrote: |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss